Abstract
Several studies have reported a waning of the effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines. We report real-life vaccine effectiveness in Hungary, estimated with the screening method, in 2021, i.e., covering the dominance of both the Alpha and the Delta variant, and including the booster roll-out. Hungary is in the unique position to use six different vaccines (including the Sputnik V and Sinopharm vaccines, for which limited evidence was available prior to the present study) in the same, relatively homogeneous population. All vaccines provided high level of protection initially which declined over time. While the picture is different in each age group, the waning of immunity is apparent for all vaccines and especially in the younger age groups and the Sinopharm, Sputnik-V and AstraZeneca vaccines, which performed similarly. This is clearly reversed by booster doses, more prominent for those vaccines, where recipients were more likely to take the booster dose (which were the aforementioned three vaccines). Booster doses were almost exclusively mRNA vaccines. Overall, two vaccines, Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna tend to produce the best results in all age groups, and even with waning taken into account.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study did not receive any specific funding. The Mathematical Modelling and Epidemiology Task Force was supported by National Re-search, Development and Innovation Office (NKFIH).
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Scientific and Research Ethics Committee of Medical Research Council gave ethical approval for this work.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
The raw data is not publicly available, but the analysis script - with simulated data - is available at https://github.com/tamas-ferenci/VaccineEffectivenessEstimationScreeningSpline.
https://github.com/tamas-ferenci/VaccineEffectivenessEstimationScreeningSpline
