Abstract
Background Mass vaccination is being used in response to coronavirus disease (COVID-19) epidemics, including those driven by emerging variants of concern. We evaluated the effectiveness of the inactivated whole-virus vaccine, CoronaVac, against symptomatic COVID-19 in the elderly population of São Paulo State, Brazil during widespread circulation of the P.1 variant.
Methods We conducted a test-negative, case-control study of adults ≥70 years of age from São Paulo State from January 17 to April 29, 2021, during which vaccination with a two-dose regimen of CoronaVac was implemented. We identified RT-PCR-confirmed COVID-19 cases as well as controls who had a symptomatic illness with a negative RT-PCR test from national surveillance and state vaccination databases. Controls were pair-matched to cases by age category, sex, self-report race, municipality, prior COVID-19 status, and date of RT-PCR testing. We estimated vaccine effectiveness, adjusted for age and comorbidities, using conditional logistic regression.
Findings We selected 7,950 matched pairs with a mean age of 76 years from 26,433 COVID-19 cases and 17,622 test-negative controls. Adjusted vaccine effectiveness was 18.2% (95% CI, 0.0 to 33.2) and 41.6% (95% CI, 26.9 to 53.3) in the period 0-13 and ≥14 days, respectively, after the 2nd dose. Administration of a single vaccine dose was not associated with reduced odds of COVID-19. Vaccine effectiveness ≥14 days after the 2nd dose declined with increasing age and was 61.8% (95% CI 34.8 to 77.7), 48.9% (95% CI 23.3 to 66.0) and 28.0% (95% CI 0.6 to 47.9) among individuals 70-74, 75-79 and ≥80 years of age, respectively (pinteraction = 0.05).
Interpretation CoronaVac was 42% effective in the real-world setting of extensive P.1 transmission, but significant protection was not observed until completion of the two-dose regimen and vaccine effectiveness declined with increasing age. These findings underscore the need to maintain non-pharmaceutical interventions when mass vaccination with CoronaVac is used as part of an epidemic response.
Funding Pan American Health Organization.
Evidence before this study We searched Pubmed for articles published from inception of the pandemic until May 10, 2021, with no language restrictions, using the search terms “vaccine”, “COVID-19”, “SARS-CoV-2”, “elderly”, “age”, “older”. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) have yielded varying estimates (51-84%) for the effectiveness of the inactivated whole-virus vaccine, CoronaVac, against symptomatic COVID-19. Current evidence is lacking on whether CoronaVac or other COVID-19 vaccines are effective against disease caused by the SARS-CoV-2 variant of concern, P.1, or in a setting of extensive P.1 circulation. No studies have reported the real-world effectiveness of CoronaVac and other inactivated vaccines among elderly individuals, a population that was underrepresented in RCTs of these vaccines.
Added value of this study In a population-based matched test-negative case-control study, we found that a two-dose regimen of CoronaVac had an effectiveness of 42% in preventing symptomatic COVID-19 among adults ≥70 years of age during an epidemic associated with widespread P.1 variant transmission. Significant protection was not observed until the period ≥14 days after administration of the second dose. We observed a significant decline in vaccine effectiveness with increasing age in the elderly population.
Implications of all the available evidence In the setting of extensive P.1 transmission, the effectiveness of CoronaVac in adults ≥70 years of age was similar to that observed in RCTs conducted in younger populations prior to the emergence of P.1. These findings provide supportive evidence for the use of this vaccine in countries that are experiencing P.1-associated epidemics. However, significant protection was not detected until after administration of the second dose, indicating that vaccination in countries where CoronaVac supplies are constrained may need to prioritize completion of the two dose regimen among the highest risk populations. The delay in achieving vaccine-mediated protection also underscores the need to initiate and maintain non-pharmaceutical interventions when mass vaccination with CoronaVac is used in a response to an epidemic. National immunisation programs should optimise the vaccination of the very elderly (≥80 years), accounting for specific vaccines or vaccination schemes.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
We are grateful for the Pan American Health Organization's support and the Sao Paulo State in making the databases available for analysis. JC is supported by the Oswaldo Cruz Foundation (Edital Covid-19 - resposta rapida: 48111668950485). OTR is funded by a Sara Borrell fellowship (CD19/00110) from the Instituto de Salud Carlos III. OTR acknowledges support from the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation through the Centro de Excelencia Severo Ochoa 2019-2023 Program and from the Generalitat de Catalunya through the CERCA Program.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The study was approved by the Ethical Committee for Research of Federal University of Mato Grosso do Sul (CAAE: 43289221.5.0000.0021).
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Deidentified databases as well as the R codes will be deposited in the repository https://github.com/juliocroda/VebraCOVID-19
