Abstract
Background We evaluated the use of rapid antigen detection tests (RADT) for the diagnosis of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection in school settings to determine RADT’s performance compared to PCR.
Methods In this real-world, prospective observational cohort study, high-school students and staff were recruited from two high-schools in Montreal (Canada) and followed from January 25th to June 10th, 2021. Twenty-five percent of asymptomatic participants were tested weekly by RADT (nasal) and PCR (gargle). Class contacts of cases were tested. Symptomatic participants were tested by RADT (nasal) and PCR (nasal and gargle). The number of cases and outbreaks were compared to other high schools in the same area.
Results Overall, 2,099 students and 286 school staff members consented to participate. The overall RADT’s specificity varied from 99.8 to 100%, with a lower sensitivity, varying from 28.6% in asymptomatic to 83.3% in symptomatic participants. Secondary cases were identified in 10 of 35 classes. Returning students to school after a 7-day quarantine, with a negative PCR on D6-7 after exposure, did not lead to subsequent outbreaks. Of cases for whom the source was known, 37 of 57 (72.5%) were secondary to household transmission, 13 (25%) to intra-school transmission and one to community contacts between students in the same school.
Conclusion RADT did not perform well as a screening tool in asymptomatic individuals. Reinforcing policies for symptom screening when entering schools and testing symptomatic individuals with RADT on the spot may avoid subsequent significant exposures in class.
Table of Contents Summary Rapid antigen tests were compared to standard PCR to diagnose SARS-CoV-2 infections in high-school students. They performed better in symptomatic individuals.
What’s Known on This Subject Rapid antigen detection tests (RADT) are often used to diagnose respiratory pathogens at the point-of-care. Their performance characteristics vary, but they usually have high specificity and moderate sensitivity compared with PCR.
What This Study Adds RADT sensitivity ranged from 28.6% in asymptomatic individuals to 83.3% in symptomatic individuals. Return to school after 7 days of quarantine was safe in exposed students. Secondary cases were identified in 28% of classes with an index case.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study was funded by the Quebec Ministry of Health and Social Services, to whom regular reports of the study progress were submitted. The study sponsor did not have a role in study design, in interpretation of data, writing of the report or decision to submit the paper for publication.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
This project was approved by the CHU Ste-Justine Research Ethics Board (#MP-21-2021-3271). Written invitation letters to participate in the study were sent by schools direction to parents and staff explaining the study objectives, methods and expected impacts. Online informed parental consent, as well as assent, was required for all students. Parents who preferred to keep their children home for 14 days in case of a class contact could do so. Tests results were communicated to parents and students (if ≥14 years) by the school (via email), as they became available.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Conflict of Interest Disclosures: The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Funding: Québec Ministry of Health and Social Services
Role of Funder: The study sponsor did not have a role in study design, in interpretation of data, writing of the report or decision to submit the paper for publication.
Updated version of manuscript, including a correction to Table 1.
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors
Abbreviations
- ABM
- (agent-based model)
- Ct
- (cycle threshold)
- COVID-19
- (Coronavirus disease 2019)
- D
- (day)
- ESCL
- (École Secondaire Calixa-Lavallée)
- LOD
- (limit of detection)
- PCR
- (polymerase chain reaction)
- PSNM
- (Pensionnat du Saint-Nom-de-Marie)
- RADT
- (rapid antigen detection test)
- SARS-CoV-2
- (Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2)
- TAT
- (turnaround time)
