Abstract
Setting Karonga, Rumphi, Kasungu and Lilongwe districts of Malawi in 2019.
Objectives To determine the availability and utilization of TB preventive and care services in fifteen licensed mining industries in four selected districts in Malawi in 2019.
Design We conducted a cross-sectional study using mixed-methods. Qualitative data were analysed using content analysis and thematic approach. We calculated the frequencies, proportions, median and interquartile range in STATA v16.0. Qualitative data was analysed using content analysis. We triangulated the qualitative and quantitative results.
Results Of the 373 miners, 215 (58%) indicated that they were provided with annual TB screening while 43 (12%) had TB screened before being recruited in the mine, 171 (46%) were provided with masks, and 25 (7%) were aware of compensation after being sick while working in a mine. Of the 171 miners that indicated that masks were provided, 110 (64%) cited N95, 55 (32%) cited surgical mask, and 6 (4%) cited cotton wasters. The common OHS measures at the mines were banning of smoking within the mining site, sensitization of the miners on TB and adequate ventilation. The key challenges were the absence of the national Occupational Health and Safety Policy (OHSP), limited financial resources to consistently procure the PPE, and poor coordination between the mines, labour and health offices at district level.
Conclusion The mining industries of Malawi have implemented an array of the expected measures however most of these are available at a sub-optimal level. The absence of the national OHSP has provided a loophole for non-adherence of the mining industries to providing OHS to the miners. Therefore, Malawi should put in place OHSP to safeguard the health and social protection as well as compensation of the miners and ex-miners.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
Funding for this project was provided by the Ministry of Health, Government of Malawi/World Bank TB in the Mines Project, Malawi.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The study was approved by the Malawi National Health Science Research Committee in Lilongwe, Malawi (protocol #: 18/01/1952). The study was also approved by The Union Ethics Advisory Board, Paris, France.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Request the data from the corresponding author
