Abstract
Objective To identify multi-level factors that maximize prediction of depression symptoms in a diverse sample of children in the U.S. participating in the Adolescent Brain and Cognitive Development (ABCD) study.
Methods 8,507 participants (49.6% female, 75.2% white, ages 9-10) from ABCD provided complete data at baseline and 7,998 of these participants provided one-year follow-up data. Depression symptoms were measured with the Child Behavior Checklist. Predictive features included child demographic, environmental, and structural and resting-state fMRI variables, parental depression symptoms and demographic characteristics, and relevant site and scanner-related covariates. We used linear (elastic net regression, EN) and non-linear (gradient boosted trees, GBT) predictive models to identify which set of features maximized prediction of depression symptoms at baseline and, separately, at one-year follow-up.
Results Both linear and non-linear models achieved comparable results for predicting baseline (EN: MAE=3.628; R2=0.232; GBT: MAE=3.555; R2=0.229) and one-year follow-up (EN: MAE=4.116; R2=0.143; GBT: MAE=4.141; R2=0.1400) depression. Parental depression symptoms, family support, and child sleep duration were among the top predictors of concurrent and future child depression symptoms across both models. Although resting-state fMRI features were relatively weaker predictors, connectivity of the right caudate was consistently the strongest neural feature associated with depression symptoms at both timepoints. In contrast, brain features derived from structural MRI did not significantly predict child depression symptoms.
Conclusions & Relevance Parental mental health and child sleep quality are potentially modifiable risk factors for youth depression. Functional connectivity of the caudate is a relatively weaker predictor of depression symptoms but may represent a biomarker of depression risk.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
The ABCD Study is funded by NIH and other federal partners under grants DA-041048, DA-050989, DA-051016, DA-041022, DA-051018, DA-051037, DA-050987, DA-041174, DA-041106, DA-041117, DA-041028, DA-041134, DA-050988, DA-051039, DA-041156, DA-041025, DA-041120, DA-051038, DA-041148, DA-041093, DA-041089, DA-041123, and DA-041147. A full list of supporters is available at https://abcdstudy.org/federal-partners.html. This research was supported by the National Institutes of Health (K01MH117442 to TCH), the Ray and Dagmar Dolby Family Fund (to TCH), and the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (F31AA027169 to ACM). The funding agencies played no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; and preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript. All authors report no biomedical conflicts of interest.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
This report is a secondary data analysis of publicly available data that the authors received approval to analyze from the NIH. The original data were collected at the approval of the IRB committees of each local site, as described in Auchter et al. (2018): https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1878929317302268
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Data used in the preparation of this article were obtained from the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) Study (https://abcdstudy.org), held in the NIMH Data Archive. The ABCD consortium investigators designed and implemented the study and/or provided data but did not necessarily participate in the analysis or writing of this report. This article reflects the views of the authors and may not reflect the opinions or views of NIH or of the ABCD consortium investigators. The ABCD data repository grows and changes over time. The ABCD data used in this report came from https://dx.doi.org/10.15154/1504431
