Abstract
Wastewater surveillance is a useful complement to clinical testing for managing COVID-19. While good agreement has been found between community-scale wastewater and clinical data, little is known about sub-community relationships between the two data types. Moreover, effects of non-detects in qPCR wastewater data have been largely overlooked. We used data collected from September 2020–June 2021 in Davis, California (USA) to address these gaps. By applying a predictive probability model to spatially disaggregate clinical results, we compared wastewater and clinical data at the community scale, in 16 sampling zones isolating city sub-regions, and in seven zones isolating high-priority building complexes or neighborhoods. We found reasonable agreement between wastewater and clinical data at all scales. Greater activity (i.e., more frequent detections) in clinical data tended to be mirrored in wastewater data. Small, isolated clinical-data spikes were often matched as well. We also developed a method for handling such non-detects using multiple imputation and compared results to (i) single imputation using half the qPCR limit of detection, (ii) single imputation using maximum qPCR cycle number, and (iii) non-detect censoring. Apparent wastewater trends were significantly influenced by non-detect handling. Multiple imputation improved correlation relative to single imputation, though not necessarily relative to censoring.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study was carried out with financial support from Healthy Davis Together.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The University of California, Davis IRB Administration waived ethical approval for this work as per 45 CFR 46.102 (e).
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced in the study are either provided in the SI or available upon reasonable request to the authors.
