Abstract
In the present study, we develop and validate a generalized linear model of expected mortality in 2020 based on historical trends in deaths by county of residence between 2011 and 2019. We use the results of the model to generate county estimates of excess mortality and excess deaths not assigned to COVID-19 for each county in the US along with bootstrapped prediction intervals. Overall, in counties that had statistically significant increases in excess mortality, the proportion of excess deaths assigned to COVID-19 was 82%. The proportion assigned to COVID-19 was lower in the South (77%) and West (78%) as compared to counties in the Mid-west (82%) and Northeast (94%). Rural counties across all Census Divisions (68%) reported lower proportions of excess deaths assigned to COVID-19 than urban areas (84%). The New England Census Division stood out as the only division where directly assigned COVID-19 deaths actually exceeded excess deaths, meaning there were 1.22 directly assigned COVID-19 deaths for every 1 excess death. The finding that metro areas in New England reported higher direct COVID-19 mortality than excess mortality suggests that reductions in mortality from other causes of death may have occurred in these areas, at least among some populations. Across individual counties, the percentage of excess deaths not assigned to COVID-19 varied substantially, with some counties’ direct COVID-19 tallies capturing only a small fraction of total excess deaths, whereas in other counties the direct COVID-19 death rate far exceeded the number of estimated excess deaths.
Significance The COVID-19 pandemic in the US has been largely monitored on the basis of death certificates containing reference to COVID-19. However, prior analyses reveal that a significant fraction of excess deaths associated with the pandemic were not directly assigned to COVID-19 on death records. Few studies to date provide information on patterns of excess mortality and excess deaths not assigned to COVID-19 for US counties, despite the importance of this information for health policy and planning. Our results suggest that regional inequalities in the mortality burden associated with COVID-19 are not fully revealed by data at the state level and that consideration of excess deaths across counties is critical for a full accounting of disparate regional effects of the pandemic.
Competing Interest Statement
ACS reported receiving grants from Ethicon Inc. and Swiss Re outside the submitted work. No other disclosures were reported.
Funding Statement
The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation supported the research reported in this publication (Grant #77521).
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Boston University Medical Center Institutional Review Board
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
The present investigation used publicly available data from the National Center for Health Statistics and the U.S. Census Bureau.
https://data.cdc.gov/NCHS/AH-County-of-Occurrence-Provisional-COVID-19-Death/6vqh-esgs
