Abstract
Visual shape completion is a canonical perceptual organization process that integrates spatially distributed edge information into unified representations of objects. People with schizophrenia show difficulty in discriminating completed shapes but the brain networks and functional connections underlying this perceptual difference remain poorly understood. Also unclear is whether similar neural differences arise in bipolar disorder or vary across the schizo-bipolar spectrum. To address these topics, we scanned (fMRI) people with schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, or no psychiatric illness during rest and during a task in which they discriminated configurations that formed or failed to form completed shapes (illusory and fragmented condition, respectively). Multivariate pattern differences were identified on the cortical surface using 360 predefined parcels and 12 functional networks composed of such parcels. Brain activity flow mapping was used to evaluate the likely involvement of resting-state connections for shape completion. Illusory/fragmented task activation differences (“modulations”) in the dorsal attention network (DAN) could distinguish people with schizophrenia (AUCs>.85) and could trans-diagnostically predict cognitive disorganization severity. Activity flow over functional connections from the DAN could predict secondary visual network modulations in each group, except among those with schizophrenia. The secondary visual network was strongly and similarly modulated in each subject group. Task modulations were dispersed over a larger number of networks in patients compared to controls. In summary, abnormal DAN activity emerges during perceptual organization in schizophrenia and may be related to improper attention-related feedback into secondary visual areas. Patients with either disorder may compensate for abnormal perception by relying upon non-visual networks.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This work was funded by a National Institutes of Health Mentored Career Development Award (K01MH108783) to BPK.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The study followed the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Rutgers University Institutional Review Board.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
↵* Co-senior authors
Dedications: None
Declarations of Interest: The authors declare no competing conflicts of interest.
The manuscript has been shortened and the introduction and discussion have been rewritten. Certain analyses have even placed in the 'Supplementary material' near the bottom of the manuscript.
Data Availability
Neural data will be released on OpenNeuro.org along with resting-state functional connectivity matrices and unthresholded task activation maps.
