Abstract
Introduction There is limited information on the effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccination in patients with autoimmune rheumatic diseases (AIRD).
Methods 136 consecutive patients with rheumatic diseases who never had a diagnosis of COVID-19 previously, and had completed vaccination with either the ChAdOx1 or BBV152 vaccines were recruited. Their IgG antibody titres to the Spike protein were estimated 1 month after the second dose.
Results 102 patients had AIRD while the 34 had non-AIRD. Lesser patients with AIRD (92/102) had positive antibodies titres than ones with non-AIRD(33/34) [p<0.001]. Amongst patients who received the ChAdOX1 vaccine, the AIRD group had lower antibody titres. Although the AIRD patients receiving BBV152 had similarly lower titres numerically, this did not attain statistical significance probably due to lesser numbers. Comparing the two vaccines, 114(95%) of those who received ChAdOx1 (n=120) and 11(68.7%) of those who received BBV152(n=16) had detectable antibodies [p=0.004]. Antibody titres also were higher in ChAdOx1 recipients when compared to BBV152.
To validate the findings, we estimated antibody titres in 30 healthy people each who had received either vaccine. All 30 who had received ChAdOX1 and only 23/30 of those who had received BBV152 had positive antibodies (p=0.011).
Conclusion In this preliminary analysis, patients with AIRD had lower seroconversion rates as well as lower antibody titres as compared to patients with non-AIRD. Also,the humoral immunogenicity of the BBV152 vaccine appears to be less than that of the ChAdOX1 vaccine. Validation using larger numbers and testing of cellular immunity is urgently required.
There is limited information on the effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccination in patients with autoimmune rheumatic diseases (AIRD). Some data is emerging for the mRNA vaccines[1,2], but less data is available for the non-replicating adenoviral vector ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine and the Indian heat-killed BBV152 vaccine. We have collated data that both vaccines were safe in 725 patients with rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases(RMDs).[3]
With ethics clearance (Institutional Ethics Committee of Sree Sudheendra Medical Mission Hospital No: IEC/2021/35) and written informed consent, we recruited a convenient sample of 136 RMD patients who never had a diagnosis of COVID-19 previously, and had completed two doses of either the ChAdOx1 or BBV152 vaccines. Around one month after the second dose, the presence of IgG antibody directed against the S1 domain of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein was estimated using a commercial Chemiluminescent assay (Roche, Switzerland). The normality of data was checked by the Shapiro-Wilk test. The difference in proportions was tested by the Fisher Exact test and the difference in antibody titres was tested by Independent sample t-test after log transformation. P<0.05 was the cut-off for significance.
Out of the 136 patients, 102 had AIRD while the 34 others had non-AIRD. A significantly [p<0.001] lower proportion of patients with AIRD (92/102) had positive antibodies titres than ones with non-AIRD(33/34) [Supplementary Table 1]. The characteristics of patients who had a negative response to either vaccine are summarized in Supplementary tables 2. Amongst patients who received the ChAdOX1 vaccine, the AIRD group had lower antibody titres than the others. Although the AIRD patients receiving BBV152 had similarly lower numerical titres, this did not attain statistical significance probably due to lesser numbers [Supplementary table 1]
Comparing the two vaccines, 114(95%) of those who received ChAdOx1 (n=120) and 11(68.7%) of those who received BBV152(n=16) had detectable antibodies [p=0.004]. Antibody titres also were higher in ChAdOx1 recipients when compared to BBV152. [Figure 1].
Thus, this preliminary analysis showed that patients with AIRD had lesser antibody positivity with lower titres than patients with non-AIRD. Also, the use of the BBV152 vaccine was associated with lower seroconversion rates and lower antibody titres as compared to the ChAdOX1 vaccine. To validate the findings, we estimated antibody titres in 30 healthy people each who had received either vaccine. All 30 who had received ChAdOX1 and only 23/30 of those who had received BBV152 had positive antibodies (p=0.011)[Supplementary Table 3]. Moreover, with in one month of antibody levels estimation, 3 out of the 7 controls who had negative antibodies had symptomatic COVID-19 infection.
Previously, seroconversion rates with the BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine have been shown to be lower in patients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases [2]. A case series of RMD patients who had not developed antibodies post-inoculation with the mRNA vaccines, has shown most of these patients of lupus, myositis or vasculitis and were on rituximab or mycophenolate [4]. In our cohort, findings are similar for patients who had received ChAdOx1, but not BBV152. Patients with solid organ transplants have 30-50% seropositivity after mRNA vaccines[5,6]. Factors associated with poor seroconversion included age, steroid dose, triple immunosuppression and mycophenolate use [6]. Thus, specialized strategies are required for immunocompromised patients.
The limitations of this study include a non-random sample, a small sample size, lack of T cell immunogenicity data and that the pre-vaccination antibody status of the patients was not known. However, all these patients had denied symptomatic infection or test positivity.
Thus, seroconversion rates were lower in patients with AIRD than in those with non-AIRD. The humoral immunogenicity of the BBV152 vaccine appears to be less than that of the ChAdOX1 vaccine, especially in patients with AIRD. Validation using larger numbers, testing of cellular immunity and analysis of the effects of underlying disease and immunosuppressants is required. These findings may have practical implications in vaccination recommendations for patients with rheumatic diseases.
Data Availability
All data is available and all authors have seen it