Abstract
A critical question in the COVID-19 pandemic is how to optimally allocate the first available vaccinations to maximize health impact. We used a static simulation model with detailed demographic and risk factor stratification to compare the impact of different vaccine prioritization strategies in the United States on key health outcomes, using California as a case example. We calibrated the model to demographic and location data on 28,175 COVID-19 deaths in California up to December 30, 2020, and incorporated variation in risk by occupation and comorbidity status using published estimates. We predicted the proportion of COVID-19 clinical cases, deaths and disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) averted over 6 months relative to a scenario of no vaccination for five vaccination strategies that prioritized vaccination by a single risk factor: random allocation; targeting special populations (e.g. incarcerated individuals); targeting older individuals; targeting essential workers; and targeting individuals with comorbidities. Targeting older individuals averted the highest proportion of DALYs (40% for 5 million individuals vaccinated) and deaths (65%) but the lowest proportion of cases (12%). Targeting essential workers averted the lowest proportion of DALYs (25%) and deaths (33%). Allocating vaccinations simultaneously by age and location or by age, sex, race/ethnicity, location, occupation, and comorbidity status averted a significantly higher proportion of DALYs (48% and 56%) than any strategy prioritizing by a single risk factor. Our results corroborate findings of other studies that age targeting is the best single-risk-factor prioritization strategy for averting DALYs, and suggest that targeting by multiple risk factors would provide additional benefit.
Significance statement COVID-19 has caused a global pandemic, and a key public health question is who should get the first available vaccinations. Most vaccine prioritization analyses have only considered variation in risk of infection and death by age and occupation. We provide a more granular analysis with stratification by demographics, risk factors, and location. We predict the impact of different prioritization strategies on COVID-19 cases, deaths and disability-adjusted life years (DALYs). We find that age-based targeting averts the most deaths and DALYs of strategies targeting by a single risk factor, but that targeting by two or more risk factors simultaneously would avert significantly more deaths and DALYs. Our findings highlight the potential value of multiple-risk-factor targeting of vaccination when supply is limited.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study was supported by funding from the California Department of Public Health. NCL is supported by the University of California, San Francisco (Department of Medicine). This work represents the viewpoints of the authors alone and not necessarily those of the California Department of Public Health.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The study was approved by the University of California, San Francisco Institutional Review Board.
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All analysis code is available online at https://github.com/LloydChapman/COVIDVaccineModelling. The California Department of Public Health case data required for fitting the Poisson regression model contain personally identifiable information and therefore cannot be made freely available. Individuals interested in accessing the data should contact the California Department of Public Health. All data required to run the vaccine prioritization simulations is available at https://github.com/LloydChapman/COVIDVaccineModelling.
