Abstract
Introduction Dosing of renally cleared drugs in patients with kidney failure often deviates from clinical guidelines but little is known about what is predictive of receiving inappropriate doses.
Methods and materials We combined data from the Danish National Patient Register and in-hospital data on drug administrations and estimated glomerular filtration rates for admissions between 1 October 2009 and 1 June 2016, from a pool of about 2.9 million persons. We trained artificial neural network and linear logistic ridge regression models to predict the risk of five outcomes (>0, ≥1, ≥2, ≥3 and ≥5 inappropriate doses daily) with index set 24 hours after admission. We used time-series validation for evaluating discrimination, calibration, clinical utility and explanations.
Results Of 52,451 admissions included, 42,250 (81%) were used for model development. The median age was 77 years; 50% of admissions were of women. ≥5 drugs were used between admission start and index in 23,124 admissions (44%); the most common drug classes were analgesics, systemic antibacterials, diuretics, antithrombotics, and antacids. The neural network models had better discriminative power (all AUROCs between 0.77 and 0.81) and were better calibrated than their linear counterparts. The main prediction drivers were use of anti-inflammatory, antidiabetic and anti-Parkison’s drugs as well as having a diagnosis of chronic kidney failure. Sex and age affected predictions but slightly.
Conclusion Our models can flag patients at high risk of receiving at least one inappropriate dose daily in a controlled in-silico setting. A prospective clinical study may confirm this holds in real-life settings and translates into benefits in hard endpoints.
Competing Interest Statement
SB reports ownerships in Intomics A/S, Hoba Therapeutics Aps, Novo Nordisk A/S, Lundbeck A/S, and managing board memberships in Proscion A/S and Intomics A/S outside the submitted work. All other authors report no competing interests.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by the Novo Nordisk Foundation (grants NNF14CC0001 and NNF17OC0027594) and the Danish Innovation Fund (grant 5153-00002B).
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Approval was obtained from the Danish Patient Safety Authority (3-3013-1723; then competent authority for ethical approval), the Danish Data Protection Agency (DT SUND 2016-48, 2016-50, 2017-57) and the Danish Health Data Authority (FSEID 00003724).
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Due to the sensitive nature of the data, we can neither offer access to nor share our data with third parties. Data can be obtained from the original sources upon request.
