Abstract
Severe COVID-19 is reflected by significant changes in multiple urine peptides. Based on this observation, a clinical test based on urinary peptides predicting COVID-19 severity, CoV50, was developed and registered as IVD in Germany. We have hypothesized that molecular changes displayed by CoV50, to a large degree likely reflective of endothelial damage, can be significantly reversed by specific drugs. To test this hypothesis, we have collected urinary peptide data from patients without COVID-19 prior and after drug treatment. The drugs chosen were selected based on availability of sufficient number of participants in the dataset (n>20) and potential value of drug therapies in the treatment of COVID-19 based on reports in the literature. In these participants without COVID-19, while spironolactone did not demonstrate a significant impact on CoV50 scoring, empagliflozin treatment resulted in a significant change in CoV50 scoring, indicative of a potential therapeutic benefit. The results serve as a proof-of-principle for a drug repurposing approach based on human urinary peptide signatures and support the initiation of a randomised control trial testing a potential positive effect of empagliflozin in the treatment of severe COVID-19, possibly via endothelial protective mechanisms.
Significance of the study COVID-19 pandemic has imposed a heavy burden on society, health care and economics. Although multiple drugs have been tested in the context of COVID-19, effective treatments for patients experiencing severe disease are still missing, with some drugs demonstrating benefit only at earlier disease stage. Computational drug repurposing emerged as a promising approach to boost drug development, allowing to predict drug efficacy based on the molecular signature of drug impact, mainly using transcriptomics data from cell lines.
Recently we demonstrated that urinary proteomics profiles significantly differ between patients with severe COVID-19 course and those with mild/ moderate disease. This resulted in the development of a molecular signature associated with COVID-19 severity (CoV50), allowing to predict COVID-19 course, and enabling guiding intervention.
Here we report on the first study demonstrating the application of clinical proteomics data (from clinical trial participants) in a drug repurposing approach. We used the CoV50 signature to examine if the molecular changes associated with COVID-19 severity in patients without COVID-19 might be altered by existing drugs. In a study population without COVID-19, empagliflozin demonstrated a partial, yet significant reversion of the CoV50 signature, indicating a potential benefit in the context of severe COVID-19.
Competing Interest Statement
HM is the founder and co-owner of Mosaiques Diagnostics (Hannover, Germany). AL and JS are employed by Mosaiques Diagnostics.
Funding Statement
Not applicable.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
All underlying studies were conducted to conform to regulations on the protection of individuals participating in medical research and in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki (2013) and received ethical approval by the responsible institutional review boards. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants at the time of sampling. All data sets received were anonymized. Specifically, for all samples from COVID-19 patients the Ethics Committee of the German-Saxonian Board of Physicians, Dresden, Germany (number EK-BR-88/20.1) and the Institutional Review Boards of the recruiting sites provided ethical clearance [1]. The protocol was registered with the German Register for Clinical Studies (www.drks.de), number DRKS00022495, which is interconnected with the WHO International Clinical Trial Registry Platform (www.who.int/clinical-trials-registry-platform). For the samples from patients undergoing empagliflozin treatment, all patients consented to the study, which was approved by the University of Toronto University Health Network with approval #11-0213 [2]. All samples from subjects undergoing spironolactone treatment and placebo controls were from the HOMAGE trial, a prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded-endpoint (PROBE), multicentre design, in which people at increased risk of developing HF were randomly assigned to receive either spironolactone or standard of care (control) - not receiving spironolactone or other mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02556450). The study was approved by all relevant ethics committees and regulatory bodies [3]. References: [1] Wendt R, Thijs L, Kalbitz S, Mischak H, Siwy J, Raad J, Metzger J, Neuhaus B, Leyen HV, Dudoignon E, et al. A urinary peptidomic profile predicts outcome in sars-cov-2-infected patients. EClinicalMedicine. 2021;36:100883. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.100883 [2] Cherney D, Perkins BA, Lytvyn Y, Heerspink H, Rodriguez-Ortiz ME, Mischak H. The effect of sodium/glucose cotransporter 2 (sglt2) inhibition on the urinary proteome. PLoS One. 2017;12:e0186910. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0186910 [3] Pellicori P, Ferreira JP, Mariottoni B, Brunner-La Rocca HP, Ahmed FZ, Verdonschot J, Collier T, Cuthbert JJ, Petutschnigg J, Mujaj B, et al. Effects of spironolactone on serum markers of fibrosis in people at high risk of developing heart failure: Rationale, design and baseline characteristics of a proof-of-concept, randomised, precision-medicine, prevention trial. The heart omics in aging (homage) trial. Eur J Heart Fail. 2020;22:1711-1723. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.1716
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Abbreviations
- CMap
- Connectivity Map
- SGLT2
- sodium-glucose transport protein 2
- UPP
- urinary peptide pattern
- WHO
- World Health Organization.
