Abstract
Purpose The increased stress the globe has experienced with the COVID-19 pandemic has affected mental health, disproportionately affecting women. However, how perceived stress in the first year affected menstrual and menopausal symptoms has not yet been investigated.
Methods Residents in British Columbia, Canada, were surveyed online as part of the COVID-19 Rapid Evidence Study of a Provincial Population-Based Cohort for Gender and Sex (RESPPONSE). A subgroup (n=4171) who were assigned female sex at birth (age 25-69) and were surveyed within the first 6-12 months of the pandemic (August 2020-February 2021), prior to the widespread rollout of vaccines, were retrospectively asked if they noticed changes in their menstrual or menopausal symptoms, as well as completing validated measures of stress, depression, and anxiety.
Results We found that 27.8% reported menstrual cycle disturbances and 6.7% reported increased menopause symptoms. Those who scored higher on perceived stress, depression, and anxiety scales were more likely to have reproductive cycle disturbances. Free text responses revealed that reasons for disturbances were perceived to be related to the pandemic.
Conclusions The COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the need to research women’s health issues, such as menstruation. Our data indicates that in the first year of the pandemic, almost a third of the menstruating population reported disturbances in their cycle, which is approximately two times higher than in non-pandemic situations and four times higher than any reported changes in menopausal symptoms across that first year of the pandemic.
The COVID-19 pandemic led to closures of public places, strict health regulations, and limited social interactions. These changes, along with the uncertainty of the pandemic, resulted in increased perceived levels of stress, depression, and anxiety (Brotto et al., 2021; Kujawa et al., 2020). Women and gender diverse individuals exhibited greater indices of distress, including heightened risk for mental health disorders than men throughout the COVID-19 pandemic (Brotto et al., 2021; Connor et al., 2020; Hunt et al., 2021).
Despite these findings, there has been minimal attention paid to the effects of sex and gender in COVID-19 studies (Brady et al., 2021; Ciarambino et al., 2021; Edelman et al., 2022). There has been a lack of research on the specific impact of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines, and pandemic response on female health (Sharp et al., 2021) which has contributed to alarming anecdotal reports of menstrual cycle irregularities following COVID-19 vaccination on social media (Male, 2021). These reported incidents underscored the importance of studying female cycles, which are now being closely examined in relation to COVID-19 vaccination (Edelman et al., 2022; Lee et al., 2021; Trogstad, 2022). However, there remains a need to examine the overall impact of the pandemic response on female menstrual cycles.
Menstrual cycle irregularities, perimenopause, and menopausal disturbances can be important indicators of overall physical health (Alvergne & Högqvist Tabor, 2018). Menstrual cycle irregularity is linked to metabolic dysfunction (Souza et al., 2010) and increased risk of cardiovascular disease (Solomon et al., 2002). Furthermore, vasomotor menopausal symptoms are related to white matter hyperintensities and cognitive disturbances (Thurston et al., 2016). Exposure to stress affects the hypothalamic pituitary gonadal (HPG) axes (Viau, 2002) as higher perceived stress is correlated with menopausal symptoms (Nosek et al., 2010; Weidner et al., 2020) and menstrual dysregulation (Nagma et al., 2015).
Thus, it is not surprising that the COVID-19 pandemic and the associated increase in stress has led to reports of disturbances to menstrual cycles (Phelan et al., 2021). Premenopausal people have reported irregularities in their menstrual cycles across different phases of the COVID-19 pandemic (Demir et al., 2021), consistent with the literature indicating that heightened perceived stress is a predictor for menstrual irregularities (Yamamoto et al., 2009). Prolonged stress is also associated with an increased risk for psychiatric disorders (McEwen & Akil, 2020) and females reported higher depressive symptoms than males during the COVID-19 pandemic (Brotto et al., 2021; Pieh et al., 2020). Moreover, studies show that depressed mood is associated with menstrual irregularities (Yu et al., 2017), meaning that pandemic-related stress may be affecting mental health and menstrual irregularities simultaneously or sequentially. Given that stress and menstrual irregularities are connected (Yamamoto et al., 2009), and may play a role in mental health disturbances (Yu et al., 2017), it is important to study these relationships.
Heightened stress would likely have an impact on menstrual/menopausal irregularities, but to our knowledge no study to date has examined these irregularities in relation to psychosocial outcomes such as perceived stress, anxiety, or depression scores, and other factors that may play a role in perceived stress (age, number of children) within the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. We hypothesized that females would report an increase in the number of menstrual and menopausal symptoms during the first year of the pandemic, and secondly that these disturbances would be associated with stress, anxiety and depression levels.
Methods
Participant Recruitment
The Rapid Evidence Study of a Provincial Population Based COhort for GeNder and SEx (RESPPONSE) was led by the Women’s Health Research Institute in British Columbia (BC). All participants provided informed consent prior to participation in RESPPONSE. Ethics approval was received from The BC Children’s and Women’s Research Ethics Board (H20-01421). Between mid-August 2020 and March 1, 2021, participants were recruited (Ogilvie et al., 2021). Survey responses were collected anonymously, with the exception of postal code. All respondents who completed the survey were invited to enter a draw to win a $100 e-gift card.
The survey was open to residents of BC aged 25 to 69 years of all sexes and genders. However, only participants who were assigned female sex at birth were eligible for this particular analysis (n=5608). For analyses pertaining to menstrual changes, eligibility was restricted to: female sex, not post-menopausal, not pregnant, first six months postpartum, and not on hormonal suppression drugs (n=1866). In addition, we also conducted sensitivity analyses for menstrual changes to those people under 40 to avoid conflation with possible symptoms of perimenopause (n=810). For analyses of menopausal symptoms, eligibility was restricted to female sex and those who responded that they were postmenopausal (n=2305). In addition, we also conducted sensitivity analyses for menopause status to those people over 50 (n=1978) to avoid conflation with possible symptoms of perimenopause.
Survey Design and Measures
The survey was tested for face validity, pilot tested, and implemented using REDCap (Research Electronic Data Capture) (Harris et al., 2009). The survey consisted of multiple modules, with the present analysis focused on female reproductive health questions surrounding menstrual cycle and menopause symptoms.
All survey participants that were premenopausal were asked “Since the COVID-19 pandemic and subsequent public health measures in mid-March 2020, have you noticed any changes to your menstrual cycle? (yes/no/not applicable due to hormonal suppression/not applicable other)”, and participants that were postmenopausal were asked “ Have you noticed any changes to your postmenopausal status since mid-March 2020? (yes/no).” Respondents who indicated changes to their menstrual cycle or postmenopausal status were prompted to check all that applied from a list of changes and provided with a free-text box (Survey available in Supplemental Section). All free-text responses were coded with thematic analysis using the methods outlined in Braun & Clarke (2006) to examine the potential variables influencing these changes. All responses were assigned to one of two main themes: ‘Non-pandemic related’ and ‘Pandemic control measures.’ “Non-pandemic related” comments were obvious changes to their health and reproductive system at the start of the pandemic or preceding the pandemic. Alternatively, specific mentions of changes to their status or cycle, without medical reason, and stated as due to the pandemic were categorized as pandemic-related. After separating all responses into these two themes, sub-themes were created to identify reproductive changes that occurred during the pandemic. Sub-themes were created if one or more respondents expressed the same theme in their free-text response.
Validated scores of general pandemic stress, anxiety, and depression were measured (Huang et al., 2006; Löwe et al., 2008). General pandemic stress was measured using the CoRonavIruS Health Impact Survey (CRISIS) V0.3. Participants were asked to self-report feelings of stress on a Likert scale from one (not at all) to five (extremely). Scores for this questionnaire range from 10–50 with higher scores indicating greater COVID-related stress.
Anxiety scores were calculated using the Generalized Anxiety Disorder questionnaire (GAD-7) The GAD-7 used self-reported feelings of anxiety on a Likert scale from zero (not at all) to three (nearly everyday) with scores ranging from 0–21. Scores above 10 suggest clinically significant levels of anxiety (Spitzer et al., 2006).
The Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) was used to measure self-reported symptoms of depression on a Likert scale from zero (not at all) to three (nearly everyday). Scores range from 0–27 with a score of 0–4 indicating minimal depression, 5–14 indicating mild to moderate depression and 15–27 indicating moderately severe to severe depression (Brotto et al., 2021).
Internal consistency across data collection and Cronbach’s alpha in the current sample was very good (CRISIS: α = 0.882; GAD-7: 0.889, PHQ: α = 0.848).
Statistical Analyses
Analyses were carried out using R v.4.1.3. (Core Team, 2022). The data set was divided into two separate groups: people with menstrual periods and those in menopause (postmenopause) as described above and summarized the percentages of those with any changes noted. We examined the relationship between mental health and changes in menopause status or menstruation using mixed-effects linear regression models with individual as random effects, and controlling for age. Significance was assessed using likelihood-ratio tests, and interactions were removed from the models if non-significant at p < .05. Post-hoc pairwise tests were conducted to further explore main or interaction effects with Tukey adjusted p-values. Missing data were excluded from analyses.
Results
Survey Participants
Demographic information (age, ethnicity, gender, number of adults or children in the household, education, etc.) is seen in Table 1. Of the premenopausal participants, 98.4% identified as women, 0.1% identified as men and 1.5% as gender diverse. Of the postmenopausal participants, 99% identified as women, 0.1% identified as men and 0.8% as gender diverse. Given that nearly all females also identified as women, we have chosen to use the term women+ to refer to participants in our survey.
Demographic characteristics of respondents.
+ denotes GenderQueer, Agender, Two-Spirit, other
Changes in menstrual symptoms
Among our sample of premenopausal women+, 519 (27.8% of the sample without suppressed cycles) reported that they had noticed changes in their menstrual cycle since March 2020. Of these 519 respondents, 44.3% indicated that their periods were more symptomatic (painful, more bleeding, etc.), 25.4%% indicated that their periods were longer, 23.7%% said they were having fewer periods than before the pandemic, 21.8% noticed having more periods than normal, 15.7% said their periods had gotten shorter, 2.3% said their periods were less symptomatic. Options were not mutually exclusive and we received 784 answers from a potential 519 respondents. Moreover, 17.8% used free-text space to explain the changes to their menstrual cycles that they had noticed. The analysis of the free text responses indicated that there were twice as many respondents that indicated their changes in symptoms were due to the Pandemic control measures(Table 2).
Summary of free-text responses for changes noticed in menstrual cycles. Sample sizes are given and percentages of total sample are given in parentheses.
As those aged >40 years are more likely to be experiencing perimenopause, which could create menstrual disturbances independent of psychosocial stress, we undertook a sensitivity analysis of those who were less than 40 years old. Of this subset (n=810), 29.2% (n=237) reported changes in their menstrual cycle since the pandemic began. In addition, 52.7% indicated that their periods were more symptomatic (painful, more bleeding, etc.), 32.1% indicated that their periods had gotten longer, 13.1% said they were having fewer periods than normal, 20.7% noticed having more periods than normal, 19.0% said their periods had gotten shorter, 2.1% said their periods were less symptomatic, and 19.8% used free-text space to explain the changes to their menstrual cycles that they had noticed. Options were not mutually exclusive and we received 378 answers from a potential 237 respondents.
Changes in menopausal symptoms
Among our sample of postmenopausal females (n = 2305), 155 (6.7%) reported that they noticed changes in their postmenopausal status since mid-March 2020. Of this subset (n=155), 16.1% indicated that they started bleeding again and 12.3% indicated that they were experiencing “more menstrual symptoms”. Additionally, 72.9% used free-text space to explain the changes to their postmenopausal status. The analysis of the free-text responses revealed that there were four times as many respondents that indicated changes to postmenopausal status falling into the “due to the pandemic control measures” category (Table 3).
Summary of free-text responses for changes noticed in postmenopausal status. Sample sizes are given and percentages of total sample are given in parentheses.
As those aged <50 years are more likely to be experiencing perimenopause, which could create menopausal disturbances independent of psychosocial stress, a sensitivity analysis that restricted to those ≥50 (n = 1978) was conducted. Of this subset, there were 127 (6.4%) who reported that they had noticed changes in their postmenopausal status since before the pandemic. Of this subset (n=127), 18.1% indicated that they started bleeding again and 7.9% indicated that they were experiencing “more menstrual symptoms”. Additionally, 71.7% of this subset used free-text space to explain the changes to their postmenopausal status that they had noticed. Analysis of these free-text responses revealed that 19.8% of reported changes were associated with the onset of the pandemic and 80.1% were not not pandemic-related.
Higher pandemic stress, anxiety, and depression symptoms were related to more disturbances in menstrual and menopausal symptoms
We next examined whether any changes to menstrual or menopause symptoms were related to anxiety, depression, or perceived stress. We found that across both groups, more disturbances in their cycles indicated they scored higher on each of the psychosocial measures, with premenopausal women+ scoring higher than postmenopausal women+. For premenopausal women+ pandemic stress were 3.9 (95%CI:3.1-4.8) points higher, anxiety scores were 2.0 (95%CI: 1.6-2.4) points higher, and depression scores were 2.4 (95%CI: 2.0-2.8) points higher on average in those that reported menstrual cycle disturbances(Figure 1 A-C). For postmenopausal women+, pandemic stress scores were 2.9 (95%CI: 1.9-3.9) points higher, anxiety scores were 1.5 (95%CI: 0.9-2.1) points higher, depression scores were 1.8 (95%CI: 1.2-2.5) points higher on average in those that reported changes to their menopausal status (Figure 1D-F).
Changes to menstrual and menopausal status during early COVID-19 pandemic increased mean CoRonavIruS Health Impact survey (CRISIS) scores, anxiety (GAD-7) and depression symptoms (PHQ-9) in women+. A) Mean (±95%CI) CRISIS scores in women+ with changes to menstrual status were 3.4 points higher. B) Mean (±95%CI) GAD-7 scores in women+ with changes to menstrual status were 2 points higher. C) Mean (±95%CI) PHQ-9 scores in women+ with changes to menstrual status were 2.4 D) Mean(±95%CI) CRISIS scores in women+ with changes to menopausal status were 2.9 points higher. E) Mean (±95%CI) GAD-7 scores in women+ with changes to menopausal status were 1.5 points higher. F) Mean(±95%CI) PHQ-9 scores in women+ with changes to menopausal status were 1.8 points higher. CI=confidence interval. Figure was constructed in R v.4.1.3.
Relationship of menstrual or postmenopausal disturbances to number of children
As previous studies have found an association between number of children and stress (Bigalke et al., 2020), we also examined whether the number of children influenced our results. We ran these analyses in premenstrual women+ that were under 40, choosing to exclude individuals who may have been perimenopausal based on age. There was no significant relationship between the number of children and whether or not the participant indicated they had disturbances to their menstrual cycle (p=0.100). We next examined whether or not there was a relationship between menopausal disturbances and the number of children. There was a significant relationship (p=0.007), however when we used age as a covariate the effect was no longer significant (p=0.409). There were also no significant relationships between the number of children and pandemic stress scores, after controlling for age and changes to menstruation or menopause (p=0.167 and 0.400, respectively).
Discussion
In a sample of 4171 surveyed women+ in BC that met our inclusion criteria, 27.8% of naturally cycling women+ had a disruption in their menstrual cycle and 6.7% of postmenopausal women+ indicated a change in their status, across the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic and prior to widespread rollout of COVID-19 vaccines. These disturbances to the reproductive cycles were related to higher levels of anxiety, depression, and perceived stress, but not to the number of children, in both pre and postmenopausal women+. Premenopausal women+ with menstrual cycle phase disturbances scored higher on perceived stress (3.4 points), anxiety (2.0) and depression (2.4) measures. We previously found that women had higher levels of perceived stress, depression, and anxiety compared to men, using data from the same source (Brotto et al., 2021). Our findings here indicate that both pre and postmenopausal women+ with higher levels of mental distress experienced greater disturbances in reproductive cycles. Stress has pervasive effects on mental and physical health and our results add to the growing data that female-specific reproductive cycles are also affected.
During the first year of the pandemic menstrual cycle disturbances were related to distress, anxiety and depression
We found that in the first year of the pandemic, 27.8% of the naturally-cycling women+ surveyed had disturbances to their menstrual cycles. This is slightly lower than other surveys suggesting that 44% of women (including women that were younger than our own cohort 18-24) noticed changes in their cycles using fertility tracking devices (Buran & Gerçek Öter, 2022; Haile et al., 2022). Other studies have suggested that the baseline rates of menstrual disturbances are ∼15% (Toffel et al., 2013, Kim et al., 2018). Premenopausal women in our study with reported menstrual disturbances had 3.4 times higher perceived stress. Our findings are consistent with another study that showed an association between perceived stress during the COVID-19 pandemic and menstrual irregularities (Ozimek et al., 2022). Although the literature suggests that parental responsibility increases perceived stress in women compared to men (Bigalke et al., 2020), we found no evidence that there was a significant relationship between the number of children, and changes in the menstrual cycle or in perceived stress in women+ younger than 40. Our data also indicate that anxiety scores were 2 points higher and depression scores were 2.4 points higher on average in those that reported menstrual cycle disturbances. As can be seen in Figure 1 this was enough of a change to push the average depression scores to mild-moderate depression, however the values for anxiety remain below a clinical diagnosis. Our findings add to the growing body of research on the relationship between pandemic-related stress and menstrual disturbances.
Increased menopause symptoms were associated with increased perceived stress, anxiety and depression
We also found that fewer than ten percent of postmenopausal women+ noticed changes to their menopausal status during the first year of the pandemic. Those who noticed changes in their status reported more menopausal symptoms, and furthermore these individuals were more likely to score higher on perceived stress, depression and anxiety. Perimenopause is thought to be a time of heightened risk for mental health disruption (Schmidt, 2005) and those with menopausal symptoms may be at greater risk to develop psychiatric disorders (Cohen et al., 2006).
The percentage of disturbances in reproductive symptoms was four times greater in our sample of premenopausal (27.8%) compared to postmenopausal women+ (6.7%). It is not clear why this large difference occurred but may be due to age, influence of stress on the HPG axis, or level of stress overall. Indeed, other studies, including data from this same sample, have found that perceived stress, anxiety and depression scores were reduced with increasing age (Brotto et al., 2021; Tang et al., 2022). Thus, our findings of greater premenopausal versus postmenopausal disturbances aligns with data indicating mental health indices were lower for older adults during the first year of the pandemic (Brotto et al., 2021). Hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis activation, via stress, initially stimulates, and chronic activation inhibits the HPG resulting in menstrual abnormalities (Toufexis et al., 2014) and as these interactions vary across age (Heck & Handa, 2019; Phumsatitpong et al., 2021), this may also explain our findings as there would have been less HPA activation in the postmenopausal women+ in our sample. However, it is also possible that the premenopausal versus postmenopausal difference was due, in part, to the differences in the question posed to the two different groups, as our survey asked about menopause status rather than symptoms of menopause.
Relevance and Limitations
Allostatic load, or the cumulative burden of a variety of stressors, affects cardiovascular and metabolic health (Guidi et al., 2021; McEwen, 1998). However, it is important to acknowledge that female-specific factors, such as menstruation and menopause, are also impacted by chronic stress. Others have postulated that female health is cyclical as menstrual patterns correspond to changes in immune system function (Alvergne & Högqvist Tabor, 2018). Moreover, there are specific interactions between gonadal hormones and immune cells (Baker et al., 2004) emphasizing important crosstalk (Arambula & McCarthy, 2020). It is possible that the mechanism behind stress and menstrual changes also involves glucocorticoid receptors in the endometrium (Michael & Papageorghiou, 2008). Although SARS-CoV-2 infection and vaccines use can also disrupt reproductive cycles in the short term (Edelman et al., 2022; Lee et al., 2021), we do not believe this influenced our findings because we found that the seroprevalence of previous infection in this cohort was 2.9% (Racey et al., submitted) and vaccines were not widely available to the general BC population at the time of this survey.
There are limitations to our study. This was a retrospective survey that required online access. However, our findings of high levels of menstrual disturbances is consistent with other studies using data from menstrual tracking apps (Haile et al., 2022). In our survey we did not obtain information on the normal levels of menstrual or menopausal symptoms pre-COVID19 pandemic hence we are only able to cross study comparisons.
This survey was limited to residents of the province of BC and our unique patterns of pandemic restriction measures may have impacted results. We also asked about menopausal status rather than menopausal symptoms and this may have reduced responses to this population of postmenopausal people. In our survey we also did not clarify why people had suppressed cycles (e.g which type of hormonal contraceptives, gender affirming hormone therapy) which future studies could explore.
We cannot rule out a selection bias in this study, and it is possible that individuals who experienced higher stress pre- and post pandemic were more likely to participate. Similarly, those with menstrual abnormalities may be hyper-aware of their menstrual cycle and led them to participate in the current study.
Conclusions
The stress associated with the pandemic has impacted both our physical and mental health and our findings suggest that this includes female-specific physical health characteristics. It is imperative to continue advancing the literature on external and internal factors impacting women’s reproductive health. Factors that can mitigate against the effects of stress such as social support (Zhao et al., 2019) and exercise (Belgen Kaygısız et al., 2020), which were limited during the initial phases of the pandemic, may have exacerbated the negative outcomes on reproductive cycles for women+. Given the lack of attention to women’s health data (Rechlin et al., 2021), more studies examining female-specific health indices are needed in the literature.
Data Availability
Data cannot be shared publicly because of ethical restrictions. Data are available from the UBC Research Ethics Board (contact via cwreb{at}bcchr.ubc.ca) for researchers who meet the criteria for access to confidential data.
Statements and Declarations
Funding
Funding for this project was from a Michael Smith Foundation for Health Research Grant (19055) and a BC Women’s Health Foundation Grant (LRZ30421) both awarded to LAB and GSO. Additional support was provided by CIHR (PJT-148662) awarded to LAMG.
Competing Interests
The authors have no competing interests to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.
Ethical Approval
Ethical approval was received from the BC Children’s and Women’s Research Ethics board (H20–01421). All methods performed as a part of this study were in accordance with the UBC Research Ethics Board guidelines.
Informed consent
to participate was obtained from participants.
Data Availability
Data cannot be shared publicly because of ethical restrictions. Data are available from the UBC Research Ethics Board (contact via cwreb{at}bcchr.ubc.ca) for researchers who meet the criteria for access to confidential data.
Author Contributions
All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by Arianne Albert, Amy Booth, Shanlea Gordon, Alexandra Baaske and Romina Garcia de Leon. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Romina Garcia de Leon, Alexandra Baaske, and Liisa Galea and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Supplement
Are you postmenopausal (have not had a period in 1 year or more)?
Yes
No
[If “No” to question 1] Since the COVID-19 pandemic and subsequent public health measures in mid-March 2020, have you noticed any changes to your menstrual cycle?
Yes
No
Not applicable: I have a suppressed menstrual cycle due to hormonal contraception, breast feeding, a medical condition, etc.
Not applicable: other
[If “yes” to question 2] What changes have you noticed to your menstrual cycle?
Periods have gotten shorter
Periods have gotten longer
Periods are more symptomatic (painful, more bleeding, etc.)
Periods are less symptomatic
More periods than normal
Fewer periods than normal
Other
[If “other” to question 3] What other changes in your menstrual cycle have you noticed since COVID-19?
[If “yes” to question 1] Have you noticed any changes to your postmenopausal status since mid-March 2020?
Yes
No
[If “yes” to question 5] What changes have you noticed?
Started bleeding again
More menstrual symptoms
Other
[If “other” to question 6] Please specify the “Other” changes you have experienced in your postmenopausal status
Acknowledgements
We thank David M. Goldfarb and Melanie Murray for their contributions to this work.
References
