Abstract
Introduction An Ideal battery of testing for function would be inexpensive, easily administered, standardized and validated for multiple health issues. This would also be sensitive to change over time and able to extrapolate avocational and vocational tasks. The data collection exercise for this study included both subjective and objective measures which include the Short Form Health Survey 12 (SF-12), the 2 minute walk test (2MWT) and a newly developed upper extremity strength/conditioning activity called the Elevation and Movement Lift test (EMLi).
Methods A convenience sample of 102 patients with chronic pain. They were seen in the Canadian Forces Health Services Unit (CFHSU (O)) Physiatry Clinic between January-September 2019 and were asked to complete the data intake protocol. This included: completing a questionnaire with the Numeric Rating Pain Scale (NRS) covering the previous 7 days, the SF-12, and completed the 2 MWT and EMLi.
Results For the 2MWT heart rate, perceived exertion and number of steps were all increased for patients with chronic pain compared to the control group. There was no difference noted between patients with upper/lower body pain. In patients with chronic pain SF-12 physical function score negatively correlated with perceived exertion but not performance. As for the EMLI test, all groups had similar perceived exertion and heart rate outcomes but a reduced performance was noted with the upper extremity group.
Discussion For the 2MWT, the individual’s performance related to effort and not their pain state, PE and SF-12. This suggests a higher capacity for walking then the patients realise. As for the EMLi, individual’s performance was poorer for same level of effort. This correlates to their perceived function as seen on the SF-12 which might measure pain related dysfunction.
Conclusion The 2MWT performance was effort dependent and not correlated with perceived abilities. Therefore it can be used to challenge patient performance. EMLi performance correlated with perception and upper extremity pain. This could be used to set clinical training targets and monitor each individual’s progress.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
NA
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The registration of this study was done with the Canadian Forces Health Services Group which monitors the research for this population.As noted in our communication a waiver of ethical approval was received from the CAF Health Surgeon General. Please note such a decision specifically regarded the ethics of this study along with approval for dissemination.
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
