Anterior Spinal Artery Syndrome due to Intervertebral Disc Herniation

2. Methodology

The research protocol was decided at the start of the project, which specified goals, search design, inclusion/exclusion criteria, data extraction, outcomes, and analysis techniques.

2.1. Study design

A systematic literature review was conducted under the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines to identify studies anterior spinal artery secondary to due to intervertebral disc herniation. Formulated PICO question for the review described, Population: patient clinical and imaging evidence of anterior spinal artery syndrome by intervertebral disc herniation; Intervention: Surgical decompression or conservative management, Compare: no comparator; Outcome: long term outcome, residual neuro deficit, rate of recovery, speed of recovery.

2.2 Search strategy

Databases used for comprehensive literature search include Ovid MEDLINE(R) and Epub Ahead of Print, In-Process and Other Non-Indexed Citations, and Daily, Ovid EMBASE, Ovid Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Ovid Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Scopus. The search design was planned and carried out by a medical reference librarian with feedback from the investigators. Search for anterior spinal artery syndrome due to intervertebral disk herniation was completed by using the following terms: “intervertebral disc,” “spondylosis,” “Spinal cord infarct,” “anterior Spinal Artery,” “anterior spinal artery syndrome,” “ASA,” “ASAS,” “Spinal cord ischemia,” “Spinal Artery dissection,” “Spinal Artery occlusion,” “Spinal Artery compression,” “ASAS” along with “AND” and “OR” operators and published in the English language.

2.3. Eligibility criteria

We included case reports and other studies in which anterior cord ischemia was evident most likely due to ASA occlusion by herniated intervertebral disc were included. Due to a very scant number of cases, we also collected data from some review articles that reported several non-english literature cases, and those were not included in our primary search results. No restrictions were applied to age, gender, ethnicity, and geographical location. The reference list of included papers was examined for other pertinent studies not identified by our initial search terms. Studies were excluded if in animal models or without patient data, not fulfilling the study population criteria, conference abstracts only, review article or meta-analysis in the absence of new patient data, or studies without full text. The literature search strategy and paper inclusion were performed by two authors independently

2.4. Study selection process

Duplicate studies have been removed from all citations received by extensive literature searches. Titles and abstracts have been selected for inclusion by pairs of researchers. The same pairs of reviewers recorded abstracts, also screened and retrieved full text. Conflicts have been resolved by the third independent reviewer.

2.5. Data collection

Two independent authors extracted data from finally selected studies in a pre-piloted electronic database. Due to a very scant number of cases, we also collected data from some review articles that reported several non-English literatures cases and were not included in our primary search results. The literature search strategy and paper inclusion were performed by two authors independently. Patient demographic data, possible precipitating factors, duration of neuro deficits, initial presentation, the pattern of motor and sensory deficit, physical findings, imaging data, treatment approaches, outcome, follow-up data were collected for qualitative synthesis. To reduce the chances of bias, no attention was paid to the author, journal, or country of origin, and the outcome data were recorded according to the patient perspective.

4.1. Pathogenesis

Anterior spinal artery (ASA) arises from the vertebral arteries at the level of the medulla. It runs down rostrally along the anterior median sulcus, supplies the anterior portion of the spinal cord. Pathophysiologically, generalized hypoperfusion or localized vascular interruption accounts for spinal cord infarction. Common contributors for ASAS include thoracoabdominal aortic surgery, spinal surgery, aortic dissection or aneurysm, atherosclerosis, vasculitis, arteriovenous malformation (AVM), embolic causes, and hypercoagulability. Symptomatic ASAS due to a herniated intervertebral disc has been rarely reported and thought to have occurred in the setting of direct compression to ASA or its feeding artery [3],[22].

Ischemic change is the critical contributor to the pathogenesis for spondylotic myelopathy is well established [23]. Morphological changes imply ischemic insult include necrosis, edema, myelomalacia, gliosis, and inflammation [24]. Spondylotic myelopathy, therefore, stems from either ischemia due to higher interstitial pressure by direct cord compression or arterial occlusion by a herniated disc. In a study on 14 patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy, no ASA occlusion was evident by CT angiography, even with 80% sagittal diameter compression and T2 hyperintensity [25]. Thus, compression of the spinal cord on its anterior surface is more probable than ASA. Nevertheless, more patient groups are needed to identify and study. Considering true arterial occlusion, a typical posterolaterally displaced disc is more likely to compress the radicular artery. However, direct compression to ASA has also been reported, should be considered as more severe than occluding its feeding branch [5], [11], [12], [14], [15]. Therefore, a probability of ASA interruption should be considered in a spondylotic patient with ventral cord syndrome.

In our study, disc herniation was demonstrated in a diverse range of vertebral levels. The cervical region was most frequently involved in 66% of cases, and the remaining 34% were in the lower thoracic(T7-T12) region. The degree of motor and sensory deficit was consistent with the level of injury. Patients who had disc-herniation in cervical vertebrae manifested quadriparesis, while paraparesis for the thoracic region.

4.2. Clinical presentation

ASAS presents as an abrupt onset of painful myelopathy with bilateral loss of motor functions, pain, and temperature sensation. Symptoms typically appear with acute back or neck pain, referring to the level of injury and neurological impairment progress within 2-24 hours. Depending on the level of infarction, motor impairment commonly demonstrates as paraplegia or quadriplegia. Due to ventral horn injury or spinal shock, flaccid motor paralysis with decreased deep tendon reflexes is typical at the beginning. However, over time, patients progress to upper motor signs such as hyperactive reflexes and spasticity. Sensory disturbances typically include loss of pain and temperature sensation, preserved dorsal column sensation, vibratory sense, and proprioception. Patients may also experience autonomic dysfunction complicated by bowel and bladder dysfunction as well as hypotension [4], [10], [26].

In our analysis, all of the cases present with motor weakness, 67% with quadriparesis and 33% paraparesis; among them, 60% had pain at presentation. Although not presented as a symptom, sensory disturbances were evident in neurological examinations. This includes loss of perception of pain and temperature with preserved dorsal column sensation, vibratory sense, and proprioception unique to ASAS. 25% of our cases also had bowel or bladder disturbances at the presentation.

4.3. Imaging

The diagnosis of ASAS was based mostly on clinical presentation and imaging study. MRI is the most sensitive and reliable imaging modality to detect spinal cord infarction [3]. Within a few hours of the onset of symptoms, it can detect signal changes and swelling related to cord ischemia and also demonstrate other pathologies, such as extradural compression, intramedullary tumors, AVM, and multiple sclerosis plaques. The typical finding is T2 hyperintensity resembling the “owl-eye” or “snake-eye” pattern in axial planes and “pencil-like” T2 hyperintensity over multiple segments in the vertical plane. In contrast to conventional sequences, DWI can detect cord ischemia within a few minutes following symptom onset [10], [22], [27]. Cervical spondylosis may occupy over 80% sagittal diameter of the spinal canal and exhibit T2 hyperintensity on MRI. Therefore, ASAS in the setting of spondylosis should not solely be based on clinical findings preferably on ASA occlusion [25]. In our analysis, angiographic evidence of ASAS was not reported in all cases. However, primary authors of reported cases were concluded ASAS from a herniated disc by clinical and imaging evidence of concurrent spinal ischemia and disc herniation. We recommend angiograms in every case of ASAS to detect any external compression to justify the decision for surgical decompression.

4.4. Management and outcome

The exact cause of ventral cord syndrome directs the management plan. Acute bulging of an intervertebral disk may cause ventral cord dysfunction with or without ASA compression. However, ASA occlusion explains ischemic cord injury rather than direct compression. Systemic steroids have no beneficial effects on ischemic spinal cord injury. Early intervention to prevent pulmonary, hemodynamic, and thromboembolic complications is critical in acute management. Long-term neurological outcome solely depends on the reversing of the ASA decompression and re-establishment of blood flow. Therefore, the timing between the occlusion and intervention is the most critical factor for long-term prognosis. Early initiation of physiotherapy and extensive rehabilitation training has a potential role in regaining neurologic function, but these interventions are not superior to urgent decompression surgery. Regardless, the approaches of imaging and interventions must be explored much more diligently to ensure patient benefit, reduce the degree of morbidity, impairment, and an increase in psychological well-being.

Seven patients underwent surgical treatment to decompress the anterior spinal artery; all of them demonstrated complete recovery, and the mean duration of the recovery period was 23.25 days (5-63days). In contrast, full recovery occurred only in 40% of cases managed conservatively with the longest recovery length, 90days. Hypothetically revascularization should have a better prognostic outcome. However, the interval between onset and intervention, use of steroids, other vascular or spinal comorbidities may have the potential influence yet need to be studied.

A diverse array of recovery is possible following infarction of the spinal cord. A study on spinal cord stroke demonstrated that recovery rate of walking power was 41% for those using a wheelchair at discharge and rate of removal of catheter was 33% for those with a long-term catheter in situ [28].