Abstract
Firms in the food industry may experience more than one contamination incident over time. In a food safety context, increasing the time between foodborne outbreaks represents a key objective for the food industry and public health officials. We demonstrate a systematic way of analyzing repeated recalls, specifically to evaluate factors that influence time to next recall and, more importantly, to identify the extent of firm learning from inter-event time. Analysis of meat/poultry recalls issued by publicly traded firms in the United States for the period 1994-2015 indicates that more diversified firms incur a smaller risk of repeat recall as firm size expands compared to firms producing primarily meat/poultry products. The hazard of a recall incident decreases with the severity of the past recall incident. Some evidence of firm learning is found, but there is no definitive evidence indicating that a firm's ability to prevent recalls grows with the number of foodborne outbreaks it has experienced. Our findings highlight the need for the design of policies that incetivize food industry to reflect more effectively on food safety incidents.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study was supported by the UEAS at Utah State University.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Section 2 (Background and Literature) has been updated. Section 3 (Methods) has been updated. Section 4 (Results) has been updated.
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors.
