Pain management after dental extractions – non-opioid combination analgesics minimize opioid use for acute dental pain ======================================================================================================================== * Qirong Huang * Linda Rasubala * Richard Gracely * Junad Khan * Eli Eliav * Yanfang Ren ## Abstract **Objective** To evaluate long-term changes in pain management strategies and assess the outcomes of opioids and non-opioid combination analgesics after dental extractions. **Methods** This is a cross-sectional study of patients who received dental extractions and analgesic prescriptions in a large dental urgent care center in two 12-month periods: January 2012 to December 2012 (Year-2012) and March 2021 to February 2022 (Year-2022). Data extracted from electronic records include type of dental extractions, analgesics prescribed, and follow-up visits. The primary outcome was failure rate measured by the proportions of patients who returned to the clinic for management of pain after receiving dental extractions and analgesic prescriptions. **Results** A total of 3,357 patients in Year-2012 and 3,785 patients in Year-2022 received analgesic prescriptions in conjunction with dental extractions. Combination analgesics were significantly higher in Year-2022 (62.5%) than in Year-2012 (34.9%) (RR=1.79, 95% CI 1.70-1.89. p<0.0001). Combinations analgesics were almost exclusively opioids and 1,166 patients, or 34.7%, received opioids in Year-2012, compared to none received opioids, 49.4% received ibuprofen/ acetaminophen and 13.1% received gabapentin combinations in Year-2022. After surgical extractions, a majority were prescribed opioids (52.4%), followed by ibuprofen (46.2%) in Year-2012. In contrast, a majority received ibuprofen/acetaminophen (56.2%) or gabapentin combinations (17.3%) in Year-2022. Ibuprofen/acetaminophen had a failure rate (2.2%) lower than gabapentin combinations (4.4%) (RR=0.50, 95%CI 0.31-0.83. p=0.01), or opioid combinations (21.4%) (RR=0.10, 95%CI 0.08-0.14. p<0.0001). Failure rate for gabapentin combinations was lower than opioids (RR=0.21, 95%CI 0.14-0.31. p<0.0001). **Conclusions and Relevance** This study showed a paradigm shift from opioids and single medication analgesics to non-opioids and combination analgesics with ibuprofen, acetaminophen and gabapentin as components in prescribing for pain after dental extractions, which presents an opportunity to minimize or eliminate our reliance on opioids for dental pain. ## Introduction The epidemic of opioid use disorder (OUD) challenges conventional use of opioids for pain management after dental extractions. Nearly 10 million people reported misuse of prescription opioids in 2019 in the US1. Drug-related overdose deaths increased from 70,000 in 20192 to over 100,000 in 20213. Prescription opioids are recognized as the gateway to OUD or misuse of other illicit drugs4,5. Dentists frequently prescribe opioids for dental pain6-8, which contributes substantially to opioid misuse and OUD9-11. In recognition of the dental role in OUD, the American Dental Association (ADA) recommended the use of prescription drug monitoring programs (PDMP) to promote the appropriate use of opioids, and alternatives such as nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and multimodal strategies for managing postoperative dental pain12. Unfortunately, these recommendations have had only a modest effect. Nearly half of the dentists never use the PDMP program13 and opioid prescriptions (56.8%) remain higher than non-opioid prescription (43.2%) for acute dental pain14. Prescriptions for pain management after surgical tooth extractions illustrate the current problem: opioid prescription decreased only moderately from 90% in 2011 to about 70% in 2020 in dental clinics affiliated to US dental schools7,15, though considerable evidence demonstrates that non-opioid analgesics, such as NSAIDs or a combination of NSAIDs such as ibuprofen with acetaminophen (N-acetyl-para-aminophenol, or APAP), are superior to opioids for dental pain after dental extractions, including third molar surgeries16-18. Possible explanations include: 1) immediate-release opioids continue to be the drugs of choice in patients who cannot tolerate NSAIDs or APAP due to direct side effects or indirect effects from interaction with other medications19, 2) cases in which NSAIDs are ineffective, 3) dental prescribers are not convinced that short-term opioid prescription may result in opioid dependency20, and 4) ingrained prescription habit21. The Howitt Dental Urgent Care (HDUC) at the University of Rochester Medical Center adopted an evidence-based pathway to minimize opioid use for acute dental pain, implemented the PDMP program in 2013, well before the ADA recommendation in 2016, and significantly decreased opioid prescriptions22. However, a significant number of patients continued to receive opioid analgesics when NSAIDs or APAP are contraindicated or ineffective. The OUD epidemic has been exacerbated by an additional public health crisis in the last two years23,24. More patients delayed preventive dental care during the COVID-19 pandemic25,26, resulting in a significant increase in patients seeking treatments for dental pain. The convergence of the COVID-19 pandemic and the OUD epidemic not only worsens the ongoing crisis related to OUD27-30, but also increases difficulties in pain management in dental clinics with rising demand for prescription analgesics when non-opioid alternatives are limited31. In response to the clear need for effective non-opioid analgesics, HDUC systematically reviewed existing evidence that inclusion of gabapentin in combination analgesics may benefit patients who could not tolerate either NSAIDs or APAP. Clinical trials have established the efficacy of gabapentin for acute postoperative pain32-36, but the evidence on the effectiveness of gabapentin combination analgesics in the real-world dental setting is limited to empirical experiences and clinical impressions. The purpose of the present study was to compare patterns and effectiveness of analgesic prescriptions for acute dental pain before and after implementation of opioid reduction strategies in HDUC. Effectiveness was evaluated using a real-world measure of proportion of patients returning for additional pain treatment after receiving the prescribed analgesics. ## Methods This project was approved by the Research Subject Review Board of University of Rochester Medical Center (approval number RSRB-00005798). All patient information were anonymized and de-identified prior to the analysis. This study was a cross-sectional survey of patient records for analgesic prescriptions after dental extractions, and followed the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) reporting guidelines for cross-sectional studies37. ### Data collection The opioid reduction initiative was first implemented in 2013 with the mandatory requirement of checking the New York State PDMP before prescription of any opioid analgesics in HDUC. A multimodal strategy including gabapentin combination analgesics were initiated in March 2020 during the lockdown period of the COVID-19 pandemic. We used the analgesic prescription data from the past 12 months (March 1, 2021 to February 28, 2022) to represent the current prescription pattern (Year-2022), and the data from the year 2012 (January 1, 2012 to December 31, 2012) to represent the pattern before opioid reduction (Year-2012). Records of all the patients who visited HDUC for tooth extractions and received analgesic prescriptions were analyzed and compared between the two periods. The following information was retrieved from the electronic records of patients who visited HDUC during the two study periods: 1. Tooth extractions: Extractions were divided into routine or surgical extractions. Routine extraction was defined as removal of erupted tooth or exposed tooth root without raising a soft tissue flap or cutting and removing bone. Surgical extraction was defined as removal of erupted or impacted tooth or buried tooth root that required cutting the soft tissue, and cutting and removing bone structure around the tooth. 2. Classes of analgesics prescribed: Opioid analgesics included hydrocodone, oxycodone, codeine in combination with APAP and/or ibuprofen. Non-opioid analgesics included APAP, NSAIDs (primarily ibuprofen), gabapentin and their combinations. Gabapentin was always used as a combination with either APAP or ibuprofen. Our guidelines for prescribing analgesics have changed with emerging evidence over the years. In Year-2012, patients with mild pain were usually treated with over-the-counter medications including APAP (325mg) and ibuprofen (200mg); those with moderate to severe pain were prescribed higher doses of ibuprofen (400-600mg) or opioid combinations, usually hydrocodone/APAP 5/325mg, and patients expected to have severe pain were prescribed ibuprofen 600-800mg or opioid combinations such as hydrocodone/APAP 7.5/325mg. In Year-2022, patients with mild pain were more likely prescribed with APAP 500mg or ibuprofen 400mg; those with moderate to severe pain were prescribed ibuprofen 600mg or ibuprofen 400mg/APAP 325mg combinations; and those expected to have severe pain were prescribed ibuprofen 400-600mg/APAP 500mg combinations. For patients who had moderate to severe pain but could not take ibuprofen when indicated, they were usually prescribed opioid combinations in Year-2012, but were prescribed gabapentin 300mg/APAP 500mg combinations in Year-2022 when indicated. Similarly, for patients who could not take APAP when combination medications were indicated, hydrocodone/ibuprofen combinations were prescribed in Year-2012, but gabapentin 300mg/ibuprofen 400mg combinations were prescribed in Year-2022. 3. Follow-up visits for postoperative pain: These included patients who had follow-up or observation visits after a procedure performed during a previous visit. Patients who returned to the clinic for additional treatment of pain were identified from the patients with a follow-up observation visit. These patients were considered failed to achieve adequate pain control after receiving tooth extraction and the prescribed analgesics. ### Sample size and statistical analysis Records of all the patients who visited the HDUC during the two study periods were included in the analyses. Frequencies of dental extractions and different analgesic prescriptions were compared between the two study periods using Chi-square tests. Descriptive statistics, Chi-square tests, relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used to show the change in the pattern of analgesic prescriptions between the two study periods and compare the failure rates of different combination analgesics. All statistics were performed using OpenEpi (Open Source Epidemiologic Statistics for Public Health, Version 3.01) software for two-tailed tests, and a p-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. ## Results A total of 8,955 and 14,765 patients visited the HDUC during the two 12-month periods in Year-2012 and Year-2022, respectively. Of these patients, 4,863 (54.3%) received dental extraction in Year-2012, compared to 7,056 (47.8%) in Year-2022 (X2=94.68, RR=1.14, 95% CI 1.11-1.17, p<0.0001). A statistically significant lower percentage of patients received dental extractions in the current 12-month periods. The mean age of patients received dental extractions was 37 years (range 18 to 93) in Year-2012, and 39 years (range 18 to 97) in Year-2022. Gender of the patients were about equally distributed between woman and man in both periods (51.6% women and 48.4% man in Year-2012, and 51.0% women and 49.0% men in Year-2022). In patients who received dental extractions, 3,357 (69.0%) were prescribed analgesic medications in Year-2012, compared to 3,785 (53.6%) in Year-2022 (X2=283.9, RR=1.29, 95% CI 1.25-1.32, p<0.0001). A significantly lower percentage of patients received analgesic prescriptions in conjunction with the dental extractions in the current period (Table 1). View this table: [Table 1:](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/05/17/2022.05.12.22274900/T1) Table 1: Frequencies of different types of analgesics prescribed for patients received routine or surgical tooth extractions during the two study periods Patterns of analgesic prescription for dental extractions changed drastically between Year-2012 and Year-2022 (Table 1). Overall, combination analgesics were used in a much higher rate in Year-2022 (62.5%) than in Year-2012 (34.9%) (X2=541.9, p<0.0001; Rate Ratio=1.79, 95% CI 1.70-1.89). Patients were about 80% more likely to receive combination analgesics than single analgesics after tooth extractions in Year-2022 than in Year-2012. Combination analgesic prescriptions were limited almost exclusively to opioid combinations (99.4%) in Year-2012. A total of 1,166 patients, or 34.7%, received opioid prescriptions after dental extractions in Year-2012. In comparison, none of the patients received opioid prescriptions after extractions in Year-2022, but 49.4% received APAP/ibuprofen combination and 13.1% received gabapentin combinations (Table 1). For patients who were prescribed single analgesics only, ibuprofen was predominant at 63.8% compared to only 1.3% for APAP in Year-2012. This pattern was reversed in Year-2022, when only 9.3% of the patients received ibuprofen compared to 28.1% received APAP (Table 1). Table 2 and Figure 1 shows the numbers and proportions of different classes of analgesics prescribed for routine extractions and surgical extractions, respectively, in the two study periods. After routine dental extractions, analgesic prescriptions were largely limited to ibuprofen (76.9%) as a single analgesic and opioid combinations (21.5%) in Year-2012, but a much diverse classes of analgesics were used in Year-2022, including APAP (32.1%), ibuprofen (10.4%), APAP/ibuprofen combinations (46.3%) and gabapentin combinations (11.2%). After surgical extractions, a majority of the patients were prescribed opioid combinations (52.4%), followed by ibuprofen as a single analgesic (46.2%) in Year-2012. In contrast, a majority of the patients received APAP/ibuprofen combinations (56.2%), followed by APAP (19.4%), gabapentin combinations (17.3%), and ibuprofen (7.1%) in Year-2022. View this table: [Table 2:](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/05/17/2022.05.12.22274900/T2) Table 2: Analgesic prescriptions after dental extractions during the two study periods ![Figure 1:](http://medrxiv.org/https://www.medrxiv.org/content/medrxiv/early/2022/05/17/2022.05.12.22274900/F1.medium.gif) [Figure 1:](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/05/17/2022.05.12.22274900/F1) Figure 1: Proportions of different classes of analgesics prescribed (%) after dental extractions (routine and surgical) during the two study periods. Overall, prescription of ibuprofen alone decreased, APAP alone increased, APAP and ibuprofen combinations increased from 2012 to 2022. Opioid combinations were eliminated in 2022 with increased use of APAP/ibuprofen combinations and the addition of gabapentin combinations. Failure rates for different classes of combination analgesics, defined by the numbers and proportions of patients who returned to the clinic with pain, are listed in Table 3. APAP/ibuprofen combination had a failure rate (2.2%) significantly lower than gabapentin combinations (4.4%) (RR=0.50, 95% CI 0.31–0.83), or opioid combinations(21.4%) (RR=0.10, 95% CI 0.08–0.14). Failure rate for gabapentin combinations was significantly lower than opioid combinations (X2=73.1, p<0.0001, RR=0.21, 95% CI 0.14–0.31). View this table: [Table 3:](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/05/17/2022.05.12.22274900/T3) Table 3: Pain control outcomesa after simple and surgical extractions in patients received different combination analgesics during the two study periods ## Discussions The findings of the present study signify a paradigm shift from opioids and single medication analgesics to non-opioids and combination analgesics in prescribing for pain after dental extractions. Compared to 10 years ago when opioid combinations or ibuprofen alone were the predominant analgesics for dental extractions, a wider selection including APAP, ibuprofen, APAP/ibuprofen combinations and gabapentin combinations are used today to manage postoperative dental pain. This shift represents a more evidence-based approach and presents an opportunity to minimize or even eliminate our reliance on immediate-release opioids for dental pain. No opioids were prescribed for patients with dental pain in the past 12-months in HDUC. Considering that about 1,800 patients received prescriptions of more than 20,000 pills of opioids annually in this clinic alone before we introduced our opioid reduction initiatives22, reducing the reliance on opioids for acute dental pain is particularly salient in light of a persistent OUD crisis2,38,39. Population-based cohort studies found that 2 - 7% of the patients receiving a dental opioid prescription would develop new and persist use of opioids within one year9-11. A reduction of opioid prescriptions from 1,800 to zero implies that potentially 36 to 126 individuals each year are spared from developing persistent opioid use in this clinic alone. The reliance on opioid analgesics for dental pain in the US is more likely a cultural phenomenon than a medical necessity. The superiority of non-opioid analgesics such as APAP/ibuprofen combinations to opioids for dental pain has been common knowledge for many years17,18,22, yet dentists continue to rely on opioids in North America10,20,21. In countries where dentists have limited access to opioid drugs, very few opioids were prescribed for dental pain40,41. A 2020 report showed that many patients continued to receive opioids after routine (49.4%) or surgical extractions (70.3%) in an academic dental institution in the US7. Compared to the non-opioid alternatives, opioid analgesics also lacked effectiveness, as 65% of the patients who received opioids after routine extraction and 64% after surgical extractions complained of moderate to severe pain in the first week after the procedure, and 17.7% and 11.2% of these patients, respectively, visited or called the clinic due to postoperative pain7. The current study corroborated these findings and showed that 21% of the patients received opioid analgesics returned to the clinical for pain, far higher than those received non-opioid combination analgesics. Besides a long list of potential adverse effects, opioids could also aggravate pain by inducing hyperalgesia and increasing sensitivity to pain after both short and long-term use42-45. Pharmacogenetic variations related to cytochrome P450 polymorphisms may also render opioids such as hydrocodone or oxycodone ineffective due to poor metabolic conversions46,47. The APAP/NSAIDs combinations, though proven effective, are by no means the silver bullet that will solve the OUD problems associated with prescribing for dental pain. Both NSAIDs and APAP have inherent shortcomings because of their systematic toxicities on vital organs and physiological functions48,49. Randomized controlled trials that demonstrated efficacies of APAP, NSAIDs and their combinations on dental pain used the third molar surgery model for postoperative pain in young and healthy volunteers17,18. As clinicians facing patients of all ages and health status, we treat many patients who have contraindications to NSAIDs or APAP, either due to compromised systematic health or potential drug-drug interactions with their existing medications50. For patients who have contraindications to either NSAIDs or APAP and those who could not achieve adequate pain relief from the APAP/NSAIDs combination, opioids become the obvious and only choice because there are no other non-opioid alternatives for acute dental pain19. Gabapentinoids, including gabapentin and pregabalin, are structural derivatives of γ amino butyric acid and act on both central and peripheral sensory pathways to inhibit central sensitization and peripheral pain transmission51. Though gabapentinoids are classified as antiepileptics and were approved primarily for neuropathic pain such as postherpetic neuralgia and fibromyalgia, numerous clinical trials have demonstrated their efficacies for acute pain and for reduction of opioid consumption after major surgery32,33,52. A Cochrane review demonstrated efficacy of gabapentin for acute pain after dental extractions32. A recent systematic review indicates that preoperative use of gabapentinoids reduces pain and opioid consumption after various oral surgeries including third molar removals33. Gabapentioids are not metabolized in the body and is excreted through the kidney in its original form, providing safety for combination with other analgesics53. Such combinations may provide additive or synergistic analgesic effects35,54,55. Gabapentin as a single medication is probably not adequate for acute dental pain as it has a number-needed-to-treat (NNT) value of 11 for dental pain32, but it compares favorably against codeine, a common opioid analgesic, which has an NNT of 21 for dental pain56. Codeine in combination with APAP is frequently used for dental pain10. Gabapentin used in combination with APAP or NSAIDs should provide a potential alternative to opioids35,54,55, especially when the APAP/NSAIDs combination is contraindicated or ineffective. Pregabalin has the same mechanisms of actions with gabapentin but may have advantages due to its favorable pharmacodynamic properties57. We elected to use gabapentin because its efficacy against dental pain is established in randomized controlled trials32. The data from the present study provides additional evidence that gabapentin when used in combination with APAP or ibuprofen may be potentially effective against acute dental pain. However, this data must be treated with caution because of its retrospective nature. The outcome measure used in this study, the number of patients returned to the clinic for treatment of pain after receiving dental extractions and the analgesics, is too crude to arrive at definitive conclusions of effectiveness. Well-designed clinical trials are needed to assess the effectiveness and safety in patients with a wide range of age and health status. Gabapentin is not FDA-approved for acute pain and it may have significant adverse effects58,59. Considering that gabapentin is one of the most prescribed medications in the US and up to 95% of its prescriptions were “off-label”60,61, its use should be judicious and based on thorough understanding of the best available evidence. Patients should be informed the off-label status and potential adverse effects. In addition, gabapentin may potentiate the effects of opioids and have its own potential for misuse or abuse62. We have limited its use to a maximum of 600mg per day divided in 2 doses for 3 days, which is very small in quantity and duration compared to greater than 1200mg per day for 8 weeks that are often used for chronic pain conditions59. We believe that the potential benefits of its short-term use outweigh its potential risks in comparison to opioids for patients with moderate to severe postoperative dental pain. The COVID-19 pandemic has significantly affected oral health and changed dental care to a more palliative approach worldwide25,31. A much larger volume of patients visited HDUC but a lower percentage received dental extractions compared with previous years. The fact that less patients received prescription analgesics after dental extractions in the current period also reflected the effect of the pandemic on dental care – more patients had already received analgesics elsewhere before they arrived at our clinic for dental extractions. We do not deny that opioid analgesics are effective for many patients and have their rightful roles as part of our armamentarium against pain. Our efforts in minimizing opioid use for dental pain is based on our assessments of potential risks and benefits and our professional judgement. Safe and effective pain relief remain our primary goal for patients with dental pain. In summary, gabapentin combinations with APAP or ibuprofen may provide viable alternatives to opioids for acute dental pain. But its effectiveness and safety awaits confirmation from well-designed clinical trials. We do not advocate wide-spread use of gabapentin combinations for acute dental pain before more definitive evidence is available, though we believe that their judicious use may benefit a select group of patients. ## Data Availability All data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript * Received May 12, 2022. * Revision received May 12, 2022. * Accepted May 16, 2022. * © 2022, Posted by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory The copyright holder for this pre-print is the author. All rights reserved. The material may not be redistributed, re-used or adapted without the author's permission. ## References 1. 1.Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Key substance use and mental health indicators in the United States: Results from the 2019 National Survey on Drug Use and Health (HHS Publication No. PEP20-07-01-001, NSDUH Series H-55). Rockville, MD: Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Available at: [https://www.samhsa.gov/data/](https://www.samhsa.gov/data/). In:2020. 2. 2.Mattson CL, Tanz LJ, Quinn K, Kariisa M, Patel P, Davis NL. Trends and Geographic Patterns in Drug and Synthetic Opioid Overdose Deaths - United States, 2013-2019. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2021;70(6):202–207. [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=http://www.n&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2022%2F05%2F17%2F2022.05.12.22274900.atom) 3. 3.Ahmad FB, Rossen LM, Sutton P. Provisional drug overdose death counts. National Center for Health Statistics, Available at: [https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/vsrr/drug-overdose-data.htm](https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/vsrr/drug-overdose-data.htm) 2021. 4. 4.Lankenau SE, Teti M, Silva K, Jackson Bloom J, Harocopos A, Treese M. Initiation into prescription opioid misuse amongst young injection drug users. Int J Drug Policy. 2012;23(1):37–44. [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.drugpo.2011.05.014&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=21689917&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2022%2F05%2F17%2F2022.05.12.22274900.atom) 5. 5.Cicero TJ, Ellis MS, Surratt HL, Kurtz SP. The changing face of heroin use in the United States: a retrospective analysis of the past 50 years. JAMA Psychiatry. 2014;71(7):821–826. 6. 6.Suda KJ, Zhou J, Rowan SA, et al. Overprescribing of Opioids to Adults by Dentists in the U.S., 2011-2015. Am J Prev Med. 2020. 7. 7.Nalliah RP, Sloss KR, Kenney BC, et al. Association of Opioid Use With Pain and Satisfaction After Dental Extraction. JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3(3):e200901. 8. 8.Suda KJ, Evans CT, Gibson G, et al. Opioid Prescribing by Dentists in the Veterans Health Administration. Am J Prev Med. 2022. 9. 9.Chua KP, Hu HM, Waljee JF, Nalliah RP, Brummett CM. Persistent Opioid Use Associated With Dental Opioid Prescriptions Among Publicly and Privately Insured US Patients, 2014 to 2018. JAMA Netw Open. 2021;4(4):e216464. 10. 10.Campbell TJ, Martins D, Tadrous M, et al. Dental Opioid Prescription Characteristics and the Risk of New, Persistent Use. Am J Prev Med. 2021;60(6):831–839. 11. 11.Schroeder AR, Dehghan M, Newman TB, Bentley JP, Park KT. Association of Opioid Prescriptions From Dental Clinicians for US Adolescents and Young Adults With Subsequent Opioid Use and Abuse. JAMA Intern Med. 2019;179(2):145–152. 12. 12.American Dental Association. Statement on the use of opioids in the treatment of dental pain. American Dental Association. Current Policies Web site. [https://www.ada.org/about/governance/current-policies#substanceusedisorders](https://www.ada.org/about/governance/current-policies#substanceusedisorders). Publisehd 2016. Updated April 10, 2022. Accessed May 10, 2022. 13. 13.McCauley JL, Gilbert GH, Cochran DL, et al. Prescription Drug Monitoring Program Use: National Dental PBRN Results. JDR Clin Trans Res. 2019;4(2):178–186. 14. 14.Miller CS, Ke C, Witty JT, Nagarajan R. Prescribing patterns of opioid analgesics in a dental setting: 2013–2018. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology. 2020;130(4):402–410. 15. 15.Barasch A, Safford MM, McNeal SF, Robinson M, Grant VS, Gilbert GH. Patterns of postoperative pain medication prescribing after invasive dental procedures. Spec Care Dentist. 2011;31(2):53–57. [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=21371065&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2022%2F05%2F17%2F2022.05.12.22274900.atom) 16. 16.Denisco RC, Kenna GA, O’Neil MG, et al. Prevention of prescription opioid abuse: the role of the dentist. Journal of the American Dental Association. 2011;142(7):800–810. [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6NDoiamFkYSI7czo1OiJyZXNpZCI7czo5OiIxNDIvNy84MDAiO3M6NDoiYXRvbSI7czo1MDoiL21lZHJ4aXYvZWFybHkvMjAyMi8wNS8xNy8yMDIyLjA1LjEyLjIyMjc0OTAwLmF0b20iO31zOjg6ImZyYWdtZW50IjtzOjA6IiI7fQ==) 17. 17.Derry CJ, Derry S, Moore RA. Single dose oral ibuprofen plus paracetamol (acetaminophen) for acute postoperative pain. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 2013;6:CD010210. 18. 18.Moore PA, Hersh EV. Combining ibuprofen and acetaminophen for acute pain management after third-molar extractions: translating clinical research to dental practice. Journal of the American Dental Association (1939). 2013;144(8):898–908. [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6NDoiamFkYSI7czo1OiJyZXNpZCI7czo5OiIxNDQvOC84OTgiO3M6NDoiYXRvbSI7czo1MDoiL21lZHJ4aXYvZWFybHkvMjAyMi8wNS8xNy8yMDIyLjA1LjEyLjIyMjc0OTAwLmF0b20iO31zOjg6ImZyYWdtZW50IjtzOjA6IiI7fQ==) 19. 19.Hersh EV, Moore PA, Grosser T, et al. Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs and Opioids in Postsurgical Dental Pain. J Dent Res. 2020;99(7):777–786. 20. 20.Freilich E, Zhao Y, Yan S, Caldroney S, Mehra P. Opioid Prescribing Patterns Among Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons: A Regional Survey-Based Study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020;78(7):1078–1087. 21. 21.Heron MJ, Nwokorie NA, O’Connor B, Brown RS, Fugh-Berman A. Survey of opioid prescribing among dentists indicates need for more effective education regarding pain management. Journal of the American Dental Association (1939). 2022;153(2):110–119. 22. 22.Rasubala L, Pernapati L, Velasquez X, Burk J, Ren YF. Impact of a Mandatory Prescription Drug Monitoring Program on Prescription of Opioid Analgesics by Dentists. PLoS One. 2015;10(8):e0135957. 23. 23.Mitchell M, Shee K, Champlin K, Essary AC, Evans M. Opioid use disorder and COVID-19: Implications for policy and practice. Jaapa. 2021;34(6):1–4. 24. 24.Ghose R, Forati AM, Mantsch JR. Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Opioid Overdose Deaths: a Spatiotemporal Analysis. J Urban Health. 2022;99(2):316–327. 25. 25.Kranz AM, Gahlon G, Dick AW, Stein BD. Characteristics of US Adults Delaying Dental Care Due to the COVID-19 Pandemic. JDR Clin Trans Res. 2021;6(1):8–14. [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=http://www.n&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2022%2F05%2F17%2F2022.05.12.22274900.atom) 26. 26.Papautsky EL, Rice DR, Ghoneima H, et al. Characterizing Health Care Delays and Interruptions in the United States During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Internet-Based, Cross-sectional Survey Study. J Med Internet Res. 2021;23(5):e25446. 27. 27.Ayad AE. Opioid epidemics during the pandemic: Further insights to the same story. J Opioid Manag. 2021;17(1):9–12. 28. 28.Kelley MA, Lucas J, Stewart E, Goldman D, Doctor JN. Opioid-related deaths before and after COVID-19 stay-at-home orders in Los Angeles County. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2021;228:109028. 29. 29.Rodda LN, West KL, LeSaint KT. Opioid Overdose-Related Emergency Department Visits and Accidental Deaths during the COVID-19 Pandemic. J Urban Health. 2020;97(6):808–813. 30. 30.Slavova S, Rock P, Bush HM, Quesinberry D, Walsh SL. Signal of increased opioid overdose during COVID-19 from emergency medical services data. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2020;214:108176. [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=http://www.n&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2022%2F05%2F17%2F2022.05.12.22274900.atom) 31. 31.Mian M, Teoh L, Hopcraft M. Trends in Dental Medication Prescribing in Australia during the COVID-19 Pandemic. JDR Clin Trans Res. 2021;6(2):145–152. 32. 32.Straube S, Derry S, Moore RA, Wiffen PJ, McQuay HJ. Single dose oral gabapentin for established acute postoperative pain in adults. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 2010(5):CD008183. 33. 33.Bhavaraju SA, Vorrasi JS, Talluri S, Kalladka M, Khan J. Pre-emptive administration of gabapentinoids to reduce postoperative pain and opioid usage following oral and maxillofacial surgical procedures. Oral Surgery. 2022;15(1):106–115. 34. 34.Campbell R, Khuong JN, Liu Z, et al. Perioperative gabapentinoid use lowers short-term opioid consumption following lower limb arthroplasty: Systematic review and meta-analysis. J Opioid Manag. 2021;17(3):251–272. 35. 35.Dahl JB, Nielsen RV, Wetterslev J, et al. Post-operative analgesic effects of paracetamol, NSAIDs, glucocorticoids, gabapentinoids and their combinations: a topical review. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2014;58(10):1165–1181. [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1111/aas.12382&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=25124340&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2022%2F05%2F17%2F2022.05.12.22274900.atom) 36. 36.Liu B, Liu R, Wang L. A meta-analysis of the preoperative use of gabapentinoids for the treatment of acute postoperative pain following spinal surgery. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017;96(37):e8031. 37. 37.von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. The Lancet. 2007;370(9596):1453–1457. [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/s0140-6736(07)61602-x&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=http://www.n&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2022%2F05%2F17%2F2022.05.12.22274900.atom) 38. 38.Hadland SE, Bagley SM, Gai MJ, et al. Opioid use disorder and overdose among youth following an initial opioid prescription. Addiction. 2021;116(10):2790–2800. 39. 39.Kharasch ED, Clark JD, Adams JM. Opioids and Public Health: The Prescription Opioid Ecosystem and Need for Improved Management. Anesthesiology. 2022;136(1):10–30. 40. 40.Suda KJ, Durkin MJ, Calip GS, et al. Comparison of Opioid Prescribing by Dentists in the United States and England. JAMA Netw Open. 2019;2(5):e194303. [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=http://www.n&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2022%2F05%2F17%2F2022.05.12.22274900.atom) 41. 41.Thornhill MH, Suda KJ, Durkin MJ, Lockhart PB. Is it time US dentistry ended its opioid dependence? Journal of the American Dental Association (1939). 2019;150(10):883–889. 42. 42.Angst MS, Koppert W, Pahl I, Clark DJ, Schmelz M. Short-term infusion of the mu-opioid agonist remifentanil in humans causes hyperalgesia during withdrawal. Pain. 2003;106(1-2):49–57. [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/S0304-3959(03)00276-8&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=14581110&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2022%2F05%2F17%2F2022.05.12.22274900.atom) [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000186693400008&link_type=ISI) 43. 43.Chen L, Malarick C, Seefeld L, Wang S, Houghton M, Mao J. Altered quantitative sensory testing outcome in subjects with opioid therapy. Pain. 2009;143(1-2):65–70. [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.pain.2009.01.022&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=19237249&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2022%2F05%2F17%2F2022.05.12.22274900.atom) [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000265780600012&link_type=ISI) 44. 44.Chu LF, Clark DJ, Angst MS. Opioid tolerance and hyperalgesia in chronic pain patients after one month of oral morphine therapy: a preliminary prospective study. J Pain. 2006;7(1):43–48. [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.jpain.2005.08.001&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=16414554&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2022%2F05%2F17%2F2022.05.12.22274900.atom) [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000235142300008&link_type=ISI) 45. 45.Colvin LA, Bull F, Hales TG. Perioperative opioid analgesia-when is enough too much? A review of opioid-induced tolerance and hyperalgesia. Lancet. 2019;393(10180):1558–1568. [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30430-1&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=30983591&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2022%2F05%2F17%2F2022.05.12.22274900.atom) 46. 46.Ren ZY, Xu XQ, Bao YP, et al. The impact of genetic variation on sensitivity to opioid analgesics in patients with postoperative pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Pain Physician. 2015;18(2):131–152. 47. 47.Samer CF, Daali Y, Wagner M, et al. Genetic polymorphisms and drug interactions modulating CYP2D6 and CYP3A activities have a major effect on oxycodone analgesic efficacy and safety. Br J Pharmacol. 2010;160(4):919–930. [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1111/j.1476-5381.2010.00709.x&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=20590588&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2022%2F05%2F17%2F2022.05.12.22274900.atom) [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000278032300012&link_type=ISI) 48. 48.McCrae JC, Morrison EE, MacIntyre IM, Dear JW, Webb DJ. Long-term adverse effects of paracetamol – a review. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology. 2018;84(10):2218–2230. [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=http://www.n&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2022%2F05%2F17%2F2022.05.12.22274900.atom) 49. 49.Risser A, Donovan D, Heintzman J, Page T. NSAID prescribing precautions. Am Fam Physician. 2009;80(12):1371–1378. [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=20000300&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2022%2F05%2F17%2F2022.05.12.22274900.atom) [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000273015000006&link_type=ISI) 50. 50.Moore N, Pollack C, Butkerait P. Adverse drug reactions and drug-drug interactions with over-the-counter NSAIDs. Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2015;11:1061–1075. [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=26203254&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2022%2F05%2F17%2F2022.05.12.22274900.atom) 51. 51.Chincholkar M. Analgesic mechanisms of gabapentinoids and effects in experimental pain models: a narrative review. Br J Anaesth. 2018;120(6):1315–1334. 52. 52.Lam DM, Choi SW, Wong SS, Irwin MG, Cheung CW. Efficacy of Pregabalin in Acute Postoperative Pain Under Different Surgical Categories: A Meta-Analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2015;94(46):e1944. 53. 53.Bockbrader HN, Wesche D, Miller R, Chapel S, Janiczek N, Burger P. A comparison of the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of pregabalin and gabapentin. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2010;49(10):661–669. [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.2165/11536200-000000000-00000&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=20818832&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2022%2F05%2F17%2F2022.05.12.22274900.atom) 54. 54.Mititelu Tartau L, Popa EG, Lupusoru RV, Lupusoru CE, Stoleriu I, Ochiuz L. Synergic effects of pregabalin-acetaminophen combination in somatic and visceral nociceptive reactivity. Pharmacology. 2014;93(5-6):253–259. 55. 55.Yoon MH, Yaksh TL. Evaluation of interaction between gabapentin and ibuprofen on the formalin test in rats. Anesthesiology. 1999;91(4):1006–1013. [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1097/00000542-199910000-00021&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10519504&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2022%2F05%2F17%2F2022.05.12.22274900.atom) [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000082892200017&link_type=ISI) 56. 56.Derry S, Moore RA, McQuay HJ. Single dose oral codeine, as a single agent, for acute postoperative pain in adults. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2010(4). 57. 57.Bockbrader HN, Wesche D, Miller R, Chapel S, Janiczek N, Burger P. A Comparison of the Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Pregabalin and Gabapentin. Clinical Pharmacokinetics. 2010;49(10):661–669. [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.2165/11536200-000000000-00000&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=20818832&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2022%2F05%2F17%2F2022.05.12.22274900.atom) 58. 58.Derry S, Bell RF, Straube S, Wiffen PJ, Aldington D, Moore RA. Pregabalin for neuropathic pain in adults. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 2019;1(1):Cd007076. 59. 59.Wiffen PJ, Derry S, Bell RF, et al. Gabapentin for chronic neuropathic pain in adults. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 2017;6(6):Cd007938. 60. 60.Hamer AM, Haxby DG, McFarland BH, Ketchum K. Gabapentin use in a managed medicaid population. Journal of Managed Care Pharmacy. 2002;8(4):266–271. 61. 61.Radley DC, Finkelstein SN, Stafford RS. Off-label prescribing among office-based physicians. Arch Intern Med. 2006;166(9):1021–1026. [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1001/archinte.166.9.1021&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=16682577&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2022%2F05%2F17%2F2022.05.12.22274900.atom) [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000237334900012&link_type=ISI) 62. 62.Evoy KE, Sadrameli S, Contreras J, Covvey JR, Peckham AM, Morrison MD. Abuse and Misuse of Pregabalin and Gabapentin: A Systematic Review Update. Drugs. 2021;81(1):125–156.