Abstract
Polygenic Risk Score (PRS) models are used extensively to find the population/individual risk towards disease. These predictive scores are of great help as risk scores if predicted earlier the life of individual can be saved from the chronic/ complex diseases. In this empirical assessments study, the polygenic risk score was calculated in three different ancestries (SAS, EAS and African Americans) based on more than three hundred markers. The risk score we observed indicated that average population risk scores are varied but on cumulating the ancestries the average risk score increased ∼1.3 times than individual population average risk. The parameter which varies greatly while calculating the PRS is the ancestry; it should be prerequisite that individuals of same ancestry should be taken as a one population groups while calculating the scores.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
there was no funding for the present study
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
↵* shared first authors
Data Availability
the data used in the manuscript are submitted as supplementary data along with the MS.