Impairment and characteristics of postural control sub-components in people with COPD: a scoping review
=======================================================================================================

* Romain Pichon
* Olivier Van Hove
* Mathieu Ménard
* Diane Hearing
* Armel Crétual

## ABSTRACT

**Purpose** Impairment of postural control is a common extra-respiratory manifestation in people with COPD. However, the precise characteristics of this alteration are not clearly known. The “Systems Framework for Postural Control” which define postural control sub-components, is a relevant tool to explore this field. The main aim of this review was to identify which postural control sub-components are impaired in patients with COPD and to summarize characteristics for each sub-component. A secondary aim was to precise the relation between postural control and activities of daily living.

**Materials and methods** A scoping review was conducted, according to the JBI methodology. Pubmed, Cochrane Library, Scielo, Google Scholar, Open Grey and HAL were searched from inception to March 2021. The search was performed in English and French.

**Results** Seventy-seven articles were included. There was evidence of a potential impairment for most of the postural control sub-components. Characteristics of every sub-component alteration were heterogeneous. Even if the relation was poorly studied, reduced postural control seemed to be associate with difficulties in activities of daily living.

**Conclusion** Patients with COPD could experiment impairment among a wide range of postural control sub-components. Future research must clarify if a common pattern of modification exits for this alteration.

**Implications for rehabilitation**

*   Impairment of postural control is a common extra-respiratory manifestation in patients with COPD and so clinicians must include it in their clinical reasoning

*   Numerous postural control sub-components could be altered in patients with COPD, suggesting that postural control assessment must be holistic.

*   This scoping review shows that characteristics of postural control impairment are varied and that there may be no common pattern at the COPD population level.

Keywords
*   activities of daily living
*   balance
*   COPD
*   postural control
*   rehabilitation
*   scoping review

## Introduction

According to the World Health Organization [1], Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) is the third worldwide leading cause of mortality in 2019. COPD induces important socio-economic problems and is considered as an international major concern [2,3]. COPD is a common, preventable and treatable pathology that is characterized by persistent respiratory symptoms and airflow limitation [4]. The main respiratory symptoms are dyspnea, cough and sputum hypersecretion [4]. The primary cause is exposure to tobacco smoke and other risk factors include exposure to various inhaled toxics [3,4]. Hence, it is well established that COPD has an important impact on people’s activities and quality of life [5].

Beyond respiratory symptoms, comorbidities are extremely frequent during the evolution of the disease [6]. Presence of comorbidities increase the difficulties in activities of daily living and the impact on the quality of life of COPD patients [7]. Among these comorbidities, the impairment of postural control is one important extra-respiratory manifestation for these patients that could impact their daily lives [8].

The postural control is a complex system, which allows to manage the body’s position in the space for the dual purposes of stability and orientation [9]. Three systematic reviews highlighted the impairment of postural control of COPD compared to non-pathological subjects [10,11,8]. However, the characteristics and the mechanisms of the postural control alteration are still unknown and the impact on daily living activities is poorly known.

Contemporary theories consider the postural control as a global organisation that integrate various inputs and tend to adapt the body as a mechanical system in interaction with the nervous system in a continuously changing environment [9]. This is supported by numerous studies, showing that impairments of these systems can alter the postural control [12]. To evaluate the postural control and better understand the whole implicated system, Horak [13] proposed the *Systems Framework for Postural Control* and identifies different interconnected sub-components involved, that are presented in *table1*.

View this table:
[Table 1.](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/04/16/2022.04.13.22273798/T1)

Table 1. Postural control sub-components definitions

This framework has been used to develop and classify postural control assessment tools [12,14– 17]. To identify impairments in postural control sub-components in patients with COPD and clarify the role of these alterations in daily living activities for COPD patients, this work proposes a scoping review framed on this model. The main aim was to identify and characterize the alterations of the postural control sub-components in patients with COPD. A second aim proposed to explore the association between the postural control and the difficulties encountered during activities of daily living by patients with COPD.

## Materials and methods

This scoping review was conducted in accordance with the Johanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methodology for scoping review [18]. The objectives, inclusion criteria and methods for this scoping review were specified in advance and documented in an *a priori* protocol, registered on OSF.io the 03-02-2021 [19].

### Inclusion criteria

#### Participants

This review considered studies that include COPD patients as defined by the *Global Initiative for Obstructive Lung Disease* (GOLD) [4]. All stages of the disease were considered. Patients must be over 18 years old. This review excluded studies involving other chronic respiratory lung diseases (eg. Asthma, interstitial lung diseases or bronchiectasis).

#### Concept

The concept of postural control (through the “Systems Framework for Postural Control” proposed by Horak [13]) and his sub-components were explored in this review. This model was used and adapted by Sibley et al. [16] who established an operational definition of the model. The adaptation includes 9 sub-components which are presented and defined in the *table1*.: 1. Static stability, 2. Underlying motor systems, 3. Functional stability limits, 4. Verticality, 5. Reactive postural control, 6. Anticipatory postural control, 7. Dynamic stability, 8. Sensory integration, 9. Cognitive influences.

This review included studies that focus on postural control, or at least one of its sub-components but in relation with global postural control strategies or performance in static or dynamic conditions. This work considered as postural control assessment all functional tools described by Sibley et al. [16] and laboratory assessments (kinetic or kinematic analyses in static and dynamic conditions) [20]. Subjective assessments of postural control were not included in the review. Sources analysing one sub-component in isolation, with no direct link to postural control are excluded from the review.

#### Context

Postural control is now identified as an important concern for the assessment and the management of COPD patients all over the world and in every care setting [11]. This review focused on available evidence on postural control with no geographical restriction. We included studies in the widest possible range of settings (laboratory assessment, inpatient or outpatient studies, pulmonary rehabilitation settings) and population (community-dwelling, real life…).

#### Types of studies

This scoping review considered observational studies (descriptive studies, cohort studies, cross-sectional studies, case-control studies), experimental studies (randomized controlled trials, non-randomized controlled trials, and quasi-experimental designs such as before-after studies) and systematic reviews. Conference abstracts and grey literature were considered for inclusion, as they represent an important source of unpublished evidence that can have an impact on review’s results and conclusions [21,22].

#### Search Strategy

The search strategy follows the three-steps methodology recommended by the JBI. Firstly, an initial search was carried out on PubMed and Cochrane Library, to identify articles related to our research question. The text words included in titles and abstracts and the different keywords were used to develop a complete search strategy. Secondly, the full-search strategy was developed including information from the *first step* and completed by specific keywords related to each postural control sub-components. The search was conducted on PubMed, Google Scholar, Scielo and Cochrane Library. The full search strategy for PubMed is presented in *Appendix I*. Search strategy was adapted as necessary for each database. For the search on Google Scholar, the 500 first results were screened. Finally, references list of identified articles were searched for additional sources.

A search for grey literature was conducted on OpenGrey and the multidisciplinary open archive HAL. If relevant, reviewers (RP and OVH) contacted authors for further information.

Studies published in English and French were considered for inclusion. The databases were searched from inception to March 3, 2021.

#### Source of evidence selection

All identified citations were uploaded into *Rayyan* application. Two researchers (RP and OVH) independently reviewed titles, abstracts, and keywords from identified citations and applied inclusion and exclusion criteria. In the case of incomplete information, full text was studied. Then, the same two researchers examined independently the full texts applying inclusion and exclusion criteria. In the case of disagreement, an argumentative discussion was implemented between the two reviewers and a third member of the team was consulted if the discussion does not permit a decision. Reasons for exclusion of sources that do not meet inclusion criteria were recorded and presented in the final review. The complete results of the search were reported in the final report and presented in a Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) flow diagram [23].

#### Data extraction

Relevant data were extracted from papers included in this scoping review using a charting table developed in connection to the questions and the objectives of the review. A pilot testing of the charting table was conducted. As planned in the *a priori* protocol, the charting table was modified after the pilot testing by the reviewers. The final version of the charting table is available in the *appendix II*.

## Results

### Study inclusion

Our searches returned 10313 records. Following the exclusion of 2902 duplicated records, 7415 records were screened by title and abstracts. 7218 records that did not meet the inclusion criteria were then excluded and 197 records were thought for full text retrieval. For 31 sources, full texts were not available and full text examination was performed on 166 studies. 89 sources did not meet the inclusion criteria of this scoping review, leaving a final 77 sources eligible for the review. The screening process was reported in a PRISMA-Scoping Review study flow diagram (figure.1).

![Figure 1](http://medrxiv.org/https://www.medrxiv.org/content/medrxiv/early/2022/04/16/2022.04.13.22273798/F1.medium.gif)

[Figure 1](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/04/16/2022.04.13.22273798/F1)

Figure 1 PRISMA-Scoping Review flow diagram
flow diagram representing the successive steps of studies identification, screening, and inclusion for the scoping review. After the full process, 77 studies were included in the review.

Long description: flow diagram representing the successive steps of studies identification, screening, and inclusion for the scoping review. The first step was the initial search that identified a total of 10317 sources. After deduplication, the second step consisted in the screening by the reviewers of 7415 records. The application of eligibility criteria resulted in 77 studies that were included in the scoping review.

### Characteristics of included studies

#### Year of publication

The earliest study included in this review was published in 2004. There is a trend toward an increase of the number of publications from 2012 (3 studies) until a peak in 2020 (15 studies) (figure.2).

![Figure 2](http://medrxiv.org/https://www.medrxiv.org/content/medrxiv/early/2022/04/16/2022.04.13.22273798/F2.medium.gif)

[Figure 2](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/04/16/2022.04.13.22273798/F2)

Figure 2 Publications per year of included studies (n=77). *The literature search was stopped in March 2021*.
a combo graph (line plus column) plotting the number of studies included in the scoping review for each year. A progressive increase of publications occurred between 2004 and 2020.

#### Country of origin

The included publications were from 21 different countries. All continents were represented in this repartition. The most represented countries are USA (n = 11), Brazil (n = 9), Canada and India (n = 7). The complete geographical distribution of included studies is presented on the *figure 3*.

![Figure 3](http://medrxiv.org/https://www.medrxiv.org/content/medrxiv/early/2022/04/16/2022.04.13.22273798/F3.medium.gif)

[Figure 3](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/04/16/2022.04.13.22273798/F3)

Figure 3 Worldwide geographical repartition of included studies (n = 77).
a world map providing the geographical origins of studies included in the review. Countries with more studies were indicated by darker colour. USA, Brazil, Canada, Australia, India and Turkey were the most represented countries, respectively.

#### Article type

The majority of included studies were observational cross-sectional studies (n = 67). Other studies were cohort studies (n = 6), experimental pilot studies (n = 2), longitudinal study (n = 1) and reliability study (n = 1). Fifty-two studies included a control group to compare postural control of COPD patients to healthy subjects.

#### Participants

The number of participants ranged from 7 [24] to 1202 [25,26] with a median of 34. The median age for COPD patients was 68 years with a median forced expiratory volume in one second of 50 percent of the predicted value.

### Review findings

Overall evidence indicated that postural control is altered in COPD patients compared to healthy subjects. On the fifty-two studies that directly compare postural control of COPD patients with healthy subjects, forty-nine of them reported a statistically significant alteration in at least one postural control sub-component. This modification has been assessed by a wide variety of tools (both with laboratory and functional tools).

Every of the nine sub-components were assessed independently in the included studies. The complete distribution of the sub-components assessment in included studies is presented in the *figure 4*. The full detailed list of sub-components assessed in each included studies is available in the *appendix III*.

![Figure 4](http://medrxiv.org/https://www.medrxiv.org/content/medrxiv/early/2022/04/16/2022.04.13.22273798/F4.medium.gif)

[Figure 4](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/04/16/2022.04.13.22273798/F4)

Figure 4 Repartition of postural control sub-components assessed in included studies (n=77).
an horizontal bar chart plotting the number of studies that assessed each sub-component of postural control. The graph shows that all of the sub-components were assessed, with a minimum of three studies for “verticality” and a maximum of 77 studies for “underlying motor systems”.

Long Description : an horizontal bar chart plotting the number of studies that assessed each sub-component of postural control. “Underlying motor systems” were assessed in 77 studies, then the following subcomponents were included in: 66 studies for “dynamic stability”, 49 studies for “static stability”, 47 studies for “anticipatory postural control”, 35 studies for “sensory integration”, 27 studies for “functional stability limits”, 10 studies for “reactive postural control”, 8 studies for “cognitive influences” and 3 studies for “verticality”.

#### Static stability

“Static stability” was assessed in forty-nine sources. The most frequent tools used to analyse “static stability” were force platform measurement, one leg stance test, specific parts of composite tests (BESTest, Berg Balance Scale (BBS), Tinetti, Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB)) or the Sensory Organisation Test (SOT). In the included studies, “static stability” was assessed for several conditions of visual status (eyes open / eyes closed), stance (natural stance, tandem stance, one leg stance) or surface (stable / unstable surface, foam). A significant alteration of the component was found in the majority of studies: on thirty-five studies comparing COPD and healthy subjects, thirty studies reported a significant decrease in COPD group (twenty-six studies assessing “static stability” in isolation [26–51], four studies with composite tests [52–55]), four studies found no significant differences between groups [56–59] and data were not available in one study [60].

Nineteen studies used force platform measurements including an important variety of centre of pressure (COP) parameters [27–29,32,33,35,36,39–43,47,49,56,58,59,61,62]. Main COP variables used were area, velocity (in both anteroposterior (AP) and mediolateral (ML) directions), variability (AP and ML directions), and amplitude (AP and ML directions). Significant differences compared to healthy subjects were identified for each of these parameters, but results were heterogenous between studies [27–29,32,33,35,36,39–43,47,49]. The reported correlations between “static stability” and clinical factors are summarized in *table 2*.

View this table:
[Table 2.](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/04/16/2022.04.13.22273798/T2)

Table 2. Summary of correlations between clinical factors and “static stability” sub-component.

#### Underlying motor systems

Using the operational definition of the “systems framework for postural control framework” [16], all the tools used in the included studies assess “underlying motor systems”. However, few studies offered the possibility to isolate the motor component of postural control. Electromyographic assessments were realized in 3 studies [33,54,62]. Beauchamp et al. [54] found no significant differences in lower limb muscles activation in COPD patients compared to healthy controls during a postural perturbation task, except for tibialis anterior onset. de Castro et al. [33] analysed the activation of neck, respiratory and hip muscles during different static conditions. They found a higher activation of scalene during one leg stance in COPD patients and a higher Gluteus Medius activation during eyes closed standing. Lastly, Smith et al. [62] reported that abdominal muscle activities (obliquus externus and rectus abdominis) were higher in COPD patients during postural tasks.

Some studies investigated the relative contribution of each postural control sub-component using the BESTest [44,54,55]. Studies by Beauchamp et al. [54] and Qurashi et al. [44] are consistent to identify the “biomechanics constraints” component of the BESTest (comprising “underlying motor systems”) as one of the most altered of those assessed, in COPD patients compared to controls. However, another study employing a similar design did not support that findings [55].

Studies by Liu et al.[67] and Janssens et al. [35] proposed stratified analyses of postural control, using low and high strength subgroups in COPD patients. Liu et al. [67] showed no differences in gait parameters between low and high quadriceps strength groups. On the other hand, Janssens et al. [35] demonstrated that COPD patients with low inspiratory muscle strength, have different postural control strategies compared to patients with higher inspiratory muscle strength, using a greater reliance on ankle-related proprioceptive signals and a more ankle-steered strategy.

#### Functional stability limits

Twenty-seven studies included an evaluation of “functional stability limits”. This sub-component was mainly assessed by the Functional Reach Test (FRT) (alone or included in a composite test). There is consistent and direct evidence of a significant decrease of limits of stability in patients with COPD compared to healthy controls [25,37,47,68]. One study showed that this alteration is predominant in the antero-posterior direction [47]. However, this finding was not supported by another study, that reported alterations in all directions tested [37]. Studies assessing postural control with composite functional tests (such as the BESTest or the BBS) also presented conflicting results: two studies [55,58] identified “functional stability limits” as one of the most impaired sub-component of postural control while other did not confirm these findings [44,54].

Concerning the associations with this sub-component, Eisner et al. [26] suggested that FRT was not associated with pulmonary function. Beauchamp et al. [54] found no association between this sub-component and different markers of lower limb muscle function or patient-reported physical activity. On the other hand, Standkvist et al. [47] reported that the major determinants of stability limits in the antero-posterior direction were muscle strength parameters (hip abductors, knee extensors, hand grip strength).

#### Verticality

“Verticality” was investigated in only three studies [39,54,55]. This component was assessed by sub-parts of composite balance tests (BESTest and mini BESTest). Among these sources, two studies allowed to isolate information on “verticality” [54,55], suggesting that this sub-component could be altered in COPD patients compared to healthy subjects. Relative comparison of the sub-components using the BESTest did not identify “verticality” as one of the most impaired postural control sub-components for COPD patients [54,55].

In the study by Beauchamp et al. [54], the “verticality / stability limits” component of the BESTest show no correlation with either daily-reported physical activity or lower limb strength.

#### Reactive postural control

Ten studies included assessments of “reactive postural control”. “Reactive postural control” was mainly assessed by stepping responses, in isolation or included in composite balance tests (eg.BESTest or BBS). Three studies found a specific impairment of this component in COPD patients compared to healthy subjects [44,54,55]. Comparative analysis of sub-components with the BESTest identified “reactive postural control” as one of the most impaired component of postural control in one study [55] but this was not supported by two other studies using a similar design [44,54].

Concerning the associations with the “reactive postural control” component, Beauchamp et al. [54] showed a significant moderate correlation with physical activity and a significant weak correlation with ankle strength.

#### Anticipatory postural control

“Anticipatory postural control” was assessed in forty-seven studies. This component was mainly analyzed by transitions assessment, in isolation or as a part of composite functional tests (e.g. BESTest or BBS) but also during simple functional tools such as the Timed up and Go test (TUG).

Only very few studies have the potential to give isolated information on this sub-component. Smith et al. [62] found no differences in the number of “anticipatory postural adjustments” between COPD group and controls, but a decreased ability for COPD patients to recover initial stability after the movement. In agreement with these findings, Beauchamp et al. [54] showed that if the frequency of anticipatory postural adjustments did not differ between COPD and controls, the duration of the anticipatory postural adjustments was longer in COPD patients. All studies using the BESTest as an outcome showed that the “anticipatory postural control” sub-component is significantly impaired in patients with COPD compared to healthy subjects [44,54,55]. One of these studies identified this sub-component as one of the most impaired among all [54], but it was not supported by the results of the two others [44,55]. Regarding correlations of this sub-component, Beauchamp et al. [54] found significant weak correlations with physical activity and knee flexion strength.

#### Dynamic stability

This component was assessed in sixty-six studies included in the review. “Dynamic stability” was evaluated by various tools: the Timed up and Go test (TUG), laboratory gait analysis and by composite balance tests (BESTest, BBS, SPPB) including a specific part for dynamic stability assessment.

All studies that used the TUG as an outcome reported a significant constant alteration compared to healthy subjects [30–33,36,39,45,48,50,51,68–74]. In addition, when a sub-component analysis is performed in studies using composite balance tests, the dynamic stability component was significantly impaired compared to control participants [44,54,55]. These three studies were consistent to identify dynamic stability sub-component as one of the most impaired among all postural control sub-component.

Some studies using laboratory gait analysis identified impairments in parameters related to “dynamic stability” in COPD patients: alteration of margins of stability (in medio-lateral direction) and its variability [75] and increase of centre of mass medio-lateral sway [60] and acceleration variability [76].

Moreover, eight studies reported significant differences in gait parameters when compared to healthy subjects [63,72–78]. It concerns spatio-temporal parameters (e.g. Gait speed, cadence or step time) [76–78,80,82], variability of spatio-temporal parameters (e.g. Coefficient of variation of step time or stride length) [67,77,82] and kinematics parameters (e.g. Ankle range of motion or power absorption at ankle level) [79,81].

Significant correlations were reported between dynamic stability and numerous clinical factors, and they are presented in the *table 3*.

View this table:
[Table 3.](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/04/16/2022.04.13.22273798/T3)

Table 3. Summary of correlations between clinical factors and “dynamic stability” sub-component.

#### Sensory integration

“Sensory integration” was evaluated in thirty-five studies. “Sensory integration” was assessed by manipulating sensorial inputs (visual, vestibular, or somatosensory inputs) during different conditions (mainly in static condition, such as tandem stance or one leg stance). The SOT could be considered as a specific assessment tool of this sub-component and was employed in three studies [45,46,57]. This sub-component was also investigated in specific sub-parts of composite tools (eg.BESTest or BBS).

Studies that used the BESTest (or a derivative), were consistent to report that the sensory integration sub-component was impaired in COPD patients compared to healthy subjects [44,54,55]. Some studies used the SOT to isolate the relative “weight” of the different sensory inputs: Shalaby et al. [46] found that the overall SOT score is impaired in COPD patients compared to healthy controls, and that the conditions that targeted the vestibular system are altered. Roig et al. [45], using a similar design, also found a significant decrease in the total SOT score but did not identify significant differences in any of the conditions tested. In contrast, Pedrozo and Silveira [57] reported no significant difference between COPD group and control group using the SOT.

Some studies investigated the effect of the vision or the stability of the surface on postural control: Morlino et al. [39] reported no specific effect of the vision on postural control. Oliveira et al. [42] found no influence of the vision condition but that the surface (foam) caused a significant impairment in patients with COPD. Almeida et al. [27] tested various conditions (visual and surface) but reported no effect nor interaction between the conditions on the postural control. Strandkvist et al. [47] reported differences in unstable support condition eyes open whereas this difference was not found eyes closed. Butcher et al. [29] reported differences between COPD and healthy subjects only in the same condition (unstable surface, eyes open), no difference was found in other conditions.

In addition, Janssens et al. [35] found significant differences of proprioceptive pattern in COPD subjects compared to healthy controls : COPD patients increased their reliance on ankle muscle proprioceptive signals and decreased their reliance on back muscle signals.

Regarding the associations, Beauchamp et al. [54] reported that the sensory integration component of the BESTest was significantly correlated with lower limb strength (moderately with knee flexion strength and weakly with knee extension and ankle flexion).

#### Cognitive influences

“Cognitive influences” were assessed in eight studies. This sub-component was investigated using various cognitive task such as counting backwards or reciting a list of words during static or dynamic conditions (eg. on force plateform, during the TUG). Evidence on this component was sparse, and only few studies offered the opportunity to isolate information on cognitive influences and postural control of COPD patients. Cognitive tasks impair postural control performance in both COPD and healthy subjects [39,49,72]. Two studies [49,72] showed no supplementary effect of the cognitive task in COPD patients compared to controls while Morlino et al. [39] found the opposite. In addition, studies that assessed postural control by using the BESTest reported that the “cognitive influences” sub-component is impaired compared to healthy subjects [54,55]. Finally, the study by Van Hove et al. [49] reported that different types of cognitive tasks produced different effects on postural control in COPD patients.

Concerning the associations with this sub-component, one study found no association between cognitive ability and postural control assessed on Wii balance board [49]. Another study identified weak correlations between the double task-TUG and dyspnea and with self-reported physical functioning [66]. These correlations were similar with those reported for the TUG without additional cognitive task in the same study.

#### Postural control and activities of daily living

This review identified five sources that investigate the association between postural control of COPD patient and ADL. Cruz et al. [90] reported that COPD patients with a postural control impairment are more dependant in at least one activity of daily living (ADL) and are more severely restricted in daily life than patients without postural control impairment. Another study from the same team [86] identified determinants of “dynamic stability”: restriction in recreational activities was retained among other clinical factors (such as body mass index, depression score or number of medication) in a multiple regression model explaining around one third of the stability variance.

Three studies examined the correlations between postural control and various indicators related to ADL: Roig et al. [88] reported significant moderate correlations between “dynamic stability” (assessed by the TUG) and a specific ADL (stair climbing). In the study by Almeida et al. [27], a parameter of “static stability” was moderately correlated with the Glittre ADL (a specific functional assessment of ADL-related ability). Finally, Albarrati et al. [69] found a significant but weak correlation between “dynamic stability” (assessed by the TUG) and the activity score of the Saint-George Respiratory Questionnaire (a specific section focusing on difficulties during ADL).

## Discussion

This review examined the available evidence on postural control sub-components impairments and characteristics in patients with COPD. The associations between postural control and activities of daily living in this population were also explored. Seventy-seven studies were included indicating that this review is timely, permitting to identify gaps in knowledge and outlining interesting perspectives for research.

We will discuss the main results of the review for each sub-component and then the relation between postural control and activities of daily living.

### Static stability

Most studies underlined an impairment of static stability in people with COPD compared to healthy subjects. However, no specific pattern of alteration of “static stability” has been identified in the review. Indeed, in studies using force platform as an outcome, findings are various and heterogenous on centre of pressure parameters, preventing any firm conclusion. One potential explanation is that sub-groups analysis of COPD patients may be necessary to identify some homogenous phenotypes of static stability alterations. In addition, interesting associations between “static stability” and some clinical factors were reported, especially for dyspnea, age, and functional capacity where results of studies were consistent. If these associations are confirmed, they could help for sub-group analysis of static stability alterations. The relations between age or functional capacity and static stability have already been reported in general population [91,92]. Dyspnea is a cardinal symptom for COPD patients and its influence on postural control has been poorly studied. Dyspnea leads to an increase of neural drive, modifications of central nervous system regulation, changes of dynamic respiratory mechanics and has a psychological impact on patients [93]. All these alterations could potentially interfere with some sub-components implicated in postural control and lead to a worst performance for people with COPD.

### Underlying motor systems

Results of included studies support that underlying motor systems participate to postural control alteration in COPD patients. Moreover, some studies suggest that this sub-component is one of the most impacted compared to healthy subjects [44,54,55]. Muscle dysfunction is a well-established extra-respiratory impairment in COPD [94] and high-quality evidence showed that several muscle qualities are altered in this population [95]. As motor system is an important contributor to postural control [96] and muscle parameters are associated with postural control ability in healthy subjects [97], it could also play a central role in COPD postural control impairment [98]. In this review, included studies focused on muscular strength but other muscular qualities such as power and endurance could be relevant for postural control system [97,98].

This review showed that patients with COPD present different muscle activations patterns at both inspiratory, expiratory, and lower limb levels to maintain stability compared to healthy participants. These findings suggest that the precise assessment of these muscles could have an important role in postural control evaluation in COPD patients. Muscle function training is already a central feature of the treatment of COPD subjects [99] and could also play an interesting role in the management of postural control impairment.

### Functional stability limits

Available evidence indicates that this component is impaired in patients with COPD. In the elderly population, limits of stability are a valid predictor of future falls [100]. In COPD population, the alteration of limits of stability could be an important factor regarding the occurrence of falls. Conflicting evidence exists on the predominance of the direction(s) of the impairment and on the relative importance of this component alteration compared to others postural control components. Identification of direction-specific impairment could have some implication for the rehabilitation of patients [101]. Lower limb and hand grip strength seems to be major determinants of antero-posterior limits of stability in patients with COPD [47]. These findings suggest that the muscular strength is associated with functional stability limits and could be relevant for the management of COPD patients.

### Verticality

This sub-component of postural control is the less frequently assessed in the included studies. The few available results seem to indicate that verticality perception is impaired in COPD population. Previous research on the perception of verticality has highlighted the central role of brain areas (such as the thalamus) integrating inputs from visual, vestibular, and somatosensory systems [102,103]. In COPD patients, structural brain changes have been reported and can concern the thalamus [104]. These central modifications could be in relation to the impairment of verticality perception in COPD population. Based on relative comparisons reported in only two studies [54,55], verticality sub-component is not one of the most impacted by the disease. However, one study by Chauvin et al. [105] identified this sub-component as a robust predictor of falls in COPD patients in combination with the functional stability limits sub-component. This could underline the importance of integrating this sub-component in the assessment of postural control in COPD patients.

### Reactive postural control

This sub-component seems to be impaired in patients with COPD compared to healthy controls. In older adults, an impairment of reactive postural control represents an established risk factor of fall [106]. As the prevalence of falls have been reported to be high in the COPD population [42], factors influencing them are important to be identified.

Muscle function has an important influence on this sub-component: a systematic review conducted in older individuals, established that muscle fatigue induces deteriorations in reactive postural control [107]. Our review did not establish a direct link between muscle fatigue and this sub-component in COPD. However, an included study found a correlation between reactive postural control and lower limb strength [54] and muscle fatigue is a common and relevant disorder in patients with COPD [108].

### Anticipatory postural control

There is evidence in the literature showing that this sub-component can be impaired in people with COPD. Available evidence suggests that a longer duration of the anticipatory postural adjustments rather than the number of them could be the underlying mechanism of this impairment [54]. The duration of anticipatory postural adjustments is under the control of the cortical activity of central nervous system [109]. As structural brain changes have been documented in patients with COPD [104], it could have implications for “anticipatory postural control”. Fear of falling is also related to the impairment of this sub-component in other populations [110–112] and is often present in people with COPD [52].

### Dynamic stability

Dynamic stability was frequently studied in people with COPD. Results are consistent to report an alteration of “dynamic stability” in patients with COPD compared to healthy controls. This review also suggests that this sub-component could be one of the more impaired among postural control components [44,54,55]. The alteration of dynamic stability could be more important in the medio-lateral direction than in the antero-posterior direction [60,75,76]. As modifications in the medio-lateral direction are related to an increased risk of falls in elderly [113], this emphasizes the need of the assessment of this specific characteristic of “dynamic stability” in COPD patients.

Quantified motion analysis represents an interesting option for the purpose of an accurate understanding of postural control in COPD patients. Several studies employing this tool were included is the review, however they mainly focused on gait. Other relevant activities of daily living such as stairs climbing, transitions or objects carrying were not fully investigated. Investigating these tasks using motion analysis could give relevant information on the role of postural control in activities of daily living impairment in COPD population.

### Sensory integration

This review identify evidence showing that this sub-component is impaired in patients with COPD. However, sensory integration implicates different inputs and a central reweighting, and the precise changes related to each sensory input are still unclear. We found studies indicating that nature of the surface of support could induces more alterations of postural control than the manipulation of the visual input [42,47]. It could implicate that plantar sensory system and proprioceptive system are less performant in individuals with COPD and that the reliance to the visual input is not increase for these patients. Another possible explanation is that the reweighting of the sensory information is different in patient with COPD. This is in line with the study of Janssens et al. [35], indicating that the proprioceptive weighting of COPD patients is more related to lower limb information than trunk proprioceptive signals. In addition, the literature shown that COPD patients could have structural brain changes [104]. It could be hypothesised that these modifications could have an impact on the central integration and processing of sensory data.

### Cognitive influences

Various cognitive tasks induce changes in postural control of both healthy and COPD patients. However, there is conflicting evidence that cognitive tasks cause more alteration on postural control in COPD patients than in healthy subjects. Previous research with elderly people has shown an age-related decrease of postural control performance under dual task conditions [114]. It is currently unclear if COPD disease provokes an additional impairment, but some specific factors associated with the pathology could be of interest regarding cognitive influences and postural control: for example, dyspnea has a known negative impact on cognitive parameters [115]. The presence of both acute and chronic dyspnea could induce modifications on cognitive function with some potential consequences on postural control. Other prevalent clinical factors in COPD, such as pain, could produce relevant interaction with cognitive load and postural control [116].

### Postural control and ADL

Activities of daily living are often difficult for patients with COPD [117]. These difficulties have some consequences in patients’ quality of life [118]. Some studies suggest that a performant postural control system is associated with a good realization of activities of daily living [119,120]. COPD patients with postural control impairment could experiment more difficulties in the realization of these tasks [86,90]. Postural control impairment is not only relevant for its association with the risk of fall but could potentially lead to an increased metabolic cost of the movement [121]. As research has already established that COPD patients present an increased energy expenditure compared to healthy subjects [122], it is possible that postural control impairment contributes to it. Finally, it can be hypothesized that increasing the postural control capacities of COPD patients could lead to a better daily life tasks realization.

### Strength and limitations

To our knowledge this is the first review aiming to summarize evidence on sub-components of postural control in COPD population. Using a robust conceptual and clinically relevant model, this review is interesting both for researchers and clinicians. By incorporating grey literature, this work aims to propose a wide and realistic synthesis. The methodology of the review is in line with the JBI guidelines for scoping reviews that represents the actual reference for designing and carrying out this type of review.

As with any review, these results should be interpreted with the consideration of some limitations. The combination of interrogated databases was done to ensure a wide coverage of the literature; however, it is possible that relevant sources have been omitted as some databases combinations could be more performant. The literature search has been performed only in French and English, preventing the inclusion of sources in other languages. In addition, no critical appraisal was performed as it is not a requirement for scoping review.

### Perspectives and futures directions

From this review different research perspectives could be drawn. They are presented in the *table 4* for each postural control sub-component and for activities of daily living. If this review proposed perspectives for each sub-component, postural control is a complex system that use sub-components in perpetual coordination during real life. Therefore, the understanding of postural control impairment in COPD, its origins, and its consequences will require in the future a wide variety of both human (different professions and skills) and material resources (analysis tools from new technologies for example).

View this table:
[Table 4.](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/04/16/2022.04.13.22273798/T4)

Table 4. Research perspectives

## Conclusion

This review provides an overview of the current knowledge on postural control sub-components in people with COPD. This work highlights that most of the postural control sub-components could be altered in the latter. Results underline the relative poverty of scientific literature concerning the relation between postural control of COPD patients and activities of daily living (perceived difficulties, performance, and characteristics of realization). New professional orientations and research perspectives will require comprehensive and multidisciplinary work including contributors from different fields to introduce new ways of postural control impairment assessment and management in COPD patients from an evidence-based perspective.

## Data Availability

All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors

## Declaration of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

## Acknowledgments

Olivier Honoré, librarian at IFPEK Rennes, for his support in literature search strategy development. Dr. Karim Jamal, researcher, and physiotherapist, for his expert input on literature review and postural control.

## APPENDICES

### Appendix I. Pubmed search strategy

View this table:
[Table5](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/04/16/2022.04.13.22273798/T5)

### Appendix II. Charting table

View this table:
[Table6](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/04/16/2022.04.13.22273798/T6)

### Appendix III. Complete list of included studies with sub-components assessed in each study

View this table:
[Table7](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/04/16/2022.04.13.22273798/T7)

*   Received April 13, 2022.
*   Revision received April 13, 2022.
*   Accepted April 16, 2022.


*   © 2022, Posted by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

This pre-print is available under a Creative Commons License (Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International), CC BY-NC-ND 4.0, as described at [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/](http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

## REFERENCES

1.  1.World Health Organization. Global health estimates: Leading causes of death. [http://www.who.int](http://www.who.int) [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2020 December 10]. Available from: [https://www.who.int/data/gho/data/themes/mortality-and-global-health-estimates/ghe-leading-causes-of-death](https://www.who.int/data/gho/data/themes/mortality-and-global-health-estimates/ghe-leading-causes-of-death)
    
    

2.  2.Rehman AU, Hassali MAA, Muhammad SA, et al. The economic burden of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in Europe: results from a systematic review of the literature. Eur J Health Econ. 2020;21:181–194.
    
    

3.  3.World Health Organization. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). [http://www.who.int](http://www.who.int) [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2020 December 10]. Available from: [https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/chronic-obstructive-pulmonary-disease-(copd)](https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/chronic-obstructive-pulmonary-disease-(copd))
    
    

4.  4.Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease. Global Strategy for the diagnosis, Management, and prevention of COPD, 2020 report. 2020. Available from: [https://goldcopd.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/GOLD-2020-FINAL-ver1.2-03Dec19\_WMV.pdf](https://goldcopd.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/GOLD-2020-FINAL-ver1.2-03Dec19_WMV.pdf)
    
    

5.  5.Miravitlles M, Ribera A. Understanding the impact of symptoms on the burden of COPD. Respiratory Research. 2017;21;18:67.
    
    

6.  6.Putcha N, Drummond MB, Wise RA, et al. Comorbidities and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Prevalence, Influence on Outcomes, and Management. Semin Respir Crit Care Med. 2015;36:575–591.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1055/s-0035-1556063&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=26238643&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2022%2F04%2F16%2F2022.04.13.22273798.atom) 

7.  7.Smith MC, Wrobel JP. Epidemiology and clinical impact of major comorbidities in patients with COPD. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2014;9:871–888.
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=25210449&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2022%2F04%2F16%2F2022.04.13.22273798.atom) 

8.  8.Porto E, Castro A, Schmidt V, et al. Postural control in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2015;29;10:1233–1239.
    
    

9.  9.Shumway-Cook A, Woollacott MH. Motor control: translating research into clinical practice. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2007.
    
    

10. 10.Chuatrakoon B, Ngai SPC, Sungkarat S, et al. Balance Impairment and Effectiveness of Exercise Intervention in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease-A Systematic Review. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2020;101:1590–1602.
    
    

11. 11.Loughran KJ, Atkinson G, Beauchamp MK, et al. Balance impairment in individuals with COPD: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Thorax. 2020;75:539–546.
    
    [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6OToidGhvcmF4am5sIjtzOjU6InJlc2lkIjtzOjg6Ijc1LzcvNTM5IjtzOjQ6ImF0b20iO3M6NTA6Ii9tZWRyeGl2L2Vhcmx5LzIwMjIvMDQvMTYvMjAyMi4wNC4xMy4yMjI3Mzc5OC5hdG9tIjt9czo4OiJmcmFnbWVudCI7czowOiIiO30=) 

12. 12.Horak F, Wrisley D, Frank J. The Balance Evaluation Systems Test (BESTest) to Differentiate Balance Deficits. Phys Ther. 2009 1;89:484–98.
    
    [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6OToicHRqb3VybmFsIjtzOjU6InJlc2lkIjtzOjg6Ijg5LzUvNDg0IjtzOjQ6ImF0b20iO3M6NTA6Ii9tZWRyeGl2L2Vhcmx5LzIwMjIvMDQvMTYvMjAyMi4wNC4xMy4yMjI3Mzc5OC5hdG9tIjt9czo4OiJmcmFnbWVudCI7czowOiIiO30=) 

13. 13.Horak FB. Postural orientation and equilibrium: what do we need to know about neural control of balance to prevent falls? Age Ageing. 2006;35 Suppl 2:ii7–ii11.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1093/ageing/afl077&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=16926210&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2022%2F04%2F16%2F2022.04.13.22273798.atom) 

14. 14.Franchignoni F, Horak F, Godi M, et al. Using psychometric techniques to improve the Balance Evaluation Systems Test: the mini-BESTest. J Rehabil Med. 2010;42:323–331.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.2340/16501977-0537&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=20461334&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2022%2F04%2F16%2F2022.04.13.22273798.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000277827500006&link_type=ISI) 

15. 15.Padgett PK, Jacobs JV, Kasser SL. Is the BESTest at its best? A suggested brief version based on interrater reliability, validity, internal consistency, and theoretical construct. Phys Ther. 2012;92:1197–1207.
    
    [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6OToicHRqb3VybmFsIjtzOjU6InJlc2lkIjtzOjk6IjkyLzkvMTE5NyI7czo0OiJhdG9tIjtzOjUwOiIvbWVkcnhpdi9lYXJseS8yMDIyLzA0LzE2LzIwMjIuMDQuMTMuMjIyNzM3OTguYXRvbSI7fXM6ODoiZnJhZ21lbnQiO3M6MDoiIjt9) 

16. 16.Sibley KM, Beauchamp MK, Van Ooteghem K, et al. Using the systems framework for postural control to analyze the components of balance evaluated in standardized balance measures: a scoping review. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015;96:122–132.e29.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.apmr.2014.06.021&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=25073007&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2022%2F04%2F16%2F2022.04.13.22273798.atom) 

17. 17.Sibley KM, Beauchamp MK, Van Ooteghem K, et al. Components of Standing Postural Control Evaluated in Pediatric Balance Measures: A Scoping Review. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2017;98:2066–2078.e4.
    
    

18. 18.1.  Aromataris E, 
    2.  Munn Z
    
    Peters M, Godfrey C, McInerney P, et al. Chapter 11: Scoping Reviews. In: Aromataris E, Munn Z, editors. JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis. JBI; 2020. Available from: https://wiki.jbi.global/display/MANUAL/Chapter+11%3A+Scoping+reviews
    
    

19. 19.Pichon R, Van Hove O. Postural control and its sub-components in patients with COPD : a scoping review protocol. 2021 March 2 [cited 2021 July 23]. Available from: [https://osf.io/spqe6](https://osf.io/spqe6)
    
    

20. 20.Paillard T, Noé F. Techniques and Methods for Testing the Postural Function in Healthy and Pathological Subjects. BioMed Res Int. 2015;2015:1–15.
    
    

21. 21.Paez A. Gray literature: An important resource in systematic reviews. J Evid Based Med. 2017;10:233–240.
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=http://www.n&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2022%2F04%2F16%2F2022.04.13.22273798.atom) 

22. 22.Scherer RW, Saldanha IJ. How should systematic reviewers handle conference abstracts? A view from the trenches. Syst Rev. 2019;7;8:264.
    
    

23. 23.Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, et al. PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation. Ann Intern Med. 2018;4;169:467–473.
    
    

24. 24.Yentes JM, Blanke D, Rennard SI, et al. The Effect of a Short Duration, High Intensity Exercise Intervention on Gait Biomechanics in Patients With COPD: Findings From a Pilot Study. Chronic Obstr Pulm Dis. 2014;1:133–147.
    
    

25. 25.Eisner MD, Blanc PD, Yelin EH, et al. COPD as a systemic disease: impact on physical functional limitations. Am J Med. 2008;121:789–796.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.amjmed.2008.04.030&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=18724969&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2022%2F04%2F16%2F2022.04.13.22273798.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000259165600013&link_type=ISI) 

26. 26.Eisner MD, Iribarren C, Yelin EH, et al. Pulmonary function and the risk of functional limitation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Epidemiol. 2008;1;167:1090–1101.
    
    

27. 27.Almeida CNS, da Costa RA, Manso KP, et al. Static balance in older adults with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease undergoing pulmonary rehabilitation. Geriatr Gerontol Aging. 2020;14:98–107.
    
    

28. 28.Boffino CC, Pereira ACAC, Coelho DB, et al. Age and Disease have a Distinct Influence on Postural Balance of Patients with COPD. COPD. 2019;16:246–253.
    
    

29. 29.Butcher SJ, Meshke JM, Sheppard MS. Reductions in functional balance, coordination, and mobility measures among patients with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. J Cardiopulm Rehabil. 2004;24:274–280.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1097/00008483-200407000-00013&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=15286536&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2022%2F04%2F16%2F2022.04.13.22273798.atom) 

30. 30.Crişan AF, Oancea C, Timar B, et al. Balance impairment in patients with COPD. PloS ONE. 2015;10:e0120573.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1371/journal.pone.0120573&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=25768731&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2022%2F04%2F16%2F2022.04.13.22273798.atom) 

31. 31.De Buyser SL, Petrovic M, Taes YE, et al. Physical function measurements predict mortality in ambulatory older men. Eur J Clin Invest. 2013 April;43:379–386.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1111/eci.12056&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=23398295&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2022%2F04%2F16%2F2022.04.13.22273798.atom) 

32. 32.de Castro LA, Ribeiro LR, Mesquita R, et al. Static and Functional Balance in Individuals With COPD: Comparison With Healthy Controls and Differences According to Sex and Disease Severity. Respir Care. 2016;1;61:1488–1496.
    
    

33. 33.de Castro LA, Morita AA, Sepúlveda-Loyola W, et al. Are there differences in muscular activation to maintain balance between individuals with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and controls ? Respir Med. 2020;173:106016.
    
    

34. 34.Iwakura M, Okura K, Shibata K, et al. Relationship between balance and physical activity measured by an activity monitor in elderly COPD patients. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2016;11:1505–1514.
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=http://www.n&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2022%2F04%2F16%2F2022.04.13.22273798.atom) 

35. 35.Janssens L, Brumagne S, McConnell AK, et al. Proprioceptive Changes Impair Balance Control in Individuals with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e57949.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1371/journal.pone.0057949&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=23469255&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2022%2F04%2F16%2F2022.04.13.22273798.atom) 

36. 36.Jirange P, Vaishali K, Sinha MK, et al. A Cross-Sectional Study on Balance Deficits and Gait Deviations in COPD Patients. Can Respir J. 2021;2021:6675088.
    
    

37. 37.Kamble PM, Parulekar P. Assessment of Balance in Individuals Suffering from Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Diseases. Indian J Physiother & Occup Ther. 2020;15;14:120–126.
    
    

38. 38.Mkacher W, Tabka Z, Trabelsi Y. Relationship between postural balance, lung function, nutritional status and functional capacity in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Sci Sports. 2016;31:88–94.
    
    

39. 39.Morlino P, Balbi B, Guglielmetti S, et al. Gait abnormalities of COPD are not directly related to respiratory function. Gait Posture. 2017;58:352–357.
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=http://www.n&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2022%2F04%2F16%2F2022.04.13.22273798.atom) 

40. 40.Sayed S, Naqvi W, Phansopkar P. Submaximal Exercise Task Post Clinical Balance in COPD Patients and its Correlation with Quadriceps Girth, Body Mass Index and Disease Severity. Indian J Forensic Med Toxicol. 2021;15;1:1505–1512.
    
    

41. 41.Smith MD, Chang AT, Seale HE, et al. Balance is impaired in people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Gait Posture. 2010;31:456–460.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.gaitpost.2010.01.022&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=20206529&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2022%2F04%2F16%2F2022.04.13.22273798.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000278181500009&link_type=ISI) 

42. 42.Oliveira CC, Lee AL, McGinley J, et al. Balance and Falls in Acute Exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Prospective Study. COPD. 2017;3;14:518–525.
    
    

43. 43.Park JK, Deutz NEP, Cruthirds CL, et al. Risk Factors for Postural and Functional Balance Impairment in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. J Clin Med. 2020;9;2:609.
    
    

44. 44.Qurashi MUM, Rupak S, Shambhovi M. FACTORS AFFECTING BALANCE IN CHRONIC OBSTRUCTIVE PULMONARY DISEASE. Int J of Physiother. 2019;9:160–168.
    
    

45. 45.Roig M, Eng JJ, MacIntyre DL, et al. Postural Control Is Impaired in People with COPD: An Observational Study. Physiother Can. 2011;63:423–431.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.3138/ptc.2010-32&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=22942519&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2022%2F04%2F16%2F2022.04.13.22273798.atom) 

46. 46.Shalaby AA, Fatouh FN, Ezzelregal HG, et al. Vestibular Assessment in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Patients. Zagazig Univ Med J. 2019;1;25:601–607.
    
    

47. 47.Strandkvist V, Röijezon U, Lindberg A, et al. Hand grip strength and postural control among individuals with and without Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease : Epidemiological and motion laboratory studies [Dissertation]. Luleå University of Technology. 2019.
    
    

48. 48.Tudorache E, Oancea C, Avram C, et al. Balance impairment and systemic inflammation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2015;10:1847–1852.
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=http://www.n&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2022%2F04%2F16%2F2022.04.13.22273798.atom) 

49. 49.Van Hove O, Cebolla AM, Andrianopoulos V, et al. The influence of cognitive load on static balance in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients. Clin Respir J. 2021;15;3:351–357
    
    

50. 50.Voica AS, Oancea C, Tudorache E, et al. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease phenotypes and balance impairment. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2016;11:919–925.
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=http://www.n&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2022%2F04%2F16%2F2022.04.13.22273798.atom) 

51. 51.Yazici O, Ceylan E, Demir Yazici S, et al. Evaluation of balance in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with practical tests. Int J Clin Pract. 2021;75:e13901.
    
    

52. 52.Oliveira CC, McGinley J, Lee AL, et al. Fear of falling in people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Respir Med. 2015;109:483–489.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.rmed.2015.02.003&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=25708268&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2022%2F04%2F16%2F2022.04.13.22273798.atom) 

53. 53.Ozalevli S, Ilgin D, Narin S, et al. Association between disease-related factors and balance and falls among the elderly with COPD: a cross-sectional study. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2011;23:372–377.
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=22526071&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2022%2F04%2F16%2F2022.04.13.22273798.atom) 

54. 54.Beauchamp MK, Sibley KM, Lakhani B, et al. Impairments in Systems Underlying Control of Balance in COPD. Chest. 2012;1;141:1496–1503.
    
    

55. 55.Hetal M, Sejal G. Assessment of Components of Functional Balance in Individuals Suffering From Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and to Compare It with Age and Gender Matched Individuals. Int J Health Sci Res. 2018;8:149–160.
    
    

56. 56.Lee AL, Goldstein RS, Chan C, et al. Postural deviations in individuals with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Can J Respir Crit Care Sleep Med. 2018;3;2:61–68.
    
    

57. 57.Pedrozo MD, Silveira AF. Balance assessment in people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Fisioter Mov. 2015;28:149–156.
    
    

58. 58.Porto EF, Pradella CO, Rocco CM, et al. Comparative postural control in COPD patients and healthy individuals during dynamic and static activities. J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev. 2017;37:139–145.
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=http://www.n&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2022%2F04%2F16%2F2022.04.13.22273798.atom) 

59. 59.Rocco CM, Sampaio LM, Stirbulov, R, et al. Neurophysiological aspects and their relationship to clinical and functional impairment in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Clinics. 2011;66:125–129.
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=21437448&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2022%2F04%2F16%2F2022.04.13.22273798.atom) 

60. 60.Terui Y, Iwakura M, Suto E, et al. New evaluation of trunk movement and balance during walking in COPD patients by a triaxial accelerometer. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2018;13:3957–3962.
    
    

61. 61.Chang AT, Seale H, Walsh J, et al. Static balance is affected following an exercise task in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev. 2008;28:142–145.
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=18360191&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2022%2F04%2F16%2F2022.04.13.22273798.atom) 

62. 62.Smith MD, Chang AT, Hodges PW. Balance recovery is compromised and trunk muscle activity is increased in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Gait Posture. 2016;43:101–107.
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=26471324&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2022%2F04%2F16%2F2022.04.13.22273798.atom) 

63. 63.Bernabeu-Mora R, Giménez-Giménez LM, Montilla-Herrador J, et al. Determinants of each domain of the Short Physical Performance Battery in COPD. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2017;12:2539–2544.
    
    

64. 64.Mohan D, Benson VS, Allinder M, Galwey N, Bolton CE, Cockcroft JR, MacNee W, Wilkinson IB, Tal-Singer R, Polkey MI. Short Physical Performance Battery: What Does Each Sub-Test Measure in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease? Chronic Obstr Pulm Dis. 2020;7:13–25.
    
    

65. 65.Eisner MD, Blanc PD, Sidney S, Yelin EH, Lathon PV, Katz PP, Tolstykh I, Ackerson L, Iribarren C. Body composition and functional limitation in COPD. Respir Res. 2007 January 29;8:7.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1186/1465-9921-8-7&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=17261190&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2022%2F04%2F16%2F2022.04.13.22273798.atom) 

66. 66.McLay R, Kirkwood RN, Kuspinar A, et al. Validity of balance and mobility screening tests for assessing fall risk in COPD. Chron Respir Dis. 2020 December;17:1479973120922538.
    
    

67. 67.Liu W-Y, Spruit MA, Delbressine JM, et al. Spatiotemporal gait characteristics in patients with COPD during the Gait Real-time Analysis Interactive Lab-based 6-minute walk test. PLoS ONE. 2017;12:e0190099.
    
    

68. 68.Yumrutepe T, Aytemur ZA, Baysal O, et al. Relationship between vitamin D and lung function, physical performance and balance on patients with stage I-III chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Rev Assoc Med Brasil. 2015;61:132–138.
    
    

69. 69.Albarrati AM, Gale NS, Enright S, et al. A simple and rapid test of physical performance in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2016;11:1785–1791.
    
    

70. 70.Al Haddad MA, John M, Hussain S, et al. Role of the Timed Up and Go Test in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev. 2016;36:49–55.
    
    

71. 71.Mkacher W, Mekki M, Tabka Z, et al. Effect of 6 months of balance training during pulmonary rehabilitation in patients with COPD. J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev. 2015;35:207–213.
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=http://www.n&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2022%2F04%2F16%2F2022.04.13.22273798.atom) 

72. 72.Ozsoy I, Ozsoy G, Kararti C, et al. Cognitive and motor performances in dual task in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a comparative study. Ir J Med Sci. 2021;190;2:723–730.
    
    

73. 73.Singh SS, Bhat A, Mohapatra AK, et al. Comparison of reaction time and functional balance in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and healthy participants. Heart Lung. 2019;48:570–573.
    
    

74. 74.Vardar-Yagli N, Saglam M, Calik-Kutukcu E, et al. Increased pain sensitivity, postural abnormalities, and functional balance impairment in obstructive lung disease compared to healthy subjects. Heart Lung. 2019;1;48:351–355.
    
    

75. 75.Fallahtafti F, Curtze C, Samson K, et al. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients increase medio-lateral stability and limit changes in antero-posterior stability to curb energy expenditure. Gait Posture. 2020;75:142–148.
    
    

76. 76.Annegarn J, Spruit MA, Savelberg HHCM, et al. Differences in walking pattern during 6-min walk test between patients with COPD and healthy subjects. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e37329.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1371/journal.pone.0037329&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=22624017&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2022%2F04%2F16%2F2022.04.13.22273798.atom) 

77. 77.Iwakura M, Okura K, Shibata K, et al. Gait characteristics and their associations with clinical outcomes in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Gait Posture. 2019;74:60–65.
    
    

78. 78.Lahousse L, Verlinden VJA, van der Geest JN, et al. Gait patterns in COPD: the Rotterdam Study. Eur Respir J. 2015;46:88–95.
    
    [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6MzoiZXJqIjtzOjU6InJlc2lkIjtzOjc6IjQ2LzEvODgiO3M6NDoiYXRvbSI7czo1MDoiL21lZHJ4aXYvZWFybHkvMjAyMi8wNC8xNi8yMDIyLjA0LjEzLjIyMjczNzk4LmF0b20iO31zOjg6ImZyYWdtZW50IjtzOjA6IiI7fQ==) 

79. 79.Liu W-Y, Schmid KK, Meijer K, et al. Subjects With COPD Walk With Less Consistent Organization of Movement Patterns of the Lower Extremity. Respir Care. 2020;65:158–168.
    
    [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6ODoicmVzcGNhcmUiO3M6NToicmVzaWQiO3M6ODoiNjUvMi8xNTgiO3M6NDoiYXRvbSI7czo1MDoiL21lZHJ4aXYvZWFybHkvMjAyMi8wNC8xNi8yMDIyLjA0LjEzLjIyMjczNzk4LmF0b20iO31zOjg6ImZyYWdtZW50IjtzOjA6IiI7fQ==) 

80. 80.Rutkowski S, Rutkowska A, Luniewski J, et al. Gait analysis of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Fizjoterapia Polska. 2014;1;14:24–33.
    
    

81. 81.Yentes JM, Schmid KK, Blanke D, et al. Gait mechanics in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Respir Res. 2015;16;1:31
    
    

82. 82.Yentes JM, Rennard SI, Schmid KK, et al. Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Walk with Altered Step Time and Step Width Variability as Compared with Healthy Control Subjects. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2017;14:858–866.
    
    

83. 83.Butcher SJ, Pikaluk BJ, Chura RL, et al. Associations between isokinetic muscle strength, high-level functional performance, and physiological parameters in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2012;7:537–542.
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=22973094&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2022%2F04%2F16%2F2022.04.13.22273798.atom) 

84. 84.Liwsrisakun C, Pothirat C, Chaiwong W, Bumroongkit C, Deesomchok A, Theerakittikul T, Limsukon A, Tajarernmuang P, Phetsuk N. Exercise Performance as a Predictor for Balance Impairment in COPD Patients. Medicina (Kaunas). 2019 May 20;55:E171.
    
    

85. 85.Kovelis D, Gomes ARS, Mazzarin C, de Miranda A, Valderramas S. Association Between the Results of the Timed Up-and-Go Test Adjusted for Disease Severity and Sarcopenia in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: a Pilot Study. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2019;74:e930.
    
    

86. 86.Jácome C, Cruz J, Gabriel R, et al. Functional balance in older adults with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. J Aging Phys Act. 2014;22:357–363.
    
    

87. 87.Benton MJ, Wagner CL, Alexander JL. Relationship between body mass index, nutrition, strength, and function in elderly individuals with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev. 2010 August;30:260–263.
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=20410829&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2022%2F04%2F16%2F2022.04.13.22273798.atom) 

88. 88.Roig M, Eng JJ, MacIntyre DL, et al. Associations of the Stair Climb Power Test with muscle strength and functional performance in people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a cross-sectional study. Phys Ther. 2010;90:1774–82.
    
    [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6OToicHRqb3VybmFsIjtzOjU6InJlc2lkIjtzOjEwOiI5MC8xMi8xNzc0IjtzOjQ6ImF0b20iO3M6NTA6Ii9tZWRyeGl2L2Vhcmx5LzIwMjIvMDQvMTYvMjAyMi4wNC4xMy4yMjI3Mzc5OC5hdG9tIjt9czo4OiJmcmFnbWVudCI7czowOiIiO30=) 

89. 89.Matkovic Z, Tudoric N, Cvetko D, Esquinas C, Rahelic D, Zarak M, Miravitlles M. Easy to Perform Physical Performance Tests to Identify COPD Patients with Low Physical Activity in Clinical Practice. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2020;15:921–929.
    
    

90. 90.Cruz J, Marques A, Jácome C, et al. Global Functioning of COPD Patients With and Without Functional Balance Impairment: An Exploratory Analysis Based on the ICF Framework. COPD. 2015;12:207–216.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.3109/15412555.2014.933793&link_type=DOI) 

91. 91.Goble DJ, Baweja HS. Normative Data for the BTrackS Balance Test of Postural Sway: Results from 16,357 Community-Dwelling Individuals Who Were 5 to 100 Years Old. Phys Ther. 2018;98:779–785.
    
    

92. 92.Jacobson BH, Thompson B, Wallace T, et al. Independent static balance training contributes to increased stability and functional capacity in community-dwelling elderly people: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil. 2011;25:549–556.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1177/0269215510392390&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=21402649&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2022%2F04%2F16%2F2022.04.13.22273798.atom) 

93. 93.O’Donnell DE, Milne KM, James MD, et al. Dyspnea in COPD: New Mechanistic Insights and Management Implications. Adv Ther. 2020;37:41–60.
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=http://www.n&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2022%2F04%2F16%2F2022.04.13.22273798.atom) 

94. 94.Donaldson AV, Maddocks M, Martolini D, et al. Muscle function in COPD: a complex interplay. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2012;7:523–535.
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=22973093&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2022%2F04%2F16%2F2022.04.13.22273798.atom) 

95. 95.Marillier M, Bernard A-C, Vergès S, et al. Locomotor Muscles in COPD: The Rationale for Rehabilitative Exercise Training. Front Physiol. 2020;10:1590.
    
    

96. 96.Ivanenko Y, Gurfinkel VS. Human Postural Control. Front Neurosci. 2018;12:171.
    
    

97. 97.Paillard T. Relationship between Muscle Function, Muscle Typology and Postural Performance According to Different Postural Conditions in Young and Older Adults. Front Physiol. 2017;8:585.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.3389/fphys.2017.00585&link_type=DOI) 

98. 98.McLay R, O’Hoski S, Beauchamp M. Role of Muscle Strength in Balance Assessment and Treatment in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. Cardiopul Phys Ther J. 2019;30:35–43.
    
    

99. 99.Spruit MA, Singh SJ, Garvey C, et al. An official American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society statement: key concepts and advances in pulmonary rehabilitation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2013;188:e13–64.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1164/rccm.201309-1634ST&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=24127811&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2022%2F04%2F16%2F2022.04.13.22273798.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000325789700001&link_type=ISI) 

100.100.Johansson J, Jarocka E, Westling G, et al. Predicting incident falls: Relationship between postural sway and limits of stability in older adults. Hum Mov Sci. 2019;66:117–123.
    
    

101.101.Ganesan M, Kanekar N, Aruin AS. Direction-specific impairments of limits of stability in individuals with multiple sclerosis. Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2015;58:145–150.
    
    

102.102.Barra J, Marquer A, Joassin R, et al. Humans use internal models to construct and update a sense of verticality. Brain. 2010;133:3552–3563.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1093/brain/awq311&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=21097492&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2022%2F04%2F16%2F2022.04.13.22273798.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000284951600015&link_type=ISI) 

103.103.Dieterich M, Brandt T. Perception of Verticality and Vestibular Disorders of Balance and Falls. Front Neurol. 2019;10:172.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.3389/fneur.2019.00172&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=31001184&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2022%2F04%2F16%2F2022.04.13.22273798.atom) 

104.104.Yin M, Wang H, Hu X, et al. Patterns of brain structural alteration in COPD with different levels of pulmonary function impairment and its association with cognitive deficits. BMC Pulm Med. 2019;19:203.
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=http://www.n&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2022%2F04%2F16%2F2022.04.13.22273798.atom) 

105.105.Chauvin S, Kirkwood R, Brooks D, et al. Which Balance Subcomponents Distinguish Between Fallers and Non-Fallers in People with COPD? Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2020;15:1557–1564.
    
    

106.106.Okubo Y, Schoene D, Caetano MJ, et al. Stepping impairment and falls in older adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis of volitional and reactive step tests. Ageing Res Rev. 2021;66:101238.
    
    

107.107.Papa EV, Garg H, Dibble LE. Acute Effects of Muscle Fatigue on Anticipatory and Reactive Postural Control in Older Individuals: A Systematic Review of the Evidence. J Geriatr Phys Ther. 2015;38:40–48.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1519/JPT.0000000000000026&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=24978932&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2022%2F04%2F16%2F2022.04.13.22273798.atom) 

108.108.Bachasson D, Wuyam B, Pepin J-L, et al. Quadriceps and Respiratory Muscle Fatigue Following High-Intensity Cycling in COPD Patients. PloS ONE. 2013;8:e83432.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1371/journal.pone.0083432&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=24324843&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2022%2F04%2F16%2F2022.04.13.22273798.atom) 

109.109.Bouisset S, Do M-C. Posture, dynamic stability, and voluntary movement. Neurophysiologie Clinique/Clinical Neurophysiology. 2008;38:345–362.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.neucli.2008.10.001&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=19026956&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2022%2F04%2F16%2F2022.04.13.22273798.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000264937300003&link_type=ISI) 

110.110.Chiou S-Y, Hurry M, Reed T, et al. Cortical contributions to anticipatory postural adjustments in the trunk. J Physiol. 2018;596:1295–1306.
    
    

111.111.Ellmers TJ, Maslivec A, Young WR. Fear of Falling Alters Anticipatory Postural Control during Cued Gait Initiation. Neurosci. 2020;438:41–49.
    
    

112.112.Uemura K, Yamada M, Nagai K, et al. Fear of falling is associated with prolonged anticipatory postural adjustment during gait initiation under dual-task conditions in older adults. Gait & Posture. 2012;35:282–286.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.gaitpost.2011.09.100&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=22024142&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2022%2F04%2F16%2F2022.04.13.22273798.atom) 

113.113.Hilliard MJ, Martinez KM, Janssen I, et al. Lateral Balance Factors Predict Future Falls in Community-Living Older Adults. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008;89:1708–1713.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.apmr.2008.01.023&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=18760155&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2022%2F04%2F16%2F2022.04.13.22273798.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000259057300010&link_type=ISI) 

114.114.Ghai S, Ghai I, Effenberg AO. Effects of dual tasks and dual-task training on postural stability: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Interv Aging. 2017;12:557–577.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.2147/CIA.S125201&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=http://www.n&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2022%2F04%2F16%2F2022.04.13.22273798.atom) 

115.115.Sucec J, Herzog M, Van den Bergh O, et al. The effect of dyspnea on recognition memory. Int J Psychophysiol. 2020;148:50–58.
    
    

116.116.Ge L, Yu Q, Wang C, et al. How cognitive loads modulate the postural control of older women with low back pain? BMC Geriatr. 2021;21:82.
    
    

117.117.Kaptain RJ, Helle T, Patomella A-H, et al. New Insights into Activities of Daily Living Performance in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2021;16:1–12.
    
    

118.118.Álvarez-Gutiérrez FJ, Miravitlles M, Calle M, et al. Impact of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease on Activities of Daily Living: Results of the Multicenter EIME Study. Archivos de Bronconeumología ((English Edition)). 2007;43:64–72.
    
    

119.119.Hagovská M, Olekszyová Z. Relationships between balance control and cognitive functions, gait speed, and activities of daily living. Z Gerontol Geriat. 2016;49:379–385.
    
    

120.120.Sabashi K, Ishida T, Matsumoto H, et al. Dynamic postural control correlates with activities of daily living and quality of life in patients with knee osteoarthritis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021;22:287.
    
    

121.121.Houdijk H, Brown SE, van Dieën JH. Relation between postural sway magnitude and metabolic energy cost during upright standing on a compliant surface. J Appl Physiol. 2015;119:696–703.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1152/japplphysiol.00907.2014&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=26159762&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2022%2F04%2F16%2F2022.04.13.22273798.atom) 

122.122.Ramires BR, de Oliveira EP, Pimentel GD, et al. Resting energy expenditure and carbohydrate oxidation are higher in elderly patients with COPD: a case control study. Nutr J. 2012;11:37.
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=22672689&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2022%2F04%2F16%2F2022.04.13.22273798.atom)