Effects of cardiovascular disease risk factors on cardiorespiratory fitness in firefighters – a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
====================================================================================================================================================

* Jaron Ras
* Elpidoforos S. Soteriades
* Andre P. Kengne
* Denise Smith
* Lloyd Leach

## Abstract

**Introduction** Globally, firefighting is recognized as among the most physically demanding professions. In addition, because of the hazardous nature of firefighting, firefighters are required to wear heavy insulated personnel protective equipment that protects them from exposures to hazardous chemicals and fumes and severe temperatures. This requires that, throughout their careers, firefighters maintain their cardiovascular health and maintain a satisfactory cardiovascular fitness to manage these stressors and perform their duties sufficient vigour. The aim of this systematic is to determine the effects of cardiovascular disease risk factors on cardiorespiratory fitness of firefighters.

**Methods** Using the comprehensive search terms, a detailed literature search, with no limitation to publication year, will be conducted to identify relevant studies from PubMed/Medline, Web of Science, EBSCOHost, ScienceDirect and SCOPUS. Data-extraction will be extracted using a researcher-generated data extraction form. Data will be imported into Zotero® version 6.0.9, and duplicates removed. The article screening will be conducted using the Rayyan® intelligent systematic review tool. Thereafter, information from the included studies will be captured on the researcher-generated data extraction form. For the methodological assessment, the Appraisal Tool for Cross Sectional Studies (AXIS) checklist and the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) toolkit will be used. For the meta-analysis, Review Manager 5.3 will be used to determine the exposure effects and MedCalc® statistical software Ltd. to determine the pooled correlation effects.

**Discussion** This systematic review arose from the global cardiovascular health concerns that firefighters face, and how the development and progression of CVD risk factors effect cardiorespiratory fitness in firefighters. Cardiorespiratory has been shown to be an essential factor in optimal occupational performance in firefighters but understudied related to CVD risk factors. It is anticipated that this review will make a considerable contribution to the international scientific literature on the effect that CVD risk factors will have on cardiorespiratory fitness.

**Systematic review protocol registration** PROSPERO (CRD42021258898)

Keywords
*   Firefighters
*   cardiovascular disease
*   cardiorespiratory fitness
*   risk factors
*   Dyslipidaemia
*   obesity
*   hypertension
*   cigarette smoking

## INTRODUCTION

Globally, firefighting is recognized as among the most physically demanding professions [1– 4]. In addition, because of the hazardous nature of firefighting, firefighters are required to wear heavy insulated personnel protective equipment that protects them from exposures to hazardous chemicals and fumes and severe temperatures [1–4]. The full PPE worn with the self-contained breathing apparatus (SCBA) may weigh up to 29.3 kg, which places significant strain on the cardiovascular system [1]. It has been shown that firefighters routinely exceed their age predicted maximal heart rates while performing work-related duties [5–7], which significantly predisposes firefighters to sudden cardiac events while on duty [3,4,8], which may account for the high mortality rates in this population.

Studies have shown that numerous firefighters have multiple cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors, with the most prevalent risk factors being obesity, cigarette smoking, dyslipidemia, and physical inactivity [9–15]. This is a concern given the physically strenuous occupation of firefighting [2–4,8]. Numerous studies have reported that firefighters have an inadmissibly high percentage of mortality due to cardiovascular related incidents, with the preponderance of these events related to underlying CVD risk factors [4,8,16]. An additional factor contributing toward the high prevalence of cardiovascular-related mortality is inadequate physical fitness, which results in increased cardiovascular strain and overexertion [17,18]. Firefighters are, therefore, required to remain in peak cardiorespiratory conditioning, while maintaining good CVD health throughout their careers [4,8,17]. Firefighters that have multiple CVD risk factors, and have suboptimal cardiorespiratory conditioning, are not only at risk for sustaining a SCE while on duty, but also at risk for endangering the public they serve to protect [4,8,16,17].

This study arose from the difficulties that firefighters routinely encounter, both globally and, in particular, locally in South Africa [12,19]. A disconcerting quantity of firefighters are at increased CVD risk and have poor cardiorespiratory fitness levels, which negatively impacts their overall health, well-being, and occupational performance [20–24]. The development of these CVD risk factors diminish firefighters ability to cope with the physical strain of firefighting, that has been described as being comparable to the demands placed on elite sportspersons [25]. It has been shown, in previous systematic reviews, that CVD risk factors are significantly related to cardiorespiratory fitness [26–29]. However, to the best of the authors knowledge, no systematic review and meta-analysis has investigated the effect of CVD risk factors on cardiorespiratory fitness in firefighters, which motivated the current systematic review. One of the intentions of this review was to assist in informing policy change in South Africa, specifically on the need for remedial action and the development of strategies to enhance and maintain the cardiorespiratory fitness levels and cardiovascular wellbeing of firefighters.

## METHODS AND ANALYSIS

### Study Design

This protocol was registered in the PROSPERO (International prospective register of systematic reviews), with the registration number CRD42022330510. The systematic review protocol is reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocol (PRISMA-P). The systematic review methodology will be conducted in accordance with the guidelines Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology studies (MOOSE) and Quality of Reporting of Meta-analysis (QUOROM) [30,31]. When considering studies for this review, the PRISMA guidelines will be followed.

The authors have chosen to investigate the effect of CVD risk factors on cardiorespiratory fitness in adult, full-time firefighters. The focus of this review will be to determine the effect of CVD risk factors on cardiorespiratory fitness of firefighters. A quantitative systematic review is the preferred study design for this review [32].

### Aim of the Review

The aim of this systematic review is to determine the effects of cardiovascular disease risk factors on the cardiorespiratory fitness of firefighters.

### Research Question

What effects do cardiovascular disease risk factors have on the cardiorespiratory fitness of firefighters?

### Objectives of the Review

The objective of the study is to investigate the effects of cardiovascular disease risk factors on the cardiorespiratory fitness of firefighters.

### Participants

Full-time, part-time and volunteer firefighters 18 years and older.

### Exposure Types

Cardiovascular disease risk factors in relation to the cardiorespiratory fitness of firefighters.

### Outcome Types

1.  Cardiovascular disease risk factors related to the cardiorespiratory fitness of firefighters.

### Search Strategy for Identification of Studies

Using the comprehensive search terms, a detailed literature search will be conducted to identify studies investigating the effects of cardiovascular disease risk factors on the cardiorespiratory fitness of firefighters. Details on the inclusion and exclusion criteria for the systematic review is contained in Table 1:

View this table:
[Table 1:](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/08/30/2022.08.29.22279323/T1)

Table 1: 
Inclusion and exclusion criteria of studies.

The team of reviewers responsible for study identification will be made up of three main contributors:

1.  Reviewer I (JR) will be the primary investigator. JR will assume responsibility for all aspects of the review and will be one of the reviewers tasked with conducting the literature search, independently extracting the data, responsible for verifying the data collected, analysing the results, grading the quality of the data, and write up of the first draft of the systematic review.

2.  Reviewer II (RN) will be the second reviewer and be tasked with independently conducting a literature search, extracting the data of studies, validating the data collected, and grading the quality of the data.

3.  Reviewer III (LL) will serve as the adjudicator and resolve any disagreements between the two independent reviewers.

#### Electronic Literature Search

Using the comprehensive search terms, an extensive literature search will be conducted to enable the capturing of as many relevant articles as possible to be included in the systematic review and meta-analysis, however, these studies will be limited to English papers only. The academic journal databases that will be searched will include PubMed/Medline, Web of Science, SCOPUS, ScienceDirect and EBSCOhost. The literature search will take place between August and September 2022. In addition, there will be no limitation to publication year to allow inclusivity. The comprehensive search strategy will include the arrangement of keywords and medical subject heading (MeSH) in various arrangements depending on the specific database searched. In Table 2, the various arrangements of each of the search terms for the population and the cardiovascular disease risk factors will be combined with each of the outcome terms. The search strategies for the other databases are presented in Appendix 1.

View this table:
[Table 2:](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/08/30/2022.08.29.22279323/T2)

Table 2: 
Search strategy developed in PubMed.

### Study Selection

Initially, the electronic database search will be performed to acquire all eligible research papers. All studies that meet the inclusion criteria will be selected for full-text screening. Authors will be contacted in the instance where data is missing or where a full-text is not available. Subsequently, the full-text articles will be assessed independently by the two principal reviewers (JR and RN), using the Rayyan® intelligent systematic review (RIS) tool [33]. When screening and categorizing the studies, three categories will be used, specifically, included, excluded and unsure. Where uncertainties in study inclusion or study grading, the dispute will be discussed between the two reviewers, and in the event of disagreement, the adjudicator (LL) will resolve the dispute.

#### Selection and Screening of Articles

Firstly, all relevant, pre-selected databases will be searched to identify and, initially, screen the titles and abstracts of potential studies for eligibility. Secondly, the search outputs will be downloaded and compiled in a reference software, namely, Zotero® version 6.0.9 and thirdly, the reference software will be used to remove duplicate studies. Fourthly, the studies remaining after the removal of duplicates, will be screened against the inclusion criteria to determine the final studies for inclusion in the review and meta-analysis. Next, data will be extracted from the included studies using a standard data extraction form. Lastly, studies included into the meta-analysis will be analysed and interpreted using Review Manager 5.3[34] and MedCalc® statistical software Ltd.

### Data Management

All data that will be extracted from the initially selected studies will be captured using an initial electronic researcher-generated data extraction form (Appendix 2), by the two principal reviewers, in order to retrieve the key characteristics of each study. Thereafter, a detailed second data extraction form (Appendix 3) will be used to capture information of the included studies. The study data that will be extracted will include the general details of the study, such as the study title, authors, publication date, study design and the country of origin, the exposures evaluated, and the outcome measured. Thereafter, characteristics of the included studies will be collected, such as the sample size and method of sampling, participants details (age, height, weight, body mass index, cardiorespiratory fitness, gender). Lastly, the details of exposures and the outcome variables will be extracted, i.e., the research paper must report on at least one of the CVD risk factors under investigation in relation to cardiorespiratory fitness.

#### Critical Appraisal of Included Studies

Two critical appraisal tools will be used for this systematic review and meta-analysis, namely, The Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) toolkit (Middle Way, Oxford, UK) and the Appraisal Tool for Cross Sectional Studies (AXIS) checklist [35] (Table 2) ([https://casp-uk.net/casp-tools-checklists/](https://casp-uk.net/casp-tools-checklists/)) to conduct the methodological quality assessment of each study that was included. The CASP toolkit and the AXIS toolkit was shown to be a reliable and valid tool for assessing the quality of cross-sectional studies [35,36]. For the grading of each study, where questions can be answered dichotomously, an article will be awarded a yes, denoted as a “□”, and when scored a no, an “×” will be denoted. For questions that require written grading, all attempts will be made to adapt the question to a dichotomous scale, and if a rating is not possible, the question will be excluded from the checklist. For questions that are not relevant, an “na” will be given.

### Data Synthesis and Meta-Analysis

Data synthesis will commence once all relevant details of each study has been captured. Initially, a systematic synthesis of the results will be used to integrate the findings, narratively, from the various studies. This method will be used initially as it allows the researcher to identify, evaluate, and summarize study findings that are similar across all relevant studies [37–39]. Thereafter, data will be captured, quantitatively, and analysed using a meta-analysis.

#### Meta-Analysis

Where there is sufficient reporting and the data permits, a meta-analysis will be conducted. For each study, quantitative data will be pooled to determine the pooled effect estimate [40]. For dichotomous data, the odds ratio (OR) and risk ratio (RR) will be generated, whereas for continuous data, the mean difference (MD) and standardized mean difference (SMD) of estimation will be used to estimate the effect of each cardiovascular disease risk factor on cardiorespiratory fitness of firefighters [41]. The data will be imported and analysed using the Review Manager 5.3 [34,39,41,42], using the inverse method of meta-analysis [40]. In addition, a meta-analysis of correlations will be performed to determine the relationship between continuous CVD risk factors and cardiorespiratory fitness of firefighters. To perform the analysis, the MedCalc® statistical software Ltd. (version 20.104) will be preferred [40]. The meta-analysis will involve using the original sample sizes and r values to generate the pooled r values between each cardiovascular risk factor in relation to cardiorespiratory fitness [40]. Using the Fisher’s r to z transformation the original r values will be converted to a common test metric [40]: ![Formula][1]</img> 

The following will be used to indicate the strength of correlation [40]:

1.  Very high correlation: 0.90 to 1.00 (−0.90 to −1.00).

2.  High correlation: 0.70 to 0.90 (−0.70 to −0.90).

3.  Moderate correlation: 0.50 to 0.70 (−0.50 to −0.70).

4.  Low correlation: 0.30 to 0.50 (−0.30 to −0.50).

5.  Negligible correlation: 0.00 to 0.30 (−0.00 to −0.30).

#### Assessment of Heterogeneity

Heterogeneity will be evaluated, initially, through visual inspection of the forest plot, to judge the extent of overlap. In addition, to quantitively assess the heterogeneity, the Chi-square test and the I2 test will be used [60]. The following will be used to explain I2 statistics: 1) 0% to 30% not be important; 2) 31% to 60% moderate heterogeneity; 3) 61% to 80% substantial heterogeneity; and 4) 81% to 100% considerable heterogeneity [40,42].

In the instance where substantial and considerable heterogeneity is found, potential reasons will be determined by performing a subgroup analysis. A meta-analysis will be favoured by a low degree of heterogeneity [60]. Where significant heterogeneity is present, then a descriptive analysis of the results will be presented. If homogeneity is found between the studies, then a fixed-effects model will be preferred, and if heterogeneity is present, a random-effects model will be preferred [60].

#### Subgroup Analysis and Investigation of Heterogeneity

The following characteristics are expected to introduce significant clinical heterogeneity, i.e., firefighters’ age, gender, experience, methods of measuring CVD risk factors, type of testing procedure used to assess cardiorespiratory fitness, and plan to implement subgroup analysis on these variables, if possible. Although all exposures and outcomes will be measured using standardized instruments and protocols, the protocols preferred by each study may be different. This will necessitate the comparison and conversion of certain variables to produce analogous findings for comparison. The authors will use Review Manager for the subgroup analysis [39,41,42], and MedCalc® statistical software Ltd.[40] if adequate numbers of included studies are available.

#### Publication Bias

Publication bias will be assessed visually using the Begg’s funnel chart. Thereafter, quantitative analysis will be conducted to assess the possibility of publication bias using the Egger’s test and Begg’s test [40].

#### Presenting and Reporting of Results

The results generated will be presented using a combination of figures, graphs, and tables. The presentation will include the method involved in study selection, exclusion and inclusion, using the PRISMA guidelines [32]. In addition, forest plots, funnel charts and summary tables will be created to present the data.

## DISCUSSION

To the best of the authors’ knowledge, no conclusive evidence currently exists on the effect of CVD risk factors and cardiorespiratory fitness of firefighters. This systematic review arose from the global cardiovascular health concerns that firefighters face, and how the development and progression of CVD risk factors effect cardiorespiratory fitness in firefighters. Cardiorespiratory has been shown to be an important factor in optimal occupational performance in firefighters, but understudied [21,43–45]. The results of this review is expected to make a significant contribution to the international scientific literature on the effect that CVD risk factors will have on cardiorespiratory fitness. In addition, the results of this review will assist policy makers in implementing policy changes, particularly in developing countries, such as South Africa, but also globally, to promote the wellbeing, health, and career longevity of firefighters. Moreover, the planned review will support researchers design original studies relating to this issue and, assist in identifying gaps in the research for further studies.

As with all research, there are inherent limitations in the current systematic review and meta-analysis protocol when interpreting the findings. One limitation of this study is that only English studies will be used, which may result in the exclusion of potentially relevant studies. Another limitation is that there may be considerable heterogeneity between studies, due to differences in study population age, gender and the method used to assess cardiorespiratory fitness. There are, however, several strengths of this study, one of which being that this review will be guided by reference methodologies to ensure that a high standard of quality is maintained throughout the review process. The exclusion of a publication date limit is a strength of this review, removing the possibility of high-quality studies being excluded due to falling outside the publication limit. Lastly, the inclusion of all study designs, using various study methodologies, in this review.

### Ethics and Dissemination

This study has been registered onto PROSPERO (CRD42022330510) and has been granted ethical clearance by the University of the Western Cape (BM21/10/9). Because a systematic review and meta-analysis will be conducted, there will be no direct engagement with human participants. Freely accessible and published data will be used in the study and, therefore, no confidentiality or ethical procedures need to be considered for this review [46]. The information gathered will be presented to local firefighter organisations and health departments, at conferences and in webinars. Furthermore, the systematic review and meta-analysis will be published in an accredited peer-reviewed journal. Lastly, this protocol will form a chapter of a doctoral thesis.

## Data Availability

No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study. All relevant data from this study will be made available upon study completion.

## AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

**Conceptualisation**: Jaron Ras

**Data curation:** Jaron Ras

**Formal analysis:** Jaron Ras

**Funding acquisition:** Jaron Ras

**Investigation:** Jaron Ras

**Methodology:** Jaron Ras, Elpidofos Soteriades, Denise Smith, Andre Kengne and Lloyd Leach

**Project administration:** Jaron Ras, Elpidofos Soteriades, Denise Smith, Andre Kengne and Lloyd Leach

**Resources:** Jaron Ras, Elpidofos Soteriades, Denise Smith, Andre Kengne and Lloyd Leach

**Supervision:** Elpidofos Soteriades, Denise Smith, Andre Kengne and Lloyd Leach

**Writing – original draft preparation:** Jaron Ras

**Writing – review and editing:** Elpidofos Soteriades, Denise Smith, Andre Kengne and Lloyd Leach

**Protocol Registration**

Details of the protocol for this systematic review were registered on PROSPERO (CRD42022330510) and can be accessed at [https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=330510](https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=330510)

## Footnotes

*   **Conflict of Interest:** The authors have no conflict of interest.

*   **Funding:** The Ryoichi Sasakawa Young Leaders Fellowship Fund (Sylff) Program and the National research foundation (NRF) (grant number: 141282)

*   Received August 29, 2022.
*   Revision received August 29, 2022.
*   Accepted August 30, 2022.


*   © 2022, Posted by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

This pre-print is available under a Creative Commons License (Attribution 4.0 International), CC BY 4.0, as described at [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/](http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

## REFERENCES

1.  Li J, Wang Y, Jiang R, et al. Quantifying self-contained breathing apparatus on physiology and psychological responses during firefighting: a systematic review and meta-analysis. International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics Published Online First: 2022. doi:10.1080/10803548.2021.2024020
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1080/10803548.2021.2024020&link_type=DOI) 

2.  Smith DL, Haller JM, Benedict R, et al. Cardiac Strain Associated with High-rise Firefighting. 2015;:213–21. doi:10.1080/15459624.2014.970272
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1080/15459624.2014.970272&link_type=DOI) 

3.  Smith DL, DeBlois JP, Kales SN, et al. Cardiovascular strain of firefighting and the risk of sudden cardiac events. Exerc Sport Sci Rev 2016;44:90–7. doi:10.1249/JES.0000000000000081
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1249/JES.0000000000000081&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=http://www.n&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2022%2F08%2F30%2F2022.08.29.22279323.atom) 

4.  Smith DL, Barr DA, Kales SN. Extreme sacrifice: Sudden cardiac death in the US Fire Service. Extrem Physiol Med 2013;2:1–9. doi:10.1186/2046-7648-2-6
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1186/2046-7648-2-1&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=23849512&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2022%2F08%2F30%2F2022.08.29.22279323.atom) 

5.  Smith DL, Haller JM, Benedict R, et al. Firefighter incident rehabilitation: Interpreting heart rate responses. Prehospital Emergency Care 2016;20:28–36. doi:10.3109/10903127.2015.1037477
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.3109/10903127.2015.1037477&link_type=DOI) 

6.  Marcel-Millet P, Ravier G, Grospretre S, et al. Physiological responses and parasympathetic reactivation in rescue interventions: The effect of the breathing apparatus. Scand J Med Sci Sports 2018;28:2710–22. doi:[https://doi.org/10.1111/sms.13291](https://doi.org/10.1111/sms.13291)
    
    

7.  Nazari G, Lu S, MacDermid JC. Quantifying physiological responses during simulated tasks among Canadian firefighters: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Mil Veteran Fam Health 2021;7:55–75. doi:10.3138/JMVFH-2019-0063
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.3138/JMVFH-2019-0063&link_type=DOI) 

8.  Yang J, Teehan D, Farioli A, et al. Sudden cardiac death among firefighters ≤45 years of age in the United States. American Journal of Cardiology 2013;112:1962–7. doi:10.1016/j.amjcard.2013.08.029
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.amjcard.2013.08.029&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=24079519&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2022%2F08%2F30%2F2022.08.29.22279323.atom) 

9.  Soares EMKVK, Smith D, Grossi Porto LG. Worldwide prevalence of obesity among firefighters: A systematic review protocol. BMJ Open 2020;10:1–5. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031282
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038832&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32978187&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2022%2F08%2F30%2F2022.08.29.22279323.atom) 

10. Smith DL, Fehling PC, Frisch A, et al. The prevalence of cardiovascular disease risk factors and obesity in firefighters. J Obes 2012;2012. doi:10.1155/2012/908267
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1155/2012/908267&link_type=DOI) 

11. Risavi BL, Staszko J. Prevalence of Risk Factors for Coronary Artery Disease in Pennsylvania (USA) Firefighters. Prehosp Disaster Med 2015;31:102–7. doi:10.1017/S1049023X15005415
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1017/S1049023X15005415&link_type=DOI) 

12. Ras J, Leach L. Prevalence of coronary artery disease risk factors in firefighters in the city of Cape Town fire and rescue service – A descriptive study. J Public Health Res 2021;10. doi:10.4081/jphr.2021.2000
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.4081/jphr.2021.2000&link_type=DOI) 

13. Damacena FC, Batista TJ, Ayres LR, et al. Obesity prevalence in Brazilian firefighters and the association of central obesity with personal, occupational and cardiovascular risk factors: a cross-sectional study. BMJ Open 2020;10:1–10. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032933
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038832&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32978187&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2022%2F08%2F30%2F2022.08.29.22279323.atom) 

14. Savall A, Charles R, Bertholon A, et al. Volunteer and career French firefighters: Cardiovascular risk factors and cardiovascular risk assessment. Eur J Prev Cardiol 2020;27:107–9. doi:10.1177/2047487319827463
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1177/2047487319827463&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=http://www.n&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2022%2F08%2F30%2F2022.08.29.22279323.atom) 

15. Martin ZT, Schlaff RA, Hemenway JK, et al. Cardiovascular Disease Risk Factors and Physical Fitness in Volunteer Firefighters. Int J Exerc Sci 2019;12:764–76.[http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31156744](http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31156744) %0A[http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=PMC6533096](http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=PMC6533096)
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=http://www.n&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2022%2F08%2F30%2F2022.08.29.22279323.atom) 

16. Soteriades ES, Smith DL, Tsismenakis AJ, et al. Cardiovascular disease in US firefighters: A systematic review. Cardiol Rev 2011;19:202–15. doi:10.1097/CRD.0b013e318215c105
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1097/CRD.0b013e318215c105&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=21646874&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2022%2F08%2F30%2F2022.08.29.22279323.atom) 

17. Smith DL, Haller JM, Korre M, et al. The Relation of Emergency Duties to Cardiac Death Among US Firefighters. American Journal of Cardiology 2019;123:736–41. doi:10.1016/j.amjcard.2018.11.049
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.amjcard.2018.11.049&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=http://www.n&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2022%2F08%2F30%2F2022.08.29.22279323.atom) 

18. Farioli A, Yang J, Teehan D, et al. Duty-related risk of sudden cardiac death among young US firefighters. Occup Med (Chic Ill) 2014;64:428–35. doi:10.1093/occmed/kqu102
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1093/occmed/kqu102&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=25104277&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2022%2F08%2F30%2F2022.08.29.22279323.atom) 

19. Ras J, Mosie D, Strauss M, et al. Knowledge of and attitudes toward health and cardiovascular disease risk factors among firefighters in Cape Town, South Africa. J Public Health Res 2021;11. doi:10.4081/jphr.2021.2307
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.4081/jphr.2021.2307&link_type=DOI) 

20. Phelps SM, Drew-Nord DC, Neitzel RL, et al. Characteristics and Predictors of Occupational Injury Among Career Firefighters. Workplace Health Saf 2018;66:291–301. doi:10.1177/2165079917740595
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1177/2165079917740595&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=http://www.n&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2022%2F08%2F30%2F2022.08.29.22279323.atom) 

21. Wynn P, Hawdon P. Cardiorespiratory fitness selection standard and occupational outcomes in trainee firefighters. 2012;:123–8. doi:10.1093/occmed/kqr206
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1093/occmed/kqr206&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=22199364&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2022%2F08%2F30%2F2022.08.29.22279323.atom) 

22. McDonough SL, Phillips JS, Twilbeck TJ. Determining Best Practices to Reduce Occupational Health Risks in Firefighters. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research 2015;29.[https://journals.lww.com/nsca-jscr/Fulltext/2015/07000/Determining\_Best\_Practices\_to\_Reduce\_Occupational.34.aspx](https://journals.lww.com/nsca-jscr/Fulltext/2015/07000/Determining\_Best\_Practices_to_Reduce_Occupational.34.aspx)
    
    

23. Nazari G, Osifeso TA, MacDermid JC. Distribution of Number, Location of Pain and Comorbidities, and Determinants of Work Limitations among Firefighters. Rehabil Res Pract 2020;2020:1942513. doi:10.1155/2020/1942513
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1155/2020/1942513&link_type=DOI) 

24. Nazari G, MacDermid JC, Sinden KE, et al. The Relationship between Physical Fitness and Simulated Firefighting Task Performance. Rehabil Res Pract 2018;2018:1–7. doi:10.1155/2018/3234176
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1155/2018/6183654&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=http://www.n&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2022%2F08%2F30%2F2022.08.29.22279323.atom) 

25. Bucala M, Sweet E. Obesity in the fire service: An inside look at the perceptions of firefighters towards obesity and other health issues. Res Sq Published Online First: 2019. doi:10.21203/rs.2.15518/v1
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.21203/rs.2.15518/v1&link_type=DOI) 

26. Chu DJ, al Rifai M, Virani SS, et al. The relationship between cardiorespiratory fitness, cardiovascular risk factors and atherosclerosis. Atherosclerosis 2020;304:44–52. doi:[https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2020.04.019](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2020.04.019)
    
    

27. Tarp J, Støle AP, Blond K, et al. Cardiorespiratory fitness, muscular strength and risk of type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabetologia 2019;62:1129–42. doi:10.1007/s00125-019-4867-4
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1007/s00125-019-4867-4&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=http://www.n&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2022%2F08%2F30%2F2022.08.29.22279323.atom) 

28. Vega GL, Grundy SM, Barlow CE, et al. Association of triglyceride-to-high density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio to cardiorespiratory fitness in men. J Clin Lipidol 2016;10:1414-1422.e1. doi:[https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacl.2016.09.008](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacl.2016.09.008)
    
    

29. Parto P, Lavie CJ, Swift D, et al. The role of cardiorespiratory fitness on plasma lipid levels. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther 2015;13:1177–83. doi:10.1586/14779072.2015.1092384
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1586/14779072.2015.1092384&link_type=DOI) 

30. Stroup DF, Berlin JA, Morton SC, et al. Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in EpidemiologyA Proposal for Reporting. JAMA 2000;283:2008–12. doi:10.1001/jama.283.15.2008
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1001/jama.283.15.2008&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10789670&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2022%2F08%2F30%2F2022.08.29.22279323.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000086436600037&link_type=ISI) 

31. Brand RA. Editorial: Standards of Reporting: The CONSORT, QUORUM, and STROBE Guidelines. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2009;467:1393–4. doi:10.1007/s11999-009-0786-x
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1007/s11999-009-0786-x&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=19296187&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2022%2F08%2F30%2F2022.08.29.22279323.atom) 

32. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, et al. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. PLoS Med 2009;6:e1000097.[https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097](https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097)
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=19621072&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2022%2F08%2F30%2F2022.08.29.22279323.atom) 

33. Ouzzani M, Hammady H, Fedorowicz Z, et al. Rayyan-a web and mobile app for systematic reviews. Syst Rev 2016;5:1–10. doi:10.1186/s13643-016-0384-4
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1186/s13643-016-0345-y&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=http://www.n&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2022%2F08%2F30%2F2022.08.29.22279323.atom) 

34. Collaboration C. Review manager (RevMan) version 5.3. Copenhagen: The Nordic Cochrane Centre 2014.
    
    

35. Downes MJ, Brennan ML, Williams HC, et al. Development of a critical appraisal tool to assess the quality of cross-sectional studies (AXIS). BMJ Open 2016;6:e011458. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011458
    
    [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6NzoiYm1qb3BlbiI7czo1OiJyZXNpZCI7czoxMjoiNi8xMi9lMDExNDU4IjtzOjQ6ImF0b20iO3M6NTA6Ii9tZWRyeGl2L2Vhcmx5LzIwMjIvMDgvMzAvMjAyMi4wOC4yOS4yMjI3OTMyMy5hdG9tIjt9czo4OiJmcmFnbWVudCI7czowOiIiO30=) 

36. Sanderson S, Tatt ID, Higgins JPT. Tools for assessing quality and susceptibility to bias in observational studies in epidemiology: a systematic review and annotated bibliography. Int J Epidemiol 2007;36:666–76. doi:10.1093/ije/dym018
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1093/ije/dym018&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=17470488&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2022%2F08%2F30%2F2022.08.29.22279323.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000249098500038&link_type=ISI) 

37. Harris JD, Quatman CE, Manring MM, et al. The American Journal of Sports Medicine P < P How to Write a Systematic Review. Published Online First: 2013. doi:10.1177/0363546513497567
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1177/0363546513497567&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=23925575&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2022%2F08%2F30%2F2022.08.29.22279323.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000344658000032&link_type=ISI) 

38. Metelli S, Chaimani A. Challenges in meta-analyses with observational studies. 2020;:83–7. doi:10.1136/ebmental-2019-300129
    
    [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6ODoiZWJtZW50YWwiO3M6NToicmVzaWQiO3M6NzoiMjMvMi84MyI7czo0OiJhdG9tIjtzOjUwOiIvbWVkcnhpdi9lYXJseS8yMDIyLzA4LzMwLzIwMjIuMDguMjkuMjIyNzkzMjMuYXRvbSI7fXM6ODoiZnJhZ21lbnQiO3M6MDoiIjt9) 

39. Gurevitch J, Koricheva J, Nakagawa S, et al. Meta-analysis and the science of research synthesis. Nature 2018;555:175–82. doi:10.1038/nature25753
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1038/nature25753&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=http://www.n&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2022%2F08%2F30%2F2022.08.29.22279323.atom) 

40. Akkaya-Hocagil T. Meta-analysis: Methods for health and experimental studies: Shahjahan Khan Springer Nature Singapore Pte. Ltd. 2020. pp. 293. Biometrics 2022;78:414. doi:[https://doi.org/10.1111/biom.13605](https://doi.org/10.1111/biom.13605)
    
    

41. Haidich AB. Meta-analysis in medical research. Hippokratia 2010;14:29–37.[https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21487488](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21487488)
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=21487488&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2022%2F08%2F30%2F2022.08.29.22279323.atom) 

42. Lin L. Comparison of four heterogeneity measures for meta-analysis. J Eval Clin Pract 2020;26:376–84. doi:10.1111/jep.13159
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1111/jep.13159&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=http://www.n&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2022%2F08%2F30%2F2022.08.29.22279323.atom) 

43. Siddall AG, Stevenson RDM, Turner PJF, et al. Physical and Physiological Performance Determinants of a Firefighting Simulation Test. J Occup Environ Med 2018;60:637–43. doi:10.1097/JOM.0000000000001313
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1097/JOM.0000000000001313&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=http://www.n&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2022%2F08%2F30%2F2022.08.29.22279323.atom) 

44.  Heimburg E von, Ingulf Medbø J, Sandsund M, et al. Performance on a Work-Simulating Firefighter Test Versus Approved Laboratory Tests for Firefighters and Applicants. International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics 2013;19:227–43. doi:10.1080/10803548.2013.11076981
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1080/10803548.2013.11076981&link_type=DOI) 

45. Skinner TL, Kelly VG, Boytar AN, et al. Aviation Rescue Firefighters physical fitness and predictors of task performance. J Sci Med Sport 2020;23:1228–33. doi:10.1016/j.jsams.2020.05.013
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.jsams.2020.05.013&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=http://www.n&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2022%2F08%2F30%2F2022.08.29.22279323.atom) 

46. Vergnes J-N, Marchal-Sixou C, Nabet C, et al. Ethics in systematic reviews. J Med Ethics 2010;36:771LP–774. doi:10.1136/jme.2010.039941
    
    [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6OToibWVkZXRoaWNzIjtzOjU6InJlc2lkIjtzOjk6IjM2LzEyLzc3MSI7czo0OiJhdG9tIjtzOjUwOiIvbWVkcnhpdi9lYXJseS8yMDIyLzA4LzMwLzIwMjIuMDguMjkuMjIyNzkzMjMuYXRvbSI7fXM6ODoiZnJhZ21lbnQiO3M6MDoiIjt9)

 [1]: /embed/graphic-5.gif