Preexisting and new-onset diabetes in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia
======================================================================

* Andrea Laurenzi
* Amelia Caretto
* Chiara Molinari
* Elena Bazzigaluppi
* Cristina Brigatti
* Ilaria Marzinotto
* Alessia Mercalli
* Raffaella Melzi
* Rita Nano
* Cristina Tresoldi
* Giovanni Landoni
* Fabio Ciceri
* Vito Lampasona
* Marina Scavini
* Lorenzo Piemonti

## Abstract

**Objective** The aim of the current study was to compare clinical characteristics, laboratory findings and major outcomes of patients hospitalized for COVID 19 pneumonia with new-onset or preexisting diabetes.

**Design** A cohort of 176 adult patients with a diagnosis of pre-existing (n=112) or new-onset diabetes (n=55) and confirmed COVID-19 pneumonia was studied. Clinical outcomes and laboratory findings were analysed according to the presence of preexisting or new-onset diabetes. The time to viral clearance and the persistence of hyperglycemia were assessed during the follow-up after hospital discharge.

**Results** Patients with new-onset diabetes had lower BMI, significantly less comorbidities and higher levels of inflammatory markers and indicators of multi-organ injury than those with preexisting diabetes. No differences between preexisting and new onset diabetes were evident for symptoms at admission, humoral response against SARS-CoV-2 or autoantibodies to glutamic acid decarboxylase or interferon alpha-4. New-onset diabetes was independently associated with the risk of adverse clinical outcome defined as ICU admission or death (HR 2.11, 95% CI 1.34-3.31; p=0.001), even after adjustment for age, sex and other selected variables associated with COVID-19 severity. Furthermore, we documented a negative association (HR 0.661, 95% CI 0.43-1.02; p=0.063) between new-onset diabetes and the time to swab negativization. During follow-up we observed that in 30% of the patients with new-onset diabetes hyperglycemia reversed when the viral infection resolved.

**Conclusions** The recognition of new-onset diabetes as a specific clinical entity associated with COVID-19 pneumonia is relevant for early and appropriate patient management and close monitoring for the progression of disease severity.

Keywords
*   COVID-19
*   diabetes
*   clinical outcome
*   humoral response
*   SARS-CoV-2

## Introduction

Increasing evidence suggests the existence of a bidirectional link between COVID 19 and diabetes 1. Preexisting diabetes is a risk factor for poor outcomes and death after SARS-CoV-2 infection 2-4. On the other hand, new-onset diabetes/hyperglycemia 5 and acute metabolic decompensation of preexisting diabetes 6 are now emerging as complications of COVID-19 pneumonia, especially in patients requiring hospitalization. This suggests a potential diabetogenic effect of SARS-CoV-2 infection, independent from the stress response to the acute illness 7. Both reduced insulin secretion and increased insulin resistance have been proposed as possible mechanisms 8. In fact, both endocrine and exocrine pancreatic tissues are susceptible to productive SARS-CoV-2 infection 9, 10, which may damage β-cell integrity, and decrease insulin secretion. Furthermore, the surge in cytokines production associated with the viral infection may be responsible for an increase in insulin resistance11. Regardless of the mechanism responsible for the metabolic dysregulation observed in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia, the clinical entity of new-onset diabetes/hyperglycemia still has not been adequately characterized and separated from the entity of preexisting diabetes 5. Few studies have comparatively characterized the two types of diabetes as for the presence of comorbidities, pre-hospitalization treatments, symptoms at admission and laboratory variables associated with the severity of COVID-19 pneumonia. Many studies have recently reported that new-onset diabetes/hyperglycemia is associated with a poorer outcome compared to that of the normoglycemic individuals 12-17. However, whether new-onset diabetes/hyperglycemia is associated with a poorer outcome of COVID-19 pneumonia compared to preexisting diabetes is still an open question, with conflicting findings 13, 15, 18-20. Moreover, data on islet autoimmunity prevalence, anti SARS-CoV-2 antibody responses, and timing for viral clearance are still missing. Finally, it is unclear whether new-onset diabetes/hyperglycemia associated with COVID-19 pneumonia persists or reverts when the viral infection resolves. To address this gap in our knowledge, we studied a cohort of 176 adult patients with confirmed COVID-19 pneumonia, with a diagnosis of preexisting or new-onset diabetes.

## Material and Methods

### Study population and data sources

The study population consisted of 176 adult patients hospitalized for COVID-19 pneumonia with a diagnosis of diabetes, either preexisting or new-onset. These patients were selected from two previously described and partially overlapping cohorts 12, assembled at the IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital (Milan, Italy) as part of an institutional clinical– biological cohort (COVID-BioB; [ClinicalTrials.gov](http://ClinicalTrials.gov) Identifier: [NCT04318366](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?link\_type=CLINTRIALGOV&access_num=NCT04318366&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2021%2F04%2F22%2F2021.04.17.21255548.atom)) of patients with COVID-19 pneumonia. The first cohort (n=584) was previously analysed for the humoral response against SARS-Cov-2 (n = 509) 21, while the second cohort (n=169) was studied for the development of thromboembolic complications. The study was approved by the local Institutional Review Board (protocol n 34/int/2020; [NCT04318366](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?link_type=CLINTRIALGOV&access_num=NCT04318366&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2021%2F04%2F22%2F2021.04.17.21255548.atom)) and all patients signed a written informed consent. A confirmed case was defined as presence of symptoms and radiological findings suggestive of COVID-19 pneumonia and/or a SARS-CoV-2-positive RT-PCR test from a nasal/throat (NT) swab. Demographic information, clinical features and laboratory tests were obtained within 72 hours from admission. Data were collected directly through patients’ interviews or medical chart review. Data regarding patients’ comorbidities were collected during hospitalization or after discharge from both structured baseline patient interviews and hospital paper or electronic medical records. All disease diagnoses present at the date of infection were included as comorbidities. Data were verified by data managers and clinicians for accuracy and crosschecked in blind. Data were recorded until hospital discharge or in-hospital death, whichever occurred first. We also recorded mortality and swab negativization beyond hospital discharge through our dedicate follow-up clinic: for patients non attending the follow-up clinic, we verified patient’s vital status with either family members or family physician.

### Laboratory variables

Routine blood tests encompassed serum biochemistry [including renal and liver function, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH)], complete blood count with differential, markers of myocardial damage [troponin T and pro-brain natriuretic peptide (proBNP)], and inflammation markers [C-reactive protein (CRP), ferritin, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), interleukin-6 (IL-6), procalcitonin]. An extended coagulation profile was obtained including D-dimer, PT, PTT, fibrinogen and antithrombin activity. Specific antibodies to different SARS-CoV-2 antigens, interferon alpha-4 and glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD) were tested by a luciferase immunoprecipitation system (LIPS) assay, as previously described (11).

### Definition of diabetes

Study participants were defined as having: a) preexisting diabetes if they had a documented diagnosis of diabetes before the hospital admission for COVID-19 pneumonia [fasting plasma glucose (FPG) ≥7.0 mmol/l or HbA1c ≥ 6.5% (48 mmol/mol), or they were prescribed diabetes medications]; b) new-onset diabetes if they had a mean fasting plasma glucose in the absence of infusions of dextrose ≥7.0 mmol/l during the hospitalization for COVID-19 pneumonia in the presence of a negative history for diabetes and/or normal glycated hemoglobin level in the last year and in the absence of prescribed diabetes medications. We computed mean fasting glucose and glucose variability (standard deviation) from all fasting laboratory glucose values measured during hospitalization. The diagnosis of pancreatogenic and steroid-induced diabetes was attributed to patients whose diabetes was reasonably secondary to their exocrine pancreatic disease or steroid use. The diagnosis of type 1 diabetes was attributed to patients whose diabetes at onset was associated with evidence of islet autoimmunity. The diagnosis of type 2 diabetes was attributed to all patients who did not fulfil the criteria for any of the above.

### Statistical analysis

Categorical variables are reported as frequency or percent, continuous variables as median with inter-quartiles range (IQR) in parenthesis. Categorical variables were compared using Chi-square or Fischer’s exact test, as appropriate; continuous variables using the Mann-Whitney test. Associations between baseline variables and diabetes status was assessed by logistic regression. Multiple regression models, each adjusted for age and sex and one additional baseline variable of interest were performed. The effect estimates were reported as Odd Ratios (ORs), outcome variable were pre-existing diabetes ore new onset diabetes as appropriate to obtain OR >1.

Survival was estimated according to Kaplan–Meier. The time-to-event was calculated from the date of symptom onset to the date of the event, or of last follow-up visit, whichever occurred first. We used univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards models to study the association between patient characteristics with time to adverse outcome (a composite endpoint of admission to ICU or death, whichever occurred first). The effect estimates were reported as Hazard Ratios (HRs) with the corresponding 95% CI estimated according to the Wald approximation. Multivariate analyses were performed including variables significant at the level of <0.1 in the univariate analysis. Variables were excluded from multivariate Cox regression if they showed substantial biological redundancy with other variables (e.g., aspartate aminotransferase vs alanine aminotransferase), had data obtained for fewer than 78% of patients, in order to prevent model overfitting. Two-tailed P values are reported, with P value <0.05 indicating statistical significance. All confidence intervals are two-sided and not adjusted for multiple testing. Statistical analyses were performed with the SPSS 24 (SPSS Inc. /IBM) and the R software version 3.4.0 (R Core Team (2020).

## Results

### Study participants

The study population consisted of 176 adult patients (≥18 years) with diabetes and confirmed COVID-19 pneumonia admitted between February 25th and May 2nd 2020 to the Emergency or Clinical departments of the IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital (Milan, Italy). Among the 176 cases included in the study 11 (6.3%) were discharged without hospitalization, 137 (77.8%) were treated with non-invasive ventilation and 39 (22.2%) were admitted to the ICU over the hospitalization period. The median hospital stay was 17 (8-17) days. As of February 14, 2021 the median follow-up time after symptoms onset was 213 (95% CI: 199-227) days. Sixty-four patients died (36.4%). According to the composite endpoint of ICU admission or death, 82 patients (46.6%) had an adverse in-hospital outcome.

### New-onset diabetes was associated with specific basal characteristics

Preexisting and new-onset diabetes accounted for 68.8% (n=121) and 31.25% (n=55) of our cohort, respectively. Among the 121 subjects with pre-existing diabetes, 109 (90.1%) were diagnosed with type 2 diabetes, 4 (3.3%) with type 1 diabetes and 8 (6.6%) with secondary diabetes (5 pancreatogenic, 3 steroid-induced). The characteristics of the study participants for patients with pre-existing or new-onset diabetes at the time of hospitalization are reported in Table 1. Sex- and age-adjusted logistic regression analysis was used to assess the associations between baseline variables and preexisting vs new-onset diabetes. Higher BMI at admission [after log1p transformation OR 19.44 (2.204-171.43), p=0.008], cardiovascular comorbidities [OR 3.16 (1.32-8.01), p=0.017], hypertension [OR 2.14 (1.04-4.4), p=0.038], active neoplastic disease [OR 3.69 (1.045-1.305), p=0.043] and chronic kidney disease [OR 2.23 (0.897-5.56), p=0.084] were all associated with preexisting diabetes, while comorbid neurodegenerative diseases were associated with new-onset diabetes [OR 3.23 (1.044-10.02), p=0.042]. The median time from symptoms onset to hospital admission was 6 (2-9.5) and 7 (3-10) days for patients with preexisting and new-onset diabetes, respectively (p=0.484). Patients with preexisting and new-onset diabetes reported similar symptoms at the time of hospital admission for COVID-19 pneumonia (Table 1).

View this table:
[Table 1.](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/04/22/2021.04.17.21255548/T1)

Table 1. Baseline characteristics of study cohort, according to either preexisting or new-onset diabetes

### New-onset diabetes was associated with a specific clinical laboratory profile at admission

Upon admission (Table 2), patients with new-onset diabetes exhibited significantly higher white blood cell count [9.7 (6.1-14.3) vs 7.1 (5.4-10.4) x109/L, p=0.004], neutrophil count [8.4 (4.85-12.9) vs 5.2 (3.9-8.1) x109/L, p=0.003], and tissue damage markers [LDH 8.04 (5.35-16.63) vs 5.92 (4.42-8.17) μkat/L, p=0.001; AST 0.95 (0.65-1.39) vs 0.63 (0.42-1.14) μkat/L, *p*=0.001; ALT 0.78 (0.47-1.24) vs 0.53 (0.3-0.93) μkat/L, *p*=0.012] compared to patients with preexisting diabetes. Furthermore, an increase in procalcitonin [0.95 (0.49-3.58) vs 0.61 (0.31-1.38) ng/ml, p=0.014] and hemoglobin [12.9 (11.5-14.6) vs 12.5 (10.75-13.5) μg/L, p= 0.042] was evident, with a trend also for ferritin [1254 (585-2433) vs 823 (462-1499) g/L, p= 0.063] and total bilirubin [11.62 (8.16-18.81) vs 9.23 (5.39-14.87) μmol/L, p=0.054]. All the other laboratory variables associated with COVID-19 pneumonia severity, including inflammation indices (CRP and IL-6), hemostatic variables (D-dimer levels, platelet count, fibrinogen, partial thromboplastin time and prothrombin time), biomarkers of myocardial damage (troponin T and Pro-BNP), markers of liver and kidney function (albumin, phosphatase alkaline, creatinine) and glucose control were similar between preexisting and new-onset diabetes. Antibody responses to SARS-CoV-2 were available for a large subgroup of patients (Table 2). No differences between preexisting and new-onset diabetes were evident for IgG, IgM and IgA responses to the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein (RBD or S1+S2), IgG response to NP, autoimmune antibodies anti GAD and anti interferon alpha-4.

View this table:
[Table 2.](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/04/22/2021.04.17.21255548/T2)

Table 2. Clinical laboratory profile at hospital admission and clinical outcome

### New-onset diabetes was associated with a worse clinical outcome

Sex-and age-adjusted Cox proportional hazards model (HR 2.11, CI 1.34-3.31; p=0.001) and Kaplan-Meier estimator log-rank test (p=0.005) indicated that new-onset diabetes was strongly associated with an increased risk of adverse clinical outcome, as defined by composite endpoint of admission to ICU or death, whichever occurred first. (Fig 1 and Table 2). Laboratory variables associated with adverse clinical outcome in univariate Cox proportional hazards model, included inflammation indices (CRP, IL-6, ferritin, procalcitonin, low lymphocytes count, high white blood cell and neutrophil count), hemostatic parameters (D-dimer levels, fibrinogen and partial thromboplastin time), biomarkers of myocardial damage (troponin T and Pro-BNP), markers of liver and kidney dysfunction (albumin, total bilirubin and creatinine), markers of tissue damage (lactate dehydrogenase and aspartate transaminase) and markers of glucose control (fasting plasma glucose and glucose variability). Of note, the presence of hypertension (HR 0.59, CI 0.36-0.94; p=0.028) and the treatment with Angiotensin II receptor blocker (HR 0.44, CI 0.22-0.85; p=0.014) was associated to a decreased risk for adverse clinical outcome. A multivariable analysis using two different models confirmed new-onset diabetes (HR 2.68, CI 1.47-4.89; p=0.001 and HR 1.72, CI 0.95-3.09; p=0.073 respectively) as an independent predictor of adverse clinical outcome (Figure 1B) for patients with COVID-19 pneumonia. To evaluate the specific impact of clinical characteristics and laboratory tests, the univariate Cox proportional hazards model was also conducted separately for patients with preexisting and those with new-onset diabetes. Although many analysed factors were similarly associated with COVID-19 adverse clinical outcome in either new-onset or preexisting diabetes, some qualitative or quantitative differences emerged (fig 1B).

![Figure 1](http://medrxiv.org/https://www.medrxiv.org/content/medrxiv/early/2021/04/22/2021.04.17.21255548/F1.medium.gif)

[Figure 1](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/04/22/2021.04.17.21255548/F1)

Figure 1 a-b. Adverse clinical outcome in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia with either preexisting or new-onset diabetes.
Kaplan-Meier estimates of survival without adverse clinical outcome for 176 patients with COVID-19 pneumonia (panel a). Survival without adverse clinical outcome (defined by composite endpoint of admission to ICU or death, whichever occurred first) was estimated for patients with new-onset (n=55) or preexisting diabetes (n=121). The log-rank test was used to test differences between the two groups. Crosses indicate censored patients (censoring for death or end of follow-up). The forest plots (panel b) show the hazard ratios for survival without adverse clinical outcome according to presence of new-onset or preexisting diabetes. Left panel: univariate Cox regression analysis adjusted for sex and age. Right panel: multivariate Cox regression analysis adjusted for sex and age, including variables significant at the level of <0.1 in the univariate analysis. Variables were excluded from multivariate Cox regression if they showed substantial biological redundancy with other variables (e.g. aspartate aminotransferase vs alanine aminotransferase) or had data obtained for fewer than 78% of patients. Dots represent the HR, lines represent 95% confidence interval (CI), and solid dots indicate P < 0.05.

![Figure 2](http://medrxiv.org/https://www.medrxiv.org/content/medrxiv/early/2021/04/22/2021.04.17.21255548/F2.medium.gif)

[Figure 2](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/04/22/2021.04.17.21255548/F2)

Figure 2 a-b. Post discharge follow-up: time to NT swab negativization and persistence of hyperglycemia.
Kaplan-Meier estimates of the time to NT swab negativization for 176 patients with COVID-19 pneumonia (panel a). NT Swab negativization was estimated in patients with new-onset (n=55) or preexisting diabetes (n=121). The log-rank test was used to test differences between groups. Crosses indicate censored patients (censoring for death or end of follow-up). Fasting blood glucose during the post discharge follow up (panel b). Valid glucose measurements during follow up (median 6 month) was available for 61 out of 121 and 20 out of 55 patients with preexisting or new-onset diabetes, respectively. NFG: Normal Fasting Glucose, <5.6 mmol/L; IFG: Impaired Fasting Glucose 5.6-6.9 mmol/L; DFG: Diabetes Fasting Glucose ≥ **7** mmol/L.

### Post discharge follow-up: time to NT swab negativization and persistence of hyperglycemia

As the prolonged viral shedding is a risk factor for poor outcome of COVID 19 and may interfere with the immunological mechanism of virus elimination, in our study population we evaluated the time to NT swab negativization. Sex-and age-adjusted Cox proportional hazards model (HR 0.661, 95% CI 0.43-1.02; p=0.063) and Kaplan-Meier estimator log-rank test (45 days, 95% CI 37-52 vs 35 days, 95% CI 29-41; p=0.023) documented a negative association between new-onset diabetes and the time to NT swab negativization. The entity of new-onset diabetes also include stress-induced hyperglycemia that may resolve during follow up. For this reason, we evaluated fasting blood glucose during the post-discharge follow up (i.e., at the 1, 3, 6, and 9 month outpatient visits). Among 121 subjects with preexisting diabetes, 40 died and 20 had no glucose measurements during follow up (median 6 month). Of the remaining 61 patients with a prescribed treatment for diabetes, six had normal fasting glucose (NFG) [9.8%, 90 (84.5-91.75) mg/dl], 21 impaired fasting glucose (IFG) [34.4%, 112 (108-119) mg/dl] and 34 fasting glucose in the diabetes range (DFG) [55.7%, 160.5 (133-189.5) mg/dl]. Among 55 patients with new-onset diabetes, 23 died and 12 had no glucose measurements during follow up (median 6 month). Of the remaining 20 patients, none had a prescribed diabetes treatment during follow up: six showed normalization of their fasting glucose [30%; 86 (84-90 mg/dl)], while 14 were confirmed as having either IFG [n=8, 40%, 104 (100.2-111)] or DFG [n=6, 30%; 136 (126-148) mg/dl].

## Discussion

New-onset diabetes 5 is emerging as a common feature among patients hospitalized for COVID 19 pneumonia 22. This clinical entity still needs to be adequately characterized since there are only few studies documenting how new-onset diabetes differs from preexisting diabetes in COVID-19 patients. To address this issue, we studied a cohort of 176 adult patients with COVID-19 pneumonia with a diagnosis of preexisting or new-onset diabetes. Our study generated several interesting findings. First, patients with new-onset diabetes had significantly less comorbidities related to the metabolic syndrome than those with preexisting diabetes. The main reason for this difference probably lies in the lower prevalence of obesity and a shorter duration of hyperglycemia. Consistent with this, prior to admission only a low proportion of patients was prescribed antihypertensive drugs, lipid lowering agents or antiplatelet therapy. However, it cannot be excluded that the lower prevalence is an effect related to an underdiagnosis driven by the absence of diabetes diagnosis. Similarly, the higher prevalence of neurodegenerative disease in subjects with “new onset diabetes” could be related with lower utilization of health care and therefore lower rates of diagnosis of diabetes pre admission in patients with a cognitive impairment. Second, patients with new-onset diabetes showed increased levels of inflammatory markers and indicators of multi-organ injury compared to patients with preexisting diabetes. Third, the prevalence of autoimmune biomarkers as anti GAD (a marker of islet autoimmunity) or interferon alpha-4 antibody (an autoimmune marker recently associated with COVID-19 severity) 23 was generally very low and did not differ between new-onset and preexisting diabetes. Fourth, new-onset diabetes was associated with a poorer clinical outcome and a delayed time to viral clearance compared to preexisting diabetes, despite the presence of a superimposable humoral responses to SARS-CoV-2 and similar glucose levels. Fifth, new-onset diabetes associated with severe COVID-19 pneumonia reversed in 30% of the patients when the viral infection resolved.

Whether new-onset diabetes should be considered a specific clinical entity is a matter of discussion. In terms of pathophysiology, new-onset diabetes may include (a) “stress-induced” hyperglycemia; (b) previously unrecognized (pre)diabetes (either type 2 or, less likely, type 1 diabetes); (c) a form of diabetes due to the direct effect of the SARS-CoV-2 virus on the pancreas; or (d) a form of diabetes secondary to the treatment of COVID-19 (e.g., with glucocorticoids or other medications possibly inducing secondary diabetes) 24-31. To adequately addressing this question would require the availability of pancreatic tissue or advanced studies on insulin secretion and resistance, which would be unrealistic to perform during the acute phase of COVID-19 pneumonia. Moreover, it is very likely that more than one cause may contribute to the hyperglycemia of new-onset diabetes. In our study, the absence of markers of islet autoimmunity and the lower prevalence of comorbidities related to metabolic syndrome do suggest specific pathophysiological mechanisms responsible for new-onset diabetes. More specifically, the extremely low prevalence of GAD autoantibodies excludes a previously unrecognized autoimmune (pre)diabetes (ie LADA) as possible cause of new onset diabetes. The use of glucocorticoids in the first wave of the pandemic was very limited and, therefore, unlikely to have played a role in the pathogenesis of new-onset diabetes. Moreover, as new-onset diabetes reverted in some patients when the infection resolved, it is reasonable to hypothesize that reversible transient factors, such as inflammation-induced insulin resistance, may play a role in causing hyperglycemia in those patients 28.

Regardless of the pathophysiological mechanism, our study documented that new-onset diabetes was associated with an adverse clinical outcome of SARS-CoV-2 infection and that this association was independent from the major risk factors for COVID-19 disease severity. As good glycemic control was indeed shown to reduce disease severity and mortality in COVID-19 patients with hyperglycemia 32, early recognition and treatment of hyperglycemia may greatly benefit these patients. Therefore, our findings do strongly support the need to screen all patients with COVID-19 pneumonia for hyperglycemia (i.e., blood glucose and/or HbA1c) at the time of admission, despite a mute personal or family history of diabetes.

Since blood glucose levels in our study were not different in patients with either new-onset or preexisting diabetes, factors other than hyperglycemia should be considered to explain the differences in clinical outcome. A role could be played by a different drug treatment prior to admission, Of note, in our study sex-and age-adjusted Cox proportional hazards model indicated that angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) and/or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) treatment was significantly associated with a better clinical outcome in preexisting diabetes, but not in new-onset diabetes. Most studies, including several meta-analyses, found no substantial differences in the risk for severe COVID-19 pneumonia associated with the prescription of common classes of antihypertensive medications 33. On the other hand, evidence of the beneficial effects of chronic ACEi/ARB use, especially in hypertensive cohort of patients with COVID-19 pneumonia, was reported 34-37. As the prevalence of hypertension is higher among patients with preexisting diabetes, ACEi/ARB use may mediate a selective beneficial effect. Similarly, in our study around 60% of patients with preexisting diabetes was taking metformin and the treatment was associated with a better clinical outcome. Concordantly, previous observational studies suggested that in patients taking metformin the risk for COVID-19 mortality is reduced 38, 39. Of note is the evidence of a delayed viral clearance after SARS-CoV-2 infection among patients with new-onset diabetes. Of great interest is also the finding of a slow viral clearance in COVID-19 pneumonia patients with new onset diabetes. Discordant data exist about differences in viral clearance or shedding in people with diabetes 40. As increased glucose levels and glycolysis promoted Sars-CoV-2 replication in monocytes via ROS/HIFα pathway activation leading to secondary T-cell dysfunction 41, this could explain the delayed viral clearance associated with the acute hypeglycaemia in patients with new-onset diabetes.

Our study has some limitations. First, the analysis was performed on a subcohort of 176 patients selected for having hyperglycemia (either new-onset or preexisting diabetes) out of 584 subjects of our original cohort (12). All patients with diabetes were included, and as for age, sex, new-onset diabetes prevalence, and the clinical outcome of our cohort appears superimposable to those reported by many authors. Despite this, we cannot exclude a selection bias. Second, our cohort is limited to hospitalized patients with COVID-19 pneumonia. Third, we only assessed fasting blood glucose and we acknowledge that more specific indicators of beta cell function, such as serum insulin and or C peptide levels, should have been measured. Fourth, the lack of HbA1c measurements in our cohort is a limitation. The evidence of normal HbA1c at the time of admission would indicate no history of recent hyperglycemia and confirm the diagnosis of new-onset diabetes. HbA1c levels were available for some patients with preexisting diabetes (51 (41-58) mmol/mol; 6.8%), but in very few patients with new-onset diabetes (38 (36-40) mmol/mol; 5.6%), and for this reason were not included in the analysis.

In conclusion, new-onset diabetes/hyperglycemia is emerging as a complication of COVID-19 pneumonia and this clinical entity still needs to be adequately characterized in comparison with preexisting diabetes. It is clear from our study that patients with new-onset diabetes had increased levels of inflammatory markers and indicators of organ injuries associated with a poorer clinical outcome compared to preexisting diabetes. This strongly support the need to screen all COVID-19 patients for hyperglycemia at the time of admission, despite a mute personal or family history of diabetes, and to treat them in order to reach and maintain a good glycemic control during the hospitalization for COVID-19 pneumonia.

## Data Availability

Some or all datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are not publicly available but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

## DATA AVAILABILITY

Some or all datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are not publicly available but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

## Declaration of interests

The authors have no conflict of interest to disclose in relation to the topic of this manuscript. The authors declare that there are no relationships or activities that might bias, or be perceived to bias, their work.

## Individual contributions

LP, VL and MS contributed to the conception of the study, wrote the manuscript, researched data and contributed to the discussion. EBa, CB and IM contributed to the acquisition and analysis of antibody data and revised the manuscript. AM, RM, CT, RT, FC and GL contributed to the acquisition of samples, managed the biobanking activities, critically revised the manuscript, recruited patients and managed sample biobanking. AL, AC and CM, contributed to the acquisition, analysis and interpretation of clinical data, contributed to the design of the study and critically reviewed/edited the manuscript. Professor Lorenzo Piemonti is the guarantor of this work and, as such, had full access to all the data presented in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of data and the accuracy of data analysis. The final manuscript has been read and approved by all named authors.

## Acknowledgments

This work was funded by Program Project COVID-19 OSR-UniSR and Ministero della Salute (COVID-2020-12371617).

## Footnotes

*   **Declaration of interests.** The authors have no conflict of interest to disclose in relation to the topic of this manuscript. This work was funded by Program Project COVID-19 OSR-UniSR and Ministero della Salute (COVID-2020-12371617).

*   Received April 17, 2021.
*   Revision received April 17, 2021.
*   Accepted April 22, 2021.


*   © 2021, Posted by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

The copyright holder for this pre-print is the author. All rights reserved. The material may not be redistributed, re-used or adapted without the author's permission.

## Reference

1.  1.Muniangi-Muhitu H, Akalestou E, Salem V, Misra S, Oliver NS & Rutter GA. Covid-19 and Diabetes: A Complex Bidirectional Relationship. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2020 11 582936.
    
    

2.  2.McGurnaghan SJ, Weir A, Bishop J, Kennedy S, Blackbourn LAK, McAllister DA, Hutchinson S, Caparrotta TM, Mellor J, Jeyam A, O’Reilly JE, Wild SH, Hatam S, Hohn A, Colombo M, Robertson C, Lone N, Murray J, Butterly E, Petrie J, Kennon B, McCrimmon R, Lindsay R, Pearson E, Sattar N, McKnight J, Philip S, Collier A, McMenamin J, Smith-Palmer A, Goldberg D, McKeigue PM & Colhoun HM. Risks of and risk factors for COVID-19 disease in people with diabetes: a cohort study of the total population of Scotland. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2021 9 82–93.
    
    

3.  3.Huang C, Wang Y, Li X, Ren L, Zhao J, Hu Y, Zhang L, Fan G, Xu J, Gu X, Cheng Z, Yu T, Xia J, Wei Y, Wu W, Xie X, Yin W, Li H, Liu M, Xiao Y, Gao H, Guo L, Xie J, Wang G, Jiang R, Gao Z, Jin Q, Wang J & Cao B. Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China. Lancet 2020 395 497–506.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30183-5&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=http://www.n&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2021%2F04%2F22%2F2021.04.17.21255548.atom) 

4.  4.Mantovani A, Byrne CD, Zheng MH & Targher G. Diabetes as a risk factor for greater COVID-19 severity and in-hospital death: A meta-analysis of observational studies. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis 2020.
    
    

5.  5.Rubino F, Amiel SA, Zimmet P, Alberti G, Bornstein S, Eckel RH, Mingrone G, Boehm B, Cooper ME, Chai Z, Del Prato S, Ji L, Hopkins D, Herman WH, Khunti K, Mbanya JC & Renard E. New-Onset Diabetes in Covid-19. N Engl J Med 2020 383 789–790.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1056/NEJMc2018688&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=32530585&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2021%2F04%2F22%2F2021.04.17.21255548.atom) 

6.  6.Li J, Wang X, Chen J, Zuo X, Zhang H & Deng A. COVID-19 infection may cause ketosis and ketoacidosis. Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism 2020 22 1935–1941.
    
    

7.  7.Hayden MR. An Immediate and Long-Term Complication of COVID-19 May Be Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: The Central Role of beta-Cell Dysfunction, Apoptosis and Exploration of Possible Mechanisms. Cells 2020 9.
    
    

8.  8.Ceriello A. Hyperglycemia and COVID-19: What was known and what is really new? Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2020 167 108383.
    
    

9.  9.Müller JA, GroßR Conzelmann C, Krüger J, Merle U, Steinhart J, Weil T, Koepke L, Bozzo CP, Read C, Fois G, Eiseler T, Gehrmann J, van Vuuren J, Wessbecher IM, Frick M, Costa IG, Breunig M, Grüner B, Peters L, Schuster M, Liebau S, Seufferlein T, Stenger S, Stenzinger A, MacDonald PE, Kirchhoff F, Sparrer KMJ, Walther P, Lickert H, Barth TFE, Wagner M, Münch J, Heller S & Kleger A. SARS-CoV-2 infects and replicates in cells of the human endocrine and exocrine pancreas. Nature Metabolism 2021.
    
    

10. 10.Coate KC, Cha J, Shrestha S, Wang W, Goncalves LM, Almaca J, Kapp ME, Fasolino M, Morgan A, Dai C, Saunders DC, Bottino R, Aramandla R, Jenkins R, Stein R, Kaestner KH, Vahedi G, Brissova M & Powers AC. SARS-CoV-2 Cell Entry Factors ACE2 and TMPRSS2 Are Expressed in the Microvasculature and Ducts of Human Pancreas but Are Not Enriched in beta Cells. Cell Metab 2020 32 1028–1040 e1024.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.cmet.2020.11.006&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=33207245&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2021%2F04%2F22%2F2021.04.17.21255548.atom) 

11. 11.Wu L, Girgis CM & Cheung NW. COVID-19 and diabetes: Insulin requirements parallel illness severity in critically unwell patients. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 2020 93 390–393.
    
    

12. 12.Lampasona V, Secchi M, Scavini M, Bazzigaluppi E, Brigatti C, Marzinotto I, Davalli A, Caretto A, Laurenzi A, Martinenghi S, Molinari C, Vitali G, Di Filippo L, Mercalli A, Melzi R, Tresoldi C, Rovere-Querini P, Landoni G, Ciceri F, Bosi E & Piemonti L. Antibody response to multiple antigens of SARS-CoV-2 in patients with diabetes: an observational cohort study. Diabetologia 2020 63 2548–2558.
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=http://www.n&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2021%2F04%2F22%2F2021.04.17.21255548.atom) 

13. 13.Li H, Tian S, Chen T, Cui Z, Shi N, Zhong X, Qiu K, Zhang J, Zeng T, Chen L & Zheng J. Newly diagnosed diabetes is associated with a higher risk of mortality than known diabetes in hospitalized patients with COVID-19. Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism 2020 22 1897–1906.
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=http://www.n&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2021%2F04%2F22%2F2021.04.17.21255548.atom) 

14. 14.Wang S, Ma P, Zhang S, Song S, Wang Z, Ma Y, Xu J, Wu F, Duan L, Yin Z, Luo H, Xiong N, Xu M, Zeng T & Jin Y. Fasting blood glucose at admission is an independent predictor for 28-day mortality in patients with COVID-19 without previous diagnosis of diabetes: a multi-centre retrospective study. Diabetologia 2020.
    
    

15. 15.Fadini GP, Morieri ML, Boscari F, Fioretto P, Maran A, Busetto L, Bonora BM, Selmin E, Arcidiacono G, Pinelli S, Farnia F, Falaguasta D, Russo L, Voltan G, Mazzocut S, Costantini G, Ghirardini F, Tresso S, Cattelan AM, Vianello A, Avogaro A & Vettor R. Newly-diagnosed diabetes and admission hyperglycemia predict COVID-19 severity by aggravating respiratory deterioration. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2020 168 108374.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.diabres.2020.108374&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=http://www.n&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2021%2F04%2F22%2F2021.04.17.21255548.atom) 

16. 16.Bode B, Garrett V, Messler J, McFarland R, Crowe J, Booth R & Klonoff DC. Glycemic Characteristics and Clinical Outcomes of COVID-19 Patients Hospitalized in the United States. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2020 14 813–821.
    
    

17. 17.Singh AK & Singh R. Hyperglycemia without diabetes and new-onset diabetes are both associated with poorer outcomes in COVID-19. Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice 2020 167 108382.
    
    

18. 18.Cariou B, Pichelin M, Goronflot T, Gonfroy C, Marre M, Raffaitin-Cardin C, Thivolet C, Wargny M, Hadjadj S & Gourdy P. Phenotypic characteristics and prognosis of newly diagnosed diabetes in hospitalized patients with COVID-19: results from the CORONADO study. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2021 108695.
    
    

19. 19.Zhang Y, Li H, Zhang J, Cao Y, Zhao X, Yu N, Gao Y, Ma J, Zhang H, Zhang J, Guo X & Liu X. The clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with diabetes and secondary hyperglycaemia with coronavirus disease 2019:A single-centre, retrospective, observational study in Wuhan. Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism 2020 22 1443–1454.
    
    

20. 20.Sachdeva S, Desai R, Gupta U, Prakash A, Jain A & Aggarwal A. Admission Hyperglycemia in Non-diabetics Predicts Mortality and Disease Severity in COVID-19: a Pooled Analysis and Meta-summary of Literature. SN Compr Clin Med 2020 1–6.
    
    

21. 21.Secchi M, Bazzigaluppi E, Brigatti C, Marzinotto I, Tresoldi C, Rovere-Querini P, Poli A, Castagna A, Scarlatti G, Zangrillo A, Ciceri F, Piemonti L & Lampasona V. COVID-19 survival associates with the immunoglobulin response to the SARS-CoV-2 spike receptor binding domain. J Clin Invest 2020 130 6366–6378.
    
    

22. 22.Sathish T, Kapoor N, Cao Y, Tapp RJ & Zimmet P. Proportion of newly diagnosed diabetes in COVID-19 patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism 2021 23 870–874.
    
    

23. 23.Bastard P, Rosen LB, Zhang Q, Michailidis E, Hoffmann HH, Zhang Y, Dorgham K, Philippot Q, Rosain J, Beziat V, Manry J, Shaw E, Haljasmagi L, Peterson P, Lorenzo L, Bizien L, Trouillet-Assant S, Dobbs K, de Jesus AA, Belot A, Kallaste A, Catherinot E, Tandjaoui-Lambiotte Y, Le Pen J, Kerner G, Bigio B, Seeleuthner Y, Yang R, Bolze A, Spaan AN, Delmonte OM, Abers MS, Aiuti A, Casari G, Lampasona V, Piemonti L, Ciceri F, Bilguvar K, Lifton RP, Vasse M, Smadja DM, Migaud M, Hadjadj J, Terrier B, Duffy D, Quintana-Murci L, van de Beek D, Roussel L, Vinh DC, Tangye SG, Haerynck F, Dalmau D, Martinez-Picado J, Brodin P, Nussenzweig MC, Boisson-Dupuis S, Rodriguez-Gallego C, Vogt G, Mogensen TH, Oler AJ, Gu J, Burbelo PD, Cohen JI, Biondi A, Bettini LR, D’Angio M, Bonfanti P, Rossignol P, Mayaux J, Rieux-Laucat F, Husebye ES, Fusco F, Ursini MV, Imberti L, Sottini A, Paghera S, Quiros-Roldan E, Rossi C, Castagnoli R, Montagna D, Licari A, Marseglia GL, Duval X, Ghosn J, Tsang JS, Goldbach-Mansky R, Kisand K, Lionakis MS, Puel A, Zhang SY, Holland SM, Gorochov G, Jouanguy E, Rice CM, Cobat A, Notarangelo LD, Abel L, Su HC & Casanova JL. Autoantibodies against type I IFNs in patients with life-threatening COVID-19. Science 2020 370.
    
    

24. 24.Boddu SK, Aurangabadkar G & Kuchay MS. New onset diabetes, type 1 diabetes and COVID-19. Diabetes Metab Syndr 2020 14 2211–2217.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.dsx.2020.11.012&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=33395782&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2021%2F04%2F22%2F2021.04.17.21255548.atom) 

25. 25.Papachristou S, Stamatiou I, Stoian AP & Papanas N. New-Onset Diabetes in COVID-19: Time to Frame Its Fearful Symmetry. Diabetes Therapy 2021 12 461–464.
    
    

26. 26.Unsworth R, Wallace S, Oliver NS, Yeung S, Kshirsagar A, Naidu H, Kwong RMW, Kumar P & Logan KM. New-Onset Type 1 Diabetes in Children During COVID-19: Multicenter Regional Findings in the U.K. Diabetes Care 2020 43 e170–e171.
    
    [FREE Full Text](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiRlVMTCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6NzoiZGlhY2FyZSI7czo1OiJyZXNpZCI7czoxMDoiNDMvMTEvZTE3MCI7czo0OiJhdG9tIjtzOjUwOiIvbWVkcnhpdi9lYXJseS8yMDIxLzA0LzIyLzIwMjEuMDQuMTcuMjEyNTU1NDguYXRvbSI7fXM6ODoiZnJhZ21lbnQiO3M6MDoiIjt9) 

27. 27.Nassar M, Nso N, Baraka B, Alfishawy M, Mohamed M, Nyabera A & Sachmechi I. The association between COVID-19 and type 1 diabetes mellitus: A systematic review. Diabetes Metab Syndr 2021 15 447–454.
    
    

28. 28.Sathish T, Tapp RJ, Cooper ME & Zimmet P. Potential metabolic and inflammatory pathways between COVID-19 and new-onset diabetes. Diabetes Metab 2020 101204.
    
    

29. 29.Apicella M, Campopiano MC, Mantuano M, Mazoni L, Coppelli A & Del Prato S. COVID-19 in people with diabetes: understanding the reasons for worse outcomes. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2020.
    
    

30. 30.Smith SM, Boppana A, Traupman JA, Unson E, Maddock DA, Chao K, Dobesh DP, Brufsky A & Connor RI. Impaired glucose metabolism in patients with diabetes, prediabetes, and obesity is associated with severe COVID-19. J Med Virol 2020.
    
    

31. 31.Wang J & Meng W. COVID-19 and diabetes: the contributions of hyperglycemia. J Mol Cell Biol 2020.
    
    

32. 32.Sardu C, D’Onofrio N, Balestrieri ML, Barbieri M, Rizzo MR, Messina V, Maggi P, Coppola N, Paolisso G & Marfella R. Outcomes in Patients With Hyperglycemia Affected by COVID-19: Can We Do More on Glycemic Control? Diabetes Care 2020 43 1408–1415.
    
    [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6NzoiZGlhY2FyZSI7czo1OiJyZXNpZCI7czo5OiI0My83LzE0MDgiO3M6NDoiYXRvbSI7czo1MDoiL21lZHJ4aXYvZWFybHkvMjAyMS8wNC8yMi8yMDIxLjA0LjE3LjIxMjU1NTQ4LmF0b20iO31zOjg6ImZyYWdtZW50IjtzOjA6IiI7fQ==) 

33. 33.Reynolds HR, Adhikari S, Pulgarin C, Troxel AB, Iturrate E, Johnson SB, Hausvater A, Newman JD, Berger JS, Bangalore S, Katz SD, Fishman GI, Kunichoff D, Chen Y, Ogedegbe G & Hochman JS. Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System Inhibitors and Risk of Covid-19. N Engl J Med 2020 382 2441–2448.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1056/NEJMoa2008975&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=http://www.n&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2021%2F04%2F22%2F2021.04.17.21255548.atom) 

34. 34.Baral R, White M & Vassiliou VS. Effect of Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System Inhibitors in Patients with COVID-19: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of 28,872 Patients. Curr Atheroscler Rep 2020 22 61.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1007/s11883-020-00880-6&link_type=DOI) 

35. 35.Guo X, Zhu Y & Hong Y. Decreased Mortality of COVID-19 With Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System Inhibitors Therapy in Patients With Hypertension: A Meta-Analysis. Hypertension 2020 76 e13–e14.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.120.15572&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=http://www.n&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2021%2F04%2F22%2F2021.04.17.21255548.atom) 

36. 36.Zhang X, Yu J, Pan LY & Jiang HY. ACEI/ARB use and risk of infection or severity or mortality of COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Pharmacol Res 2020 158 104927.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.phrs.2020.104927&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=http://www.n&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2021%2F04%2F22%2F2021.04.17.21255548.atom) 

37. 37.Barochiner J & Martinez R. Use of inhibitors of the renin-angiotensin system in hypertensive patients and COVID-19 severity: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Pharm Ther 2020 45 1244–1252.
    
    

38. 38.Crouse AB, Grimes T, Li P, Might M, Ovalle F & Shalev A. Metformin Use Is Associated With Reduced Mortality in a Diverse Population With COVID-19 and Diabetes. Frontiers in Endocrinology 2021 11.
    
    

39. 39.Han T, Ma S, Sun C, Zhang H, Qu G, Chen Y, Cheng C, Chen EL, Ahmed MA, Kim KY, Manem R, Chen M, Guo Z, Yang H, Yan Y & Zhou Q. The Association Between Hypoglycemic Agents and Clinical Outcomes of COVID-19 in Patients with Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. medRxiv 2021 2021.2001.2026.21250506.
    
    

40. 40.Drucker DJ. Diabetes, obesity, metabolism, and SARS-CoV-2 infection: the end of the beginning. Cell Metab 2021 33 479–498.
    
    

41. 41.Codo AC, Davanzo GG, de Brito Monteiro L, de Souza GF, Muraro SP, Virgilio-da-Silva JV, Prodonoff JS, Carregari VC, de Biagi Junior CAO & Crunfli F. Elevated glucose levels favor SARS-CoV-2 infection and monocyte response through a HIF-1α/glycolysis-dependent axis. Cell Metabolism 2020 32 437–446. e435.