Abstract
Higher educational attainment is observationally associated with lower risk of Alzheimer’s disease. However, the biological mechanisms underpinning this association remain unclear. The protective effect of education on Alzheimer’s disease may be mediated via increased brain reserve. We used two-sample Mendelian randomization to explore putative causal relationships between educational attainment, structural brain reserve as proxied by MRI phenotypes, and Alzheimer’s disease.
Summary statistics were obtained from genome-wide association studies of educational attainment (n=1,131,881), late-onset Alzheimer’s disease (35,274 cases, 59,163 controls), and 15 measures of grey or white matter macro- or micro-structure derived from structural or diffusion MRI (nmax=33,211). We conducted univariable Mendelian randomization analyses to investigate bidirectional associations between (i) educational attainment and Alzheimer’s disease, (ii) educational attainment and imaging-derived phenotypes, (iii) imaging-derived phenotypes and Alzheimer’s disease. Multivariable Mendelian randomization was used to assess whether brain structure phenotypes mediated the protective effect of education on Alzheimer’s disease risk.
Genetically-proxied educational attainment was inversely associated with Alzheimer’s disease (odds ratio per standard deviation increase in genetically-predicted years of schooling = 0.70, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.60, 0.80). There was also evidence for positive associations between genetically-predicted educational attainment and four cortical macro-structure metrics (surface area: β=0.30, 95% CI: 0.20, 0.40; volume: β=0.29, 95% CI: 0.20, 0.37; intrinsic curvature: β=0.18, 95% CI: 0.11, 0.25; local gyrification index: β=0.21, 95% CI: 0.11, 0.31), as well as inverse associations with cortical intracellular volume fraction (β=-0.09, 95% CI: − 0.15, −0.03) and white matter hyperintensities volume (β=-0.14, 95% CI: −0.23, −0.05).
Genetically-proxied levels of three cortical macro-structure metrics were positively associated with years of education (surface area: β=0.13, 95% CI: 0.10, 0.16; volume: β=0.15, 95% CI: 0.11, 0.19; intrinsic curvature: β=0.12, 95% CI: 0.04, 0.19). We found no evidence of associations between genetically-predicted imaging-derived phenotypes and Alzheimer’s disease. The inverse association of genetically-predicted education with Alzheimer’s disease did not attenuate after adjusting for imaging-derived phenotypes in multivariable analyses.
Our results provide support for a protective causal effect of educational attainment on Alzheimer’s disease risk, as well as bi-directional causal associations between education and several brain macro- and micro-structure metrics. However, we did not find evidence that these structural markers affect risk of Alzheimer’s disease. The protective effect of education on Alzheimer’s disease may be mediated via other measures of brain reserve not included in the present study, or by alternative mechanisms.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
AS has been supported by a studentship funded by the Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge. VW was funded by the Bowring Research Fellowship from St. Catharine's College, Cambridge. RAIB was supported by a British Academy Postdoctoral fellowship and by the Autism Research Trust. BIP is supported by a Clinical Lectureship funded by University of Cambridge. SB is supported by a Sir Henry Dale Fellowship jointly funded by the Wellcome Trust and the Royal Society (204623/Z/16/Z) and supported by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre (BRC-1215-20014). Data were curated and analyzed using a computational facility funded by an MRC research infrastructure award (MR/M009041/1) to the School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge and supported by the mental health theme of the NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre. The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NIH, NHS, the NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The present study is a secondary analysis of publicly available data sources, except for the in-house GWAS analysis of UK Biobank brain imaging data. The in-house GWAS has an exemption from ethical approval from the Human Biology Research Ethics Committee of the University of Cambridge.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Summary statistics from the in-house GWAS of cortical macro- and micro-structure are available on publication. Individual-level imaging and genetic data used for the in-house GWAS analyses may be requested through the UK Biobank (https://www.ukbiobank.ac.uk/), and the code used in generating the imaging phenotypes is available on GitHub (https://github.com/ucam-department-of-psychiatry/UKB). Summary-level genetic association estimates with all other phenotypes were obtained from publicly available published GWAS, and can be accessed from the respective publications as cited in the article. R code for reproducing all MR analyses can be found on https://github.com/as2970/EA_brain_AD_MR.
Abbreviations
- CI
- confidence interval
- FWER
- family-wise error rate
- GWAS
- genome-wide association study
- IGAP
- International Genomics of Alzheimer’s Project
- IQ
- intelligence quotient
- IVW
- inverse-variance weighted
- LD
- linkage disequilibrium
- MAF
- minor allele frequency
- MR
- Mendelian randomization
- MR-PRESSO
- Mendelian randomization pleiotropy residual sum and outlier
- OR
- odds ratio
- SD
- standard deviation
- SNP
- single nucleotide polymorphism
