Abstract
Importance Excessive consumption of fast food (FF) is associated with chronic disease. Population-level research on FF outlet visits is now possible with mobility data, however its usefulness as an indicator of FF intake and diet-related disease must be established.
Objective Investigate whether FF outlet visits from mobility data are indicators of self-reported FF intake, obesity, and diabetes, and compared with self-reported intake, equivalent or better indicators of obesity and diabetes.
Design, Setting, and Participants A secondary analysis of data from a representative sample of 8,036 adult residents of Los Angeles County (LAC) from the 2011 Los Angeles County Health Survey (LACHS), and mobility data representing all geolocations between October 2016 - March 2017 of 243,644 anonymous and opted-in smartphone users in LAC.
Main Outcomes and Measures Main outcomes were self-reported FF intake frequency (never, infrequent, moderate, frequent), obesity, and diabetes from LACHS. FF outlet visits were computed as the temporal frequency of FF visits (FF visits/time) and the ratio of visits to FF over all food outlets (FF visits/food), summarized over smartphone users in a neighborhood, scaled from 0-10, and linked to LACHS respondents by census tract.
Results The analytic sample included 5,447 LACHS respondents and 234,995 smartphone users with 14,498,850 visits to food outlets. FF outlet visits were significantly associated with self-reported FF intake (reference: never) for both FF visits/time (infrequent: odds ratio [OR], 1.13; 95% CI, 1.06-1.20; frequent: OR, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.28-1.42) and FF visits/food (infrequent: OR, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.06-1.17; frequent: OR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.22-1.33). FF outlet visits were significantly associated with obesity (FF visits/time: adjusted OR [AOR], 1.16; 95% CI, 1.12-1.21; FF visits/food: AOR, 1.13; 95% CI, 1.10-1.17) and diabetes (FF visits/time: AOR, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.09-1.21; FF visits/food: AOR, 1.11; 95% CI, 1.07-1.16), adjusted for sociodemographic factors. Models of the association between FF outlet visits and obesity or diabetes had better fits than between self-reported FF intake and obesity or diabetes.
Conclusions and relevance This study illustrates that population-scale mobility data provide useful, passively-collected indicators of FF intake and diet-related disease within large, diverse urban populations that may be better than self-report intake.
Question Do visits to fast food outlets observed in mobility data provide meaningful measures of fast food intake, and when compared with self-reported intake, equivalent or better indicators of diet-related disease?
Findings In this cross-sectional Los Angeles County study from a survey of 8,036 adults and mobility data from 243,644 smartphone users with 14.5 million food outlet visits, neighborhood-level features representing visits to fast food outlets were significantly associated with self-reported fast food intake, significantly associated with obesity and diabetes, and were a better predictor of these diseases than self-reported fast food intake.
Meaning Measures of food behaviors observed in population-scale mobility data can provide meaningful indicators of food intake and diet-related diseases, and could complement existing dietary surveillance methods.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This work was supported with funding from the University of Southern California's Keck School of Medicine Dean's Pilot Funding Program (PI: de la Haye) and by MIT Connection Science (PIs: Pentland and Moro). Dr. Horn acknowledges support from an NIH Ruth L Kirschstein National 591 Research Service Award (NRSA) Institutional Training Grant (T32 5T32CA009492-35). Dr. Moro acknowledges funding from Agencia Estatal de Investigacion (Spain) (PID2019-106811GB-C32/AEI/10.13039/501100011033).
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
All study protocols were approved by the Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) of (i) the Los Angeles County Department of Public Health, (ii) the University of Southern California, and (iii) the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Two datasets were analyzed in this manuscript. Individual-level measures of FF intake and diet-related disease analyzed in this study came from the 2011 Los Angeles County Health Survey (LACHS). This data was shared privately under an IRB-approved Data Use Agreement with the University of Southern California. These data cannot be shared. Geolocation (i.e., mobility) data were collected by Cuebiq Inc., consisting of anonymized records of GPS locations from individual adult (≥18) smartphone users who have opted in to provide access to their GPS location data anonymously through a General Data Protection Regulation and California Consumer Privacy Act compliant framework, were collected by Cuebiq Inc. and shared with the Massachusetts Institute of Technology through an IRB-approved Data License Agreement via their Data for Good Program. These data cannot be shared.
