Understanding the evidence for climate concerns, negative emotions and climate-related mental ill-health in young people: a scoping review
==========================================================================================================================================

* Reem Ramadan
* Alicia Randell
* Suzie Lavoie
* Caroline X Gao
* Paula Cruz Manrique
* Rebekah Anderson
* Isabel Zbukvic

## ABSTRACT

**Background** Human-induced climate change represents a serious threat to human health, including mental health, due to both the traumatising effects of extreme climate events and the psychological effect of worry about climate change. The present scoping review aims to systematically search and synthesise original research related to mental health and climate related concerns, negative emotions and mental ill-health in young people. Findings will help to understand the current landscape, gaps in the literature, and to provide recommendations for future youth mental health research and practice.

**Methods** A systematic search and narrative synthesis of the literature published prior to October 2020 examining negative emotions associated with climate change in young people was undertaken. Studies were included if they examined mental ill-health (e.g. symptoms of depression or anxiety) or negative emotions (e.g. distress, worry, concern) associated with the threat of climate change.

**Findings** Of the 3329 peer-reviewed articles screened, 12 met the inclusion criteria. Together, included studies show that young people are worried about climate change. Studies also explored the coping strategies young people use to manage their distress caused by climate change.

**Interpretations** The limited literature in this area indicates a key gap in youth mental health research. Available evidence suggests that young people are concerned about climate change, which may increase risk of mental ill-health. Thus, clinicians should assess for and address climate anxiety in young people. Mental health leaders are urged to advocate for urgent climate action to mitigate the effects of climate anxiety in young people.

**Funding** this project was not funded.

## INTRODUCTION

Climate change has been described as the biggest threat to global health of the 21st century.1 In addition to having a deleterious impact on a range of physical health outcomes, climate change also poses a major threat to mental health,2 referring not only to mental illnesses or disorders, but to general wellbeing, cognition, and emotional states.3 Several reviews have been published in recent years that aimed to synthesise the existing literature on climate change and mental health.4-8 These reviews based on a large body of research show that climate change can negatively impact mental health via exposure to traumatic events such as drought or hurricane. However, relatively less attention has been given to understanding the mental health impacts of worry or concern about climate change. Table 1 provides a summary of terms used to describe negative emotions related to climate change (e.g., worry, distress, fear or despair) from existing literature.

View this table:
[Table 1.](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/09/29/2021.09.27.21264151/T1)

Table 1. Concepts of negative emotions related to environment and climate change

Although worrying about climate change is not pathological by itself, negative climate-related emotions can become clinically significant when they grow to being difficult to control.9-11 Experiences of distress and anxiety related to climate change may also exacerbate other mental health problems or compound daily stressors to negatively affect overall mental health, wellbeing, quality of life and functioning.12,13 Understanding how climate anxiety and related experiences can impact mental health is critical for understanding the full impacts of climate change on human health.

Several reviews of the literature have highlighted young people as a key group likely to be disproportionately affected by the mental health effects of climate change.4,22 Childhood, adolescence and young adulthood are seen as critical periods of development in terms of mental ill-health, with 75% of mental illnesses emerging before the age of 25 years.23,24 Experiencing mental ill-health during youth can have significant and lasting impacts, affecting mental health, wellbeing, and functional outcomes over the lifetime. Globally, youth-led climate action as well as the evidence from grey literature suggests that young people are concerned about climate change.25-27 Therefore, understanding the short- and long-term mental health effects of negative emotions related to climate change in young people is key to supporting positive outcomes for individuals, communities, and society. The Lancet recently published a call to action related to climate anxiety in young people, which emphasised the urgent need for further research in this area.28 However, there are currently no known peer-reviewed literature reviews focused on the evidence related to mental health and negative emotions about climate change in young people.

The present scoping review aims to systematically search and synthesise original research related to mental health and climate-related concerns, negative emotions and mental ill-health in young people. Findings will help to understand the current landscape, gaps in the literature, and to provide recommendations for future youth mental health research and practice.

## METHODS

This review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines.29,30 The protocol (unpublished) for the full search strategy can be seen in Supplementary Materials. Computerised literature searches of Embase, PsycINFO and MEDLINE were conducted in October 2020. The searches did not apply any limitation on the year of publication or study design. The reference lists of included studies and reviews were also manually searched for any additional articles for potential inclusion. Articles selected were screened initially by title and abstract by AR, RA and IZ. Articles flagged as potentially fulfilling the inclusion criteria were retrieved, and full text screening was completed by AR, RA, IZ, RR and SL. Full text screening assessed articles for inclusion against the inclusion criteria.

Studies were included in this review if they met the following criteria: 1) the study reported primary research; 2) the paper reported negative emotions (e.g., worry, concern) and/or mental ill-health in relation to the threat of climate change; 3) the sample or a subset of the sample was age 26 years or younger, or described as young people, teens, students, adolescents, children, or similar; 4) the paper was written in English, French or German; 5) the paper was published in a peer-reviewed journal. Articles were excluded if they reported negative emotions and/or mental ill-health following a natural disaster or in response to a specific climatic event or causative factor, as this review aimed to examine the psychological presentations resulting from concerns related to changing climate or environment. Studies that measured a correlation between mental health and a specific weather or environmental factors (e.g., air temperature, level of air pollution) were therefore excluded. Any studies that were in doubt for inclusion were discussed by the authors until consensus was reached.

Ten percent of the full text results were randomly selected and double-screened by PCM. PCM was blind to the initial inclusion/exclusion status of studies. Any discrepancies were resolved through discussion in team meetings, and by making the inclusion and exclusion criteria clearer. In this initial 10% of full text articles that were double screened, the discrepancies revealed indicated that the inclusion criteria were not strict enough resulting in ineligible studies being included by PCM, as opposed to eligible studies being excluded. Consequently, the authors concluded that it was unlikely any eligible studies had been screened out.

The following data were extracted from included studies into a standardised data collection spreadsheet: number of young people included in the study, their mean age or age range, the country where the study was conducted as well as type of sample selected, data type and collection methods, climate-specific mental health outcome and findings, factors associated with climate anxiety and worry, protective and coping factors, and authors’ key conclusion. Study findings were summarised by the types of outcomes they examined, the country where research was conducted, and whether there was an older comparison group.

Although not the focus of this review, literature screening also included consideration of articles that examined the effect of natural disasters on youth mental health. Any article screened that discussed the effect of a natural disaster on the mental health of young people was compiled in a separate list to examine trends in number of publications over time.

## RESULTS

Figure 1 shows that 3329 articles were considered for inclusion in this scoping review, 174 full-text articles were assessed for eligibility and 12 records fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Articles were excluded mainly due to the study participants not being young people, the articles being reviews or opinion pieces rather than original research, outcomes not being related to mental health, or mental health outcome/s being linked to climate change via an extreme weather event. Included studies were published between 1995 and 2019 and were undertaken across five countries, all developed countries. Table 2 summarises key details of included studies.

View this table:
[Table 2.](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/09/29/2021.09.27.21264151/T2)

Table 2. 
Details of Studies that Investigated the Effect of Climate Anxiety on Young People’s Mental Health

![Figure 1.](http://medrxiv.org/https://www.medrxiv.org/content/medrxiv/early/2021/09/29/2021.09.27.21264151/F1.medium.gif)

[Figure 1.](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/09/29/2021.09.27.21264151/F1)

Figure 1. 
PRISMA-ScR Flow diagram 29

### Main analysis

Of the 12 studies included, four studies aimed to provide general understanding of climate concerns or negative emotions in the population,31,34,35,38 seven focused on understanding the interplay between climate-related concerns and negative emotions, with psychological distress, wellbeing, hope, as well as coping mechanisms, 32,36,37,39-42 and one clinical case report focused on climate change-related psychotic features.33 Two studies, both conducted in Australia, reported age-group comparisons and suggested a higher level of climate distress among young people compared with older populations.34,35 Studies predominantly used interviews, focus groups, or surveys to collect data from young people, and almost half the studies included in this review were conducted by one research group.

Studies examined a range of negative emotions, mental health outcomes, and coping strategies related to the threat of climate change (Table 3). Most studies focused on worry or concern.31,32,34,36,37,40,42 Two studies included a range of different negative emotions such as anger, stress, and boredom,35,41 while one investigated self-described feelings.38 Notably, most included studies examined factors associated with supporting wellbeing or coping in the face of climate change. Of these, most focused on efficacy (i.e., the belief that individuals and communities can take action) and hope.36,37,42 Three papers explored self-described coping strategies.36,37,41

View this table:
[Table 3.](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/09/29/2021.09.27.21264151/T3)

Table 3. 
Assessments and definitions of different concepts of ‘negative emotions’ and coping mechanisms related to climate change and mental health

Only two studies evaluated psychological symptoms, namely depression and stress, using validated psychometric scales.35,37 One study conducted a survey with Swedish young people (n=293), and found that negative affect measured by the Child Depression Scale was positively correlated with problem-solving coping, but negatively correlated with meaning-focused coping. Meaning-focused coping was also positively related to life satisfaction and general positive affect. The second study is the only one that directly examined the link between psychological symptoms and worry about the threat of climate change. An Australian survey (n=275) measured symptoms indicative of clinically significant emotional states of depression, anxiety, and stress using the DASS-21, and found higher scores for respondents who reported higher climate change distress.35 The study included a mix of age groups, with young adults age 18-25 years making up a majority (57%) of the sample, and demonstrating the highest climate change distress and anxiety. One qualitative study reported whether participants had ever struggled with any mental health-related issues or challenges at any time in their lives, but did not relate this to climate anxiety.41

### Impact of specific climactic events on young people’s mental health

During the literature search it was clear that most of the research on mental health and climate change conducted to date related to specific climatic events. An exploratory article count was performed and articles that examined the effect of natural disasters on youth mental health were mapped across time from first publication to present (Figure 2).

![Figure 2.](http://medrxiv.org/https://www.medrxiv.org/content/medrxiv/early/2021/09/29/2021.09.27.21264151/F2.medium.gif)

[Figure 2.](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/09/29/2021.09.27.21264151/F2)

Figure 2. 
Number of journal articles that discuss the mental health of young people in relation to a natural disaster published annually over time

## DISCUSSION

The present review provides an overview of the current evidence for how young people experience negative emotions towards climate change. To the best of our knowledge, the present review represents the first systematic review of the evidence related to climate anxiety in young people. Overall, evidence is scarce, with most research conducted in the last 10 years. Although the causal relationship between worry about climate change and a diagnosis of mental illness was not directly examined in any included papers, available evidence suggests that young people are worried and experienced a range of negative emotions about the threat of current and future effects of climate change.

Although only one study directly examines the connection between climate distress and clinically significant symptoms of depression, anxiety and stress,35 the findings suggest a possible link between experiences of climate anxiety and mental health in young people, and give support to the idea that young people may be at heightened risk of mental health impacts compared to older people.

Several reasons have been proposed to explain young people’s vulnerability to the negative impacts of climate anxiety, including neurobiological changes occurring in the brain.28 Indeed, young people are already at heightened risk of emerging mental ill-health compared to other age groups, with prevalence of mental illness among young people being the highest of any age group.43 Across several studies included the present review, young people reported concern about climate change not only in the present but also into the future. This is consistent with the view of climate anxiety as owing to an “existential” threat to life itself.9,10 Research on other existential global threats, such as the fear of nuclear war, have found that this type of concern is associated with an increased risk for common mental disorders in adolescents.44 This further supports the argument that young people are likely to be at higher risk for the detrimental effects of climate-related worry. While lack of data currently makes it difficult to draw firm conclusions about the mechanisms or long-term mental health impacts of climate-related worry in young people, there is a clear argument for youth being a critical period both for emergence and prevention of climate-related mental health problems.

Positively, results of the current review also revealed evidence for factors that may help to promote well-being among young people in the face of climate change. This was an unexpected finding, as our research question and search strategy aimed at understanding the evidence related to mental health and negative emotions associated with climate anxiety, rather than how young people cope with existential threat. Results suggest a number factors that can support wellbeing or coping related to climate change, including meaningfulness, hope, and optimism regarding climate change, an awareness of possible solutions, a high degree in trust in environmental organisations, and motivation to engage in positive environmental behaviours.27,32,37,38,42 Findings of one research group showed that different types of coping strategies can be more or less effective for reducing negative affect and promoting well-being.32,36 Specifically, meaning-focused coping (such as the belief that “more and more people have started to take climate change seriously”) was associated with improved wellbeing and reduced negative affect, while problem-focused coping such as “thinking about what I myself can do”) was associated with higher negative affect.37,39 Findings from this group also showed that worry about the environment could co-occur with both positive and negative wellbeing, suggesting that coping may act to support wellbeing without impacting level of worry. This is consistent with the idea that negative feelings associated with climate change are not necessarily pathological in and of themselves.10,45 In fact, anxiety can act as a source of efficacy beliefs and motivation for change.46 However further research is needed to understand underlying mechanisms in larger and diverse samples.

Although not the focus of any included studies, another way that young people may be coping with climate change is through activism. Recent youth-led movements have been attended by millions of young people across 150 countries. Children and adolescents have also sued their government in Australia,47 Canada,48 the United States,49 and several other countries50 for their inaction in response to the climate crisis. While there is a body of literature suggesting that engaging in political activism can have positive psychological and social outcomes for young people,51 there is also evidence to suggest that major protests may increase the prevalence of depression, even without direct involvement.52 In this review the authors posit that this is due to disruptions in interpersonal relationships related to ideological disputes following the protests. While coping is widely-accepted as a key concept for understanding the impact of negative emotions such as worry on mental health and well-being, there are at least 100 taxonomies of coping proposed in the literature. Future research on this and other types of coping could help build understandings of who might benefit from different strategies to support wellbeing, and why.

Figure 3 provides a conceptual framework of how negative emotions associated with the existential threat of climate change may interact with and impact young people’s mental health. Negative emotions such as anxiety, concern, worry or despair, while not pathological by themselves, may increase the risk of mental ill-health if they become prolonged and overwhelming. While the evidence for the long-term mental health risks associated with climate anxiety is scarce, there is a strong body of research to show that other types of long-term stress increases the risk of mental health problems such as depression, anxiety, and substance use problems. In the context of climate change, the risk of emergence of mental ill-health may be increased by individual or collective risk factors, including the direct effects of climate change such as displacement and exposure to traumatic climatic events and other predisposing risk factors such as pre-existing physical or mental ill-health. This risk may be buffered by healthy coping strategies, such as meaning-focused strategies, and by protective factors like having a strong connection to culture.

![Figure 3.](http://medrxiv.org/https://www.medrxiv.org/content/medrxiv/early/2021/09/29/2021.09.27.21264151/F3.medium.gif)

[Figure 3.](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/09/29/2021.09.27.21264151/F3)

Figure 3. 
Conceptual framework showing the interaction between negative emotions associated with the existential threat of climate change and mental ill-health. Risk and protective factors may act to mediate risk of negative emotions contributing to the development of mental ill-health

The small number of studies included in this review were heterogeneous in design. Some used qualitative methods (mainly interviews and focus groups), others quantitative (surveys). Most of the studies did not aim to evaluate the prevalence or severity of concerns and negative emotions related to climate change, and no study evaluated how these negative emotions may increase risk of psychiatric morbidity. Two studies considered existing mental health issues of participants, but did not explore differences in the experience of climate-related distress between those with existing mental health problems compared to those without. In addition, no studies looked at climate-related worry over time to explore population-level risk and protective factors or changes at the individual level. Measures used across studies to investigate climate anxiety and related experiences were inconsistent, apart from those conducted by the same author group. Variation in terms and measures is consistent with wider literature in the area of climate change and mental health, which includes a wide range of terms to describe these concepts (see Table 1). Although, the term “climate anxiety” has been widely used, there is currently a lack of consensus on what aspects of negative emotions it should cover, and how its severity should be measured. This makes it difficult to compare the overall levels of concerns and negative emotions across studies in this review and across the field.

The majority of included studies were conducted in industrialised countries with largely White populations, with 10 out of 12 studies conducted in three countries (Sweden, Australia, and USA). The limited diversity in study settings and populations is consistent with findings of other reviews on the impact of climate change on health4 and further adds to the clear need for more research in this area overall. Only one qualitative study included in the present review was conducted with an Indigenous community.41 Findings of that study suggest that there may be unique factors that help to support mental health and wellbeing of First Nations young people in the face of climate change, such as the protective power of being on the land and connecting to Indigenous culture.

The relatively small number of studies that met inclusion criteria for this review contrasts with the large amount of research found on the direct impact of natural disasters on the mental health of young people, which included nearly 500 peer-reviewed articles to-date. Visual analysis of trends over time (Figure 2) shows that research in this area was extremely scarce until the mid-1980s. Following 2005, Hurricane Katrina prompted a spike in publications, and publications per year have been relatively stable since. The increasing number of publications examining the effect of natural disaster on mental health reflects the increasing frequency of natural disasters worldwide53 and the growing understanding of their direct effect on human health and wellbeing.50 It is also representative of the increased understanding of the impact of distressing experiences on the development of children and young people.54 Main findings of the present review highlight the need for more research that considers the experiences of young people who have not been directly impacted by a specific climatic event as well as those who have. As the frequency of climate disasters increases, the likelihood that more people will be directly impacted by such events also increases. Understanding how climate-related worry may interact with stress of experiencing climatic events is a key area for further investigation.

The scant evidence around climate anxiety in young people is seemingly at odds with available evidence from grey literature that suggests many young people are worried about climate change. A recent survey of more than 2000 young people in the UK found that almost three quarters (73%) said they are worried, and one in five (22%) said they were very worried about the state of the planet.55 Australia’s largest online youth survey of 15 to 19 year-olds (n=25,12625 and n=25,80026) has similarly placed mental health and the environment amongst the top four most important issues to young people for the last two years. Large-scale, rigorous surveys could add to these findings and paint a picture of the prevalence of climate concern among the population.

### Implications for research and clinical practice

Findings clearly show that experiences of climate anxiety in young people is understudied, with only 12 articles included through a systematic literature search and screen of over 3000 articles. This adds support to Wu and colleagues’ call to action to researchers, mental health professionals and policy-makers to better understand the effects of climate anxiety on youth mental health in order to improve the mental health and wellbeing of our future leaders.28 Further research is needed to characterise climate concern in young people, to clarify if there are qualitative and/or quantitative differences between adults and young people in experiences of climate-related worry and coping. Longitudinal research is needed to assess climate change-related negative emotions and mental health outcomes over time. Such research would offer invaluable data on potential factors contributing to vulnerability and/or resilience towards the development and trajectory of psychological impact of climate change.

To support comparison and harmonisation across studies, structured measures of climate anxiety must be developed and validated. It is currently unclear if climate anxiety is qualitatively or quantitatively different across the lifespan or across cultural groups. This may be particularly relevant for First Nations Peoples, who have strong cultural connection with nature and the land, as well as other historically marginalised groups who may have experience with existential threat to community and culture from human actions such as colonisation. More broadly, more research is needed with young people from a range of diverse backgrounds, particularly while the language and thinking around climate-related worry and anxiety is still emerging. To avoid creating definitions that centre the experience of White, wealthy communities, researchers must engage in genuine collaboration with young people with diverse experiences and identities to design research, and develop terminology and measures that consider the complexity of climate anxiety as a phenomenon. There is an urgent need to develop evidence-based conceptual frameworks defining climate anxiety and the relationship to mental health and wellbeing, along with robust measures that capture different dimensions and severities of the issue for different populations.

Results of this scoping review also have implications for youth mental health care. Prevention and intervention initiatives could aim to target coping mechanisms, in particular those shown to support wellbeing and reduce negative affect (i.e., meaning-based coping). Education programs and materials may be one strategy for helping to build the capacity and confidence of young people to reduce their own footprint and advocate for other individuals and organisations to take action. Given the large numbers of young people reporting worry about climate change, we suggest that mental health professionals ask about climate-related worry as part of their routine clinical assessment to inform approaches to care.

In addition, the mental health system itself needs to be resilient and responsive to the challenges brought by climate change, through the development of risk assessment and adaptation plans that respond to climate change through the building of climate-resilient health infrastructure and workforce.56 Mental health services can also play a direct role in climate change mitigation by reducing their greenhouse emissions through the adoption of environmentally sustainable practices and infrastructure.56 Beyond research and clinical practice, young people are concerned over lack of action by the governments and policy-makers.47-50 Policy inaction on climate change will threaten the mental well-being and lives of individuals and communities.57 A recent survey of 10,000 young people in ten countries showed a profound impact of climate change on young people’s psychological and emotional reactions, which was associated with their perceptions of governments’ responses to climate change.58 Thus, arguably the most important role mental health leaders and service providers can play is to show leadership in advocating for climate change action consistent with the concerns of young people. The cost of inaction is also disproportionately greater for those who are most affected by climate change; therefore, climate change mitigation is essential for climate and intergenerational justice as well as the prevention of mental health consequences of climate change.59,60

### Strengths and limitations

The main strength of this review is that it was created by performing comprehensive systematic literature searches of several major databases using carefully determined and refined terms and selection criteria. A subset of papers was double-screened and all included papers were discussed by the author group, which includes researchers with prior experience screening and synthesising peer-reviewed literature. However, only papers published in English, French, or German were included and searches did not include grey literature, which means that some relevant evidence may have been missed and the cultural and geographic diversity of included papers may have been limited. In addition, the quality of included papers was not rigorously assessed, hence conclusions made should be interpreted with some caution.

## CONCLUSION

Building the evidence-base around the mental health and wellbeing impacts of the threat of climate change in young people is an urgent priority. Understanding the evidence for the impact of the threat of climate change on the mental health of young people is essential for designing interventions and approaches that aim to improve outcomes for young people experiencing distress. Future research should seek to measure the relationship between climate anxiety and mental health outcomes over time in people with various cultural and socioeconomic identity, and to further build knowledge of protective factors and coping mechanisms. In the meantime, governments and mental health professionals can support youth mental health by acknowledging the real threat of climate change to young people’s wellbeing and by engaging in action to mitigate the effects of climate change.

## Data Availability

There is no data associated with this study.

## SOURCE OF FUNDING

This project was not funded.

## Supplementary Material

### Database Searches

#### EMBASE (Ovid)

View this table:
[Table4](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/09/29/2021.09.27.21264151/T4)

#### Medline (Ovid)

View this table:
[Table5](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/09/29/2021.09.27.21264151/T5)

#### PsycINFO (Ovid)

View this table:
[Table6](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/09/29/2021.09.27.21264151/T6)

*   Received September 27, 2021.
*   Revision received September 27, 2021.
*   Accepted September 29, 2021.


*   © 2021, Posted by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

The copyright holder for this pre-print is the author. All rights reserved. The material may not be redistributed, re-used or adapted without the author's permission.

## REFERENCES

1.  1.Costello A, Abbas M, Allen A, et al. Managing the health effects of climate change: Lancet and University College London Institute for Global Health Commission. Lancet 2009; 373(9676): 1693–733. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60935-1.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60935-1&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=19447250&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2021%2F09%2F29%2F2021.09.27.21264151.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000266209800017&link_type=ISI) 

2.  2.Palinkas LA, Wong M. Global climate change and mental health. Curr Opin Psychol 2020; 32: 12–6. doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.06.023.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.06.023&link_type=DOI) 

3.  3.1.  Butler CD
    
    Butler CD, Bowles DC, McIver L, Page L. Mental Health, Cognition and the Challenge of Climate Change. In: Butler CD, ed. Climate Change and Global Health. Wallingford, UK: CABI; 2014: 251–9.
    
    

4.  4.Charlson F, Ali S, Benmarhnia T, et al. Climate change and mental health: a scoping review. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2021; 18(9): 4486. doi:10.3390/ijerph18094486.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.3390/ijerph18094486&link_type=DOI) 

5.  5.Middleton J, Cunsolo A, Jones-Bitton A, Wright CJ, Harper SL. Indigenous mental health in a changing climate: a systematic scoping review of the global literature. Environ Res Lett 2020; 15(5): 053001. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ab68a9.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1088/1748-9326/ab68a9&link_type=DOI) 

6.  6.Hayes K, Blashki G, Wiseman J, Burke S, Reifels L. Climate change and mental health: risks, impacts and priority actions. Int J Ment Health Syst 2018; 12(1): 28. doi:10.1186/s13033-018-0210-6.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1186/s13033-018-0210-6&link_type=DOI) 

7.  7.Fritze JG, Blashki GA, Burke S, Wiseman J. Hope, despair and transformation: climate change and the promotion of mental health and wellbeing. Int J Ment Health Syst 2008; 2(1): 13. doi:10.1186/1752-4458-2-13.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1186/1752-4458-2-13&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=18799005&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2021%2F09%2F29%2F2021.09.27.21264151.atom) 

8.  8.Hayes K, Poland B. Addressing mental health in a changing climate: incorporating mental health indicators into climate change and health vulnerability and adaptation assessments. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2018; 15(9): 1806. doi:10.3390/ijerph15091806.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.3390/ijerph15091806&link_type=DOI) 

9.  9.Burke SEL, Sanson AV, Van Hoorn J. The psychological effects of climate change on children. Curr Psychiatry Rep 2018; 20(5): 35. doi:10.1007/s11920-018-0896-9.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1007/s11920-018-0896-9&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=http://www.n&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2021%2F09%2F29%2F2021.09.27.21264151.atom) 

10. 10.Clayton S. Climate anxiety: psychological responses to climate change. J Anxiety Disord 2020; 74(102263). doi:10.1016/j.janxdis.2020.102263.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.janxdis.2020.102263&link_type=DOI) 

11. 11.Ogunbode CA, Pallesen S, Böhm G, et al. Negative emotions about climate change are related to insomnia symptoms and mental health: cross-sectional evidence from 25 countries. Curr Psychol 2021. doi:10.1007/s12144-021-01385-4.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1007/s12144-021-01385-4&link_type=DOI) 

12. 12.Reyes MES, Carmen BPB, Luminarias MEP, Mangulabnan SANB, Ogunbode CA. An investigation into the relationship between climate change anxiety and mental health among Gen Z Filipinos. Curr Psychol 2021. doi:10.1007/s12144-021-02099-3.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1007/s12144-021-02099-3&link_type=DOI) 

13. 13.Stanley SK, Hogg TL, Leviston Z, Walker I. From anger to action: differential impacts of eco-anxiety, eco-depression, and eco-anger on climate action and wellbeing. J Clim Change Health 2021; 1: 100003. doi:10.1016/j.joclim.2021.100003.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.joclim.2021.100003&link_type=DOI) 

14. 14.Stewart AE. Psychometric properties of the Climate Change Worry Scale. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2021; 18(2): 494. doi:10.3390/ijerph18020494.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.3390/ijerph18020494&link_type=DOI) 

15. 15.1.  Weissbecker I
    
    Albrecht G. Chronic Environmental Change: Emerging ‘Psychoterratic’ Syndromes. In: Weissbecker I, ed. Climate Change and Human Well-Being: Global Challenges and Opportunities. New York, NY: Springer New York; 2011: 43–56.
    
    

16. 16.Clayton S, Manning C, Krygsman K, Speiser M. Mental health and our changing climate: impacts, implications, and guidance Washington, DC, 2017. [https://www.apa.org/news/press/releases/2017/03/mental-health-climate.pdf](https://www.apa.org/news/press/releases/2017/03/mental-health-climate.pdf).
    
    

17. 17.Cunsolo A, Ellis NR. Ecological grief as a mental health response to climate change-related loss. Nat Clim Chang 2018; 8(4): 275–81. doi:10.1038/s41558-018-0092-2.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1038/s41558-018-0092-2&link_type=DOI) 

18. 18.Helm SV, Pollitt A, Barnett MA, Curran MA, Craig ZR. Differentiating environmental concern in the context of psychological adaption to climate change. Glob Environ Change 2018; 48: 158–67. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2017.11.012.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2017.11.012&link_type=DOI) 

19. 19.Higginbotham N, Connor L, Albrecht G, Freeman S, Agho K. Validation of an Environmental Distress Scale. Ecohealth 2006; 3(4): 245–54. doi:10.1007/s10393-006-0069-x.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1007/s10393-006-0069-x&link_type=DOI) 

20. 20.Kevorkian KA. Environmental grief™: hope and healing. Cincinnati, OH: Union Institute and University; 2004.
    
    

21. 21.Albrecht G, Sartore G-M, Connor L, et al. Solastalgia: the distress caused by environmental change. Australas Psychiatry 2007; 15(Suppl 1): S95–S8. doi:10.1080/10398560701701288.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1080/10398560701701288&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=18027145&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2021%2F09%2F29%2F2021.09.27.21264151.atom) 

22. 22.Clemens V, von Hirschhausen E, Fegert JM. Report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change: implications for the mental health policy of children and adolescents in Europe—a scoping review. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2020. doi: 10.1007/s00787-020-01615-3.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1007/s00787-020-01615-3&link_type=DOI) 

23. 23.Solmi M, Radua J, Olivola M, et al. Age at onset of mental disorders worldwide: large-scale meta-analysis of 192 epidemiological studies. Mol Psychiatry 2021: 1–15. doi: 10.1038/s41380-021-01161-7.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1038/s41380-021-01161-7&link_type=DOI) 

24. 24.Kessler RC, Berglund P, Demler O, Jin R, Merikangas KR, Walters EE. Lifetime prevalence and age-of-onset distributions of DSM-IV disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2005; 62(6): 593–602. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.62.6.593.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1001/archpsyc.62.6.593&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=15939837&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2021%2F09%2F29%2F2021.09.27.21264151.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000229628400003&link_type=ISI) 

25. 25.Carlisle E, Fildes J, Hall S, Perrens B, Perdriau A, Plummer J. Youth Survey Report 2019 Sydney, NSW: Mission Australia, 2019. [https://www.missionaustralia.com.au/publications/youth-survey/1326-mission-australia-youth-survey-report-2019/file](https://www.missionaustralia.com.au/publications/youth-survey/1326-mission-australia-youth-survey-report-2019/file).
    
    

26. 26.Tiller E, Fildes J, Hall S, et al. Youth Survey Report 2020 Sydney, NSW: Mission Australia, 2020. [https://www.missionaustralia.com.au/what-we-do/research-impact-policy-advocacy/youth-survey](https://www.missionaustralia.com.au/what-we-do/research-impact-policy-advocacy/youth-survey).
    
    

27. 27.The Australian Psychological Society. Young people’s voices in the climate crisis Melbourne: APS, 2019. [https://psychweek.org.au/wp/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/19APS-PsychWeek-Summary-Report.pdf](https://psychweek.org.au/wp/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/19APS-PsychWeek-Summary-Report.pdf).
    
    

28. 28.Wu J, Snell G, Samji H. Climate anxiety in young people: a call to action. Lancet Planet Health 2020; 4(10): 435–6. doi: 10.1016/S2542-5196(20)30223-0.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/S2542-5196(20)30223-0&link_type=DOI) 

29. 29.Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Douglas G, The PRISMA Group. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. PLoS Med 2009; 6(7): e1000097. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=19621072&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2021%2F09%2F29%2F2021.09.27.21264151.atom) 

30. 30.Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, et al. PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation. Ann Intern Med 2018; 169(7): 467–73. doi: 10.7326/M18-0850.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.7326/M18-0850&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=30178033&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2021%2F09%2F29%2F2021.09.27.21264151.atom) 

31. 31.Henker B, Whalen CK, O’Neil R. Worldly and workaday worries: Contemporary concerns of children and young adolescents. J Abnorm Child Psychol 1995; 23(6): 685–702. doi: 10.1007/BF01447472.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1007/BF01447472&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=8609308&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2021%2F09%2F29%2F2021.09.27.21264151.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=A1995TJ23500002&link_type=ISI) 

32. 32.Ojala M. Adolescents’ worries about environmental risks: Subjective well-being, values, and existential dimensions. J Youth Stud 2005; 8(3): 331–47. doi: 10.1080/13676260500261934.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1080/13676260500261934&link_type=DOI) 

33. 33.Wolf J, Salo R. Water, water, everywhere, nor any drop to drink: climate change delusion. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 2008; 42(4): 350. doi: 10.1080/00048670701881603.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1080/00048670701881603&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=18330779&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2021%2F09%2F29%2F2021.09.27.21264151.atom) 

34. 34.Agho K, Stevens G, Taylor M, Barr M, Raphael B. Population risk perceptions of global warming in Australia. Environ Res 2010; 110(8): 756–63. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2010.09.007.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.envres.2010.09.007&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=20889150&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2021%2F09%2F29%2F2021.09.27.21264151.atom) 

35. 35.Searle K, Gow K. Do concerns about climate change lead to distress? Int J Clim Change Strateg Manag 2010; 2(4): 362–79. doi: 10.7554/eLife.56345.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.7554/eLife.56345&link_type=DOI) 

36. 36.Ojala M. Regulating worry, promoting hope: how do children, adolescents, and young adults cope with climate change? Int J Environ Sci Educ 2012a; 7(4): 537–61. [https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ997146.pdf](https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ997146.pdf).
    
    

37. 37.Ojala M. How do children cope with global climate change? coping strategies, engagement, and well-being. J Environ Psychol 2012b; 32(3): 225–33. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2012.02.004.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.jenvp.2012.02.004&link_type=DOI) 

38. 38.Strife SJ. Children’s environmental concerns: expressing ecophobia. J Environ Educ 2012; 43(1): 37–54. doi: 10.1080/00958964.2011.602131.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1080/00958964.2011.602131&link_type=DOI) 

39. 39.Ojala M. Coping with climate change among adolescents: implications for subjective well-being and environmental engagement. Sustainability 2013; 5(5): 2191–209. doi: 10.3390/su5052191.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.3390/su5052191&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000324048800023&link_type=ISI) 

40. 40.El Zoghbi MB, El Ansari W. Ethical concerns and contributions in response to climate change and the links to well-being: a study of University students in the Netherlands. Cent Eur J Public Health 2014; 22(2): 118–24. doi: 10.21101/cejph.a3998.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.21101/cejph.a3998&link_type=DOI) 

41. 41.MacDonald JP, Willox AC, Ford JD, et al. Protective factors for mental health and well-being in a changing climate: perspectives from Inuit youth in Nunatsiavut, Labrador. Soc Sci Med 2015; 141: 133–41. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.07.017.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.07.017&link_type=DOI) 

42. 42.Li CJ, Monroe MC. Exploring the essential psychological factors in fostering hope concerning climate change. Environ Educ Res 2017; 25(6): 936–54. doi: 10.1080/13504622.2017.1367916.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1080/13504622.2017.1367916&link_type=DOI) 

43. 43.Erskine HE, Moffitt TE, Copeland WE, et al. A heavy burden on young minds: the global burden of mental and substance use disorders in children and youth. Psychol Med 2015; 45(7): 1551–63. doi: 10.1017/S0033291714002888.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1017/S0033291714002888&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=25534496&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2021%2F09%2F29%2F2021.09.27.21264151.atom) 

44. 44.Poikolainen K, Aalto-Setälä T, Tuulio-Henriksson A, Marttunen M, Lönnqvist J. Fear of nuclear war increases the risk of common mental disorders among young adults: a five-year follow-up study. BMC Public Health 2004; 4(1): 42. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-4-42.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1186/1471-2458-4-42&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=15458568&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2021%2F09%2F29%2F2021.09.27.21264151.atom) 

45. 45.Panu P. Anxiety and the ecological crisis: an analysis of eco-anxiety and climate anxiety. Sustainability 2020; 12(19): 7836. doi: 10.3390/su12197836.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.3390/su12197836&link_type=DOI) 

46. 46.Ojala M, Cunsolo A, Ogunbode CA, Middleton J. Anxiety, worry, and grief in a time of environmental and climate crisis: a narrative review. Annu Rev Environ Resour 2021; 46(1). doi: 10.1146/annurev-environ-012220-022716.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1146/annurev-environ-012220-022716&link_type=DOI) 

47. 47.Schuijers L. These Aussie Teens Have Launched a Landmark Climate Case Against the Government. Win or Lose, it’ll Make a Difference. September 10, 2020. [https://theconversation.com/these-aussie-teens-have-launched-a-landmark-climate-case-against-the-government-win-or-lose-itll-make-a-difference-145830](https://theconversation.com/these-aussie-teens-have-launched-a-landmark-climate-case-against-the-government-win-or-lose-itll-make-a-difference-145830) (accessed Jan 15 2021).
    
    

48. 48.Tollefson J. Canadian Kids Sue Government Over Climate Change. October 25, 2019. [https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-019-03253-5](https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-019-03253-5) (accessed 15 Jan 2021).
    
    

49. 49.Schwartz J. Court Quashes Youth Climate Change Case Against Government January 17, 2020. [https://www.nytimes.com/2020/01/17/climate/juliana-climate-case.html](https://www.nytimes.com/2020/01/17/climate/juliana-climate-case.html) (accessed 15 January 2021).
    
    

50. 50.Parker L. Kids Suing Governments About Climate: It’s a Global Trend. June 27 2019. [https://www.nationalgeographic.com/environment/article/kids-suing-governments-about-climate-growing-trend](https://www.nationalgeographic.com/environment/article/kids-suing-governments-about-climate-growing-trend) (accessed 15 January 2021).
    
    

51. 51.1.  Brown NJL, 
    2.  Lomas T, 
    3.  Eiroa-Orosa FJ
    
    Montague A, Eiroa Orosa FJ. Exploring the Role of Engagement on Well-Being and Personal Development: A Review of Adolescent and Mental Health Activism. In: Brown NJL, Lomas T, Eiroa-Orosa FJ, eds. The Routledge International Handbook of Critical Positive Psychology. London, UK: Routledge: Routledge; 2017: 437–46.
    
    

52. 52.Ni MY, Kim Y, McDowell I, et al. Mental health during and after protests, riots and revolutions: a systematic review. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 2020; 54(3): 232–43. doi: 10.1177/0004867419899165.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1177/0004867419899165&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=http://www.n&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2021%2F09%2F29%2F2021.09.27.21264151.atom) 

53. 53.Institute for Economics & Peace. Ecological threat register 2020: understanding ecological threats, resilience and peace Sydney, NSW: IEP, 2020. [https://visionofhumanity.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/ETR\_2020\_web-1.pdf](https://visionofhumanity.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/ETR_2020_web-1.pdf).
    
    

54. 54.Masten AS, Osofsky JD. Disasters and their impact on child development: introduction to the special section. Child Dev 2010; 81(4): 1029–39. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01452.x.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01452.x&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=20636680&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2021%2F09%2F29%2F2021.09.27.21264151.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000279932700001&link_type=ISI) 

55. 55.Atherton R. Climate anxiety: Survey for BBC Newsround Shows Children Losing Sleep Over Climate Change and the Environment. 3 March 2020. [https://www.bbc.co.uk/newsround/51451737](https://www.bbc.co.uk/newsround/51451737) (accessed 15 Jan 2021).
    
    

56. 56.World Health Organization (WHO). Environmentally ustainable health systems: a strategic document Copenhagen: WHO Europe, 2017. [https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/environmentally-sustainable-health-systems](https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/environmentally-sustainable-health-systems).
    
    

57. 57.Zhang Y, Beggs PJ, Bambrick H, et al. The MJA–Lancet Countdown on health and climate change: Australian policy inaction threatens lives. Med J Aust 2018; 209(11): 474–. doi: 10.5694/mja18.00789.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.5694/mja18.00789&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=30521429&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2021%2F09%2F29%2F2021.09.27.21264151.atom) 

58. 58.Hickman C, Marks E, Pihkala P, et al. Young people’s voices on climate anxiety, government betrayal and moral injury: a global phenomenon. 2021. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.3918955.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.2139/ssrn.3918955&link_type=DOI) 

59. 59.Gordijn B, ten Have H. Ethics of mitigation, adaptation and geoengineering. Med Health Care Philos 2012; 15(1): 1–2. doi: 10.1007/s11019-011-9374-4.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1007/s11019-011-9374-4&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=22219039&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2021%2F09%2F29%2F2021.09.27.21264151.atom) 

60. 60.1.  Masson-Delmotte VPZ, 
    2.  Pirani A, 
    3.  Connors SL, et al.
    
    IPCC. Summary for Policymakers. In: Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Masson-Delmotte VPZ, Pirani A, Connors SL, et al., eds., In Press. [https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg1/#SPM](https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg1/#SPM).