Effectiveness of mRNA-1273 against SARS-CoV-2 omicron and delta variants ======================================================================== * Hung Fu Tseng * Bradley K. Ackerson * Yi Luo * Lina S. Sy * Carla A. Talarico * Yun Tian * Katia J. Bruxvoort * Julia E. Tubert * Ana Florea * Jennifer H. Ku * Gina S. Lee * Soon Kyu Choi * Harpreet S. Takhar * Michael Aragones * Lei Qian ## Abstract **Background** The recently emerged SARS-CoV-2 omicron variant raised concerns around potential escape from vaccine-elicited immunity. Limited data are available on real-world vaccine effectiveness (VE) of mRNA-1273 against omicron. Here, we report VE of 2 or 3 mRNA-1273 doses against infection and hospitalization with omicron and delta, including among immunocompromised individuals. **Methods** This test negative study was conducted at Kaiser Permanente Southern California. Cases were individuals aged ≥18 years testing positive by RT-PCR with specimens collected between 12/6/2021 and 12/23/2021 with variant determined by spike gene status. Randomly sampled test negative controls were 5:1 matched to cases by age, sex, race/ethnicity, and specimen collection date. Conditional logistic regression models were used to evaluate adjusted odds ratio (aOR) of vaccination with mRNA-1273 doses between cases and controls. VE(%) was calculated as (1-aOR)x100. **Results** 6657 test positive cases (44% delta, 56% omicron) were included. The 2-dose VE against omicron infection was 30.4% (95% CI, 5.0%-49.0%) at 14-90 days after vaccination and declined quickly thereafter. The 3-dose VE was 95.2% (93.4%-96.4%) against delta infection and 62.5% (56.2%-67.9%) against omicron infection. The 3-dose VE against omicron infection was low among immunocompromised individuals (11.5%; 0.0%-66.5%). None of the cases (delta or omicron) vaccinated with 3 doses were hospitalized compared to 53 delta and 2 omicron unvaccinated cases. **Conclusions** VE of 3 mRNA-1273 doses against infection with delta was high and durable, but VE against omicron infection was lower. VE against omicron infection was particularly low among immunocompromised individuals. No 3-dose recipients were hospitalized for COVID-19. ## Introduction The recently emerged severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) omicron (B.1.1.529) variant contains multiple novel spike (S) protein mutations, raising concerns about escape from naturally acquired or vaccine-elicited immunity.1 Several *in vitro* studies reported reduced vaccine-induced neutralization activity against omicron.2,3 Specifically, sera from individuals vaccinated with 2 doses of mRNA coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines, including mRNA-1273 (Moderna COVID-19 vaccine), showed substantial reductions in neutralization activity against omicron compared with wild-type SARS-CoV-2.2,4,5 However, an mRNA-1273 booster increased neutralization activity against omicron, albeit lower than wild-type.2,3 We previously reported high and durable vaccine effectiveness (VE) of mRNA-1273 against infection and hospitalization from COVID-19 caused by other emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants, including delta (B.1.617.2).6 Limited data are available on real-world VE of mRNA-1273 against omicron. As omicron has a deletion at positions 69-70, omicron-positive specimens exhibit S-gene target failure (SGTF). To provide timely results, we used SGTF as a marker for omicron in specimens collected during December 2021 for these analyses. The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and World Health Organization advised that SGTF from select COVID-19 RT-PCR assays, including the Thermo Fisher TaqPath™ COVID-19 Combo kits, can be used as a screening method for omicron;7,8 SGTF has served as a proxy in the United Kingdom for identifying omicron.9,10 In Southern California where delta was the dominant strain before omicron,11 and the proportion of SGTF among SARS-CoV-2 positive specimens increased from 2.7% to 83.9% from 12/06/2021 to 12/23/2021, SGTF can be used as a proxy for omicron, while positive specimens negative for SGTF can be considered delta. Herein, we report VE of mRNA-1273 against infection and hospitalization with omicron and delta within the Kaiser Permanente Southern California (KPSC) healthcare system in the United States. ## Methods ### Study setting KPSC is an integrated healthcare system that provides care to over 4.6 million sociodemographically diverse health plan members at 15 hospitals and associated medical offices across Southern California. Comprehensive electronic health records (EHRs) included information on demographics, immunizations, diagnoses, laboratory tests, procedures, and pharmacy records. KPSC began administering mRNA-1273 on 12/18/2020. Outside COVID-19 vaccinations were imported into members’ EHR daily from external sources, including the California Immunization Registry, Care Everywhere (system on the Epic EHR platform that allows healthcare systems to exchange patients’ medical information), claims (e.g., retail pharmacies), and self-report by members (with valid documentation). ### Laboratory methods Molecular diagnostic testing for SARS-CoV-2 is available to members who request it for any reason, before procedures and hospital admissions, with and without symptoms. Specimens were primarily collected using nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swabs (for symptomatic individuals) or saliva (for asymptomatic individuals). Specimens were tested using RT-PCR TaqPath COVID-19 High-Throughput Combo Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific). SGTF is defined as a RT-PCR test in which N and ORF1ab genes were detected (Ct values < 37), but S gene was not detected. Specimens with SGTF were considered to be omicron, whereas positive specimens without SGTF were considered to be delta. ### Study design This study employed a test negative design. Test positive cases included individuals who tested positive by the RT-PCR TaqPath COVID-19 kit, with specimens taken between 12/6/2021 and 12/23/2021, were aged ≥18 years, and had ≥12 months of KPSC membership before the specimen collection date (needed to ascertain exposure status and covariates accurately). Individuals were excluded if they received a COVID-19 vaccine other than mRNA-1273, any dose of mRNA-1273 <14 days before the specimen collection date, 2 or 3 doses of mRNA-1273 <24 days apart from previous dose, or >3 doses of mRNA-1273 prior to the specimen collection date. Additional exclusions included a positive SARS-CoV-2 test or COVID-19 diagnosis code ≤90 days before the specimen collection date. COVID-19 hospitalization included hospitalization with a SARS-CoV-2 positive test or hospitalization ≤7 days after a SARS-CoV-2 positive test. COVID-19 hospitalization was confirmed by manual chart review conducted by a physician investigator [BKA] to verify the presence of severe COVID-19 symptoms. Test negative controls included all individuals who tested negative with specimens taken between 12/6/2021 and 12/23/2021 and with the same age and membership requirement as cases. Randomly sampled test negative controls were 5:1 matched to cases by age (18-44 years, 45-64 years, 65-74 years, and ≥75 years), sex, race/ethnicity (non-Hispanic White, non-Hispanic Black, Hispanic, non-Hispanic Asian, and other/unknown), and specimen collection date. Matching was conducted separately for the 1-, 2-, and 3-dose VE analysis. To accommodate variation in real-world practice, analyses did not require dose 3 to be ≥6 months from dose 2, as some members received dose 3 at a shorter interval in this study. ### Exposure The exposure of interest was 1, 2, or 3 doses of mRNA-1273. Dose 3 in this analysis included both the 100-µg additional primary dose in immunocompromised persons, as well as the 50-µg and 100-ug booster dose in adults. ### Covariates Demographic and clinical covariates were extracted from EHRs.12 Variables assessed included socioeconomic status (Medicaid, neighborhood median household income), medical center area, pregnancy status, KPSC physician/employee status, smoking, body mass index, Charlson comorbidity score, autoimmune conditions, healthcare utilization (virtual, outpatient, emergency department, and inpatient encounters), preventive care (other vaccinations, screenings, and wellness visits), chronic diseases (kidney, heart, lung, and liver disease, and diabetes), and frailty index. Other variables included history of SARS-CoV-2 molecular test performed from 3/1/2020 to specimen collection date (irrespective of result), history of COVID-19 (positive SARS-CoV-2 molecular test or a COVID-19 diagnosis code) from 3/1/2020 to specimen collection date, and immunocompromised status. ### Statistical analyses Characteristics of cases and controls for each analysis were compared by using the χ2 test or Fisher’s exact test for categorical variables and two-sample *t* test or Wilcoxon rank sum test for continuous variables. The distribution of variant type by vaccination status was tabulated. Conditional logistic regression was used to estimate the adjusted odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for vaccination against infection with delta or omicron. Analyses were adjusted for potential confounders, determined by scientific relevance, or by absolute standardized differences (ASD) >0.1 and P value <0.1. VE(%) was calculated as (1–adjusted OR)×100. VE against hospitalization with delta or omicron by number of vaccine doses was also estimated using conditional logistic regression. Due to sample size, some variables were removed from the model due to lack of model convergence. We also assessed 2-dose and 3-dose VE against infection with delta or omicron by time since receipt of mRNA-1273 dose 2 or 3 (for 2-dose VE: 14-90 days, 91-180 days, 181-270 days, and >270 days; for 3-dose VE: on or before 10/20/2021 versus on or after 10/21/2021). 10/21/2021 was chosen since it was the date the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDCs) Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) recommended a 50-µg booster of mRNA-1273 for individuals who completed their primary series ≥6 months prior.13,14 As more immunocompromised persons might have received dose 3 before the October 2021 recommendation, we conducted a separate analysis that excluded immunocompromised individuals to assess durability of protection of 3 doses in immunocompetent individuals. We also evaluated 3-dose VE in select subgroups, including by age (<65, ≥65 years), sex, race/ethnicity (Hispanic, Non-Hispanic, and others), and immunocompromised status (yes, no). Conditional logistic regression was used for the age, sex, and race/ethnicity subgroup. Unconditional logistic regression with additional adjustment of matching factors in the model was used for the immunocompromised status subgroup and time since vaccination analyses because matched sets needed to be broken for analyses in these subgroups. SAS 9.4 was used for analyses. The study was approved by KPSC Institutional Review Board. ## Results The study included 6657 test positive cases with SGTF status available; 3513 (52.8%) individuals were unvaccinated (2040 delta, 1473 omicron), and 3144 (47.2%) were vaccinated (886 delta, 2258 omicron; 100 vaccinated with 1 dose, 2648 vaccinated with 2 doses, 396 vaccinated with 3 doses). The flow chart depicting selection steps is provided in Supplementary Figure 1. The distribution of covariates by test outcomes, separated by variant type, is summarized in Table 1 (2-dose and 3-dose analyses) and Supplementary Table 1 (1-dose analysis). View this table: [Table 1.](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/01/08/2022.01.07.22268919/T1) Table 1. Characteristics of SARS-CoV-2 test positive cases and test negative controls, by variant Omicron cases appeared to be younger and more frequently had a history of COVID-19 than delta cases. In the 2-dose and 3-dose analyses, 73.9% and 73.2% of omicron cases, respectively, were among 18-44 year-olds compared to 59.2% and 61.4% of delta cases (Table 1). 13.0% and 14.9% of omicron cases in the 2-dose and 3-dose analyses, respectively, had a history of COVID-19 versus 1.7% and 2.2% of delta cases. Table 2 shows VE against delta and omicron infection or hospitalization. Overall, the 1-dose VE was 60.2% (95% CI, 42.6%-72.3%) and 20.3% (0.0%-39.8%), the 2-dose VE was 60.7% (56.5%-64.5%) and 0.0% (0.0%-3.1%), and the 3-dose VE was 95.2% (93.4%-96.4%) and 62.5% (56.2%-67.9%) against delta and omicron infection, respectively. View this table: [Table 2.](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/01/08/2022.01.07.22268919/T2) Table 2. Vaccine effectiveness of test positive SARS-CoV-2 cases among mRNA-1273 vaccinated vs. unvaccinated individuals In analyses of 2-dose VE against delta infection by time since receipt of dose 2, VE at 14-90 days was 82.8% (69.6%-90.3%) and subsequently declined, with VE of 63.6% (51.8%-72.5%) at 91-180 days, 61.4% (56.8%-65.5%) at 181-270 days, and 52.9% (43.7%-60.5%) at >270 days (Table 2, Figure 1). The 2-dose VE against omicron infection was 30.4% (5.0%-49.0%) at 14-90 days and declined quickly to 15.2% (0.0%-30.7%) at 91-180 days and 0.0% after 180 days. The 3-dose VE against delta infection was >90%, regardless of whether the third dose was received before or after 10/20/2021. For vaccinated cases, the median number of days from vaccination to positive test date was 35 and 112 days if dose 3 was received after 10/20/2021 or on and before that day, respectively. However, the VE against omicron infection was 63.6% (57.4%-68.9%) if dose 3 was received after 10/20/2021 (for vaccinated cases, median number of days from vaccination to positive test date was 36 days) and 39.1% (3.8%-61.5%) if received on or before 10/20/2021 (for vaccinated cases, median number of days from vaccination to positive test date was 103 days; Table 2). These estimates were similar in analyses excluding immunocompromised individuals, except that the VE against omicron infection increased to 49.0% (12.6%-70.2%) among immunocompetent individuals who received dose 3 before or on 10/20/21 (Table 2, Figure 2). ![Figure 1.](http://medrxiv.org/https://www.medrxiv.org/content/medrxiv/early/2022/01/08/2022.01.07.22268919/F1.medium.gif) [Figure 1.](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/01/08/2022.01.07.22268919/F1) Figure 1. Vaccine effectiveness of 2-dose mRNA-1273 against omicron and delta variants by time since vaccination ![Figure 2.](http://medrxiv.org/https://www.medrxiv.org/content/medrxiv/early/2022/01/08/2022.01.07.22268919/F2.medium.gif) [Figure 2.](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/01/08/2022.01.07.22268919/F2) Figure 2. Vaccine effectiveness of 3-dose mRNA-1273 against omicron and delta variants by time since vaccination among immunocompetent population Only 4 vaccinated delta cases were hospitalized, of whom one received 1 dose and 3 received 2 doses (Table 2). Only 2 vaccinated omicron cases were hospitalized; both received 2 doses. None of the delta or omicron cases vaccinated with 3 doses were hospitalized. In comparison, 53 delta and 2 omicron unvaccinated cases were hospitalized (Table 2). Table 3 presents the 3-dose VE against infection by subgroups. The 3-dose VE against delta was >95% across age, sex, and race/ethnicity groups but lower in the immunocompromised population (72.2% [12.2%-91.2%]). The 3-dose VE against omicron was 63.1% (56.6%-68.6%) in those <65 years and 57.1% (14.2%-78.6%) in those ≥65 years and only 11.5% (0.0%-66.5%) in the immunocompromised population compared to 63.6% (57.4%-68.9%) in the immunocompetent population. View this table: [Table 3.](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/01/08/2022.01.07.22268919/T3) Table 3. Vaccine effectiveness of test positive SARS-CoV-2 cases by subgroups among mRNA-1273 (3 doses) vaccinated vs. unvaccinated individuals ## Discussion We evaluated the effectiveness of mRNA-1273 against the highly mutated omicron variant in a sociodemographically diverse population in a real-world setting. Between 12/6/2021 and 12/23/2021, the rapidly increasing proportion of omicron positive specimens indicated unprecedented transmissibility and raised concerns over protection conferred by currently authorized or licensed COVID-19 vaccines. Our study demonstrates that while VE of 2 doses of mRNA-1273 against infection with delta is high and wanes slowly, consistent with our previous findings,6,12 the 2-dose VE against omicron infection is poor and wanes quickly, providing minimal protection of 30% within 3 months of vaccination and virtually none thereafter. In addition, while the 3-dose VE against infection with delta is high and durable, that against omicron is lower. Nevertheless, the point estimate (>50%) and lower bound of the 95% CI (>30%) still meet the US FDA criteria for emergency use authorization for 2 doses of COVID-19 vaccines.15 Also, this VE is similar to that against asymptomatic infection observed in the trial (63.0% [56.6%-68.5%]).16 The VE of 3 doses of mRNA-1273 against infection with omicron is negligible among immunocompromised persons. Taken together, these data suggest that third (booster) doses may be needed <6 months after dose 2 in immunocompetent individuals and that 3 doses can be inadequate to protect against omicron infection in immunocompromised individuals. Furthermore, the data highlight the potential need for periodic adjustment of vaccines to target circulating variants, including omicron, that have evolved to escape current vaccine-induced immunity. While there are limited prior data on VE of 2 or 3 doses of mRNA-1273 vaccine against infection or hospitalization with omicron, a preliminary analysis from Denmark found an initial VE of 2 doses of mRNA-1273 against omicron infection of 36.7% that waned quickly, similar to our findings.17 An early report by Andrews et al found waning of 2-dose protection with an initial VE of 2 doses of BNT162b2 against symptomatic infection with omicron of 88% (65.9%-95.8%) 2-9 weeks after dose 2 that declined to 34%-37% (95% CIs ranging from -5 to 59.6%) after 15 weeks post-dose 2, but increased to 75.5% (56.1%-86.3%) a median of 41 days (range 14-72 days) after a BNT162b2 booster.18 Collie et al found that the VE of 2 doses of BNT162b2 against hospitalization during a proxy omicron period was 70% at least 14 days after receipt of dose 2.19 In England, after a primary course of BNT162b2 vaccine, VE against omicron infection was initially 70% after a BNT162b2 booster, dropping to 45% after ≥10 weeks, but stayed around 70%-75% for up to 9 weeks after an mRNA-1273 booster.10 A growing number of reports indicate that omicron disease is less severe than delta disease, resulting in a lower risk of hospitalization.1,20 This may reflect greater replication of omicron in the upper versus lower respiratory tract, which may also contribute to more efficient transmission, resulting in increased absolute21 numbers of hospitalizations. Booster vaccination has the potential to decrease hospital burden and improve outcomes.22 While the number of cases and follow-up period were not sufficient in our study or other studies to assess potential waning VE against hospitalization with omicron, our results of waning VE against infection with omicron after dose 3 of mRNA-1273 underscores the importance of monitoring VE against hospitalization with omicron. This study provides novel data complementing recent reports of the effectiveness of other COVID-19 vaccines against omicron and has several strengths and limitations. Testing for SARS-CoV-2 infection was readily available among KPSC members, including drive-through testing and self-scheduled test appointments. Furthermore, we used a highly specific and sensitive RT-PCR test and monitored variant proportions at KPSC, allowing us to quickly assess VE of mRNA-1273 against omicron. Second, we considered all SGTF specimens as omicron, rather than specifying a Ct value threshold, although this may have overestimated omicron detection. Our rate of SGTF closely mirrored regional trends in omicron emergence from the CDC.11 Furthermore, based on whole genome sequencing results received for a subset of 227 positive specimens, we confirmed that all 6 omicron cases exhibited SGTF, and the remaining 221 delta cases were all negative for SGTF. Third, this study was representative of a large, diverse racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic population in Southern California, but may be less representative of other populations. However, analysis of the effectiveness of mRNA-1273 against delta and omicron in parallel provided an internal comparator that put results in context.12 Fourth, some immunocompetent members who received a third dose before the 10/21/2021 ACIP recommendation may have received a 100-µg dose rather than a 50-µg booster dose of mRNA-1273. However, we were not able to clearly assess the difference, as dosage information was not available from external vaccination records. Finally, the number of hospitalized patients included was too small to draw definitive conclusions regarding VE and durability of 3 doses in preventing hospitalization. Long-term follow-up is needed to evaluate the durability of both 100-µg and 50-µg booster doses in preventing infection and hospitalization. In conclusion, this study of mRNA-1273 found waning 2-dose VE against delta infection, high VE 3-dose VE against delta infection, and low 2-dose and 3-dose VE against omicron infection. Protection against omicron infection wanes within 3 months after dose 2, suggesting a need for a shorter interval between second and booster doses. Lack of protection against omicron infection in the immunocompromised population underscores the importance of the recommended fourth dose (booster) for this population. Continued monitoring of VE against omicron infection and hospitalization in immunocompetent and immunocompromised individuals and surveillance for the emergence of newer SARS-CoV-2 variants are warranted to inform future vaccination strategies. ## Supporting information Supplementary Appendix [[supplements/268919_file02.pdf]](pending:yes) ## Data Availability Individual-level data reported in this study are not publicly shared. Upon request, and subject to review, KPSC may provide the deidentified aggregate-level data that support the findings of this study. Deidentified data (including participant data as applicable) may be shared upon approval of an analysis proposal and a signed data access agreement. ## Author Contributions View this table: [Table4](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/01/08/2022.01.07.22268919/T4) ## Data Sharing Individual-level data reported in this study are not publicly shared. Upon request, and subject to review, KPSC may provide the deidentified aggregate-level data that support the findings of this study. Deidentified data (including participant data as applicable) may be shared upon approval of an analysis proposal and a signed data access agreement. ## Funding This research was supported by Moderna Inc. ## Disclosures All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form at [www.icmje.org/coi\_disclosure.pdf](http://www.icmje.org/coi_disclosure.pdf) and declare the following: HFT, BKA, YL, LSS, YT, JET, AF, JHK, GSL, SKC, HST, MA, and LQ are employees of Kaiser Permanente Southern California, which has been contracted by Moderna to conduct this study. KJB is an adjunct investigator at Kaiser Permanente Southern California. CAT is an employee of and a shareholder in Moderna Inc. HFT received funding from GlaxoSmithKline and Seqirus unrelated to this manuscript; HFT also served in advisory boards for Janssen and Pfizer. BKA received funding from GlaxoSmithKline, Dynavax, Seqirus, Pfizer and Genentech for work unrelated to this study and has served on advisory boards for GlaxoSmithKline. YL received funding from GlaxoSmithKline, Seqirus and Pfizer unrelated to this manuscript. LSS received funding from GlaxoSmithKline, Dynavax, and Seqirus unrelated to this manuscript. YT received funding from GlaxoSmithKline unrelated to this manuscript. JET received funding from Pfizer unrelated to this manuscript. AF received funding from Pfizer, GlaxoSmithKline, and Gilead unrelated to this manuscript. JHK received funding from GlaxoSmithKline unrelated to this manuscript. GSL received funding from GlaxoSmithKline unrelated to this manuscript. SKC received funding from Pfizer and Pancreatic Cancer Action Network unrelated to this manuscript. HST received funding from GlaxoSmithKline, Pfizer, ALK, and Wellcome unrelated to this manuscript. MA received funding from Pfizer unrelated to this manuscript. LQ received funding from GlaxoSmithKline and Dynavax unrelated to this manuscript. ## Acknowledgements Medical writing and editorial assistance were provided by Srividya Ramachandran, PhD, and Jared Mackenzie, PhD, of MEDiSTRAVA in accordance with Good Publication Practice (GPP3) guidelines, funded by Moderna Inc, and under the direction of the authors. Laboratory and database support were provided at KPSC by Lee Childs, Julie Stern, Joy Gelfond, Radha Bathala, Kourtney Kottmann, Ana Acevedo, Elmer Ayala, Samantha Quinones, Samantha Baluyot, Errol Lopez, and Don McCarthy. The authors thank the KPSC Lab Leadership and Technician Team for their support of this study. The authors would like to acknowledge Helix OpCo, LCC, for their whole genome sequencing of SARS-CoV-2 specimens. The authors thank the patients of Kaiser Permanente for their partnership with us to improve their health. Their information, collected through our electronic health record systems, leads to findings that help us improve care for our members and can be shared with the larger community. Julie Vanas, Moderna Inc, provided critical operations support and Yamuna Paila, Moderna Inc, provided critical input on specimen sequencing. * Received January 7, 2022. * Revision received January 7, 2022. * Accepted January 8, 2022. * © 2022, Posted by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory The copyright holder for this pre-print is the author. All rights reserved. The material may not be redistributed, re-used or adapted without the author's permission. ## References 1. 1.Wolter N, Jassat W, Walaza S, et al. Early assessment of the clinical severity of the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant in South Africa. medRxiv 2021:2021.12.21.21268116. DOI: 10.1101/2021.12.21.21268116. [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6NzoibWVkcnhpdiI7czo1OiJyZXNpZCI7czoyMToiMjAyMS4xMi4yMS4yMTI2ODExNnYxIjtzOjQ6ImF0b20iO3M6NTA6Ii9tZWRyeGl2L2Vhcmx5LzIwMjIvMDEvMDgvMjAyMi4wMS4wNy4yMjI2ODkxOS5hdG9tIjt9czo4OiJmcmFnbWVudCI7czowOiIiO30=) 2. 2.Wilfredo F. Garcia-Beltran KJSD, Angelique Hoelzemer, Evan C. Lam, Adam D. Nitido, Maegan L. Sheehan, Cristhian Berrios, Onosereme Ofoman, Christina C. Chang, Blake M. Hauser, Jared Feldman, David J. Gregory, Mark C. Poznansky, Aaron G. Schmidt, A. John Iafrate, Vivek Naranbhai, Alejandro B. Balazs. mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccine boosters induce neutralizing immunity against SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant. MedRxiv 2021;medRxiv 2021.12.14.21267755. DOI: [https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.12.14.21267755](https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.12.14.21267755). 3. 3.Nicole A. Doria-Rose XS, Stephen D Schmidt, Sijy O’Dell, Charlene McDanal, Wenhong Feng, Jin Tong, Amanda Eaton, Maha Maglinao, Haili Tang, Kelly E. Manning, Venkata-Viswanadh Edara, Lilin Lai, Madison Ellis, Kathryn Moore, Katharine Floyd, Stephanie L. Foster, Robert L. Atmar, Kirsten E. Lyke, Tongqing Zhou, Lingshu Wang, Yi Zhang, Martin R Gaudinski, Walker P Black, Ingelise Gordon, Mercy Guech, Julie E Ledgerwood, John N Misasi, Alicia Widge, Paul C. Roberts, John Beigel, Bette Korber, Rolando Pajon, John R. Mascola, Mehul S. Suthar, David C. Montefiori. Booster of mRNA-1273 Strengthens SARS-CoV-2 Omicron Neutralization. MedRxiv 2021;medRxiv 2021.12.15.21267805. DOI: [https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.12.15.21267805](https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.12.15.21267805). 4. 4.Cele S, Jackson L, Khan K, et al. SARS-CoV-2 Omicron has extensive but incomplete escape of Pfizer BNT162b2 elicited neutralization and requires ACE2 for infection. medRxiv 2021 ([https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.12.08.21267417v1.full.pdf](https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.12.08.21267417v1.full.pdf)). 5. 5.Wilhelm A, Widera M, Grikscheit K, et al. Reduced Neutralization of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron Variant by Vaccine Sera and monoclonal antibodies medRxiv 2021 ([https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.12.07.21267432v2.full.pdf](https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.12.07.21267432v2.full.pdf)). 6. 6.Bruxvoort KJ, Sy LS, Qian L, et al. Real-world effectiveness of the mRNA-1273 vaccine against COVID*19: Interim results from a prospective observational cohort study. Lancet Reg Health Am. DOI: 10.1016/j.lana.2021.100134. [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.lana.2021.100134&link_type=DOI) 7. 7.United States Food and Drug Administration. SARS-CoV-2 Viral Mutations: Impact on COVID-19 Tests ([https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/coronavirus-covid-19-and-medical-devices/sars-cov-2-viral-mutations-impact-covid-19-tests#detection-patterns](https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/coronavirus-covid-19-and-medical-devices/sars-cov-2-viral-mutations-impact-covid-19-tests#detection-patterns)). 8. 8.WHO. Enhancing Readiness for Omicron (B.1.1.529): Technical Brief and Priority Actions for Member States. https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&ved=2ahUKEwimuoq15pz1AhVWhlwKHf8IBJ0QFnoECAQQAQ&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.who.int%2Fdocs%2Fdefault\*source%2Fcoronaviruse%2Ftechnical-brief-and-priority-action-on\*omicron.pdf%3Fsfvrsn%3D50732953_3%26download%3Dtrue&usg=AOvVaw03aUWlgT4Giv*PS1jVYZGK. 9. 9.Public Health England. Investigation of novel SARS-CoV-2 variant: variant of convern 202012/01. 2020. ([https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment\_data/file/959438/Technical\_Briefing\_VOC\_SH\_NJL2\_SH2.pdf](https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment\_data/file/959438/Technical\_Briefing\_VOC_SH_NJL2_SH2.pdf)). 10. 10.Public Health England. SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern and variants under investigation in England 2021. ([https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1043807/technical-briefing-33.pdf](https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1043807/technical-briefing-33.pdf)). 11. 11.United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. COVID Data Tracker: Variant Proportions. ([https://covid.cdc.gov/covid-data-tracker/#variant-proportions](https://covid.cdc.gov/covid-data-tracker/#variant-proportions)). 12. 12.Bruxvoort KJ, Sy LS, Qian L, et al. Effectiveness of mRNA-1273 against delta, mu, and other emerging variants of SARS-CoV-2: test negative case-control study. BMJ 2021;375:e068848. DOI: 10.1136/bmj*2021-068848. [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6MzoiYm1qIjtzOjU6InJlc2lkIjtzOjE5OiIzNzUvZGVjMTVfMi9lMDY4ODQ4IjtzOjQ6ImF0b20iO3M6NTA6Ii9tZWRyeGl2L2Vhcmx5LzIwMjIvMDEvMDgvMjAyMi4wMS4wNy4yMjI2ODkxOS5hdG9tIjt9czo4OiJmcmFnbWVudCI7czowOiIiO30=) 13. 13.United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. CDC Expands Eligibility for COVID-19 Booster Shots 2021. 14. 14.United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Choosing Your COVID-19 Booster Shot. ([https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/booster-shot.html](https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/booster-shot.html)). 15. 15.Food and Drug Administration. Emergency Use Authorization for Vaccines to Prevent COVID-19: Guidance for Industry. 2021. ([https://www.fda.gov/media/142749/download](https://www.fda.gov/media/142749/download)). 16. 16.El Sahly HM, Baden LR, Essink B, et al. Efficacy of the mRNA-1273 SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine at Completion of Blinded Phase. N Engl J Med 2021;385(19):1774–1785. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2113017. [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1056/NEJMoa2113017&link_type=DOI) 17. 17.Hansen CH, Schelde AB, Moustsen-Helm IR, et al. Vaccine effectiveness against SARS-CoV-2 infection with the Omicron or Delta variants following a two-dose or booster BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273 vaccination series: A Danish cohort study. medRxiv 2021 ([https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.12.20.21267966v2](https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.12.20.21267966v2)). 18. 18.Andrews N, Stowe J, Kirsebom F, et al. Effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines against the Omicron (B.1.1.529) variant of concern. medRxiv 2021:2021.12.14.21267615. DOI: 10.1101/2021.12.14.21267615. [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6NzoibWVkcnhpdiI7czo1OiJyZXNpZCI7czoyMToiMjAyMS4xMi4xNC4yMTI2NzYxNXYxIjtzOjQ6ImF0b20iO3M6NTA6Ii9tZWRyeGl2L2Vhcmx5LzIwMjIvMDEvMDgvMjAyMi4wMS4wNy4yMjI2ODkxOS5hdG9tIjt9czo4OiJmcmFnbWVudCI7czowOiIiO30=) 19. 19.Collie S, Champion J, Moultrie H, Bekker LG, Gray G. Effectiveness of BNT162b2 Vaccine against Omicron Variant in South Africa. N Engl J Med 2021. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMc2119270. [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1056/NEJMc2119270&link_type=DOI) 20. 20.Ferguson N, Ghani A, Cori A, Hogan A, Hinsley W E V., Report 49: Growth, population distribution and immune escape of Omicron in England Imperial College London, 2021. ([https://www.imperial.ac.uk/media/imperial-college/medicine/mrc-gida/2021-12-16-COVID19-Report-49.pdf](https://www.imperial.ac.uk/media/imperial-college/medicine/mrc-gida/2021-12-16-COVID19-Report-49.pdf)). 21. 21.Chan MCW, Hui KP, Ho J, et al. SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant replication in human respiratory tract ex vivo. Research Square 2021 ([https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-1189219/v1](https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-1189219/v1)). 22. 22.French G, Hulse M, Nguyen D, et al. Impact of hospital strain on excess deaths during the COVID-19 pandemic — United States, July 2020–July 2021. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2021;70:1613–1616. DOI: [http://dx.doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm7046a5externalicon](http://dx.doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm7046a5externalicon). [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.15585/mmwr.mm7046a5&link_type=DOI)