Abstract
Background The World Health Organization (WHO) has highlighted the health risks to adolescent mothers and their children. Statements and reports typically group all mothers aged under 20 together. Some studies have examined the risk variations within this age group, and several child health outcomes have yet to be examined.
Methods We analyzed data from Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS) collected between 2004 and 2018 in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) and South Asia, on children born to mothers 25 years old or younger. We examined the association between maternal age at first birth and deaths of neonates, infants, under 5 years old, and stillbirths, using mixed effects logistic regression and adjusting for common demographic and health-seeking variables.
Findings The mortality rates at all early-life stages of children born to mothers aged <16 years, 16-17 years, and 18-19 years at first birth were about 2-4 times, 1.5-2 times, and 1.2-1.3 times higher, respectively, than among children born to mothers aged 23-25 in both regions. Absolute mortality rates decreased over time, but the risk gradient versus age remained similar across time periods, regions, and most child mortality endpoints. After adjustment for rural/urban residence and maternal education, in SSA in 2014-2018 having a mother under 16 (10-15) years old was associated with stillbirth odds ratio (OR) 3.71 [95% CI 2.50–5.51], neonatal mortality OR 1.92 [1.60–2.30], infant mortality OR 2.13 [1.85–2.46], and under-5 mortality OR 2.39 [2.13– 2.68], compared with first children of mothers aged 23-25 years. For the same time period in South Asia ORs were stillbirths 5.12 [2.85–9.20], neonatal mortality 2.46 [2.03–2.97], infant mortality 2.62 [2.22– 3.08], and under-5 mortality 2.59 [2.22–3.03]. Adjustment for additional risk factors did not affect the estimates substantially.
Interpretation Adolescent motherhood is associated with dramatically worse child survival, likely reflecting a combination of biological and social factors. Revising maternal age reporting conventions will help to highlight this burden. Targeted intervention strategies to eliminate underage pregnancy are warranted.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This work is based on research conducted by Institute for Disease Modeling, a research group within, and solely funded by, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. The funders had no role in the analysis, or interpretation of the data; the preparation, review, or approval of the report; or the decision to submit the manuscript for publication. All authors are employees of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, however, this study does not necessarily represent the views of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
This study was based on secondary analysis of Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS) data. The ethical clearance was provided by the Institutional Review Board of ICF International. Therefore, this secondary analysis was exempt from ethical review approval, since it used publicly available, de-identified data.
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
This study was based on secondary analysis of Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS) data. The ethical clearance was provided by the Institutional Review Board of ICF International. Therefore, this secondary analysis was exempt from ethical review approval, since it used publicly available, de-identified data.