Abstract
Quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) is a sensitive molecular method for the detection of genetic material and regarded as the gold-standard for diagnostic testing. To detect respiratory RNA virus infections, a reverse transcription (RT) step is implemented to create cDNA molecules that can serve as template in the qPCR step. However, positive RT-qPCR results can be found long after patient recovery, in part because the RT-qPCR can detect residual viral RNA genome fragments. To minimize the detection of such fragments, we here modified the RT-qPCR assay by replacing the routinely used random hexamers with an oligonucleotide that binds to the 3′ end of the viral genome. We demonstrate that this method allows us to distinguish between infectious and non-infectious samples. Moreover, in clinical samples obtained over 15 days after the onset of symptoms, we observe that the modified RT-qPCR protocol yields significantly fewer positive results compared to a commercial RT-qPCR test. No significantly different results were found compared to the commercial test when SARS-CoV-2 clinical samples were tested within 5 days of the onset of symptoms, suggesting that the modification has a similar sensitivity for detecting infectious viral RNA. Overall, these findings may help differentiate between false-positive, persistently positive, and reinfection cases in COVID-19 patients.
Importance Various molecular tests can be used to detect RNA virus infections. The RT-qPCR test is currently regarded as the gold-standard, but its sensitivity to residual viral RNA genome fragments can lead to “incorrectly-positive” RT-qPCR results. Technically, these results are different from false-positive RT-qPCR results, which can be generated due to in vitro cross-reactivity or contaminations. However, the detection of RNA fragments leads to similar incorrect conclusions about the presence of infectious virus long after a patient has recovered from a viral infection and thus false-positive diagnoses. These false-positive diagnoses affect patient hospitalization and treatment, including transplantations. We here modified a commercial RT-qPCR kit to make it less sensitive to residual viral RNA genome fragments, reducing the likelihood for false-positive results in recovered COVID-19 patients. The method may improve test-to- release protocols, expand the tools available for clinical testing, and help reduce hospital encumbrance.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study was funded by joint Wellcome Trust and Royal Society grant 206579/Z/17/Z, and grant G107570 from Public Health England.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The Vilnius Regional Bioethics Committee approved this study with samples from the Vilnius Santaros Klinikos Biobank under number 2021/5-1342-818. The National Accreditation Board for testing and calibration Laboratories (NABL) approved this study under code KDPLP on 22 June 2021.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Added supplemental tables 1 and 2 with raw data. Updated methods and importance statement. Split figure 1 into two figures for clarity.
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are provided as supplemental tables or available upon reasonable request to the authors
