Health behaviours the month prior to COVID-19 infection and the development of self-reported long COVID and specific long COVID symptoms: A longitudinal analysis of 1,811 UK adults

Introduction

Long COVID, which includes both ongoing symptomatic COVID-19 (the presence of symptoms from 4 to 12 weeks post-onset), and post-COVID-19 syndrome (the presence of symptoms > 12 weeks post-onset)¹ is rapidly becoming a major public health concern.² Findings from studies representative of the general adult population in England suggest that around one in five (19%- 22%) of people previously infected with COVID-19 self-report long COVID,^3,4 with over half (67%) reporting that their ongoing symptoms significantly impacted their ability to carry out their day to day activities.³ The most common symptoms are weakness, fatigue, cognitive difficulties (e.g., concentration and remembering), and breathlessness.^3,5,6 Additionally, a large portion of patients suffering from long COVID report reduced quality of life.^5,6

There is some emerging evidence of the prominent role of pre-infection health factors in the development and experience of long COVID. For example, being obese or overweight is associated with risk of long COVID,^4,7–10 likely via mechanisms including chronic systemic inflammation.¹¹ However, work on behavioural risk factors for long COVID remains in its infancy. Several lifestyle factors, including smoking¹² physical inactivity,¹³ poor sleep^14,15 and excessive alcohol consumption not only increase the risk of infectious diseases, but can also impede vaccine response.¹¹ One study found smoking to increase the likelihood of persistent COVID symptoms (12 weeks or more).⁴ However, findings were cross-sectional and analyses did not include other health behaviours which may influence long COVID. It therefore remains unclear whether other behavioural factors influence risk of developing long COVID.

This is important to ascertain, as negative changes have been observed in many of these health behaviours during the pandemic. For example, in England, the prevalence of higher risk alcohol consumption has increased, and physical activity levels have declined,¹⁶ whilst sleep difficulties have also increased.¹⁷ If such behavioural factors are found to be risk factors for long COVID it could help inform public health programmes designed to reduce the risk of further cases of long COVID both during this pandemic and in potential future pandemics. Thus, the aim of this study was to identify whether specific health behaviours present in the month preceding infection with COVID-19 act as upstream and potentially modifiable markers of long COVID.

Methods

Study design and participants

Data were drawn from the COVID-19 Social Study; a large panel study of the psychological and social experiences of over 75,000 adults (aged 18+) in the UK during the COVID-19 pandemic. The study commenced on 21 March 2020 and involves online data collection from participants for the duration of the COVID-19 pandemic in the UK. Data were initially collected weekly (from study commencement through August 2020), then monthly thereafter. The study is not random and therefore is not representative of the UK population. But it does contain a well-stratified sample that was recruited using three primary approaches. First, convenience sampling was used, including promoting the study through existing networks and mailing lists (including large databases of adults who had previously consented to be involved in health research across the UK), print and digital media coverage, and social media. Second, more targeted recruitment was undertaken focusing on groups who were anticipated to be less likely to take part in the research via our first strategy, including (i) individuals from a low-income background, (ii) individuals with no or few educational qualifications, and (iii) individuals who were unemployed. Third, the study was promoted via partnerships with third sector organisations to vulnerable groups, including adults with pre-existing mental health conditions, older adults, carers, and people experiencing domestic violence or abuse. The study was approved by the UCL Research Ethics Committee [12467/005] and all participants gave informed consent. Participants were not compensated for participation (https://osf.io/jm8ra/). We included participants who met the five criteria outlined in Figure 1. First, participants were included if they had participated in the November 2021 survey and said that they had at some prior point been infected with COVID-19. Second, the date given for their COVID-19 infection had to be non-missing and had to be no earlier than 27 April 2020 and at least 5 weeks prior to completion of the specific questions on long COVID. 27 April 2020 was chosen as we were interested in health behaviours in the month prior to COVID-19 infection, and the collection of all individual items comprising these variables commenced 13 April 2020. Five weeks was chosen as the minimum time period as many studies on long COVID apply a threshold of “more than four weeks of symptoms” to be experienced for the term long COVID to be applied.^8,18,19 Third, participants who had had COVID-19 only once were included; participants who reported more than one infection were excluded to avoid overlapping symptoms from the two infections. Fourth participants had to have participated in the study in the month prior to the date of their infection to gather health behaviour data. Fifth, participants had to have non-missing data on long COVID outcome variables (presence/absence and specific long COVID symptoms) and study variables required to calculate statistical weights (gender, age, ethnicity, country, and education). The final analytic sample comprised 1,811. See Figure 1 for a flow chart of the number of participants excluded at each step.

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Figure 1.

Flow chart of sample selection.

*Note. Data from two weeks prior to COVID-19 infection were used, and when unavailable, consecutively further weeks prior, up to six weeks.

We used multiple imputation by chained equations to generate 50 imputed datasets for participants who met all study inclusion criteria but had missing data on other study variables (Supplemental Table S1). Imputation models included all variables used in the analysis, as well as additional auxiliary variables (e.g., home ownership status, depressive symptoms at baseline). Substantive results using cases without any missing data and the imputed sample were similar (Supplemental Tables S2–S5). See Supplemental Table S6 for a comparison of excluded and included participants on study variables.

Measures

Results

One in five (20.48%) either believed themselves to have or had been diagnosed with long COVID, and a further 12.04% were unsure (Supplemental Table S9). The most often reported long COVID symptom amongst those with long COVID was difficulty with cognition (62.58%), followed by difficulty with mobility (55.49 (Table 1). People living in crowded accommodation, who had a physical or mental health condition, who lived with children, had low levels of education or income, and had moderate or severe COVID-19 were all more likely to develop long COVID.

Descriptive statistics for health behaviours in the short vs long COVID groups are shown in Table 1 and results from binary logistic regressions are shown in Table 3. There was an increasing likelihood of long COVID for those with poorer quality sleep (Table 4). In the fully adjusted model, compared to people who had had very good or good quality sleep prior to infection, those who reported average and not good or very poor sleep were 2.4-3.5 times as likely to have developed long COVID (average sleep: odds ratio [OR]: 2.44; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.44 to 4.12; not good/very poor sleep: OR: 3.53; 95% CI: 2.01 to 6.21). None of the other health behaviours predicted long COVID status.

For individuals with long COVID, descriptive statistics for health behaviours by different long COVID symptoms are shown in Table 2. More days of fresh air for at least 15 minutes reduced the likelihood of difficulty with mobility (OR: 0.85; 95% CI: 0.72 to 0.99; Table 4) but this association was not maintained once socio-demographics and pre-existing health conditions were accounted for (OR: 0.85; 95% CI: 0.71 to 1.00). Not good or very poor-quality sleep associated with increased likelihood of difficulty with cognition (OR: 3.16; 95% CI: 1.15 to 8.69) but not once covariates were included in the model (OR: 3.06; 95% CI: 0.96 to 9.74). Having smoked in the month prior to infection with COVID-19 resulted in a more than eight-fold increased risk (OR: 8.39; 95% CI: 1.86 to 37.91; Table 6) of having difficulty with self-care, whilst weekly exercise of at least three hours reduced this likelihood (OR: 0.05; 95% CI: 0.01 to 0.39) in the fully adjusted model.

Results from sensitivity analyses which included people who were unsure whether they had had long COVID indicated similar findings, but with some minor exceptions (Supplemental Tables S10–S13). Having smoked in the month prior to infection with COVID-19 increased the likelihood of long COVID (OR: 1.90; 95% CI: 1.05 to 3.43). Having engaged in more mental health care behaviours predicted difficulty with mobility amongst those with long COVID (OR: 1.38; 95% CI: 1.03 to 1.85; Supplemental Table S11), whilst consumption of more than 14 alcoholic drinks in a single week in the month before infection with COVID-19 increased the likelihood of difficulty with self-care by 5.24 (95% CI: 1.34 to 19.58; Supplemental Table S13). Being slightly or very overweight was associated with 1.63 times greater odds (95% CI: 1.04 to 2.55) of long COVID (Supplemental Table S14). Findings for individual long COVID symptoms were different from those in the main analyses when overweight status was included. Not good/very poor-quality sleep and more mental health care behaviours predicted difficulty with cognition (Supplemental Table S16), and none of the health behaviours associated with the other long COVID symptoms.

Discussion

This study explored the relationship between modifiable health behaviours in the month preceding COVID-19 infection and the risk of developing long COVID in a longitudinal study of UK adults. Notably, there was little evidence of associations, with no relationship found in unadjusted or adjusted models in physical activity, fresh air, smoking, alcohol consumption or mental health care behaviours. The only association that was found was with sleep, with poorer sleep in the month prior to infection associated with a 2.4-3.5-fold increase in risk of developing long COVID. Similarly, amongst participants who did develop long COVID, there was little evidence of association between health behaviours and mobility or cognition difficulties. But regular daily exercise was associated with 95% lower odds of developing difficulties with self-care, whilst smoking was associated with more than an 8-fold increase in risk of developing such difficulties.

Comparison with other research on pre-infection health behaviours is difficult due to their being a lack of research in this area. Research on pre-infection factors influencing long COVID has focused on health conditions such as obesity, asthma, and higher pre-pandemic levels of psychological distress,^4,7–10 but research on health behaviours, which may be more amenable to intervention, is largely absent. Several of the health behaviours we examined, such as not smoking, a healthy diet, regular physical activity, and consuming fewer than 14 alcoholic drinks per week are all inversely associated with all-cause mortality and longer lifespan.²⁷ Nevertheless, our null findings are congruent with other research showing that identifying who is most at risk for long COVID is difficult to determine, even with factors such as symptom severity sometimes showing inconsistent associations with long COVID development.^6,28–30

However, we did find associations between poor sleep and development of long COVID. Whilst sleep disturbances have been commonly reported in people suffering from long COVID,^31,32 to our knowledge this is the first study to examine pre-infection sleep quality in relation to long COVID development. Lack of sleep can compromise both innate and adaptive immune function, making individuals more susceptible to infectious disease, and reduce the effectiveness of vaccine response.^14,15 Therefore, it is possible that by depleting physical resources, poor sleep places the body in a more vulnerable state for tackling COVID-19 infection. However, it is also possible that poor sleep is an indicator of other psychological stressors that could in fact be the cause of a heightened risk of developing long COVID. Prior work from our research group, which also used data from the UCL COVID-19 Social Study, reported elevated risk from worrying about a range of adversity experiences in the month before becoming infected with COVID-19 and developing long COVID.³³ Experiencing adversities as well as worrying about adversities also predicted lower sleep quality in the first months of the pandemic,³⁴ suggesting a potential biobehavioural pathway from stress to long COVID via impaired sleep.³⁵

Amongst individuals who did develop long COVID, we also found an association between exercise and the risk of developing problems involving self-care. Meeting weekly physical activity guidelines (at least 3 hours a week) was associated with a reduced odds of self-care difficulties, but this was not found for less frequent activity (e.g., 30 mins – 2 hours a week). Our findings echo those from a study that focused on physical activity pre-pandemic and risk of adverse COVID-19 outcomes including hospitalisation, mortality, and the need for intensive care in a large US study.³⁶ But our results extend these by showing that physical activity remains important in the weeks immediately prior to infection. Regular physical activity plays a critical role in reducing risk for acquiring and death from infectious disease, strengthening the immune system, and enhancing vaccine response.¹³ Exercise may therefore attenuate COVID-19 sequelae and persistent symptoms by moderating the inflammatory response.³⁷ Despite these potential benefits, the relationship between exercise and long COVID symptoms appears to be complex. Although exercise may improve symptoms of long COVID, long COVID symptoms can be triggered by physical activity,³⁸ and should therefore be titrated according to individual patient needs.^1,39 Therefore, it is important that in potential future pandemics, public health guidelines include an emphasis on maintaining physical activity, as this could help to reduce the functional consequences of developing long COVID.

Finally, having smoked in the month prior to becoming infected with COVID-19 was by far the largest predictor of difficulties with self-care amongst adults with long COVID. Although smoking has been associated with increased likelihood of more severe COVID-19 outcomes including mortality,⁴⁰ to our knowledge only one other study has examined smoking as a risk factor for long COVID. Findings from a sample designed to be representative of the adult population in England, showed that the odds of persistent COVID-19 symptoms (12 weeks or more) from smoking (OR: 1.35) were higher than those of being overweight (OR: 1.16).⁴ However, smoking was measured concurrently with outcomes. Our study therefore extends these findings by showing a temporal relationship between smoking and the development of specific long COVID symptoms. Although the prevalence of smokers in England decreased over the period 2011 to 2019 from 19.8% to 13.9%, certain groups continue to be more likely to smoke: people with a mental health condition and those working in lower skilled occupations.¹⁶ Lower socio-economic status and pre-existing mental health conditions have both been found to be risk factors for developing long COVID,^4,10,33 underscoring the importance of smoking cessation particularly for vulnerable groups. Some long COVID management guidelines recommend not smoking to manage symptoms such as breathlessness,⁴¹ but this advice is currently only within a subsection of the National Health Service’s COVID recovery guidance for patients which advises people to avoid smoking or vaping near their oxygen tank at home.⁴² General advice about not smoking is absent, although information about eating well, physical activity, and sleeping well is provided. Our findings suggest the importance of highlighting the risks of smoking in relation to potential future symptoms of long COVID.

This study has several strengths as well as limitations. A major strength is its longitudinal design, particularly the measurement of health behaviours prior to infection with COVID-19, the latter of which is random and cannot be predicted. However, due to data limitations, we were not able to include important health behaviours such as diet and nutrition, which are key behavioural risks for morbidity.¹⁶ We also assessed a limited number of long COVID symptoms, and did not assess fatigue, which is often the most commonly reported.⁵ Although well-stratified across major demographic groups, the study sample is also not representative of the general UK population, and results therefore cannot be generalised.

Our findings add to the dearth of research on health behaviours prior to infection with COVID-19 and the development of long COVID and suggest the importance of regular physical activity and smoking cessation, as early intervention (especially in relation to smoking) may reduce the likelihood of long COVID amongst those who become infected. Poor quality sleep prior to infection with COVID-19 is also associated with the development of long COVID but may be a result of stress due to experience of or concerns about adversities. More research on risk factors for long COVID is important, given that it is not the health behaviours per se that cause long COVID. At the time of writing, the percentage of people in the UK testing positive for COVID-19 is at an all-time high and still increasing,⁴³ and numbers of the population experiencing long COVID is estimated to be 2.7% of the general population, which means an estimated 1.7 million people are experiencing long COVID symptoms.³ With the removal of free testing in the UK, it is important to promote public health messages to help people minimise their risk of developing long-term debilitating symptoms.

Role of the funding source

The funders had no role in the study design; in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; or in the decision to submit the paper for publication. All researchers listed as authors are independent from the funders and all final decisions about the research were taken by the investigators and were unrestricted. All authors had full access to all the data in the study and had final responsibility for the decision to submit for publication.

Contributors

DF conceptualised and designed the study. DF also acquired funding, led the investigation, provided oversight on the methodology, administered the project, provided software and other resources, and supervised the project. Data were curated, validated, and formally analysed by EP. EP created visualisations, wrote the original manuscript draft with input from all authors. All authors reviewed and edited the manuscript. All authors approved the final version of the manuscript and had full access to and verified the data.

Declaration of interests

All authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethical approval for the COVID-19 Social Study was granted by the UCL Ethics Committee. All participants provided fully informed consent and the study is GDPR compliant.

Supplemental Materials