Abstract
Applications of computational fluid dynamics (CFD) techniques to aid in the diagnosis and treatment of cardiovascular disease have entered the research domain in recent years, due to their ability to provide valuable patient-specific information without risks associated with highly invasive procedures. SimVascular [1] [2] is an open-source software which allows streamlined processing and CFD blood flow analysis of medical imaging data. OpenFOAM [3] is a proven open-source software which allows for versatile modeling of various fluid dynamics phenomena. In this study, both SimVascular and OpenFOAM simulations are set up with identical computational mesh, similar numerical schemes, boundary conditions, and material properties, to model blood flow in the coronary artery of a 10 year old patient with Coarctation of the Aorta (CoA) who underwent end-to-side anastomosis. Difference in the flow fields such as flow rate, pressure, vorticity, and wall shear stress between SimVascular and OpenFOAM are analyzed. Similar results are obtained in both simulations up to a certain model time, before the results become drastically different. Both the similarities and differences are documented and discussed.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Clinical Trial
N/A
Funding Statement
This research is not funded by funding agencies.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Not applicable
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Data will be made available upon request.