Abstract
Background The sustainability of school-based oral health programs depends on the utilization of effective, efficient treatments and the availability of a trained clinical workforce. The objective of this study was to determine whether registered nurses are comparable to dental hygienists in the application and effectiveness of silver diamine fluoride (SDF) for the prevention of dental caries.
Methods CariedAway was a school-based study of SDF versus dental sealants and atraumatic restorations. Within the SDF arm, subjects were treated by either a licensed dental hygienist or a registered nurse, both under the supervision of a pediatric dentist. Although initial treatment assignment in CariedAway was randomized, assignment to provider was not. The proportion of children who remained caries free after two years was assessed for non-inferiority using two-group proportion tests, adjusting for the clustering effect of schools.
Results 417 children were analyzed including 298 treated by hygienists and 119 by nurses. The proportion of caries-free individuals was 0.812 and 0.798 for hygienists and nurses, respectively, for a difference of 0.014 (95% CI = -0.07, 0.098) and within the pre-determined non-inferiority margin.
Conclusions Nurses may be effective in treating children with silver diamine fluoride in school-based oral health programs.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Clinical Trial
NCT03442309
Clinical Protocols
https://trialsjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13063-018-2891-1
Funding Statement
Research reported in this publication was funded through a Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) award (PCS-1609-36824). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily reflect the official views of the funding organization, New York University, or the NYU College of Dentistry.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
CariedAway is a registered study at www.clinicaltrials.gov (#NCT03442309) and received ethical approval from the New York University School of Medicine IRB (#i17-00578).
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
The Chan Zuckerberg Initiative, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, the Sergey Brin Family Foundation, California Institute of Technology, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Imperial College London, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Stanford University, University of Washington, and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.