Effectiveness of 2 and 3 mRNA COVID-19 Vaccines Doses against Omicron and Delta-Related Outpatient Illness among Adults, October 2021 – February 2022
=======================================================================================================================================================

* Sara S. Kim
* Jessie R. Chung
* H. Keipp Talbot
* Carlos G. Grijalva
* Karen J. Wernli
* Erika Kiniry
* Emily T. Martin
* Arnold S. Monto
* Edward A. Belongia
* Huong Q. McLean
* Manjusha Gaglani
* Mufaddal Mamawala
* Mary Patricia Nowalk
* Krissy Moehling Geffel
* Sara Y. Tartof
* Ana Florea
* Justin S. Lee
* Mark W. Tenforde
* Manish M. Patel
* Brendan Flannery
* Strain Surveillance and Emerging Variants Team

## Abstract

**Background** We estimated SARS-CoV-2 Delta and Omicron-specific effectiveness of 2 and 3 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine doses in adults against symptomatic illness in US outpatient settings.

**Methods** Between October 1, 2021, and February 12, 2022, research staff consented and enrolled eligible participants who had fever, cough, or loss of taste or smell and sought outpatient medical care or clinical SARS-CoV-2 testing within 10 days of illness onset. Using the test-negative design, we compared the odds of receiving 2 or 3 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine doses among SARS-CoV-2 cases versus controls using logistic regression. Regression models were adjusted for study site, age, onset week, and prior SARS-CoV-2 infection. Vaccine effectiveness (VE) was calculated as (1 – adjusted odds ratio) x 100%.

**Results** Among 3847 participants included for analysis, 574 (32%) of 1775 tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 during the Delta predominant period and 1006 (56%) of 1794 participants tested positive during the Omicron predominant period. When Delta predominated, VE against symptomatic illness in outpatient settings was 63% (95% CI: 51% to 72%) among mRNA 2-dose recipients and 96% (95% CI: 93% to 98%) for 3-dose recipients. When Omicron predominated, VE was 21% (95% CI: -6% to 41%) among 2-dose recipients and 62% (95% CI: 48% to 72%) among 3-dose recipients.

**Conclusions** In this adult population, 3 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine doses provided substantial protection against symptomatic illness in outpatient settings when the Omicron variant became the predominant cause of COVID-19 in the U.S. These findings support the recommendation for a 3rd mRNA COVID-19 vaccine dose.

Key Words
*   COVID-19
*   vaccine effectiveness
*   outpatient

## Background

On November 29, 2021, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommended that all adults aged ≥18 years receive a 3rd mRNA COVID-19 vaccine booster dose at least 6 months after completing a 2-dose primary series [1]. The 6-month interval recommendation was shortened to at least 5 months on January 4, 2022, for the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine and on January 7, 2022, for the Moderna vaccine. These recommendations were released during the emergence of the Omicron variant, which was first detected in the United States (US) on December 1, 2021 [2]. Effectiveness of 2 mRNA vaccines doses against symptomatic illness or hospitalization due to infection with the Omicron variant has been lower compared to the Delta variant, with increased protection against both variants after receipt of a 3rd dose [3-5]. However, data comparing 2- and 3-dose vaccine effectiveness (VE) against symptomatic COVID-19 in outpatient settings during periods when the Delta and Omicron variants predominated are limited, especially among COVID-19 cases identified through active surveillance where all enrolled participants with COVID-19-like illness (CLI) are tested for SARS-CoV-2.

Studies with active enrollment such as the US Flu Vaccine Effectiveness Network (US Flu VE Network) provide access to specimens for research purposes including whole genome sequencing and access to data not available in medical records including risk factors for SARS-CoV-2 infection [6]. To assess the impact of a 3rd dose in the context of emerging variants with immune evasion [7] and potential waning immunity, we estimated variant-specific effectiveness of 2 versus 3 mRNA vaccine doses against symptomatic illness in outpatient settings. Additionally, we utilized virus sequencing data to define periods when Delta and Omicron variants each predominated.

## Methods

### Study Design and Population

This study was conducted within the US Flu VE Network, which consists of participating health systems in 7 states: California, Michigan, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Texas, Washington, and Wisconsin. Between October 1, 2021, and February 12, 2022, research staff screened patients seeking outpatient medical care or SARS-CoV-2 clinical testing using a standard case definition for CLI [8]. Eligible participants had an acute onset of fever, cough, or loss of taste/smell with symptom duration of <10 days [8] and had a clinical or research respiratory specimen collected for SARS-CoV-2 molecular testing within 10 days of illness onset. Research staff consented and enrolled eligible participants, who may have sought in-person medical care for CLI, completed a telehealth visit, or sought SARS-CoV-2 testing. Enrolled participants completed surveys with standardized questions across all research sites at enrollment including questions about demographics, symptoms experienced for current illness, COVID-19 vaccination history, prior SARS-CoV-2 infection, general health status, chronic medical conditions (heart disease, lung disease, diabetes, cancer, liver or kidney disease, immune suppression, or high blood pressure), and high-risk SARS-CoV-2 exposures (healthcare worker with close patient contact; contact with another laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 case in the 14 days before illness onset; or household member with laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 or with symptoms consistent with CLI in the 14 days before illness onset). This activity was reviewed and approved by the CDC and each US Flu VE Network site’s Institutional Review Board.1

### SARS-CoV-2 Status

Participants were tested for SARS-CoV-2 by reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction tests using respiratory specimens collected for clinical or research purposes. We classified participants with a positive SARS-CoV-2 result as cases. Participants who had discordant clinical and research results were categorized as a case if at least one of the results were positive. We classified participants with only negative SARS-CoV-2 results as controls.

In addition, SARS-CoV-2 virus variants from a subset of SARS-CoV-2 positive participants with onset dates between November 9, 2021, and January 9, 2022, were identified by whole genome sequencing. Research-collected SARS-CoV-2 positive respiratory specimens with cycle threshold values <30 and stored in appropriate transport medium were prepared for sequencing using the xGen SARS-CoV-2 library preparation kit (Integrated DNA Technologies, Inc., Coralville, IA). Libraries were sequenced on a NovaSeq instrument (Illumina Inc., San Diego, CA). A single consensus genome for each sample was generated. SARS-CoV-2 variants were determined using Pangolin version 3.1.20 [pangoLEARN 1.2.123, Scorpio 0.3.16] [9].

### COVID-19 Vaccination Status

COVID-19 vaccination status was verified using electronic medical records, immunization information systems, and vaccination record cards. Participants considered vaccinated with 2 doses were those who received 2 mRNA vaccine doses ≥14 days before illness onset (2-dose). To be considered for the 2-dose analyses, participants must have received doses ≥16 days apart for Pfizer-BioNTech vaccines and ≥23 days apart for Moderna vaccines. Participants considered vaccinated with 3 doses were those who received 3 mRNA vaccine doses, where the 3rd dose was given ≥7 days before illness onset (3-dose) [4]. Participants who received a 3rd dose before the recommended ≥150 days after the 2nd dose were also considered 3-dose recipients but excluded from sensitivity analyses. Three-dose recipients included both immunocompromised participants who received a 3rd dose as a primary series and otherwise healthy participants who received a 3rd dose as a booster. Those who did not report vaccine receipt and had no documentation of an mRNA COVID-19 vaccination before illness onset were defined as unvaccinated. We excluded participants who self-reported COVID-19 vaccination but were missing verified documentation of doses received.

### Statistical Analyses

We limited analyses to adults aged ≥18 years. Using the test-negative design [10], we compared the odds of 2- or 3-dose mRNA COVID-19 vaccination among COVID-19 cases versus test-negative controls using logistic regression. VE was calculated as (1 – adjusted odds ratio) x 100%. Regression models were adjusted for variables identified *a priori* including study site, age, and illness onset week. Sex, race and ethnicity, illness onset to specimen collection interval, self-reported high-risk exposure, self-reported chronic medical condition, and self-reported prior SARS-CoV-2 infection were evaluated as model covariates using a change-in-estimate (≥5% change in odds ratio) forward stepwise approach. We also evaluated chronic medical condition as a potential effect modifier (p-value <0.05). In addition to covariates included *a priori*, prior SARS-CoV-2 infection was included in the final regression model.

We evaluated VE by variant, either sequence-confirmed variant or using time periods of predominant Delta (illness onset of October 1 – December 9, 2021) versus Omicron circulation (illness onset of December 20, 2021 – February 12, 2022) when variant was not confirmed by sequencing. These periods were selected based on the SARS-CoV-2 sequencing results on a subset of cases in the US Flu VE Network. Due to co-circulation of the Delta and Omicron variants between December 10 – 19, 2021, we excluded participants without sequenced viruses with onset dates during this period for variant-specific estimates. We also assessed potential waning immunity among 2-dose recipients by comparing VE of those who received their 2nd dose 14-149 days versus ≥150 days prior to illness onset during each variant predominant period.

We conducted several subgroup analyses where 3-dose VE was stratified by self-reported high-risk exposure status, self-reported chronic medical condition, self-reported prior SARS-CoV-2 infection, days between illness onset and specimen collection date, and self-reported presence of fever with cough or shortness of breath during the Delta and Omicron predominant periods. Analyses by illness onset to specimen collection interval were performed to identify bias resulting from potential false negative SARS-CoV-2 test results among participants who presented for care or testing later than those presenting 0-2 days after illness onset [10]. Analyses by symptoms were performed to evaluate VE among persons with potentially more severe illness compared to those without fever paired with cough or shortness of breath, indicating more mild illness.

## Results

### Study Population

Between October 2021 and February 2022, US Flu VE Network sites enrolled 4448 eligible outpatients aged ≥18 years, among whom 601 were excluded due to receiving a non-mRNA vaccine (n=216), self-reporting vaccination history with no documentation available (n=145), receiving 1 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine dose (n=121), missing vaccine product information (n=55), missing SARS-CoV-2 testing information (n=34), or having an indeterminate vaccination status (n=30). Among 3847 included for analysis, 575 (32%) of 1775 participants tested SARS-CoV-2 positive during the Delta predominant period and 1006 (56%) of 1794 participants tested positive during the Omicron predominant period. There were 278 participants whose illness onset dates fell between the defined Delta and Omicron predominance periods. SARS-CoV-2 positivity reached over 50% during the 3rd week of December and peaked at 64% during the 2nd week of January (Figure 1).

![Figure 1:](http://medrxiv.org/https://www.medrxiv.org/content/medrxiv/early/2022/04/10/2022.04.06.22273535/F1.medium.gif)

[Figure 1:](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/04/10/2022.04.06.22273535/F1)

Figure 1: 
Number and Percent of SARS-CoV-2 Positive Enrolled Participants by Onset Week, US Flu VE Network, October 2021 – February 2022

Over the entire study period, participants who self-reported a high-risk exposure or reported fever were more likely to test positive (Table 1). Additionally, participants who were aged ≥65 years, identified as White non-Hispanic or other race non-Hispanic compared to Black non-Hispanic or Hispanic, self-reported a chronic medical condition, and did not self-report a fever were more likely to receive a 3rd vaccine dose (Table 2). Among 2-dose recipients, the median interval between receipt of a 2nd dose and illness onset date was 225 days (range:14 – 386); 13% and 87% had received a 2nd mRNA vaccine dose 14-149 days or ≥150 days prior to illness onset, respectively (data not shown). The median interval between 3rd dose receipt and illness onset was 53 days (range: 7 – 230) (data not shown).

View this table:
[Table 1:](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/04/10/2022.04.06.22273535/T1)

Table 1: 
Characteristics of Symptomatic Adults Seeking Outpatient Medical Care or Clinical SARS-CoV-2 Testing by SARS-CoV-2 Status, US Flu VE Network, October 2021 – February 2022

View this table:
[Table 2:](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/04/10/2022.04.06.22273535/T2)

Table 2: 
Characteristics of Symptomatic Adults Seeking Outpatient Medical Care or SARS-CoV-2 Clinical Testing by mRNA COVID-19 Verified Vaccination Status, US Flu VE Network, October 2021 – February 2022

### Study Periods by Variant Predominance

Sequencing results from 272 US Flu VE Network participants with onset dates between November 9, 2021, and January 9, 2022, demonstrated distinct periods of Delta versus Omicron circulation with co-circulation of both variants during December 10 – 19, 2021 (Figure 2). Overall, 45% of sequenced specimens were Delta. The first Omicron variant in the network was detected on December 10, 2021, and it became the consistently predominant variant (>50% of sequenced viruses) by December 15, 2021, with few viruses in early January 2022 still being identified as Delta.

![Figure 2:](http://medrxiv.org/https://www.medrxiv.org/content/medrxiv/early/2022/04/10/2022.04.06.22273535/F2.medium.gif)

[Figure 2:](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/04/10/2022.04.06.22273535/F2)

Figure 2: 
SARS-CoV-2 Variant Virus Distribution among Subset of Symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 Positive Participants by Onset Date, November 2021 – January 2022

*Variant transition period in the US Flu VE Network: December 10 – December 19, 202

### Vaccine Effectiveness

During the Delta period, adjusted VE against symptomatic illness in outpatient settings was 63% (95% CI: 51% to 72%) among mRNA 2-dose recipients and 96% (95% CI: 93% to 98%) for 3-dose recipients (Table 3). During the Omicron period, adjusted VE was 21% (95% CI: -6% to 41%) among 2-dose recipients and 62% (95% CI: 48% to 72%) among 3-dose recipients. During the Delta period, VE among participants who received their 2nd dose 14-149 days before illness onset was 89% (95% CI: 78% to 94%) compared to 58% (95% CI: 44% to 68%) among those who received their 2nd dose ≥150 days before illness onset (Table 3). During the Omicron period, VE among those who received their 2nd dose 14-149 days before illness onset was 45% (14% to 66%) and among those who received their 2nd dose ≥150 days before illness onset was 11% (−21% to 35%). Excluding 3-dose recipients who received the 3rd dose <150 days after the 2nd dose (n=35) did not change 3-dose VE estimates (data not shown).

View this table:
[Table 3:](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/04/10/2022.04.06.22273535/T3)

Table 3: 
2- and 3-Dose Vaccine Effectiveness during SARS-CoV-2 Delta Variant or Omicron Variant Associated Symptomatic COVID-19 Illness among Adults Seeking Outpatient Medical Care or SARS-CoV-2 Clinical Testing, US Flu VE Network, October 2021 – February 2022

### Vaccine Effectiveness by Subgroup

Self-reported high-risk exposure status, self-reported presence of a chronic medical condition, self-reported prior laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection, longer interval from illness onset to respiratory specimen collection, and self-reported presence of fever with cough or shortness of breath did not change 3-dose VE during the Delta variant predominant period (Table 4). However, during the period when the Omicron variant predominated, 3-dose VE point estimates tended to be lower but with overlapping confidence intervals among those who had a high-risk exposure, a chronic medical condition, a prior SARS-CoV-2 infection, or CLI that included fever. During the Delta period, 4% of cases and 14% of controls had prior infection compared to the Omicron period when 15% of cases and 20% of controls had prior infection.

View this table:
[Table 4:](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/04/10/2022.04.06.22273535/T4)

Table 4: 
Results of Subgroup Analyses of 3-Dose Vaccine Effectiveness against Delta and Omicron Variant Related Symptomatic COVID-19 Illness

## Discussion

This investigation adds to early evidence of effectiveness of a 3rd mRNA vaccine dose against laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection among adults seeking outpatient care and clinical testing for CLI symptoms during the pandemic wave predominated by the Omicron variant [3, 11-14]. However, 3-dose effectiveness among adults was lower during the Omicron predominant period than during the pandemic wave associated with the Delta variant. Similar to analyses of large electronic medical record databases or data from SARS-CoV-2 testing sites, 3-dose VE in this analysis was higher against Delta than against Omicron-related illness [3, 11-12].

Findings from the US Flu VE Network are also consistent with higher estimates of 2-dose VE when the 2nd dose was given less than 5 months before current illness onset compared to at least 5 months or more before illness onset [3, 5]. Waning effectiveness against SARS-CoV-2 Delta variant virus infection or associated outpatient illness was also observed 5 to 6 months after receipt of the 2nd mRNA vaccine dose in other countries using multiple study designs [15-20]. However, among US Flu VE Network participants, 2-dose mRNA VE point estimate against outpatient illness associated with the Delta variant among those who received their 2nd dose at least 5 months or more before illness onset remained higher than 2-dose VE against Omicron among those who received their 2nd dose <5 months before illness onset, with overlapping 95% confidence intervals. These results suggest that updates to COVID-19 vaccine formulations or additional booster doses may be needed to improve protection against future SARS-CoV-2 variant viruses.

Active enrollment of study participants in the US Flu VE Network provided additional information to evaluate differences in 3-dose mRNA VE according to participants’ symptoms, reported history of past laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection, high-risk exposure, and presence of underlying medical conditions. First, among generally healthy outpatients with symptomatic illness enrolled in the US Flu VE Network, 3-dose VE point estimates during the Omicron period tended to be lower among participants reporting underlying medical conditions compared to point estimates among participants without underlying conditions. Presence of underlying medical conditions, especially immunosuppressive conditions, have been associated with decreased mRNA VE against severe outcomes including COVID-19 related hospitalizations [3, 21-28], and provided the basis for the recommendation of a 3rd primary mRNA vaccine dose [1]. Second, participants who reported a high-risk exposure in the 14 days before illness onset demonstrated lower 3-dose VE during the Omicron predominant period compared with overall VE during this time. These results are consistent with previous studies, including an analysis of data from the US Flu VE Network during the Delta-predominant period [6, 29, 30]. Third, the proportion of participants reporting previous laboratory confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection was higher when the Omicron variant predominated than when the Delta variant predominated. However, we were unable to evaluate the impact of time since prior infection on VE due to small sample sizes. In contrast, prior studies have demonstrated increased protection among persons with prior SARS-CoV-2 infection history [31,32].

This investigation is subject to at least six limitations. First, small sample sizes limited our ability to evaluate VE by certain subgroups. Differences between 2- and 3-dose mRNA VE by vaccine product, age group, and underlying medical conditions have been reported from studies including larger numbers of patients or medical encounters [3, 5, 11-15]. Second, adolescents and children were not included in this analysis due to lower proportion of enrollment than in typical influenza seasons and lower percent vaccinated. Third, because of recent authorization of a booster dose for adults, waning of 3-dose VE could not be assessed. Waning effectiveness of a booster dose against COVID-19 associated emergency department or urgent care visits has been reported elsewhere, though the study population may have differed to a certain extent from that of the US Flu VE Network [5]. Fourth, with active enrollment, persons consenting to participate may differ from all patients in ways that may affect VE estimates, such as different healthcare-seeking behaviors among vaccinated and unvaccinated persons [10]. Vaccinated SARS-CoV-2 positive participants may have been more likely than unvaccinated positive participants to participate in this study. Fifth, Delta versus Omicron misclassification among the subset of infections without sequencing results is possible. Finally, increased use of at-home testing may result in changes in healthcare seeking behavior and potential biases for VE studies, which requires further examination.

VE studies that rely on active enrollment of patients meeting clinical criteria for acute respiratory illness may contribute to ongoing monitoring of effectiveness of current and future COVID-19 vaccines [8]. Studies in this outpatient setting also contribute to understanding vaccine protection against a spectrum of illness, adding effectiveness against symptomatic illness in outpatient settings to published inpatient, emergency department, and urgent care estimates for moderately severe and severe COVID-19. Systematic testing of outpatients presenting with CLI has the potential to identify SARS-CoV-2 positive cases and collect vaccination histories for VE estimates that may not be available from analyses of electronic medical records, especially as SARS-CoV-2 testing for persons with symptomatic illness becomes less frequent [33]. As SARS-CoV-2 viruses evolve and COVID-19 may continue to cause influxes of respiratory illness, systematic testing for respiratory illnesses including COVID-19 and influenza will be important to evaluate effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines and immunization schedules.

## Data Availability

De-identified data produced in the present study may be available upon reasonable request to the authors.

## Acknowledgements

Alexander Arroliga, Madhava Beeram, Kayan Dunnigan, Jason Ettlinger, Ashley Graves, Eric Hoffman, Muralidhar Jatla, Amanda McKillop, Kempapura Murthy, Manohar Mutnal, Elisa Priest, Chandni Raiyani, Arundhati Rao, Lydia Requenez, Natalie Settele, Michael Smith, Keith Stone, Jennifer Thomas, Marcus Volz, Kimberly Walker, Martha Zayed, Baylor Scott & White Health, Temple, Texas and Texas A&M University College of Medicine, Temple, Texas; Ekow Annan, Peter Daley, Krista Kniss, Angiezel Merced-Morales, Influenza Division, CDC, Atlanta, GA; Elmer Ayala, Britta Amundsen, Michael Aragones, Raul Calderon, Vennis Hong, Gabriela Jimenez, Jeniffer Kim, Jen Ku, Bruno Lewin, Ashley McDaniel, Alexandria Reyes, Sally Shaw, Harp Takhar, Alicia Torres, Pasadena Medical Office Urgent Care Staff, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, California; Rachael Burganowski, Erika Kiniry, Kathryn A. Moser, Matt Nguyen, Suzie Park, Stacie Wellwood, Brianna Wickersham, Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, Washington; Juan Alvarado-Batres, Saydee Benz, Hannah Berger, Adam Bissonnette, Joshua Blake, Krystal Boese, Emily Botten, Jarod Boyer, Michaela Braun, Brianna Breu, Gina Burbey, Caleb Cravillion, Christian Delgadillo, Amber Donnerbauer, Tim Dziedzic, Joseph Eddy, Heather Edgren, Alex Ermeling, Kelsey Ewert, Connie Fehrenbach, Rachel Fernandez, Wayne Frome, Sherri Guzinski, Linda Heeren, David Herda, Mitchell Hertel, Garrett Heuer, Erin Higdon, Lynn Ivacic, Lee Jepsen, Steve Kaiser, Julie Karl, Bailey Keffer, Jennifer King, Tamara Kronenwetter Koepel, Stephanie Kohl, Sarah Kohn, Diane Kohnhorst, Erik Kronholm, Thao Le, Alaura Lemieux, Carrie Marcis, Megan Maronde, Isaac McCready, Karen McGreevey, Jennifer Meece, Nidhi Mehta, Daniel Miesbauer, Vicki Moon, Jennifer Moran, Collin Nikolai, Brooke Olson, Jeremy Olstadt, Lisa Ott, Nan Pan, Cory Pike, DeeAnn Polacek, Martha Presson, Nicole Price, Christopher Rayburn, Chris Reardon, Miriah Rotar, Carla Rottscheit, Jacklyn Salzwedel, Juan Saucedo, Kelly Scheffen, Charity Schug, Kristin Seyfert, Ram Shrestha, Alexander Slenczka, Elisha Stefanski, Melissa Strupp, Megan Tichenor, Lyndsay Watkins, Anna Zachow, Ben Zimmerman, Marshfield Clinic Research Institute, Marshfield, Wisconsin; Sarah Bauer, Kim Beney, Caroline K. Cheng, Nahla Faraj, Amy Getz, Michelle Grissom, Michelle Groesbeck, Samantha Harrison, Kristen Henson, Kim Jermanus, Emileigh Johnson, Anne Kaniclides, Armanda Kimberly, Lois E. Lamerato, Adam Lauring, Regina Lehmann-Wandell, E. J. McSpadden, Louis Nabors, Rachel Truscon, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan and Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan; G.K. Balasubramani, Todd Bear, Jared Bobeck, Erin Bowser, Karen Clarke, Lloyd G. Clarke, Klancie Dauer, Chris Deluca, Blair Dierks, Linda Haynes, Robert Hickey, Monika Johnson, Andrea Jonsson, Nancy Luosang, Leah McKown, Alanna Peterson, Demetria Phaturos, Andrew Rectenwald, Theresa M. Sax, Miles Stiegler, Michael Susick, Joe Suyama, Louise Taylor, Sara Walters, Alexandra Weissman, John V. Williams, University of Pittsburgh Schools of the Health Sciences and University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; Marcia Blair, Juliana Carter, Jim Chappell, Emma Copen, Meredith Denney, Kellie Graes, Natasha Halasa, Chris Lindsell, Zhouwen Liu, Stephanie Longmire, Rendie McHenry, Laura Short, His-Nien Tan, Denise Vargas, Jesse Wrenn, Dayna Wyatt, Yuwei Zhu, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee; Strain Surveillance and Emerging Variant Bioinformatics Working Group.

## Footnotes

*   **Funding:** This work was supported by the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention through contracts 75D30121C11513, 75D30121C11519, 75D30121C11529, 75D30121C11909, 75D30121C12246, 75D30121C12279, and 75D30121C12339. At Vanderbilt, the project was also funded by the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS) Clinical Translational Science Award (CTSA) Program, award number 5UL1TR002243-03. At Pittsburgh, the project was also supported by the National Institutes of Health through grant UL1TR001857.

*   **Disclaimers:** The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Vaccination data from Pennsylvania were supplied by the Bureau of Health Statistics & Registries, Pennsylvania Department of Health, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania. The Pennsylvania Department of Health specifically disclaims responsibility for any analyses, interpretations, or conclusions.

*   **Disclosures:** Ana Florea reports unrelated institutional grant support for research from Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Moderna, and Pfizer. Carlos G. Grijalva reports consulting fees from Merck, Pfizer, and Sanofi Pasteur, and institutional grant support from the Agency for Health Care Research and Quality, Campbell Alliance/Syneos Health, the Food and Drug Administration, and the National Institutes of Health. Emily T. Martin reports institutional grant support from Merck. Arnold S. Monto reports personal fees from Sanofi and nonfinancial support from Seqirus. Mary Patricia Nowalk reports unrelated institutional grant support and personal fees from Merck Sharp & Dohme and institutional investigator-initiated grant support from Sanofi Pasteur. Sara Y. Tartof reports unrelated institutional grant support from Pfizer and GlaxoSmithKline. No other potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.

*   1 See 45 C.F.R. part 46; 21 C.F.R part 56

*   Received April 6, 2022.
*   Revision received April 6, 2022.
*   Accepted April 10, 2022.


*   © 2022, Posted by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

This article is a US Government work. It is not subject to copyright under 17 USC 105 and is also made available for use under a CC0 license

## References

1.  1.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. COVID-19 ACIP Vaccine Recommendations. Accessed March 14, 2022. [https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/hcp/acip-recs/vacc-specific/covid-19.html](https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/hcp/acip-recs/vacc-specific/covid-19.html)
    
    

2.  2.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Science Brief: Omicron (B.1.1.529) Variant. Accessed March 14, 2022. [https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/science/science-briefs/scientific-brief-omicron-variant.html](https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/science/science-briefs/scientific-brief-omicron-variant.html)
    
    

3.  3.Thompson MG, Natarajan K, Irving SA, et al. Effectiveness of a Third Dose of mRNA Vaccines Against COVID-19-Associated Emergency Department and Urgent Care Encounters and Hospitalizations Among Adults During Periods of Delta and Omicron Variant Predominance - VISION Network, 10 States, August 2021-January 2022. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2022;71:139–145. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm7104e3.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.15585/mmwr.mm7104e3&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=35085224&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2022%2F04%2F10%2F2022.04.06.22273535.atom) 

4.  4.Tenforde MW, Patel MM, Gaglani M, et al. Effectiveness of a Third Dose of Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna Vaccines in Preventing COVID-19 Hospitalization Among Immunocompetent and Immunocompromised Adults - United States, August-December 2021. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2022;71:118–124. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm7104a2.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.15585/mmwr.mm7104a2&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=35085218&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2022%2F04%2F10%2F2022.04.06.22273535.atom) 

5.  5.Ferdinands JM, Rao S, Dixon BE, et al. Waning 2-Dose and 3-Dose Effectiveness of mRNA Vaccines Against COVID-19-Associated Emergency Department and Urgent Care Encounters and Hospitalizations Among Adults During Periods of Delta and Omicron Variant Predominance - VISION Network, 10 States, August 2021-January 2022. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2022;71:255–263. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm7107e2.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.15585/mmwr.mm7107e2&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=35176007&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2022%2F04%2F10%2F2022.04.06.22273535.atom) 

6.  6.Chung JR, Kim SS, Belongia EA, et al. Vaccine effectiveness against COVID-19 among symptomatic persons aged ≥12 years with reported contact with COVID-19 cases, February-September 2021. Influenza Other Respir Viruses. 2022. doi: 10.1111/irv.12973.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1111/irv.12973&link_type=DOI) 

7.  7.Nemet I, Kliker L, Lustig Y, et al. Third BNT162b2 Vaccination Neutralization of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron Infection. N Engl J Med. 2022;386:492–494. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc2119358.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1056/NEJMc2119358&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=34965337&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2022%2F04%2F10%2F2022.04.06.22273535.atom) 

8.  8.Chung JR, Kim SS, Jackson ML, et al. Clinical Symptoms Among Ambulatory Patients Tested for SARS-CoV-2. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2021;8:ofaa576. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofaa576.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1093/ofid/ofaa576&link_type=DOI) 

9.  9.O’Toole Á, Scher E, Underwood A, Jackson B, Hill V, McCrone JT, et al. Assignment of epidemiological lineages in an emerging pandemic using the pangolin tool. Virus Evolution. 2021 Sep 1;7(2):veab064.
    
    

10. 10.Jackson ML, Nelson JC. The test-negative design for estimating influenza vaccine effectiveness. Vaccine. 2013 Apr 19;31(17):2165–8.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.vaccine.2013.02.053&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=23499601&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2022%2F04%2F10%2F2022.04.06.22273535.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000318329400010&link_type=ISI) 

11. 11.Accorsi EK, Britton A, Fleming-Dutra KE, Smith ZR, Shang N, Derado G, et al. Association Between 3 Doses of mRNA COVID-19 Vaccine and Symptomatic Infection Caused by the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron and Delta Variants. JAMA. 2022 Feb 15;327(7):639–51.
    
    

12. 12.Tseng HF, Ackerson BK, Luo Y, Sy LS, Talarico CA, Tian Y, et al. Effectiveness of mRNA-1273 against SARS-CoV-2 Omicron and Delta variants. Nat Med. 2022 Feb 21;1–1.
    
    

13. 13.Abu-Raddad LJ, Chemaitelly H, Ayoub HH, et al. Effect of mRNA Vaccine Boosters against SARS-CoV-2 Omicron Infection in Qatar. N Engl J Med. 2022. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2200797.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1056/NEJMoa2200797&link_type=DOI) 

14. 14.Andrews N, Stowe J, Kirsebom F, et al. Covid-19 Vaccine Effectiveness against the Omicron (B.1.1.529) Variant. N Engl J Med. 2022. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2119451.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1056/NEJMoa2119451&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=35249272&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2022%2F04%2F10%2F2022.04.06.22273535.atom) 

15. 15.Abu-Raddad LJ, Chemaitelly H, Bertollini R; National Study Group for COVID-19 Vaccination. Waning mRNA-1273 Vaccine Effectiveness against SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Qatar. N Engl J Med. 2022:NEJMc2119432. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc2119432.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1056/NEJMc2119432&link_type=DOI) 

16. 16.Chemaitelly H, Tang P, Hasan MR, Waning of BNT162b2 Vaccine Protection against SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Qatar. N Engl J Med. 2021;385:e83. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2114114.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1056/NEJMoa2114114&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=34614327&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2022%2F04%2F10%2F2022.04.06.22273535.atom) 

17. 17.Goldberg Y, Mandel M, Bar-On YM, et al. Waning Immunity after the BNT162b2 Vaccine in Israel. N Engl J Med. 2021;385:e85. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2114228.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1056/NEJMoa2114228&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=34706170&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2022%2F04%2F10%2F2022.04.06.22273535.atom) 

18. 18.Andrews N, Tessier E, Stowe J, et al. Duration of Protection against Mild and Severe Disease by Covid-19 Vaccines. N Engl J Med. 2022 Jan 7;386(4):340–350. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2115481.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1056/NEJMoa2115481&link_type=DOI) 

19. 19.Chemaitelly H, Tang P, Hasan MR, Waning of BNT162b2 Vaccine Protection against SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Qatar. N Engl J Med. 2021;385:e83. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2114114.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1056/NEJMoa2114114&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=34614327&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2022%2F04%2F10%2F2022.04.06.22273535.atom) 

20. 20.Feikin DR, Higdon MM, Abu-Raddad LJ, et al. Duration of effectiveness of vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 disease: results of a systematic review and meta-regression. Lancet. 2022;399:924–944. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)00152-0.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/S0140-6736(22)00152-0&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=http://www.n&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2022%2F04%2F10%2F2022.04.06.22273535.atom) 

21. 21.Nordström P, Ballin M, Nordström A. Risk of infection, hospitalisation, and death up to 9 months after a second dose of COVID-19 vaccine: a retrospective, total population cohort study in Sweden. Lancet. 2022;399:814–823. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)00089-7.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/S0140-6736(22)00089-7&link_type=DOI) 

22. 22.Tenforde MW, Self WH, Adams K, et al. Association Between mRNA Vaccination and COVID-19 Hospitalization and Disease Severity. JAMA. 2021;326:2043–2054. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.19499.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1001/jama.2021.19499&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=34734975&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2022%2F04%2F10%2F2022.04.06.22273535.atom) 

23. 23.Andrews N, Stowe J, Kirsebom F, et al. Effectiveness of COVID-19 booster vaccines against covid-19 related symptoms, hospitalisation and death in England. Nat Med. 2022. doi: 10.1038/s41591-022-01699-1.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1038/s41591-022-01699-1&link_type=DOI) 

24. 24.Bozio CH, Grannis SJ, Naleway AL, et al. Laboratory-Confirmed COVID-19 Among Adults Hospitalized with COVID-19-Like Illness with Infection-Induced or mRNA Vaccine-Induced SARS-CoV-2 Immunity - Nine States, January-September 2021. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2021:1539–1544. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm7044e1.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.15585/mmwr.mm7044e1&link_type=DOI) 

25. 25.Embi PJ, Levy ME, Naleway AL, et al. Effectiveness of two-dose vaccination with mRNA COVID-19 vaccines against COVID-19-associated hospitalizations among immunocompromised adults-Nine States, January-September 2021. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2021;70:1553–1559. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm7044e3.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.15585/mmwr.mm7044e3&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=http://www.n&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2022%2F04%2F10%2F2022.04.06.22273535.atom) 

26. 26.Lauring AS, Tenforde MW, Chappell JD, et al. Clinical severity of, and effectiveness of mRNA vaccines against, covid-19 from omicron, delta, and alpha SARS-CoV-2 variants in the United States: prospective observational study. BMJ. 2022;376:e069761. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2021-069761.
    
    [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6MzoiYm1qIjtzOjU6InJlc2lkIjtzOjIwOiIzNzYvbWFyMDlfMTAvZTA2OTc2MSI7czo0OiJhdG9tIjtzOjUwOiIvbWVkcnhpdi9lYXJseS8yMDIyLzA0LzEwLzIwMjIuMDQuMDYuMjIyNzM1MzUuYXRvbSI7fXM6ODoiZnJhZ21lbnQiO3M6MDoiIjt9) 

27. 27.Lewis NM, Naioti EA, Self WH, et al. Effectiveness of mRNA vaccines in preventing COVID-19 hospitalization by age and burden of chronic medical conditions among immunocompetent US adults, March-August 2021. J Infect Dis. 2021:jiab619. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiab619.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1093/infdis/jiab619&link_type=DOI) 

28. 28.Tartof SY, Slezak JM, Puzniak L, Hong V, Frankland TB, Ackerson BK, et al. Effectiveness of a third dose of BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine in a large US health system: A retrospective cohort study. The Lancet Regional Health - Americas. 2022 Feb 14;100198.
    
    

29. 29.Andrejko KL, Pry J, Myers JF, et al. Predictors of SARS-CoV-2 infection following high-risk exposure. Clin Infect Dis. 2021 Dec 21:ciab1040. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciab1040.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1093/cid/ciab1040&link_type=DOI) 

30. 30.Fisher KA, Tenforde MW, Feldstein LR, et al. Community and Close Contact Exposures Associated with COVID-19 Among Symptomatic Adults ≥18 Years in 11 Outpatient Health Care Facilities - United States, July 2020. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020 Sep 11;69(36):1258–1264. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6936a5.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.15585/mmwr.mm6936a5&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=32915165&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2022%2F04%2F10%2F2022.04.06.22273535.atom) 

31. 31.Altarawneh HN, Chemaitelly H, Hasan MR, et al. Protection against the Omicron Variant from Previous SARS-CoV-2 Infection. N Engl J Med. 2022:NEJMc2200133. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc2200133.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1056/NEJMc2200133&link_type=DOI) 

32. 32.León TM, Dorabawila V, Nelson L, Lutterloh E, Bauer UE, Backenson B, et al. COVID-19 Cases and Hospitalizations by COVID-19 Vaccination Status and Previous COVID-19 Diagnosis — California and New York, May–November 2021. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2022 Jan 28;71(4):125–131. Doi 10.15585/mmwr/mm7104e1.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.15585/mmwr.mm7104e1&link_type=DOI) 

33. 33.Flannery B, Meece JK, Williams JV, et al. Systematic Testing for Influenza and Coronavirus Disease 2019 Among Patients With Respiratory Illness. Clin Infect Dis. 2021;72:e426–e428. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa1
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1093/cid/ciaa1&link_type=DOI)