Immunogenicity of mRNA-1273, BNT162b2 and Ad26.COV2.S COVID-19 vaccines

Prophylactic vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 are being deployed globally to combat the COVID-19 pandemic. There are few data regarding the comparative immunogenicity of these vaccines, except for indirect inferences from publicly available trial data from manufacturers^1–6. Immunogenicity measures of different vaccines may be important to quantitate as we seek to understand variation in vaccine effectiveness between individuals.

We characterized the immunogenicity of mRNA-1273 (Moderna), BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) and Ad26.COV2.S (Johnson & Johnson (Janssen)) in ambulatory adults enrolled in an ongoing community study in Chelsea, Massachusetts and a vaccine biobanking effort in Boston, Massachusetts. In total we include data from 215 participants who had received one (n = 99) or two doses (n = 116) of vaccine ≥7 days prior, 130 unvaccinated participants with asymptomatic or symptomatic prior infection confirmed by positive anti-nucleocapsid antibody, 112 uninfected (anti-nucleocapsid antibody negative), and 1,220 historical controls sampled before the pandemic7. The median age of vaccinated participants was 39 years (IQR 31-55 years) and 120/215 (56%) were female (Supplementary Table 1). We compared immune responses according to prior infection, and vaccination type and dose and adjusted for age, sex and duration after vaccination in all analyses.

We assessed total IgG/M/A binding antibody levels against the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein (Roche Elecsys Anti-SARS-CoV-2 S), and found substantial variation in antibody concentrations depending on prior infection, vaccine type and vaccine dose (Figure 1A, summarized in a multivariate regression model in Supplementary Table 2). Among participants without prior infection, antibody concentrations after a single dose of mRNA-1273 or BNT162b2 were comparable or slightly lower than convalescent individuals (geometric mean concentration in U/mL (GMC) 222 vs. 189, adjusted p=0.4 for mRNA-1273 and 71 vs. 189, adjusted p=0.01 for BNT162b2). In contrast, recipients of Ad26.COV2.S with no prior infection had significantly lower antibody concentrations than convalescent unvaccinated individuals (GMC 6.9 vs 189, adjusted p <0.001). Although participants with no prior infection who received a single dose of either of the three vaccines were sampled at a comparable duration after vaccination (a median of 22-24 days), a single dose of mRNA-1273 or BNT162b2 generated higher titers than Ad26.COV2.S (adjusted p < 0.001 for both comparisons, Supplementary Table 3). At a median of 24 days post-vaccination, seven of twenty-two (17.3%) Ad26.COV2.S recipients had undetectable antibody levels. We confirmed that all 22 Ad26.COV2.S recipients had no major medical comorbidity and were not on immunosuppressive medications in the prior six months. Receipt of both doses of mRNA-1273 or BNT162b2 were associated with substantially higher antibody concentrations than convalescent individuals (GMC 6486 for mRNA-1273 and GMC 2455 for BNT162b2 vs. 189, adjusted p<0.001 for both comparisons). Individuals with prior infection who were vaccinated had ∼2 log₁₀ IU/ml higher antibody concentrations than convalescent individuals regardless of vaccine type, even after a single dose and there was a non-significant pattern towards lower concentrations in Ad26.COV2.S recipients. Using an independent validated total IgG/M/A or IgG ELISA, measurement of receptor binding domain (RBD) binding antibodies confirmed the differences above; and IgM and IgA responses were low (Figure S1). Further measurement of IgG against RBD-multimers also confirmed these findings (Figure S2). IgG responses against equivalent RBD-multimers of less pathogenic, common coronaviruses OCU43 and HKU1 were comparable between groups supporting the specificity of this finding (Figure S3).

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Figure 1: Humoral immunogenicity of mRNA-1273, BNT-162b2 and Ad26.COV2.S in individuals with and without prior SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Panel A shows the quantitative SARS-CoV-2 spike IgG/A/M antibody concentration (Roche Elecsys Anti-SARS-CoV-2 assay) in U/ml of serum for 112 participants without prior infection or vaccination, 130 with prior infection and 215 following vaccination. An antibody titre of 0.8 U/ml was considered positive (dotted line). The number of donors, proportion positive and geometric mean concentration is shown above each group. Panel B shows pseudovirus neutralization titer 50 (pNT50, defined as the titer at which the serum achieves 50% neutralization of SARS-CoV-2 wildtype pseudovirus entry into ACE2 expressing 293T cells) for a subset of the donors above and an additional 1220 pre-pandemic controls (from Garcia-Beltran et al.⁷) used in assay validation and deriving the cutoff shown. The threshold for defining positive individuals, denoted by the dotted horizontal line, was a pNT50 of 20⁷. The number of donors, proportion positive (at a threshold of 1:20) and geometric mean titer is shown above each group. In both panel A and B, for each group the horizontal line denotes the geometric mean concentration, and whiskers extend to 95% confidence interval. Asterisks denote p-values adjusted for age, sex and duration after vaccination at time of sampling, relative to unvaccinated individuals with prior infection (see supplementary Table 2 and 4) as follows: ns not significant, * p<0.05, ** p<0.01, *** p<0.001.

Correlative analysis of the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine trials demonstrate that neutralizing antibody titer is associated with the degree of protection observed^8,9. In animal models, experimental transfer of antibodies protects from infection^10,11 and in human randomized controlled-trials, prophylactic administration of neutralizing antibodies reduces incidence of clinical COVID-19 ^12,13. We assessed neutralization of pseudoviruses representing the original Wuhan isolate of SARS-CoV-2, which formed the basis of all three vaccines, in all Ad26.COV2.S recipients and a random subsample of mRNA-1273 and BNT162b2 vaccinees (total 190 vaccinees). Among pre-pandemic and confirmed uninfected individuals, a neutralization titer (pNT50) cutoff of 1:20 identified 1.6% as positive⁷. Using this threshold, 90.1% of unvaccinated convalescent individuals demonstrated neutralization (Figure 1B). Following a single dose of mRNA1273 or BNT162b2, neutralization titers were comparable to convalescent individuals (geometric mean titer (GMT) 115 for mRNA1273 and 94 for BNT162b2 vs. 139 for convalescent donors, p=ns for both comparisons Supplementary Table 4) and 78% and 86% neutralized virus. Titers were higher after both doses of mRNA vaccine (GMT 715 for mRNA1273 and 927 for BNT162b2, adjusted p<0.001 for both), and serum from all mRNA vaccinees neutralized wild-type SARS-CoV-2 pseudovirus. In contrast, only two of 21 (9.5%) Ad26.COV2.S recipients had a neutralization titer >1:20. Among individuals with prior infection, receipt of one or two doses of either of the three vaccines, generated high neutralization titers.

To evaluate the described increase in anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies at later timepoints in Ad26.COV2.S recipients^2,3, we obtained repeat measures in a subset of 15 Ad26.COV2.S recipients without prior infection For this subset the baseline sampling was at a median 23 (range 7-44) days and follow-up at a median 66 (range 25-82) days after vaccination. Anti-spike antibody concentrations increased modestly for all Ad26.COV2.S individuals (Figure 2A); however, only four individuals had an increase in neutralization, and 11/15 (73%) remained <1:20 (Figure 2B). Next, we pooled initial and repeat measures among individuals without prior infection and modelled the kinetics of responses for all three vaccines. Over the first ∼6 weeks following receipt of first dose of vaccination, antibody concentrations increased regardless of vaccine (Figure 2C) but the estimated plateau titers were lower amongAd26.COV2.S recipients. Constraining analysis to the period prior to the second mRNA vaccine effect (ie. the first four weeks for BNT162b2 and five weeks for mRNA1273), titers increased for all three vaccines, and the rate of increase was not statistically dissimilar between vaccines (interaction p=0.85). In this cohort, 80% of convalescent individuals have a pNT50 of greater than 45.6, corresponding with published estimates of the threshold for ∼50% protection⁸. Using this threshold, most recipients of mRNA-1273 and BNT162b2 achieved predicted protective neutralization titers rapidly, before receipt of the second dose of vaccination, and these appear to be sustained for several months (Figure 2D). In contrast, most Ad26.COV2.S recipients did not neutralize virus even after 6 weeks. Since previously published studies of Ad26.COV2.S recipients that have described a more robust increase in neutralization utilized the Victoria strain of SARS CoV-2 ^2,3, a strain that has been noted to be more easily neutralized¹⁴, we introduced the Victoria strain-associated S247R mutation into the SARS CoV-2 Wuhan isolate used in this study. Sera from vaccine recipients demonstrated higher neutralization titers against this S247R-containing variant than the original Wuhan strain regardless of vaccine administered (Figure S4). Therefore differences in the described neutralization seen in this study vs. the Ad26.COV2.S trials^2,3 may be partially accounted for by use of the S247R viral variant in prior studies.

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Figure 2: Follow-up measurement of response in Ad26.COV2.S recipients and kinetics of humoral responses to mRNA1273, BNT162b2 and Ad26.COV2.S SARS-CoV-2 vaccines.

Longitudinal assessment of SARS-CoV-2 spike IgG/A/M antibody titers (Panel A) and virus neutralization (Panel B) in 15 Ad26CoV2.S vaccinees with baseline and repeat measures. Pooling all data in, we modelled the kinetics of antibody concentration and neutralization according to vaccine. Panel C shows SARS-CoV-2 spike IgG/A/M antibody levels and Panel D shows virus neutralization for all donors sampled after vaccination, with best-fit lines (Loess fit) shown and colored according to vaccine type, over the first 20 weeks following vaccination. In Panels C and D, the geometric mean concentration or titer, and proportion positive at threshold indicated are shown for the periods 0-2, 2-4, 4-6 and >=6 weeks in the data table insert to the right of the main figure. Each individual point and corresponding fit are colored according to vaccine type (red mRNA-1273, blue BNT162b2 or green Ad26COV2.S), the shaded area adjacent to each line denotes the 95% confidence interval, and points are additionally shaded according to dose. Dashed lines show best-fit lines for the period after receipt of the first dose of mRNA-1273 or BNT162b2 in Panel C. In Panel D, the dotted line denotes a pNT50 threshold of 20 derived from study of pre-pandemic controls, and the upper dashed line denotes a pNT50 titer of 45.6 which represents the 20^th centile of neutralization titers for unvaccinated individuals with prior infection and corresponds with 50% estimated protection in Khoury et al⁸.

To explore differences in cellular immune response to vaccination, we assessed T-cell responses to SARS-CoV-2 spike peptides (wild-type strain) by IFN-γ ELISpot in a subset of uninfected vaccinees who completed their vaccination schedule (Figure 3). For reference, unvaccinated participants with prior infection had a mean 170 spot forming units (SFU) per 10⁶ PBMC. Spike-specific T-cell responses varied significantly by vaccine (Kruskall-Wallis p<0.001). T-cell responses were higher in recipients of mRNA-1273 or BNT-162b2 than Ad26.COV2.S (mean 564 vs. 96 SFU/10⁶ PBMC, adjusted p=0.003) and interestingly responses were also higher in mRNA1273 than in BNT-162b2 recipients (mean 564 vs 398 SFU/10⁶ PBMC, adjusted p=0.04).

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Figure 3: T-cell responses to spike peptides after completing SARS-CoV-2 vaccine series.

Inteferon gamma ELISPOT using bulk peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) with spike peptides from SARS-CoV-2 Wuhan strain were performed. The threshold for defining positive individuals, is denoted by the dotted horizontal line at 10 SFU/10⁶ PBMC. Data are normalized to background DMSO control responses. *** denotes p<0.001 with Kruskal-Wallis test.

In summary, these data suggest marked differences in the immunogenicity of mRNA-based vaccines (mRNA-1273 and BNT162b2) and Ad26.COV2.S in the first weeks following vaccination in healthy individuals. Differences in the efficacy^1,5,6 and effectiveness during deployment under emergency-use-authorization of mRNA-1273, BNT162b2, and Ad26.COV2.S vaccines may be, at least in part, due to the variable immunogenicity of the vaccines described here. Among individuals with prior infection, vaccination conferred higher antibody concentration and neutralization titers regardless of vaccine type and whether a second dose was given; efficacy and effectiveness studies should be stratified by prior infection status of participants. This supports recent data suggesting a single dose of mRNA vaccine in seropositive convalescent patients elicits comparable antibody titers to seronegative individuals who receive two doses of mRNA vaccine. The sustained lower immunogenicity of the Ad26.COV2.S vaccine by multiple measures used in this study warrants further study about the possible benefit of booster doses.