Thromboembolism risk among patients with diabetes/stress hyperglycemia and COVID-19
===================================================================================

* Stefania L Calvisi
* Giuseppe A Ramirez
* Marina Scavini
* Valentina Da Prat
* Giuseppe Di Lucca
* Andrea Laurenzi
* Gabriele Gallina
* Ludovica Cavallo
* Giorgia Borio
* Federica Farolfi
* Maria Pascali
* Jacopo Castellani
* Vito Lampasona
* Armando D’Angelo
* Giovanni Landoni
* Fabio Ciceri
* Patrizia Rovere Querini
* Moreno Tresoldi
* Lorenzo Piemonti

## Abstract

**Purpose** Individuals with diabetes/stress hyperglycemia carry an increased risk for adverse clinical outcome in case of SARS-CoV-2 infection. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether this risk is, at least in part, modulated by an increase of thromboembolic complications.

**Methods** We prospectively followed 180 hospitalized patients with confirmed COVID-19 pneumonia admitted to the Internal Medicine Units of San Raffaele Hospital. Data from 11 out of 180 patients were considered incomplete and excluded from the analysis. We analysed inflammation, tissue damage biomarkers, hemostatic parameters, thrombotic events (TEs) and clinical outcome according to the presence of diabetes/stress hyperglycemia.

**Results** Among 169 patients, 51 (30.2%) had diabetes/stress hyperglycemia. Diabetes/stress hyperglycemia and fasting blood glucose (FBG) were associated with increased inflammation and tissue damage circulating markers, higher D-dimer levels, increased prothrombin time and lower antithrombin III activity. Forty-eight venous and 10 arterial TEs were identified in 49 (29%) patients. Diabetes/stress hyperglycemia (HR 2.71, p=0.001), fasting blood glucose (HR 4.32, p<0.001) and glucose variability (HR 1.6, p < 0.009) were all associated with an increased risk of thromboembolic complication. TEs significantly increased the risk for an adverse clinical outcome only in the presence of diabetes/stress hyperglycemia (HR 3.05, p=0.01) or fasting blood glucose ≥ 7 mmol/l (HR 3.07, p=0.015).

**Conclusions** Thromboembolism risk is higher among patients with diabetes/stress hyperglycemia and COVID-19 pneumonia and is associated to poor clinical outcome. In case of SARS-Cov-2 infection patients with diabetes/stress hyperglycemia could be considered for a more intensive prophylactic anticoagulation regimen.

Keywords
*   COVID-19
*   diabetes
*   clinical outcome
*   humoral response
*   SARS-CoV-2
*   Thromboembolism

## Introduction

Diabetes has been confirmed as one of the most consistent risk factors for severe disease in case of SARS-CoV-2 infection1, 2. In fact, the risk of admission to an Intensive Care Unit (ICU) and of in-hospital mortality are increased two to three fold by the presence of diabetes in patients with COVID 19 pneumonia3. Different pathophysiological mechanisms were suggested to explain the worse clinical outcome, including hyperglycemia, older age and the presence of comorbidities (i.e., hypertension, obesity, and cardiovascular disease)4. However, because of the syndromic nature of diabetes, additional potential causative factors should be considered, such as the increased susceptibility to hyperinflammation5, the diminished immunological function 6 and the prothrombotic state7 associated with hyperglycemia. We recently investigated whether diabetes or hyperglycemia are linked to a defect in the humoral immune response against SARS-CoV-28, 9. Our data showed that the antibody response against multiple SARS-CoV-2 antigens in patients with diabetes is superimposable in terms of timing, persistence, classes, titers, and neutralizing activity to that of non-diabetic patients9, 10. However, in our cohort of patients with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia, we also observed a significant correlation between serum D-dimer levels and diabetes/hyperglycaemia, a finding confirmed also by others11-13. Elevated D-dimer levels are a direct consequence of increased fibrin formation and lysis and thus an indicator of increased thrombotic activity, such as disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) and thromboembolism14. COVID-19 is associated with an increased risk of arterial and venous thrombosis 15-17 because of a multitude of factors, including systemic inflammation, endothelial dysfunction, platelet activation, immobilization, mechanical ventilation and the use of central venous catheters18-20. Since diabetes is associated with a pro-thrombotic status 7 and elevated D-dimer levels 12, we hypothesized that diabetes is associated with an increased risk of thrombotic events (TEs) in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia. To prove this hypothesis we designed a prospective observational study in a cohort of 180 consecutively hospitalized patients with COVID-19 pneumonia, focusing on TEs which occurred during hospitalization and risk factors associated with these events.

## Material and methods

### Study population and data sources

The study population consisted of 180 adult patients (≥18 years) with confirmed COVID-19 pneumonia admitted to the Internal Medicine Units of San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy from April to May 2020. Patients were included if they were diagnosed with COVID-19 as per the Chinese management guidelines and the World Health Organization interim guidance 21, 22. There was no exclusion criterion. A confirmed infection case was defined as a SARS-CoV-2-positive RT-PCR test from a nasal/throat swab, and/or signs, symptoms and radiological findings suggestive of COVID-19 pneumonia. Within 48 hours from admission, we recorded demographic information, clinical features and laboratory exams on the day of admission on a dedicated data collection form. Data were recorded until hospital discharge or death, whichever occurred first. Data were cross-checked in blind and verified by data managers and clinicians for accuracy. We also recorded mortality beyond hospital discharge clinic: for patients non attending our dedicated outpatient follow-up clinic, we checked patient’s vital status with either family members or family physician. The study was approved by the local Institutional Review Board (protocol n 34/int/2020; [NCT04318366](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?link_type=CLINTRIALGOV&access_num=NCT04318366&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2021%2F05%2F17%2F2021.04.17.21255540.atom)). A standard written informed consent was requested to all patients for their data use.

### Thrombotic complications

The occurrence of any thrombotic event (TE) throughout the hospitalization was the primary outcome of the study. Thrombotic complications included deep vein thrombosis (DVT), pulmonary embolism (PE), and lower and upper limb ischemia, catheter-related thrombosis with deep vein involvement, mesenteric ischemia, stroke and myocardial infarction. A standard protocol to assess patients for thrombotic complications was implemented based on the position paper from the Italian Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (SISET) 23 and to the interim guidance to recognition and management of coagulopathy in COVID-19 from the International Society on Thrombosis and Hemostasis (ISTH) 24. A close control of hemostasis parameters and clinical signs and symptoms was methodically pursued. Additional investigations, including CT scan and/or ultrasound, were performed on the basis of clinical suspicion of thromboembolic events: (i) elevated D-dimer levels and/or (ii) presence of respiratory failure and/or (iii) presence of symptoms suggestive of TEs. All patients received thromboprophylaxis with enoxaparin 4,000 IU/day [adjusted to 6,000 IU/day or 3,000 IU/day in overweight (>100 kg) or underweight (<50kg) subjects, respectively] or, alternatively, with mechanical compression of the lower limbs in case of anticoagulant contraindications (active bleeding and platelet count less than 25 × 109/l). If chronic oral anticoagulant therapy with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) or warfarin/acenocoumarol (OAT) was prescribed prior to admission, it was changed to LMWH anticoagulant treatment. Thromboprophylaxis was administered on admission and during the entire duration of the hospital stay. Anti-Xa measurement was used to monitor anticoagulant treatment. There were no cases of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. No major haemorrhagic event occurred in patients with thromboprophylaxis. The Padua Prediction Score and the IMPROVE Bleeding Risk Assessment Score were used at hospital admission for stratification of the venous thromboembolism and bleeding risks, respectively. A Padua score ≥ 4 identified patients at high risk for venous thromboembolism, an IMPROVE Bleeding Risk Assessment Score ≥ 7 identified patients at increased risk of bleeding. Overt DIC was defined when the ISTH diagnostic score was ≥ 5 25.

### Definition of diabetes/stress hyperglycemia

Study participants were defined as having diabetes/stress hyperglycaemia if they had a documented diagnosis before the hospital admission for COVID-19 pneumonia [Comorbid diabetes: fasting plasma glucose (FPG) ≥7.0 mmol/l or HbA1c ≥ 6.5% (48 mmol/mol), or prescription for diabetes medications] or if patients without a previous diagnosis of diabetes had a mean FPG ≥7.0 mmol/l. during the hospitalization for COVID-19 pneumonia (stress hyperglycaemia). We computed mean FPG and glucose variability (standard deviation) from all fasting laboratory glucose values measured during hospitalisation.

### Laboratory variables

Routine blood tests encompassed serum biochemistry [including renal and liver function, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and electrolytes], complete blood count with differential, markers of myocardial damage [troponin T and pro-brain natriuretic peptide (proBNP)], inflammation markers [C-reactive protein (CRP), ferritin, interleukin-6 (IL-6)] and coagulation profile assessment (D-dimer, PT, and PTT). Specific antibodies to different SARS-CoV-2 antigens were tested in a subset of patients by a luciferase immunoprecipitation system (LIPS) assay, as previously described (11). Fibrinogen, antithrombin activity, vWF, homocysteine, protein C and S. D-dimer levels were measured in a subset of patients through a STA-R® automatic coagulation analyser. Age-specific high D-dimer (aD-dimer) was defined as D-dimer levels above 0.5 µg/dl for patients with less than 50 years of age and above their age divided by 100 in patients older than 50 years26.

### Statistical analysis

Continuous variables were presented as median with inter-quartile range (IQR) in parenthesis. Categorical variables were reported as frequency or percent. Continuous variables were compared using the Wilcoxon rank sum or Kruskal-Wallis test. Categorical variables were compared using the Chi-square or Fischer’s exact test, as appropriate. Imputation for missing data was not performed. Associations between baseline variables and diabetes was assessed by logistic regression. The effect estimates were reported as Odd Ratios (ORs). Survival was estimated according to Kaplan–Meier. The time-to-event was calculated from the date of symptom onset to the date of the event, or of last follow-up visit, whichever occurred first. We calculated univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards models to study the association between patient characteristics with time to thrombotic complication or time to adverse outcome (as defined by composite endpoint of transfer to ICU or death, whichever occurred first). In Cox proportional hazards models, the onset of a thrombotic complication was considered a time-varying covariate. The effect estimates were reported as Hazard Ratios (HRs) with the corresponding 95% CI, estimated according to the Wald approximation. Multivariate analyses were performed including variables significant at the level of <0.1 in the univariate analysis. Two-tailed P values are reported, with P value <0.05 indicating statistical significance. All confidence intervals are two-sided and not adjusted for multiple testing. Statistical analyses were performed with the SPSS 24 (SPSS Inc. /IBM) and the R software version 3.4.0 (R Core Team (2020).

## Results

### Study participants

A total of 180 consecutive patients with confirmed COVID-19 were prospectively enrolled. Data from 11 out of 180 (6.11%) patients were considered incomplete and excluded from the analysis. Among the 169 cases included in our study [median hospital stay 17 (8-31) days], 61 patients (36.1%) were treated with non-invasive ventilation and 23 (13.6%) accessed an ICU over the hospitalization period. As of January 25, 2021 the median follow-up time after symptoms onset was 222 (95% CI: 211-232) days. Thirty five patients died during follow-up (20.7%). Fifty patients (29.6%) had an adverse in-hospital outcome, according to the composite endpoint of transfer to ICU or death, whichever occurred first.

### Baseline characteristics of study population

The characteristics of study participants, according to diabetes status or glucose levels, are reported in Supplementary Table 1 and Table 2. Stress hyperglycaemia and comorbid diabetes accounted for 11.2% (*n*=19) and 18.9% (*n*=32) of the patients, respectively. Higher BMI [OR 1.112 (95% IC 1.03-1.2); p=0.007], older age [OR 1.029 x year (95% IC 1.01-1.05); p=0.013], and hypertension [OR 4.036 (1.04-3.98); p=0.037] were all associated with diabetes/stress hyperglycaemia. As for diabetes treatment, 3.9% of subject with comorbid diabetes were being treated with lifestyle modifications, 11.8% with insulin, 39.2% with non-insulin oral or injectable anti-diabetes medications, 7.8% with insulin and oral diabetes medications, while patients with stress hyperglycaemia (37.3%) were untreated. The median time from symptoms onset to hospital admission was 7 (1-12.5) and 5 (1-8) days for patients without and with diabetes/stress hyperglycaemia, respectively (p=0.33). On admission, 18.3% (n=31) of the patients were taking ACE-inhibitors (25.5% vs 15.3%, p=0.132 diabetes/stress hyperglycaemia vs no diabetes), 14.2% (n=24) chronic antiplatelet therapy (21.6% vs 11%, p=0.092 diabetes/stress hyperglycaemia vs no diabetes) and 18.3% (n=31) anticoagulant treatments (23.5% vs 16.1%, p= 0.28 diabetes/stress hyperglycaemia vs no diabetes).

### Hospital admission

On admission signs of respiratory insufficiency were evident in most patients [PaO2/FiO2 ratio 280 (200-368)] and a PaO2/FiO2 ratio <200 was present in 20% and 29.4% of patients with or without diabetes/stress hyperglycaemia, respectively (p=0.31). Diabetes/stress hyperglycaemia was associated with worse kidney function [serum creatinine: 96.4 (65.4-152) vs 82.2 (65.4-106) μmol/L, p=0.039; urea nitrogen 18.6 (10.5-33.8) vs 11.9 (8.66-19.6) mmol/L, p=0.004], increased inflammation [CRP 87.5 (35.7-184) vs 53.5 (17.9-112) mg/L; p= 0.009)] and tissue damage markers [LDH 6.65 (4.33–8.8) vs 5.04 (3.82–8.8) μkat/L, p=0.006; AST 0.82 (0.64–1.35) vs 0.6 (0.43–0.91) μkat/L, *p*=0.006; ALT 0.73 (0.45– 0.97) vs 0.57 (0.33–0.83) μkat/L, *p*=0.077; pro-BNP 738 (193-2238) vs 193 (59-910) ng/L, p= 0.011; troponin T 19.5 (11.4-61.55) vs 12.7 (6-42.6) μg/L, p= 0.078]. The same changes were associated with progressively higher blood glucose levels (Supplementary Table 2). Data regarding the IgG, IgM and IgA responses to the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein (RBD or S1+S2) and IgG to NP (Table 1) were available for a subgroup of patients, as they were part of a previous cohort evaluated for the humoral response in the presence of diabetes (12). Marginal differences between patients with and without diabetes/stress hyperglycaemia were evident. Over the hospitalization period antibiotic (80.4% vs 61.9%, p=0.02) and oxygen (84.3% vs 61%, p=0.004) treatments were more frequently used in patients with diabetes/stress hyperglycaemia while antiviral, immunomodulatory and biologic therapies were equally prescribed.

View this table:
[Table 1.](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/05/17/2021.04.17.21255540/T1)

Table 1. Hemostatic parameters, inflammation markers and SARS-Cov2 antibodies according to diabetes/stress hyperglycemia and median fasting plasma glucose

### Hemostatic parameters

Upon admission patients with diabetes/stress hyperglycaemia exhibited significantly higher D-dimer levels [11.8 (5.5-12.4) vs 4.2 (2.3-9.3) µg/ml, p<0.001] and increased prothrombin time (PT-INR 1.16 (1.02-1.25 vs 1.04 (0.98-1.15), p=0.001) compared with patients without diabetes/stress hyperglycaemia (Table 1). Concordantly, the percentage of subject with elevated age-specific D-dimer was significantly higher in the presence of diabetes/stress hyperglycaemia (76.5% vs 56.8%, p=0.016). Partial thromboplastin time, platelet count and fibrinogen were not affected by diabetes/stress hyperglycaemia. Advanced markers of thrombophilia were available for a subgroup of patients (Table 1). Exploratory analysis did not show significant changes in coagulation factors levels or activity in subjects with diabetes, except for a lower antithrombin III activity [91% (80-120) vs 100% (92-106)]. The presence of diabetes/stress hyperglycaemia did not significantly increase the proportion of patients who at baseline had a higher risk for venous thromboembolism based on the Padua score (Padua score ≥ 4: 43.1% vs 31.4%, p=0.16), even if a marginal, although significant, difference in the Padua score was evident [3 (3-5) vs 3 (1-5), p=0.006)] (Table 1). Similarly, the proportion of patients at high baseline bleeding risk based on the IMPROVE score was not affected by the presence of diabetes/stress hyperglycaemia (IMPROVE≥ 7: 9.8% vs 5.9%; p= 0.35), even if a marginal, although significant, difference in the IMPROVE score was evident [2.2 (1.2-4.1) vs 1.6 (0.97-2.9), p=0.024)] (Table 1).

### Thromboembolic complications

Forty eight venous and 10 arterial TE were identified in 49 (29%) patients (Table 2). The median time from the onset of symptoms of COVID-19 pneumonia to the TE was 17 (10-24) days. Patients with diabetes/stress hyperglycaemia developed more frequently a thromboembolic complication (47.1% vs 21.2%, p=0.001) than patients without diabetes/stress hyperglycaemia. Comorbid diabetes and stress hyperglycaemia were both associated with a higher prevalence of thromboembolic complication (52% vs 42.1% respectively, p=0.77). Concordantly, the higher prevalence of thromboembolic complication was associated with higher fasting blood glucose levels during the hospitalization (Table 1). Regarding the thrombosis site, venous events (in particular deep vein thrombosis) contributed more significantly than arterial ones in determining the higher prevalence of thromboembolic complications in patients with diabetes/stress hyperglycaemia compared to those without diabetes/stress hyperglycaemia. In patients with and without diabetes/stress hyperglycaemia, 3 and 1 (5.9% vs 0.8%, p=0.083) events were classified as overt DIC (≥5 points, according to the ISTH diagnostic criteria), respectively. The results of a Cox regression analysis for TE is presented in Fig. 1. The Cox regression analysis adjusted for age and sex indicates that diabetes/stress hyperglycaemia (HR 2.71, CI 1.53-4.8; p=0.001), fasting plasma glucose [FPG mean (log1p) HR 4.32, CI 1.86-10, p=0.001] and glucose variability [FPG standard deviation (log1p) HR 1.6, CI 1.13-2.28, p=0.009] were associated with a higher risk of thromboembolic complications. Differences in smoke habit, BMI, other comorbidities and preadmission antiplatelet or steroid were all statistically not significant. A trend towards a protective effect of preadmission anticoagulant therapy was evident (HR 0.45, CI 0.18-1.08; p=0.075). In a multivariate model, diabetes/stress hyperglycaemia and preadmission anticoagulant therapy confirmed their association with the thromboembolic complication.

View this table:
[Table 2:](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/05/17/2021.04.17.21255540/T2)

Table 2: Thrombotic events (TEs)

![Figure 1.](http://medrxiv.org/https://www.medrxiv.org/content/medrxiv/early/2021/05/17/2021.04.17.21255540/F1.medium.gif)

[Figure 1.](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/05/17/2021.04.17.21255540/F1)

Figure 1. TEs in patients with COVID-19.
The forest plots (panel a) show the Hazard Ratios (HR) for thrombosis for each factor tested. Upper panel: univariate Cox regression analysis adjusted for sex and age. Lower panel: multivariate Cox regression analysis adjusted for sex and age including variables significant at the level of <0.1 in the univariate analysis. Dots represent the HR, lines represent 95% confidence interval (CI), and solid dots indicate P < 0.05. Kaplan-Meier thrombosis-free survival estimates for patients with COVID-19 pneumonia (panel b). Survival rate was estimated for the presence of diabetes. The log-rank test was used to test differences in the estimated survival rate. Crosses indicate censored patients (censoring for death end of follow-up data).

### TEs and adverse clinical outcome in patients with and without diabetes/stress hyperglycaemia

To assess whether the presence of TEs had an impact on patient outcome according to diabetes/stress hyperglycaemia or fasting glucose levels, we conducted a Kaplan**-** Meier estimator log-rank test and a Cox proportional hazards model for adverse clinical outcome (as defined by composite endpoint of transfer to ICU or death, whichever occurred first) (Figure 2). The Cox regression analysis adjusted for age and ***sex*** indicated that diabetes/stress hyperglycaemia (HR 2.99, CI 1.7-5.03; p<0.001), fasting plasma glucose [FPG mean (log1p) HR 9.6, CI 4.59-20; p<0.001] and glucose variability [FPG standard deviation (log1p) HR 2.02, CI 1.43-2.9; p<0.001] were strongly associated with a higher risk of adverse clinical outcome (see also Supplementary Table 2). TEs were not associated with an adverse clinical outcome in the absence of diabetes/stress hyperglycaemia (HR 0.29, CI 0.04-2.16; p=0.225) or in the presence of FBG <7 mmol/l (HR 0.54, CI 0.07-4.35; p=0.56), while they significantly increased the risk in the presence of diabetes/stress hyperglycaemia (HR 3.05, CI 1.31-7.09; p=0.01) or FBG ≥ 7 mmol/l (HR 3.07, CI1.24-7.6; p=0.015).

![Figure 2.](http://medrxiv.org/https://www.medrxiv.org/content/medrxiv/early/2021/05/17/2021.04.17.21255540/F2.medium.gif)

[Figure 2.](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/05/17/2021.04.17.21255540/F2)

Figure 2. Survival in the absence of adverse clinical outcome in patients with COVID-19 with or without TEs, according to diabetes/stress hyperglycemia or fasting glucose levels.
Kaplan-Meier patient survival estimates for 169 patients with COVID-19 pneumonia (panel a). Survival rate in the absence of adverse clinical outcome (defined by composite endpoint of transfer to ICU or death, whichever occurred first) was estimated for the presence of any thrombotic event (TE) separately according diabetes/stress hyperglycemia or fasting glucose levels. The log-rank test was used to test differences in the estimated survival rate between groups. Crosses indicate censored patients (censoring for death or end of follow-up data). The forest plots (panel b) show the hazard ratios for survival in the absence of adverse clinical outcome according to presence/absence of diabetes/stress hyperglycemia or fasting glucose levels (FBG) categories. The presence of thrombotic events (TE) was considered as a time-varying covariate in Cox proportional hazards models. The effect estimates were reported as Hazard Ratios (HRs) with the corresponding 95% CI, estimated according to the Wald approximation. Cox regression analysis was adjusted for sex and age. Dots represent the HR, lines represent 95% confidence interval (CI), and solid dots indicate P < 0.05.

## Discussion

There are few reports on the relationship between hyperglycemia and the rate of TEs in COVID-19 pneumonia and it is still unknown whether thrombosis affects the prognosis of patients with COVID-19 pneumonia in the presence of diabetes. Under the hypothesis of a relevant role for diabetes, we designed a prospective observational study focusing on TEs occurring during hospitalization and risk factors associated with thromboembolic complications in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia. Our study generated several interesting findings in those patients. First, diabetes/stress hyperglycaemia, high fasting glycaemia and glycemic variability were strong risk factors for the development of thromboembolic complications. Second, the rate of venous thrombosis events (in particular deep vein thrombosis) was the most affected by the presence of diabetes/stress hyperglycaemia. Third, thromboembolic complications had an adverse impact on clinical outcome exclusively in the presence of diabetes/stress hyperglycaemia. While reasonable, these results could not have been taken for granted27. TEs have a higher incidence among patients with COVID-19 28-30 and diabetes is *per se* characterized by a pro-thrombotic status 7. We and others have previously reported an increase of D-dimer in patients with diabetes/stress hyperglycaemia and COVID-19 pneumonia compared to those without 11-13. However the clinical implications in term of thromboembolic risk of those findings were yet unclear. Moreover, data on the correlation of thromboembolic complications with clinical outcome were limited and contradictory, with some studies finding a higher risk of adverse outcome associated with TEs in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 31, while others did not find any association 32. The pathophysiological mechanisms related to the increased risk of TEs in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia and diabetes are still incompletely understood. In our study, diabetes/stress hyperglycaemia was associated with both inflammation and coagulopathy (elevated C reactive protein and D-dimer levels, mild prolongation of the prothrombin time and decreased antithrombin III), suggesting that an hyperglycaemia-related amplification of the pathobiological mechanisms of immunothrombosis 33 could be responsible of the increased thrombotic risk. The reduced activity of antithrombin III is of particular interest in this context 34. In fact, antithrombin III is a powerful natural anticoagulant which is regulated by inflammation 35. Therefore, it can be speculated that hyperinflammation might have been triggering a decrease in antithrombin III levels and its physiological anticoagulant activity. Furthermore, since the clinical anticoagulant efficacy of heparin requires interaction with antithrombin III, an impaired levels/activity of antithrombin III may be associated with “heparin resistance” 35. In agreement with this hypothesis, an association between antithrombin III levels and mortality in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia has already been reported36. An association between thromboembolic complications and the presence of antiphospholipid antibodies in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia has been previously reported in case reports, case series, cohort studies, and cross-sectional studies, although with contradictory results 37. Unfortunately antiphospholipid antibody measurements were available only for a subgroup of our patients and, therefore, it was impossible to include them in a multivariate model to test for their contribution to thromboembolic risk.

Our study encompasses some limitations: first, our cohort was limited to hospitalized patients and results could be different in less severe COVID-19 disease. Second, even if the overall venous and arterial thromboembolism rate was similar to that described until now in various studies (18), our monocentric cohort was relatively small, and, therefore, a selection bias cannot be excluded. Third, we were unable to evaluate the specific role of some markers as predictors of thrombosis in multivariate models since a complete set of biochemical coagulation data was available only for a fraction of patients. Nevertheless our study generated additional valuable knowledge about the role of diabetes/stress hyperglycaemia in predicting TEs and in stratifying their prognostic significance. In conclusion, many evidences indicate that patients with diabetes, in case of COVID-19 pneumonia, carry a significant increased risk for adverse clinical outcome when compared with patients without diabetes. It is clear from our study that part of this risk is due to an increase in thromboembolic complications. These findings suggest that in in case of SARS-Cov-2 pneumonia, patients with diabetes/stress hyperglycaemia could be considered for a more intensive prophylactic anticoagulation regimen.

## Supporting information

Supplementary Table 1 [[supplements/255540_file05.docx]](pending:yes)

Supplementary Table 2 [[supplements/255540_file06.docx]](pending:yes)

## Data Availability

Some or all datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are not publicly available but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

[https://figshare.com/articles/online\_resource/Thromboembolism\_risk\_is\_higher\_among\_patients\_with\_diabetes\_and\_COVID-19\_pneumonia\_and\_is\_associated\_to\_poor\_clinical\_outcome\_an\_observational\_cohort\_study/14381777](https://figshare.com/articles/online\_resource/Thromboembolism\_risk\_is\_higher\_among\_patients\_with\_diabetes\_and\_COVID-19\_pneumonia\_and\_is\_associated\_to\_poor\_clinical\_outcome\_an_observational_cohort_study/14381777) 

## Declaration of interests

The authors have no conflict of interest to disclose in relation to the topic of this manuscript. The authors declare that there are no relationships or activities that might bias, or be perceived to bias, their work.

*This work was funded by Program Project COVID-19 OSR-UniSR and Ministero della Salute (COVID-2020-12371617).*

## Individual contributions

LP, SLC and GAR contributed to the conception of the study, wrote the manuscript, researched data and contributed to the discussion. MSc and VL contributed to the acquisition and analysis of antibody data and revised the manuscript. VDP, GDL, AL, PRQ and FC recruited patients, contributed to the acquisition of samples, managed the biobanking activities and critically revised the manuscript, AD and GL contributed to the acquisition, analysis and interpretation of data and critically revised the manuscript. MT contributed to the design of the study and critically reviewed/edited the manuscript. LP is the guarantor of this work and, as such, had full access to all the data presented in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis. The final manuscript has been read and approved by all named authors.

*   Received April 17, 2021.
*   Revision received May 17, 2021.
*   Accepted May 17, 2021.


*   © 2021, Posted by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

The copyright holder for this pre-print is the author. All rights reserved. The material may not be redistributed, re-used or adapted without the author's permission.

## References

1.  1.Huang C, Wang Y, Li X, Ren L, Zhao J, Hu Y, Zhang L, Fan G, Xu J, Gu X, Cheng Z, Yu T, Xia J, Wei Y, Wu W, Xie X, Yin W, Li H, Liu M, Xiao Y, Gao H, Guo L, Xie J, Wang G, Jiang R, Gao Z, Jin Q, Wang J & Cao B. Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China. Lancet 2020 395 497–506.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30183-5&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=http://www.n&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2021%2F05%2F17%2F2021.04.17.21255540.atom) 

2.  2.Guan WJ, Ni ZY, Hu Y, Liang WH, Ou CQ, He JX, Liu L, Shan H, Lei CL, Hui DSC, D. B, Li LJ, Zeng G, Yuen KY, Chen RC, Tang CL, Wang T, Chen PY, Xiang J, Li SY, Wang JL, Liang ZJ, Peng YX, Wei L, Liu Y, Hu YH, Peng P, Wang JM, Liu JY, Chen Z, Li G, Zheng ZJ, Qiu SQ, Luo J, Ye CJ, Zhu SY & Zhong NS. Clinical Characteristics of Coronavirus Disease 2019 in China. N Engl J Med 2020 382 1708–1720.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1056/NEJMoa2002032&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=http://www.n&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2021%2F05%2F17%2F2021.04.17.21255540.atom) 

3.  3.Mantovani A, Byrne CD, Zheng MH & Targher G. Diabetes as a risk factor for greater COVID-19 severity and in-hospital death: A meta-analysis of observational studies. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis 2020.
    
    

4.  4.Apicella M, Campopiano MC, Mantuano M, Mazoni L, Coppelli A & Del Prato S. COVID-19 in people with diabetes: understanding the reasons for worse outcomes. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2020.
    
    

5.  5.Guo W, Li M, Dong Y, Zhou H, Zhang Z, Tian C, Qin R, Wang H, Shen Y, Du K, Zhao L, Fan H, Luo S & Hu D. Diabetes is a risk factor for the progression and prognosis of COVID-19. Diabetes Metab Res Rev 2020 e3319.
    
    

6.  6.Geerlings SE & Hoepelman AI. Immune dysfunction in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM). FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol 1999 26 259–265.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1111/j.1574-695X.1999.tb01397.x&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10575137&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2021%2F05%2F17%2F2021.04.17.21255540.atom) 

7.  7.Vazzana N, Ranalli P, Cuccurullo C & Davi G. Diabetes mellitus and thrombosis. Thromb Res 2012 129 371–377.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.thromres.2011.11.052&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=22197180&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2021%2F05%2F17%2F2021.04.17.21255540.atom) 

8.  8.Secchi M, Bazzigaluppi E, Brigatti C, Marzinotto I, Tresoldi C, Rovere-Querini P, Poli A, Castagna A, Scarlatti G, Zangrillo A, Ciceri F, Piemonti L & Lampasona V. COVID-19 survival associates with the immunoglobulin response to the SARS-CoV-2 spike receptor binding domain. J Clin Invest 2020.
    
    

9.  9.Lampasona V, Secchi M, Scavini M, Bazzigaluppi E, Brigatti C, Marzinotto I, Davalli A, Caretto A, Laurenzi A, Martinenghi S, Molinari C, Vitali G, Di Filippo L, Mercalli A, Melzi R, Tresoldi C, Rovere-Querini P, Landoni G, Ciceri F, Bosi E & Piemonti L. Antibody response to multiple antigens of SARS-CoV-2 in patients with diabetes: an observational cohort study. Diabetologia 2020 63 2548–2558.
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=http://www.n&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2021%2F05%2F17%2F2021.04.17.21255540.atom) 

10. 10.Dispinseri S, Lampasona V, Secchi M, Cara A, Bazzigaluppi E, Negri D, Brigatti C, Pirillo MF, Marzinotto I, Borghi M, Rovere-Querini P, Tresoldi C, Ciceri F, Scavini M, Scarlatti G & Piemonti L. Robust neutralizing antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 develop and persist in subjects with diabetes and COVID-19 pneumonia. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2021.
    
    

11. 11.Yan Y, Yang Y, Wang F, Ren H, Zhang S, Shi X, Yu X & Dong K. Clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with severe covid-19 with diabetes. BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care 2020 8.
    
    

12. 12.Mishra Y, Pathak BK, Mohakuda SS, Tilak T, Sen S, p H, Singh R & Singh AR. Relation of D-dimer levels of COVID-19 patients with diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Metab Syndr 2020 14 1927–1930.
    
    

13. 13.Sardu C, D’Onofrio N, Balestrieri ML, Barbieri M, Rizzo MR, Messina V, Maggi P, Coppola N, Paolisso G & Marfella R. Outcomes in Patients With Hyperglycemia Affected by COVID-19: Can We Do More on Glycemic Control? Diabetes Care 2020 43 1408–1415.
    
    [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6NzoiZGlhY2FyZSI7czo1OiJyZXNpZCI7czo5OiI0My83LzE0MDgiO3M6NDoiYXRvbSI7czo1MDoiL21lZHJ4aXYvZWFybHkvMjAyMS8wNS8xNy8yMDIxLjA0LjE3LjIxMjU1NTQwLmF0b20iO31zOjg6ImZyYWdtZW50IjtzOjA6IiI7fQ==) 

14. 14.Soomro AY, Guerchicoff A, Nichols DJ, Suleman J & Dangas GD. The current role and future prospects of D-dimer biomarker. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother 2016 2 175–184.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1093/ehjcvp/pvv039&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=27533759&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2021%2F05%2F17%2F2021.04.17.21255540.atom) 

15. 15.Malas MB, Naazie IN, Elsayed N, Mathlouthi A, Marmor R & Clary B. Thromboembolism risk of COVID-19 is high and associated with a higher risk of mortality: A systematic review and meta-analysis. EClinicalMedicine 2020 29 100639.
    
    

16. 16.Wang C, Zhang H, Zhou M, Cheng Y, Ye L, Chen J, Wang M & Feng Z. Prognosis of COVID-19 in patients with vein thrombosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 2020 24 10279–10285.
    
    

17. 17.Tang N, Li D, Wang X & Sun Z. Abnormal coagulation parameters are associated with poor prognosis in patients with novel coronavirus pneumonia. J Thromb Haemost 2020 18 844–847.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1111/jth.14768&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=http://www.n&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2021%2F05%2F17%2F2021.04.17.21255540.atom) 

18. 18.Connors JM & Levy JH. Thromboinflammation and the hypercoagulability of COVID-19. J Thromb Haemost 2020.
    
    

19. 19.Bozzani A, Arici V, Tavazzi G, Franciscone MM, Danesino V, Rota M, Rossini R, Sterpetti AV, Ticozzelli G, Rumi E, Mojoli F, Bruno R & Ragni F. Acute arterial and deep venous thromboembolism in COVID-19 patients: Risk factors and personalized therapy. Surgery 2020 168 987–992.
    
    

20. 20.Gu SX, Tyagi T, Jain K, Gu VW, Lee SH, Hwa JM, Kwan JM, Krause DS, Lee AI, Halene S, Martin KA, Chun HJ & Hwa J. Thrombocytopathy and endotheliopathy: crucial contributors to COVID-19 thromboinflammation. Nat Rev Cardiol 2020.
    
    

21. 21.China NHCo. The diagnosis and treatment plan for the novel coronavirus disease. The seventh edition 2020. 2020.
    
    

22. 22.World\_Health\_Organization. Clinical management of severe acute respiratory infection when novel coronavirus (nCoV) infection is suspected: interim guidance. 2020 January 2020.
    
    

23. 23.Marietta M, Ageno W, Artoni A, De Candia E, Gresele P, Marchetti M, Marcucci R & Tripodi A. COVID-19 and haemostasis: a position paper from Italian Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (SISET). Blood Transfus 2020 18 167–169.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.2450/2020.0083-20&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=32281926&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2021%2F05%2F17%2F2021.04.17.21255540.atom) 

24. 24.Thachil J, Tang N, Gando S, Falanga A, Cattaneo M, Levi M, Clark C & Iba T. ISTH interim guidance on recognition and management of coagulopathy in COVID-19. J Thromb Haemost 2020 18 1023–1026.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1111/jth.14810&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=32338827&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2021%2F05%2F17%2F2021.04.17.21255540.atom) 

25. 25.Taylor FB, Jr., Toh CH, Hoots WK, Wada H & Levi M. Towards definition, clinical and laboratory criteria, and a scoring system for disseminated intravascular coagulation. Thromb Haemost 2001 86 1327–1330.
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=11816725&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2021%2F05%2F17%2F2021.04.17.21255540.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000172272000031&link_type=ISI) 

26. 26.Righini M, Van Es J, Den Exter PL, Roy PM, Verschuren F, Ghuysen A, Rutschmann OT, Sanchez O, Jaffrelot M, Trinh-Duc A, Le Gall C, Moustafa F, Principe A, Van Houten AA, Ten Wolde M, Douma RA, Hazelaar G, Erkens PM, Van Kralingen KW, Grootenboers MJ, Durian MF, Cheung YW, Meyer G, Bounameaux H, Huisman MV, Kamphuisen PW & Le Gal G. Age-adjusted D-dimer cutoff levels to rule out pulmonary embolism: the ADJUST-PE study. Jama 2014 311 1117–1124.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1001/jama.2014.2135&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=24643601&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2021%2F05%2F17%2F2021.04.17.21255540.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000333010100016&link_type=ISI) 

27. 27.Wijaya I, Andhika R & Huang I. Hypercoagulable state in COVID-19 with diabetes mellitus and obesity: Is therapeutic-dose or higher-dose anticoagulant thromboprophylaxis necessary? Diabetes Metab Syndr 2020 14 1241–1242.
    
    

28. 28.Lodigiani C, Iapichino G, Carenzo L, Cecconi M, Ferrazzi P, Sebastian T, Kucher N, Studt JD, Sacco C, Bertuzzi A, Sandri MT & Barco S. Venous and arterial thromboembolic complications in COVID-19 patients admitted to an academic hospital in Milan, Italy. Thromb Res 2020 191 9–14.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.thromres.2020.04.024&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=32353746&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2021%2F05%2F17%2F2021.04.17.21255540.atom) 

29. 29.Helms J, Tacquard C, Severac F, Leonard-Lorant I, Ohana M, Delabranche X, Merdji H, Clere-Jehl R, Schenck M, Fagot Gandet F, Fafi-Kremer S, Castelain V, Schneider F, Grunebaum L, Angles-Cano E, Sattler L, Mertes PM & Meziani F. High risk of thrombosis in patients with severe SARS-CoV-2 infection: a multicenter prospective cohort study. Intensive Care Med 2020 46 1089–1098.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1007/s00134-020-06062-x&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=http://www.n&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2021%2F05%2F17%2F2021.04.17.21255540.atom) 

30. 30.Ali MAM & Spinler SA. COVID-19 and thrombosis: From bench to bedside. Trends Cardiovasc Med 2020.
    
    

31. 31.Zhang L, Feng X, Zhang D, Jiang C, Mei H, Wang J, Zhang C, Li H, Xia X, Kong S, Liao J, Jia H, Pang X, Song Y, Tian Y, Wang B, Wu C, Yuan H, Zhang Y, Li Y, Sun W, Zhu S, Wang S, Xie Y, Ge S, Hu Y & Xie M. Deep Vein Thrombosis in Hospitalized Patients With COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: Prevalence, Risk Factors, and Outcome. Circulation 2020 142 114–128.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.046702&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=32421381&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2021%2F05%2F17%2F2021.04.17.21255540.atom) 

32. 32.Hippensteel JA, Burnham EL & Jolley SE. Prevalence of venous thromboembolism in critically ill patients with COVID-19. Br J Haematol 2020 190 e134–e137.
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=http://www.n&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2021%2F05%2F17%2F2021.04.17.21255540.atom) 

33. 33.Loo J, Spittle DA & Newnham M. COVID-19, immunothrombosis and venous thromboembolism: biological mechanisms. Thorax 2021.
    
    

34. 34.Mir N, D’Amico A, Dasher J, Tolwani A & Valentine V. Understanding the andromeda strain - The role of cytokine release, coagulopathy and antithrombin III in SARS-CoV2 critical illness. Blood Rev 2020 100731.
    
    

35. 35.Levy JH, Sniecinski RM, Welsby IJ & Levi M. Antithrombin: anti-inflammatory properties and clinical applications. Thromb Haemost 2016 115 712–728.
    
    

36. 36.Gazzaruso C, Paolozzi E, Valenti C, Brocchetta M, Naldani D, Grignani C, Salvucci F, Marino F, Coppola A & Gallotti P. Association between antithrombin and mortality in patients with COVID-19. A possible link with obesity. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis 2020 30 1914–1919.
    
    

37. 37.El Hasbani G, Taher AT, Jawad A & Uthman I. COVID-19, Antiphospholipid Antibodies, and Catastrophic Antiphospholipid Syndrome: A Possible Association? Clin Med Insights Arthritis Musculoskelet Disord 2020 13 1179544120978667.