Abstract
Background Antimicrobial resistance is a major healthcare burden, exasperated when it extends to multiple drugs. While cross-resistance across multiple drugs is well-studied experimentally, it is not the case in clinical settings, and especially not while considering confounding. In addition, bacteria from different sample sources may have undergone different evolutionary trajectories, therefore examining cross-resistance across sources is desirable.
Methods We employed additive Bayesian network (ABN) modelling to examine antibiotic cross-resistance in five major bacterial species, obtained from different sources (urine, wound, blood, and sputum) in a clinical setting, collected in a large hospital in Israel over a 4-year period. ABN modelling allowed for examination of the relationship between resistance to different drugs while controlling for major confounding variables.
Findings Patterns of cross-resistance differ across sample sources. Importantly, even when positive cross-resistance exists between two antibiotics in different sample sources, its magnitude may vary substantially.
Interpretation Our results highlight the importance of considering sample sources when assessing likelihood of antibiotic cross-resistance and determining antibiotic treatment regimens and policies.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study was supported by the Israel Science Foundation (ISF 1286/21).
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board (Helsinki) Committee of Meir Medical Center. Since this was a retrospective study, using archived medical records, an exemption from informed consent was granted by the Helsinki Committee.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Data are proprietary but can be made available upon reasonable request from the authors.
