Women’s views on accepting COVID-19 vaccination during and after pregnancy, and for their babies: A multi-methods study in the UK
View ORCID ProfileHelen Skirrow, Sara Barnett, View ORCID ProfileSadie Bell, View ORCID ProfileLucia Riaposova, View ORCID ProfileSandra Mounier-Jack, View ORCID ProfileBeate Kampmann, View ORCID ProfileBeth Holder
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.04.30.21256240
Helen Skirrow
1Department of Primary Care and Public Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London
Sara Barnett
2Institute of Reproductive and Developmental Biology, Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, UK
Sadie Bell
3Department of Global Health and Development, Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine
Lucia Riaposova
2Institute of Reproductive and Developmental Biology, Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, UK
Sandra Mounier-Jack
3Department of Global Health and Development, Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine
Beate Kampmann
4The Vaccine Centre, Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, Bloomsbury, London, WC1E 7HT, United Kingdom
5Vaccines and Immunity Theme, MRC Unit The Gambia at LSHTM, Atlantic Boulevard, PO Box 273, Banjul, The Gambia
Beth Holder
2Institute of Reproductive and Developmental Biology, Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, UK
Data Availability
All of the reported data is contained within the manuscript.
Posted May 03, 2021.
Women’s views on accepting COVID-19 vaccination during and after pregnancy, and for their babies: A multi-methods study in the UK
Helen Skirrow, Sara Barnett, Sadie Bell, Lucia Riaposova, Sandra Mounier-Jack, Beate Kampmann, Beth Holder
medRxiv 2021.04.30.21256240; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.04.30.21256240
Women’s views on accepting COVID-19 vaccination during and after pregnancy, and for their babies: A multi-methods study in the UK
Helen Skirrow, Sara Barnett, Sadie Bell, Lucia Riaposova, Sandra Mounier-Jack, Beate Kampmann, Beth Holder
medRxiv 2021.04.30.21256240; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.04.30.21256240
Subject Area
Subject Areas
- Addiction Medicine (390)
- Allergy and Immunology (705)
- Anesthesia (196)
- Cardiovascular Medicine (2875)
- Dermatology (244)
- Emergency Medicine (432)
- Epidemiology (12598)
- Forensic Medicine (10)
- Gastroenterology (810)
- Genetic and Genomic Medicine (4472)
- Geriatric Medicine (405)
- Health Economics (717)
- Health Informatics (2865)
- Health Policy (1056)
- Hematology (378)
- HIV/AIDS (907)
- Medical Education (418)
- Medical Ethics (115)
- Nephrology (465)
- Neurology (4228)
- Nursing (226)
- Nutrition (619)
- Oncology (2216)
- Ophthalmology (630)
- Orthopedics (255)
- Otolaryngology (322)
- Pain Medicine (269)
- Palliative Medicine (83)
- Pathology (488)
- Pediatrics (1181)
- Primary Care Research (485)
- Public and Global Health (6815)
- Radiology and Imaging (1500)
- Respiratory Medicine (906)
- Rheumatology (430)
- Sports Medicine (372)
- Surgery (475)
- Toxicology (59)
- Transplantation (204)
- Urology (175)