ABSTRACT
Background Ontario recently implemented overdose prevention sites and consumption and treatment services (OPS/CTS) to stem the harms of the opioid epidemic. We tested whether operating any site improved local opioid-related health service use and mortality rates.
Methods We used monthly counts of all opioid-related emergency department (ED) visits, hospitalizations, and deaths between January 2014 and December 2020 for our outcomes. For each public health unit (PHU) that implemented any OPS/CTS, we created a synthetic control as a weighted combination of unexposed PHU. We estimated the population-level effects of operating any site using controlled interrupted time series with segmented regression and adjusted for time varying confounders (i.e. OPS/CTS capacity, naloxone kits distributed, and persons receiving opioid agonist treatment per 100,000 population). We repeated the analysis using a multiple baseline approach to estimate province-wide effects.
Results Between 2017 and 2020, nine out of 34 PHU implemented at least one OPS/CTS. ED visit (RR=0.96, 95%CI: 0.92 – 0.99) and hospitalization (RR=0.95, 95%CI: 0.92 – 0.98) trends declined faster among treated units. Improvements in local ED visit rate trends were observed for the majority of treated units. Hospitalization rates declined faster for London (RR=0.97, 95%CI: 0.95 – 0.99) and Niagara (RR=0.95, 95%CI: 0.92 – 0.98); while mortality rates declined faster for Hamilton (RR=0.93, 95%CI: 0.90 – 0.96), Niagara (RR=0.97, 95%CI: 0.94 – 0.99) and Guelph (RR=0.94, 95%CI: 0.88 – 1.00).
Conclusion Although OPS/CTS are not sufficient to stem the harms of the opioid overdose epidemic on their own, they play a critical role in local harm reduction strategies.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
Dr. Panagiotoglou is supported by a Junior 1 Scholar Award (#309818) from the Fonds de recherche du Quebec-sante
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
We used monthly counts of all opioid-related ED visits, acute care hospitalizations, and deaths that occurred between January 2014 and December 2020 per PHU, as reported in Ontario's publicly accessible Interactive Opioid Tool. The tool includes all opioid-related ED visits and acute care hospitalizations as captured in the province-wide National Ambulatory Care Reporting System and Discharge Abstract Database, and all fatal events where opioid poisoning from codeine, fentanyl (including carfentanil and other fentanyl analogues), heroin, hydrocodone, hydromorphone, methadone, morphine, or oxycodone was considered a contributing cause of death according to the Office of the Chief Coroner.(22) We converted event counts to incidence rates using the province's IntelliHealth population level estimates (2003-2016, extracted October 2017) and population projections (2017-2020, extracted August 2019) also available in the tool.(22) We supplemented the PHU-level overdose event data with PHU-level population demographic estimates (percent of the population designated low income, without a high school diploma, immigrant, and visible minority; median household income); age- and sex-standardized rates of alcohol-related emergency department visits and hospitalizations; and monthly counts of concomitant interventions: persons receiving opioid prescriptions (overall, for pain, OAT) and naloxone kits distributed. To capture OPS/CTS intervention 'intensity' we included the total number of booth-hours (booths/seats/spaces) available for supervised consumption of illicit substances, per month.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Funding: Dr. Panagiotoglou is supported by a Junior 1 Scholar Award (#309818) from the Fonds de recherche du Québec – santé
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors.
