Abstract
Phenomenon Professional identity development is recognised as a core goal of medical education alongside knowledge and skill acquisition. Identity is a complex entity that can be conceptualised as externally influenced, but individually constructed. Integration from legitimate bystander to ‘old timer’ of the medical community of practice provides a backdrop for individual negotiation of professional identity. During Covid-19, the medical community of practice and education experienced significant disruption. We sought to investigate how these disruptions impacted professional identity development by examining conflicts between students’ identities highlighted by the pressures of the pandemic.
Approach A mixed-methods survey was distributed to medical students in the UK. The survey was active from 2nd May to 15th June 2020, during the height of the first wave of the Covid-19 pandemic in the UK. Operating within the paradigm of constructivism, we conducted a reflexive thematic analysis of qualitative responses. Analysis was focused around the disruption to medical education, actions taken by medical students during this disruption, and the tension between student actions where they existed in conflict.
Findings Three themes were constructed to describe the identities that participants felt were in conflict during the first wave of the Covid-19 pandemic: Status and role as a future doctor; status and role as a student; and status and role as a member of the wider community. Students noted that lack of clinical exposure was detrimental to their education, implicitly recognising that many aspects of professional identity formation are forged in the clinical environment. Participants were keen to volunteer clinically but struggled to balance this with academic work. Participants worried about the risk to their families and the wider community, and wanted to ensure that their skills would add value to the clinical environment. Volunteers felt frustrated when they were unable to perform tasks which aligned with their identities as future doctors, with the exception of participants who worked as interim FY1s (FiY1s), which aligned well with the roles of FY1s.
Insights As hypothesised, the participants in this study experienced disruptions to their professional identity development during the first wave of the Covid-19 pandemic in 2020. This work provides early evidence, collected at the beginning of the pandemic, that the effects of disruptions to professional identity development were wide-reaching, often negative, and represent an important topic for future exploration. Given that the pandemic has highlighted areas of identity tension, these findings have the potential to provide insight into how medical training can better nurture professional identity development during and beyond international crises.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
None
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
University of Cambridge Psychology Research Ethics Committee (Approval number: PRE.2020.040)
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Alternative contact Name: Anna Harvey, Email address: annaharvey013{at}gmail.com, Full Institution address: King’s College London, London UK, Institution postcode: SE5 9NU, Twitter: @a_c_harvey
Emails: Matthew Byrne <mhvbyrne{at}doctors.org.uk>, James Ashcroft <jamesashcroft36{at}gmail.com>, Jonathan C. M. Wan <jonathancmw{at}gmail.com>, Laith Alexander <laith1.alexander{at}gmail.com>, Anna Harvey <annaharvey013{at}gmail.com>, Nick Schindler <nicholas.schindler{at}doctors.org.uk>, Megan Brown <hymb2{at}hyms.ac.uk>, Cecilia Brassett <cb457{at}cam.ac.uk>
Sources of support: Nil
Conflicts of interests: None financial or otherwise
Authorship: AH, MELB, MHVB, LA, JA, JCMW were responsible for conceptualisation. All authors were responsible for writing the first draft. MHVB, JA, JCMW, LA were responsible for data collection. JCMW was responsible for quantitative analysis, and AH, MHVB, LA were responsible for qualitative analysis. AH, MELB were responsible for interpretation of data. All authors were responsible for revisions. CB was responsible for supervision.
Study type: Cross sectional survey
Data Availability
None