I. Abstract
We investigated the impact of new state laws requiring or encouraging education on Child Sexual Abuse (“CSA”) in schools. From 2005 through June, 2019, 31 states enacted such laws. By comparing the states with and without those laws using a difference-in-differences calculation, and controlling for changes in population, wages, employment and other relevant CSA laws, we conclude that most likely such laws:
Increased the number of CSA reports made to state departments of child services each year, and
Decreased the number of CSA cases that those departments were able to substantiate from the reported cases.
We had hypothesized, however, that effective educational content would cause more reported cases to be substantiated as people learn what to report, but implementation of the new laws apparently instead increased the proportion of unsubstantiated reports of CSA.
Our research does not tell us whether that is good or bad. In the best scenario, children are helped, but at the expense of potentially hurting those who are wrongly accused. In another scenario, children and the wrongly accused are hurt. In arguably the worst scenario, child are hurt and perpetrators are helped.
We recommend that policymakers support research to learn why the laws are shifting more cases to unsubstantiated. Depending on the answer, the laws may be worthwhile to continue but with a modification to how the reporting is done, creating a new path for reporting troublesome but lawful activity. Such a modification would preserve the benefit to children while avoiding the harm to adults.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study did not receive any funding
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
This study was conducted under the oversight of the University of Michigan Health Sciences and Behavioral Sciences Institutional Review Board (IRB-HSBS), Project Prevent: Assessing the Value of Education-Based Legislative Interventions Aimed At Reducing Child Sex Abuse Study eResearch ID: HUM00204536, Initial IRB Approval Date: 9/3/2021
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript
