Biallelic truncation variants in ATP9A are associated with a novel autosomal recessive neurodevelopmental disorder ================================================================================================================== * Francesca Mattioli * Hossein Darvish * Sohail Aziz Paracha * Abbas Tafakhori * Saghar Ghasemi Firouzabadi * Marjan Chapi * Hafiz Muhammad Azhar Baig * Alexandre Reymond * Stylianos E. Antonarakis * Muhammad Ansar ## ABSTRACT Intellectual disability (ID) is a highly heterogeneous disorder with hundreds of associated genes. Despite progress in the identification of the genetic causes of ID following the introduction of high-throughput sequencing, about half of affected individuals still remain without a molecular diagnosis. Consanguineous families with affected individuals provide a unique opportunity to identify novel recessive causative genes. In this report we describe a novel autosomal recessive neurodevelopmental disorder. We identified two consanguineous families with homozygous variants predicted to alter the splicing of *ATP9A* which encodes a transmembrane lipid flippase of the class II P4-ATPases. The three individuals homozygous for these putatively truncating variants presented with severe ID, motor and speech impairment, and behavioral anomalies. Consistent with a causative role of *ATP9A* in these patients, a previously described *Atp9a-/-*mouse model showed behavioral changes. KEYWORDS * *ATP9A* * Autosomal Recessive Intellectual Disability * Consanguinity * Runs of Homozygosity ## INTRODUCTION Intellectual disability (ID) or delayed psychomotor development are common and highly heterogeneous phenotypes of genetic origin, affecting 1-3% of the general population 1,2 which pose a significant socio-economic burden on the affected families, the health care system, and society in general 3. Despite considerable progress in genetic diagnosis after the introduction of high throughput sequencing technologies, the genetic cause of more than half of ID cases remains undetermined 4. The leading genetic cause of ID in individuals from outbred populations is *de novo* variants 5,6; in contrast a substantial fraction of autosomal recessive (AR) disorders cause ID in families with multiple affected individuals that practice consanguinity 7. It is estimated that worldwide 10.4% of marriages occur among close relatives 8. Consanguinity increases the extent of homozygous genomic regions and brings to homozygosity deleterious alleles resulting in birth defects and infant mortality 9,10. Large consanguineous families with (multiple) affected individuals thus provide a unique opportunity to identify novel recessive causative genes. P4-ATPases are transmembrane lipid flippases 11, that function in vesicles formation and trafficking. They regulate the asymmetric distribution of phospholipids in membranes of eukaryotic cells 11,12. There are 14 different P4-ATPases in humans that can be phylogenetically grouped in five classes13. ATP9A and its 75% similar paralog ATP9B are the unique members of class II. They are the only P4-ATPase that do not require the CDC50 β-subunit for normal function and cellular localization 14. They show different intracellular and tissue distribution: ATP9A is found in early and recycling endosomes and at a lower level at the plasma membrane, while ATP9B is only found in the trans-Golgi network 12,14–16. Similarly, the genes encoding ATP9A and ATP9B present with overlapping but different expression patterns with *ATP9A* mainly expressed in the brain (Human Protein Atlas, GTEx). Suggestive of an important role of ATP9A in intercellular communication, this P4-ATPase inhibits extracellular vesicles release 15,16. Here we report two consanguineous families with homozygous pathogenic variants predicted to alter *ATP9A* splicing and we propose ATP9A as a novel cause of a recessive neurodevelopmental disorder. ## RESULTS ### CLINICAL REPORT We identified three affected individuals from two unrelated consanguineous families. The main clinical features of the affected individuals are reported in Table 1 and in Figure 1. Because rapid and automated nature of preprint posting are incompatible with verification of informed consent and that data in this section can potentially make patients identifiable, the clinical reports of the affected individuals are available upon request to the corresponding authors. View this table: [Table 1:](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/06/04/2021.05.31.21257832/T1) Table 1: Clinical features of patients with homozygous *ATP9A* splicing variants ![FIGURE 1:](http://medrxiv.org/https://www.medrxiv.org/content/medrxiv/early/2021/06/04/2021.05.31.21257832/F1.medium.gif) [FIGURE 1:](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/06/04/2021.05.31.21257832/F1) FIGURE 1: Pedigrees and Sanger sequencing The pedigrees and the available genotypes of family 1 (top) and family 2 (bottom) are depicted on the left. Sanger sequencing chromatograms confirming the segregation of the *ATP9A* NM_006045.3:c.799+1G>T (six top traces) and NM_006045.3:c.327+1G>T variants (bottom five traces) are shown on the right. ### EXOME ANALYSIS Homozygosity mapping of family 1 and whole exome sequencing (WES) of proband (IV:1) of family 1 did not reveal any pathogenic or likely pathogenic mutation in genes previously reported to cause ID or developmental delay but allowed the detection of a homozygous splicing variant (NM_006045.3:c.799+1G>T) in *ATP9A* (Figure 1). The variant was not present in gnomAD17, Bravo ([https://bravo.sph.umich.edu/freeze5/hg38/](https://bravo.sph.umich.edu/freeze5/hg38/)) or our local database of >500 controls from the same geographical region. Its segregation in the family was confirmed by Sanger sequencing, in particular the two affected siblings are homozygous for this variant (Figure 1). The change at the conserved first nucleotide of the donor splice site was predicted to cause abnormal splicing by SpliceAI 17 (score DS_DL = 0.99), MaxEntScan18 (MaxEntScan_diff = 8.504), and NNsplice19. RNA samples from affected individuals were not available to assess RNA splicing. Our search for more cases led to the identification of a second family. The WES of proband IV:1 from family 2 also revealed the presence of a homozygous splicing variant in *ATP9A*, a base pair substitution in intron 3 of *ATP9A* (NM_006045.3:c.327+1G>T;). This variant is absent from the gnomAD17 and Bravo databases, and from a database of hundreds of healthy individuals and our local database of >250 controls from the same geographical region. Multiple predictions tools indicated a likely loss of the canonical donor splice site (NNsplice, SpliceAI score DS_DL=0.95, MaxEntScan_diff = 8.504). The abnormal splicing could either result in the skipping of the inframe exon 3, leading to the deletion of 38 amino acid residues, or utilization of an alternative donor site resulting in partial intronic retention and the appearance of a premature stop codon. Testing of the aberrant RNA splicing was not possible due to unavailability of patient’s RNA or cells. Sanger sequencing confirmed the segregation of the potentially causative variant (Figure 1), i.e. the variant is heterozygous in the proband’s parents (III:2 and III:3). Homozygosity mapping of the proband revealed that the *ATP9A* variant is embedded in a putative 6.83 Mb region of homozygosity (ROH) (chr20[GRCh37]: 45358223-52192534). While we did not find any likely-pathogenic variants in known ID genes in proband IV:1 of family 2 (based on the Panelapp gene list for intellectual disability 20; Supplementary Table 1), we cannot exclude that variants beside the *ATP9A* one might play a role in the patient’s phenotype. In particular, we identified homozygous variants in *CCDC88C* (NM_001080414.4: c.1126C>T, p.Arg376Trp) and *ZNF407* (NM_017757.3: c.5497>T, p.Pro1833Ser), two genes previously implicated in neurodevelopmental disorders but associated with phenotypes different than the one found in our proband. Bi-allelic variants in *CCDC88C* were associated with a form of congenital hydrocephalus 21–23, while variant in *ZNF407* have been recently implicated in a autosomal recessive form of ID with microcephaly, short stature, hypotonia and ocular anomalies 24,25. ## DISCUSSION Autosomal recessive ID is characterized by extensive genetic heterogeneity. Still, many patients do not receive a molecular diagnosis, suggesting that a considerable number of causative genes have not yet been identified 4,27. We described three individuals from two consanguineous families with different homozygous splicing variants in canonical splice sites of the *ATP9A* gene. All three patients present with severe ID, motor delay, speech and fine motor impairment and behavioral anomalies. Both affected siblings (IV:1 and IV:7) of family 1 had an attention deficit hyperactivity disorder-like phenotype combined with aggressiveness, whereas proband IV:1 from family 2 presented with autistic features, including prominent stereotypic movements, and lack of eye contact. *ATP9A* is under constraint (intolerance to missense variants z-score = 4.15; pLI = 1; LOEUF = 0.2) according to gnomAD26. Its yeast homolog, *NEO1*, was shown to be an essential gene 28, while absence of the *C. elegans* orthologous *TAT-5* resulted in disrupted cell adhesion and morphogenesis in worms’ embryos 29. Whereas ablation of the mouse orthologous *Atp9a* did not diminish survival, the *Atp9a**-/-* mice engineered and phenotyped by the International Mouse Phenotyping Consortium were hyperactive and showed a significant increased exploration in new environment reminiscent of the behavioral symptoms of our patients 30,31. Depletion of *ATP9A* were lethal in human hepatoma HepG2 cells but not in other cell lines including HeLa, HEK293T, MCF-7, and THP-1, suggesting that the absence of ATP9A could be tolerated in certain tissues but not in others 12,15. *ATP8A2*, another P4-ATPase highly expressed in the brain, has been implicated in a recessive disorder characterized by cerebellar ataxia, ID, and disequilibrium syndrome (CAMRQ, MIM 615268), or severe hypotonia, ID, and optic atrophy with or without encephalopathy 32–36. A *de novo* balanced translocation leading to haploinsufficiency of this gene has been also proposed as the cause of moderate ID and hypotonia 37. Downregulation of *ATP9A* has been associated with a significant increase of extracellular vesicles release, in particular the exosome 15,16. Extracellular vesicles release is an important form of intercellular communication that enables the transport of several different signaling molecules - including proteins and RNA – without the need of direct cell-to-cell contacts. It is involved in a wide range of biological processes, such as blood coagulation and immune response 38,39. Different physiological roles in the central nervous system have been proposed for extracellular vesicles, including neurite outgrowth and neuronal survival 38,40. Synaptic glutaminergic activity regulates the exosome release, pinpointing a role in maintenance of synaptic physiology 41. Interestingly, an increase of neuronal-derived exosome has been documented in individuals with Down syndrome as a compensatory mechanism for alterations in the endosomal pathway 42,43. Alteration in the recycling endosomal processes have been associated with Christianson syndrome (MIM 300243), a neurodevelopmental disorder characterized by ID, speech impairment, epilepsy, postnatal microcephaly, truncal ataxia, and hyperactivity 44,45. This syndrome is caused by pathogenic variants in the endosomal sodium hydrogen exchanger *SLC9A6* 44,46–48. Suggestive of neuronal degeneration, primary hippocampal neurons of *Slc9a6-/-* mouse or expressing a deleterious mutation in this gene presented with an increase of caspase activation and a decrease in dendrites’ lengths, size, and in dendritic arborization 44,46,49. ATP9A is known to be involved in the endosomal recycling pathway 12,15,16. For instance, depletion of ATP9A reduces the plasma membrane expression of the glucose transporter GLUT1 and increases its level in endosome, altering its recycling 12. Deficiency of GLUT1 has been associated with a neurological disorder with a variable phenotype including epilepsy, movement disorders, mild to severe intellectual disability, and acquired microcephaly in some cases 50,51. Furthermore, a gene expression microarray analysis performed on knockdown *ATP9A* HepG2 cells has shown that the differentially expressed genes are involved in endocytosis 15. Using the data of the Bravo database, we have attempted to estimate the number of individuals affected by *ATP9A*-related neurodevelopmental disorder. There are 624 deleterious alleles in Bravo (Loss of function and non-synonymous variants with CADD>25). Thus, the allelic frequency of likely pathogenic *ATP9A* variants is estimated to be 1 in 424 and the frequency of heterozygous carriers 1 in 212. Using these frequencies, we estimated births per year in outbred population and consanguineous marriages to be approximately 722 in 130,000,000 and 958 in 6,500,000 births, respectively. The total estimated number of new patients per year if 1680. In conclusion, we describe a novel autosomal recessive neurodevelopmental disorder. In two unrelated consanguineous families, we identified variants predicted to affect the splicing of *ATP9A*. The three individuals homozygous for these putatively truncating variants presented with severe ID, motor and speech impairment, and behavioral anomalies. Consistent with a causative role of ATP9A in the patients’ phenotypes *Atp9a-/-*mouse model showed behavioral changes. ## METHODS The current study was approved by the IRBs of the Khyber Medical University, Peshawar, Pakistan, and the University Hospitals of Geneva, Switzerland (Protocol number: CER 11-036). Informed consent forms were obtained from guardians of all affected individuals who participated in this study. The proband IV:1 of family 1 was subjected to exome sequencing (ES). DNA was enriched using SureSelect Human All Exon v6 capture kit (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) and sequenced on an Illumina HiSeq 4000 platform, with an average coverage of 120x at each nucleotide position. ES data were analyzed with an in-house customized pipeline8 that is based on published algorithms including BWA, SAMtools 52, PICARD ([http://broadinstitute.github.io/picard/](http://broadinstitute.github.io/picard/)) and (GATK) 53. Initial screening for known or novel pathogenic mutations in the reported ID genes was performed. The 720K SNP array was performed in parents (III:3 and III:4), affected (IV:1 and IV:7) and unaffected individuals (IV:3 and IV:5) of family 1 to identify Runs of Homozygosity (ROH) using PLINK as described previously 54–56. ROH and exome sequencing data were analyzed with CATCH 57 to determine variants that were present in ROHs of patients (IV:1 and IV:7) but not in normal individuals of family 1. Subsequently the variants were filtered manually by using the criteria described in published studies 55,56. The exome of IV:1 from family 2 was captured using the xGen Exome Research Panel v2 (Integrated DNA Technologies) and sequenced using the Illumina HiSeq4000 platform according to the manufacturer’s protocols. The overall mean-depth base coverage was 153-fold and 97% of the targeted region was covered at least 20-fold. Read mapping and variant calling were performed as described 58 using the Varapp software 59. Homozygous and hemizygous variants with a MAF < 1% in the general population (1000genome, EVS, gnomAD) were retained and screened for variants in reported ID genes (Supplementary Table 1). Homozygosity mapping was performed with AutoMap, which uses Variant Call Format (VCF) files from WES 60. ## Supporting information Supplementary Table 1 [[supplements/257832_file04.xlsx]](pending:yes) ## Data Availability The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request. ## DATA AVAILABILITY The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding authors upon request. ## AUTHORS CONTRIBUTION FM and AR wrote the manuscript with the help of SEA and MA. FM and MA performed WES, in silico analysis of the variant and Sanger sequencing. SAP, HMAB provided clinical information for family 1. HD, AT, SGF and MC collected genomic DNAs and clinical information for family 2. SEA, MA and AR supervised the study. **Supplementary Table 1**: Homozygous variants identified by WES in proband IV:1 of family 2 ## ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We thank the probands and their families for their participation in this study. This work was supported by grants from the Swiss National Science Foundation (31003A_182632) and the Lejeune Foundation (JLF #1838) to AR and the Childcare Foundation to SEA. * Received May 31, 2021. * Revision received May 31, 2021. * Accepted June 4, 2021. * © 2021, Posted by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory This pre-print is available under a Creative Commons License (Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International), CC BY-NC-ND 4.0, as described at [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/](http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) ## REFERENCES 1. 1.Iqbal, Z. & van Bokhoven, H. Identifying genes responsible for intellectual disability in consanguineous families. Hum Hered 77, 150–160 (2014). [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1159/000360539&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=25060278&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2021%2F06%2F04%2F2021.05.31.21257832.atom) 2. 2.Vissers, L. E. L. M., Gilissen, C. & Veltman, J. A. Genetic studies in intellectual disability and related disorders. Nature Reviews Genetics 17, 9–18 (2016). [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1038/nrg3999&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=26503795&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2021%2F06%2F04%2F2021.05.31.21257832.atom) 3. 3.Maulik, P. K., Mascarenhas, M. N., Mathers, C. D., Dua, T. & Saxena, S. Prevalence of intellectual disability: a meta-analysis of population-based studies. Res Dev Disabil 32, 419–436 (2011). [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.ridd.2010.12.018&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=21236634&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2021%2F06%2F04%2F2021.05.31.21257832.atom) 4. 4.Bruel, A.-L. et al. Next-generation sequencing approaches and challenges in the diagnosis of developmental anomalies and intellectual disability. Clin Genet 98, 433–444 (2020). 5. 5.Vissers, L. E. L. M. et al. A de novo paradigm for mental retardation. Nature Genetics 42, 1109– 1112 (2010). [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1038/ng.712&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=21076407&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2021%2F06%2F04%2F2021.05.31.21257832.atom) [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000284578800014&link_type=ISI) 6. 6.Kaplanis, J. et al. Evidence for 28 genetic disorders discovered by combining healthcare and research data. Nature 586, 757–762 (2020). [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1038/s41586-020-2832-5&link_type=DOI) 7. 7.Antonarakis, S. E. Carrier screening for recessive disorders. Nature Reviews Genetics 20, 549– 561 (2019). 8. 8.Marchi, N. et al. Close inbreeding and low genetic diversity in Inner Asian human populations despite geographical exogamy. Scientific Reports 8, 9397 (2018). 9. 9.Tadmouri, G. O. et al. Consanguinity and reproductive health among Arabs. Reproductive Health 6, 17 (2009). 10. 10.El-Attar, L. M., Bahashwan, A. A., Bakhsh, A. D. & Moshrif, Y. M. The prevalence and patterns of chromosome abnormalities in newborns with major congenital anomalies: A retrospective study from Saudi Arabia. Intractable & Rare Diseases Research advpub, (2021). 11. 11.Andersen, J. P. et al. P4-ATPases as Phospholipid Flippases—Structure, Function, and Enigmas. Front. Physiol. 7, (2016). 12. 12.Tanaka, Y. et al. The phospholipid flippase ATP9A is required for the recycling pathway from the endosomes to the plasma membrane. Mol Biol Cell 27, 3883–3893 (2016). [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6MTE6Im1vbGJpb2xjZWxsIjtzOjU6InJlc2lkIjtzOjEwOiIyNy8yNC8zODgzIjtzOjQ6ImF0b20iO3M6NTA6Ii9tZWRyeGl2L2Vhcmx5LzIwMjEvMDYvMDQvMjAyMS4wNS4zMS4yMTI1NzgzMi5hdG9tIjt9czo4OiJmcmFnbWVudCI7czowOiIiO30=) 13. 13.Van der Mark, V. A., Elferink, R. P. J. O. & Paulusma, C. C. P4 ATPases: Flippases in Health and Disease. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 14, 7897–7922 (2013). 14. 14.Takatsu, H. et al. ATP9B, a P4-ATPase (a putative aminophospholipid translocase), localizes to the trans-Golgi network in a CDC50 protein-independent manner. J Biol Chem 286, 38159– 38167 (2011). [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6MzoiamJjIjtzOjU6InJlc2lkIjtzOjEyOiIyODYvNDQvMzgxNTkiO3M6NDoiYXRvbSI7czo1MDoiL21lZHJ4aXYvZWFybHkvMjAyMS8wNi8wNC8yMDIxLjA1LjMxLjIxMjU3ODMyLmF0b20iO31zOjg6ImZyYWdtZW50IjtzOjA6IiI7fQ==) 15. 15.Naik, J. et al. The P4-ATPase ATP9A is a novel determinant of exosome release. PLoS One 14, e0213069 (2019). 16. 16.Xu, X. et al. Effects of ATP9A on Extracellular Vesicle Release and Exosomal Lipid Composition. Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity 2020, e8865499 (2020). 17. 17.Jaganathan, K. et al. Predicting Splicing from Primary Sequence with Deep Learning. Cell 176, 535-548.e24 (2019). [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=http://www.n&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2021%2F06%2F04%2F2021.05.31.21257832.atom) 18. 18.Yeo, G. & Burge, C. B. Maximum Entropy Modeling of Short Sequence Motifs with Applications to RNA Splicing Signals. Journal of Computational Biology 11, 377–394 (2004). [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1089/1066527041410418&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=15285897&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2021%2F06%2F04%2F2021.05.31.21257832.atom) [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000222588300010&link_type=ISI) 19. 19.Reese, M. G., Eeckman, F. H., Kulp, D. & Haussler, D. Improved Splice Site Detection in Genie. Journal of Computational Biology 4, 311–323 (1997). [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1089/cmb.1997.4.311&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=9278062&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2021%2F06%2F04%2F2021.05.31.21257832.atom) [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=A1997XR80900008&link_type=ISI) 20. 20.Martin, A. R. et al. PanelApp crowdsources expert knowledge to establish consensus diagnostic gene panels. Nature Genetics 51, 1560–1565 (2019). [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1038/s41588-019-0528-2&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=31676867&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2021%2F06%2F04%2F2021.05.31.21257832.atom) 21. 21.Drielsma, A. et al. Two novel CCDC88C mutations confirm the role of DAPLE in autosomal recessive congenital hydrocephalus. J Med Genet 49, 708–712 (2012). [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6OToiam1lZGdlbmV0IjtzOjU6InJlc2lkIjtzOjk6IjQ5LzExLzcwOCI7czo0OiJhdG9tIjtzOjUwOiIvbWVkcnhpdi9lYXJseS8yMDIxLzA2LzA0LzIwMjEuMDUuMzEuMjEyNTc4MzIuYXRvbSI7fXM6ODoiZnJhZ21lbnQiO3M6MDoiIjt9) 22. 22.Ekici, A. B. et al. Disturbed Wnt Signalling due to a Mutation in CCDC88C Causes an Autosomal Recessive Non-Syndromic Hydrocephalus with Medial Diverticulum. Mol Syndromol 1, 99–112 (2010). [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1159/000319859&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=21031079&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2021%2F06%2F04%2F2021.05.31.21257832.atom) 23. 23.Ruggeri, G. et al. Bi-allelic mutations of CCDC88C are a rare cause of severe congenital hydrocephalus. Am J Med Genet A 176, 676–681 (2018). [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1002/ajmg.a.38592&link_type=DOI) 24. 24.Kambouris, M. et al. Mutations in zinc finger 407 [ZNF407] cause a unique autosomal recessive cognitive impairment syndrome. Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases 9, 80 (2014). 25. 25.Zahra, Q. et al. Biallelic ZNF407 mutations in a neurodevelopmental disorder with ID, short stature and variable microcephaly, hypotonia, ocular anomalies and facial dysmorphism. Journal of Human Genetics 65, 1115–1123 (2020). 26. 26.Lek, M. et al. Analysis of protein-coding genetic variation in 60,706 humans. Nature 536, 285– 291 (2016). [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1038/nature19057&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=27535533&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2021%2F06%2F04%2F2021.05.31.21257832.atom) [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000381804900026&link_type=ISI) 27. 27.Bamshad, M. J., Nickerson, D. A. & Chong, J. X. Mendelian Gene Discovery: Fast and Furious with No End in Sight. The American Journal of Human Genetics 105, 448–455 (2019). [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.ajhg.2019.07.011&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=http://www.n&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2021%2F06%2F04%2F2021.05.31.21257832.atom) 28. 28.Prezant, T. R., Chaltraw, W. E. & Fischel-Ghodsian, N. Identification of an overexpressed yeast gene which prevents aminoglycoside toxicity. Microbiology (Reading) 142 (Pt 12), 3407–3414 (1996). [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1099/13500872-142-12-3407&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=9004503&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2021%2F06%2F04%2F2021.05.31.21257832.atom) [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=A1996VZ71600011&link_type=ISI) 29. 29.Wehman, A. M., Poggioli, C., Schweinsberg, P., Grant, B. D. & Nance, J. The P4-ATPase TAT-5 Inhibits the Budding of Extracellular Vesicles in C. elegans Embryos. Current Biology 21, 1951– 1959 (2011). [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.cub.2011.10.040&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=22100064&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2021%2F06%2F04%2F2021.05.31.21257832.atom) 30. 30.Brown, S. D. M. & Moore, M. W. The International Mouse Phenotyping Consortium: past and future perspectives on mouse phenotyping. Mamm Genome 23, 632–640 (2012). [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1007/s00335-012-9427-x&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=22940749&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2021%2F06%2F04%2F2021.05.31.21257832.atom) [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000309543200015&link_type=ISI) 31. 31.Skarnes, W. C. et al. A conditional knockout resource for the genome-wide study of mouse gene function. Nature 474, 337–342 (2011). [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1038/nature10163&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=21677750&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2021%2F06%2F04%2F2021.05.31.21257832.atom) [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000291647100037&link_type=ISI) 32. 32.Emre Onat, O. et al. Missense mutation in the ATPase, aminophospholipid transporter protein ATP8A2 is associated with cerebellar atrophy and quadrupedal locomotion. European Journal of Human Genetics 21, 281–285 (2013). [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1038/ejhg.2012.170&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=22892528&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2021%2F06%2F04%2F2021.05.31.21257832.atom) 33. 33.Alsahli, S., Alrifai, M. T., Al Tala, S., Mutairi, F. A. & Alfadhel, M. Further Delineation of the Clinical Phenotype of Cerebellar Ataxia, Mental Retardation, and Disequilibrium Syndrome Type 4. J Cent Nerv Syst Dis 10, 1179573518759682 (2018). [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1177/1179573518759682&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=29531481&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2021%2F06%2F04%2F2021.05.31.21257832.atom) 34. 34.Guissart, C. et al. ATP8A2-related disorders as recessive cerebellar ataxia. J Neurol 267, 203– 213 (2020). 35. 35.Martín-Hernández, E. et al. New ATP8A2 gene mutations associated with a novel syndrome: encephalopathy, intellectual disability, severe hypotonia, chorea and optic atrophy. Neurogenetics 17, 259–263 (2016). [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1007/s10048-016-0496-y&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=27679995&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2021%2F06%2F04%2F2021.05.31.21257832.atom) 36. 36.McMillan, H. J. et al. Recessive mutations in ATP8A2 cause severe hypotonia, cognitive impairment, hyperkinetic movement disorders and progressive optic atrophy. Orphanet J Rare Dis 13, 86 (2018). [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1186/s13023-018-0825-3&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=30012219&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2021%2F06%2F04%2F2021.05.31.21257832.atom) 37. 37.Cacciagli, P. et al. Disruption of the ATP8A2 gene in a patient with a t(10;13) de novo balanced translocation and a severe neurological phenotype. European Journal of Human Genetics 18, 1360–1363 (2010). [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1038/ejhg.2010.126&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=20683487&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2021%2F06%2F04%2F2021.05.31.21257832.atom) 38. 38.Raposo, G. & Stoorvogel, W. Extracellular vesicles: Exosomes, microvesicles, and friends. J Cell Biol 200, 373–383 (2013). [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6MzoiamNiIjtzOjU6InJlc2lkIjtzOjk6IjIwMC80LzM3MyI7czo0OiJhdG9tIjtzOjUwOiIvbWVkcnhpdi9lYXJseS8yMDIxLzA2LzA0LzIwMjEuMDUuMzEuMjEyNTc4MzIuYXRvbSI7fXM6ODoiZnJhZ21lbnQiO3M6MDoiIjt9) 39. 39.Yáñez-Mó, M. et al. Biological properties of extracellular vesicles and their physiological functions. Journal of Extracellular Vesicles 4, 27066 (2015). 40. 40.Wang, S. et al. Synapsin I Is an Oligomannose-Carrying Glycoprotein, Acts As an Oligomannose-Binding Lectin, and Promotes Neurite Outgrowth and Neuronal Survival When Released via Glia-Derived Exosomes. J. Neurosci. 31, 7275–7290 (2011). [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6Njoiam5ldXJvIjtzOjU6InJlc2lkIjtzOjEwOiIzMS8yMC83Mjc1IjtzOjQ6ImF0b20iO3M6NTA6Ii9tZWRyeGl2L2Vhcmx5LzIwMjEvMDYvMDQvMjAyMS4wNS4zMS4yMTI1NzgzMi5hdG9tIjt9czo4OiJmcmFnbWVudCI7czowOiIiO30=) 41. 41.Lachenal, G. et al. Release of exosomes from differentiated neurons and its regulation by synaptic glutamatergic activity. Molecular and Cellular Neuroscience 46, 409–418 (2011). [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.mcn.2010.11.004&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=21111824&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2021%2F06%2F04%2F2021.05.31.21257832.atom) 42. 42.Hamlett, E. D. et al. Exosome release and cargo in Down syndrome. Developmental Neurobiology 79, 639–655 (2019). 43. 43.Gauthier, S. A. et al. Enhanced exosome secretion in Down syndrome brain - a protective mechanism to alleviate neuronal endosomal abnormalities. Acta Neuropathol Commun 5, 65 (2017). 44. 44.Kerner-Rossi, M., Gulinello, M., Walkley, S. & Dobrenis, K. Pathobiology of Christianson syndrome: Linking disrupted endosomal-lysosomal function with intellectual disability and sensory impairments. Neurobiology of Learning and Memory 165, 106867 (2019). 45. 45.1. Adam, M. P., et al. Morrow, E. M. & Pescosolido, M. F. Christianson Syndrome. in GeneReviews® (eds. Adam, M. P., et al.) (University of Washington, Seattle, 1993). 46. 46.Ilie, A. et al. A Christianson syndrome-linked deletion mutation (Δ287ES288) in SLC9A6 disrupts recycling endosomal function and elicits neurodegeneration and cell death. Molecular Neurodegeneration 11, 63 (2016). 47. 47.Ilie, A., Weinstein, E., Boucher, A., McKinney, R. A. & Orlowski, J. Impaired posttranslational processing and trafficking of an endosomal Na+/H+ exchanger NHE6 mutant (Δ(370)WST(372)) associated with X-linked intellectual disability and autism. Neurochem Int 73, 192–203 (2014). [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.neuint.2013.09.020&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=24090639&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2021%2F06%2F04%2F2021.05.31.21257832.atom) 48. 48.Ilie, A. et al. A potential gain-of-function variant of SLC9A6 leads to endosomal alkalinization and neuronal atrophy associated with Christianson Syndrome. Neurobiology of Disease 121, 187– 204 (2019). [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.nbd.2018.10.002&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=30296617&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2021%2F06%2F04%2F2021.05.31.21257832.atom) 49. 49.Ouyang, Q. et al. Christianson syndrome protein NHE6 modulates TrkB endosomal signaling required for neuronal circuit development. Neuron 80, 97–112 (2013). [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.neuron.2013.07.043&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=24035762&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2021%2F06%2F04%2F2021.05.31.21257832.atom) [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000326305300011&link_type=ISI) 50. 50.Klepper, J. et al. Glut1 Deficiency Syndrome (Glut1DS): State of the art in 2020 and recommendations of the international Glut1DS study group. Epilepsia Open 5, 354–365 (2020). 51. 51.1. Adam, M. P., et al. Wang, D., Pascual, J. M. & De Vivo, D. Glucose Transporter Type 1 Deficiency Syndrome. In GeneReviews® (eds. Adam, M. P., et al.) (University of Washington, Seattle, 1993). 52. 52.Li, H. & Durbin, R. Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics 25, 1754–1760 (2009). [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1093/bioinformatics/btp324&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=19451168&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2021%2F06%2F04%2F2021.05.31.21257832.atom) [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000267665900006&link_type=ISI) 53. 53.DePristo, M. A. et al. A framework for variation discovery and genotyping using next-generation DNA sequencing data. Nat Genet 43, 491–498 (2011). [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1038/ng.806&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=21478889&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2021%2F06%2F04%2F2021.05.31.21257832.atom) [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000289972600023&link_type=ISI) 54. 54.Purcell, S. et al. PLINK: A Tool Set for Whole-Genome Association and Population-Based Linkage Analyses. Am J Hum Genet 81, 559–575 (2007). [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1086/519795&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=17701901&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2021%2F06%2F04%2F2021.05.31.21257832.atom) 55. 55.Ansar, M. et al. Biallelic variants in LINGO1 are associated with autosomal recessive intellectual disability, microcephaly, speech and motor delay. Genet Med 20, 778–784 (2018). 56. 56.Ansar, M. et al. Bi-allelic Variants in DYNC1I2 Cause Syndromic Microcephaly with Intellectual Disability, Cerebral Malformations, and Dysmorphic Facial Features. Am J Hum Genet 104, 1073–1087 (2019). 57. 57.Santoni, F. A. et al. Simultaneous identification and prioritization of variants in familial, de novo, and somatic genetic disorders with VariantMaster. Genome Res. 24, 349–355 (2014). [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6NjoiZ2Vub21lIjtzOjU6InJlc2lkIjtzOjg6IjI0LzIvMzQ5IjtzOjQ6ImF0b20iO3M6NTA6Ii9tZWRyeGl2L2Vhcmx5LzIwMjEvMDYvMDQvMjAyMS4wNS4zMS4yMTI1NzgzMi5hdG9tIjt9czo4OiJmcmFnbWVudCI7czowOiIiO30=) 58. 58.Alfaiz, A. A. et al. TBC1D7 mutations are associated with intellectual disability, macrocrania, patellar dislocation, and celiac disease. Hum Mutat 35, 447–451 (2014). [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1002/humu.22529&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=24515783&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2021%2F06%2F04%2F2021.05.31.21257832.atom) 59. 59.Delafontaine, J. et al. Varapp: A reactive web-application for variants filtering. bioRxiv 060806 (2016) doi:10.1101/060806. [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6NzoiYmlvcnhpdiI7czo1OiJyZXNpZCI7czo4OiIwNjA4MDZ2MSI7czo0OiJhdG9tIjtzOjUwOiIvbWVkcnhpdi9lYXJseS8yMDIxLzA2LzA0LzIwMjEuMDUuMzEuMjEyNTc4MzIuYXRvbSI7fXM6ODoiZnJhZ21lbnQiO3M6MDoiIjt9) 60. 60.Quinodoz, M. et al. AutoMap is a high performance homozygosity mapping tool using next- generation sequencing data. Nat Commun 12, 518 (2021).