COVID-19 testing among children, parental preferences for testing venues and acceptability of school-based testing: a survey of US parents

METHODS

We conducted an online national survey of US parents and caregivers (‘parents’) using a Qualtrics panel recruited through social media and partner networks. Eligible participants were English and Spanish speaking adults ≥18 years identifying as a primary caregiver of a child ≤12 years. We followed the American Association for Public Opinion Research (AAPOR) guidelines for quota-based sampling.(7) Survey weights were calculated based on national estimates of US parents according to 2019 US Census data calculated using sex, race, ethnicity, education, and region.(8) Data were collected from March 9 through April 2, 2021. The institutional review board of the CUNY Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy provided ethical approval.

Parents reported information about the youngest child living in the household. Outcomes were: proportion of parents reporting child tested for COVID-19 (“has your child ever been tested for COVID-19”); where parents would take child for testing (“if your child needs testing for COVID-19 in the future, where would you take him/her to be tested”) including multiple response options; and acceptance of school-based testing (“if your child’s school or daycare required COVID-19 testing on a random basis, would you allow your child to be tested at school or daycare”). Parents also reported demographics and household information.

Survey weights were applied to generate national estimates among US parents. We present unweighted counts and weighted percentages for the sample and cumulative incidence estimates for pediatric testing, preferred testing venues and acceptance of school/daycare testing. Rao adjusted Pearson chi-squared tests were used to compare incidence by characteristics. Poisson regression models with robust standard errors were used to estimate adjusted risk ratios (aRR) of pediatric testing adjusted for demographic and household characteristics.

RESULTS

Among 2,074 US parents surveyed, 35.9% reported their youngest child (median child age: 4.8 years) had ever been tested for COVID-19 (Table 1). In adjusted models, parents significantly less likely to report a child having been tested for COVID were female (aRR 0.69 95%CI 0.60-0.79), Asian (aRR 0.58; 95%CI 0.39-0.87) and from the Midwest (aRR 0.76; 95%CI 0.63-0.91). Children with health insurance (aRR 1.38; 95%CI 1.05-1.81) and those attending in-person school/daycare (aRR 1.67; 95%CI 1.43-1.95) were significantly more likely to have been tested (Table 1). When asked to select venues where they would take their child for testing, 52.7% of all parents selected pediatrician’s office, 27.9% selected drive through testing site, 24.3% selected hospital, 21.8% selected health department testing site and 20.6% selected urgent care (data now shown).

Overall, 50.6% of parents said they would allow their youngest child to be tested for COVID-19 at school/daycare if required, 33.5% said they would not allow school-based testing and 14.4% said they didn’t know (1.5% did not answer). In univariable analyses, parents of children <2 years of age, parent of children without health insurance and parents of children not attending in-person school were less willing to allow school-or daycare-based COVID-19 testing (Table 1). We also observed that non-Hispanic Black parents, those who were 18-24 years of age, parents who had more than 2 children in the home, those who had not completed college and parents with income <$50,000 were less likely to report that they would allow their child to be tested for COVID-19 in school or daycare settings (Table 1).

DISCUSSION

COVID-19 testing among U.S. children has been low to date, in our study, only 36% of US parents reported their child had ever been tested. Female and Asian parents were least likely to report their child having been tested for COVID-19, while parents of children with health insurance and who were attending school were more likely to report testing. We also found the most preferred COVID-19 testing location was the child’s pediatrician’s office. Finally, only half of parents in our survey reported they would allow their child to be tested at school or daycare which also varied by demographic characteristics.

To maximize uptake of COVID-19 testing among unvaccinated children, an important testing implementation strategy may involve the ability for providers, laboratories, and parents to be able to authorize and easily provide and disclose certified proof of test results for children (e.g., via a national app) to entities (e.g., schools), thus allowing flexibility and the ability for parents to choose a preferred testing provider and venue that meets basic standards for COVID-19 testing. In addition, free pediatric COVID-19 testing across the US and efforts to increase parental awareness of no-fee testing venues are also needed to ensure greater access and wider uptake among children without health insurance and others facing testing barriers.

There are several limitations to our analysis. Our survey focused on children ≤12 years of age in order to collect information about younger children and does not provide information about adolescents. Survey data were self-reported and subject to recall, response and social desirability bias. The survey was weighted to reflect the US population of parents based on 2019 census estimates. However, it was conducted online, and therefore, excluded parents without access to the internet.

Our study provides important information about children who have been tested for COVID-19 thus far in the epidemic and those who may be missed for testing. It also includes novel information about venues where parents prefer to seek testing for their children. Given that a COVID-19 vaccine for children may not be approved for pediatric population until late in 2021(9), and that COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among parents may be significant(10), testing will remain critical for identifying children with infection and as a public health intervention to contain infections. As such, our data can inform strategies to increase testing coverage and acceptability among US children.