ABSTRACT
Background As the body of evidence on COVID-19 and post-vaccination outcomes continues to expand, this analysis sought to evaluate the public health impact of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine, BNT162b2, during the first year of its rollout in the US.
Methods A combined Markov decision tree model compared clinical and economic outcomes of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine (BNT162b2) versus no vaccination in individuals aged ≥12 years. Age-stratified epidemiological, clinical, economic, and humanistic parameters were derived from existing data and published literature. Scenario analysis explored the impact of using lower and upper bounds of parameters on the results. The health benefits were estimated as the number of COVID-19 symptomatic cases, hospitalizations and deaths averted, and Quality Adjusted Life Years (QALYs) saved. The economic benefits were estimated as the amount of healthcare and societal cost savings associated with the vaccine-preventable health outcomes.
Results It was estimated that, in 2021, the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine (BNT162b2) contributed to averting almost 9 million symptomatic cases, close to 700,000 hospitalizations, and over 110,000 deaths, resulting in an estimated $30.4 billion direct healthcare cost savings, $43.7 billion indirect cost savings related to productivity loss, as well as discounted gains of 1.1 million QALYs. Scenario analyses showed that these results were robust; the use of alternative plausible ranges of parameters did not change the interpretation of the findings.
Conclusions The Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine (BNT162b2) contributed to generate substantial public health impact and vaccine-preventable cost savings in the first year of its rollout in the US. The vaccine was estimated to prevent millions of COVID-19 symptomatic cases and thousands of hospitalizations and deaths, and these averted outcomes translated into cost-savings in the billions of US dollars and thousands of QALYs saved. As only direct impacts of vaccination were considered, these estimates may be conservative.
Why carry out this study?
Assessing the population-level health and economic impact of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine (BNT162b2) is important for policy makers and payers who support decision-making and investment in vaccination.
These analyses may be relevant to the public, especially those who remain hesitant to COVID-19 vaccination.
What was learned from the study?
This study showed that Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine (BNT162b2) was an effective strategy that contributed to generating substantial public health impact and economic gains in the US in 2021
The vaccine was estimated to prevent millions of COVID-19 symptomatic cases and thousands of hospitalizations and deaths, and these averted outcomes translated into cost-savings in the billions of US dollars and millions of QALYs saved
The study highlights the importance of continuing widespread uptake of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine (BNT162b2) to prevent COVID-19 related disease and generate substantial benefits from a broad, patient-centric, societal perspective
Competing Interest Statement
Manuela Di Fusco, Mary M. Moran, Timothy L. Wiemken, Alejandro Cane, and Jingyan Yang are employees of Pfizer and may hold stock or stock options. Kinga Marczell, Kristen A. Deger, Solene de Boisvilliers, and Julie Roiz are employees of Evidera, which was a paid consultant to Pfizer in connection with the development of this study. Shailja Vaghela is an employee of HealthEcon Consulting, Inc. and an external consultant for Pfizer who has received consulting fees from Pfizer in connection with the development of this study and manuscript.
Funding Statement
This study was sponsored by Pfizer Inc.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Data generated or analyzed during this study are available upon request.
