Acute and persistent symptoms in non-hospitalized PCR-confirmed COVID-19 patients

Introduction

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), has by December 2020 affected more than 82 million people worldwide and has been associated with 2 million deaths leading to a global health and financial crisis [1]. Established risk factors related to dying with the disease include high age, male sex and preexisting comorbidities [2,3,4]. A meta-analysis of 24,410 COVID-19 patients found that the most common symptoms were fever, cough, fatigue, and hyposmia [5]. However, not all exposed individuals catch the disease and not all who have the disease develop symptoms [6,7]. Thus, there is a knowledge gap of individual resilience and risk factors determining the disease trajectory.

In the wake of the initial phase of the COVID-19 pandemic, several observational studies, patient groups and case series have reported persistent symptoms including reduced respiratory capacity [8], fatigue and hyposmia [9,10,11]. In a follow-up study of 143 Italians discharged after hospitalization due to COVID-19, 87.4% still experienced COVID-19-related symptoms at two months after symptom start, and more than half of the patients reported persistent fatigue [12]. Similarly, Jacobs et al found that fatigue was the most prevalent symptom 35 days post-hospitalization in 183 participants from the United States, and the majority of participants reported reduced quality of life and both physical and mental health problems [13]. A recent Chinese study presented 6-month follow-up data from 1,733 hospitalized patients, of whom 63% still experienced fatigue and muscle weakness [14]. Clinical and public health interests are therefore no longer limited to information on mortality and clinical outcomes in hospitalized patients, but also to recovery and long-term consequences of COVID-19 post-hospitalization. Among other initiatives, this has led to the Post-Hospitalization COVID-19 study (PHOSP-COVID) in the United Kingdom aiming at long-term follow-up of 10,000 patients discharged after hospitalization due to COVID-19 [15]. The increasing awareness of persistent symptoms among COVID-19 patients has even led to the designation “long COVID” which is yet to be clearly defined [16,17,18]. A recent first draft guideline on long-term effects of COVID-19 published by the National Institute of Health and Care Excellence (NICE) suggests to use the definition “ongoing symptomatic COVID-19” for symptoms lasting between 4 and 12 weeks after the acute onset and “post-COVID-19-syndrome” for symptoms lasting more than 12 weeks [19].

Most studies on COVID-19 symptoms have recruited participants among hospitalized patients or patients attending outpatient clinics or specialized units, or support groups dealing with the consequences of COVID-19 [5,9,20,21]. This confers a selection bias likely overestimating the true prevalence of symptoms and symptom severity. Thus, there is an academic knowledge gap in symptomatology among unselected non-hospitalized patients.

The aim of the present study was to determine the nature and prevalence of acute and persistent symptoms in non-hospitalized patients with COVID-19 confirmed by a positive SARS-CoV-2 PCR.

Materials and Methods

Results

A total of 445 Danish non-hospitalized COVID-19 participants were included (see Fig. 1 for flow chart of the inclusion process).

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Figure 1. Flowchart of inclusion process

Inclusion process of Danes with PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 in study of symptoms among non-hospitalized patients. Abbreviations: e-Boks, secure digital postbox used by 92% of Danes. PCR, polymerase chain reaction. SARS-CoV-2, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2.

Most participants had been tested during the Spring of 2020 (Table 1). More women than men participated in the study and significantly more women worked in the health care sector and had patient contact (not specified if COVID-related). Also, the median date for PCR-testing of the included women was one month earlier than that of men (Table 1). There were no other significant differences in demographic data between men and women (Table 1). Less than half of the participants reported preexisting comorbidities; most commonly allergy (28%), hypertension (15%), osteoarthritis (17%), and asthma (8%) (see Supplementary Fig. S2 online).

Acute symptoms

Completely asymptomatic COVID-19 was reported by 34% of participants. There were no significant differences in sex, smoking status, comorbidities, health care worker status or BMI between those reporting symptoms and those without symptoms. Asymptomatic participants had more often been tested towards the end of the study inclusion period (weeks from PCR to questionnaire; adjusted odds ratio (OR) 1.06 95%CI:1.02-1.09, p=0.0008) (depicted in Supplementary Fig. S3 online), and were slightly older (OR for symptoms 0.98 (0.97-0.99), p=0.004).

Among the 238 participants experiencing symptoms, 55% of women and 52% of men had a sudden onset of symptoms arising within a few hours. Characteristics of symptomatic participants are presented in Table 2. Significantly more symptomatic women than men were working in the health care system, had contact with patients in their work and had been tested slightly earlier in the year (Table 2). The most common symptoms in the acute phase of COVID-19 were fatigue (95%), headache (82%), and sneezing (76%) (Fig. 2A). However, the symptoms most often reported as being severe were reduced smell, fatigue, and reduced taste (Fig. 2A). Excluding all participants with comorbidities did not change the symptom presentation (Fig. 2B).

View this table:

• View inline
• View popup
• Download powerpoint

Table 2. Characteristics of non-hospitalized symptomatic men and women with COVID-19

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Figure 2. Symptom presentation and severity during acute COVID-19 in non-hospitalized patients

Symptom pattern and severity reported in relation to the acute phase of COVID-19 by non-hospitalized participants with a SARS-CoV-2-positive PCR test. Only participants with symptom start between 28 days before and 14 days after the PCR-test were included. Figure A, all symptomatic participants (n=238). Figure B, symptomatic participants without comorbidities (n=105). Abbreviations: PCR, polymerase chain reaction. SARS-CoV-2, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2.

Persistent symptoms

Most symptomatic participants experienced symptom cessation within two weeks (n=137, women in median 14 days (range:1-112), men in median 12 days (1-138)). Ongoing symptoms at the time of filling in the questionnaire were reported by more than 35% of participants (median time from symptom start 90 days (range 5-197)). Follow-up for more than four weeks was available from 198 symptomatic participants among whom persistent symptoms were reported by 36% (44% of women and 24% of men). The most common persistent symptoms were fatigue (16%), concentration or memory difficulties (13%), reduced sense of smell (10%), and shortness of breath (10%) (Fig. 3). Among participants with more than 12 weeks of follow-up since symptom start (n=129), 40% (48% of women and 23% of men) still had symptoms, especially fatigue (16%) and concentration difficulties (13%), following the same pattern as those with a shorter follow-up period (Fig. 3).

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Figure 3. Persistent symptoms in COVID-19 at 4 and 12 weeks

Persistent symptoms after COVID-19. In dark blue, persistent symptoms for more than four weeks in the 198 non-hospitalized participants with symptoms and a follow-up time of more than four weeks and in light blue, persistent symptoms for more than 12 weeks in the 129 non-hospitalized participants with symptoms and a follow-up time of more than 12 weeks.

The risk of persistent symptoms more than four weeks after symptom start was significantly increased in women compared to men (OR 2.7 95%CI:1.4-5.2, p=0.003 (Table 3)). Furthermore, there was an increased risk of persistent symptoms with increasing BMI (OR 1.1 95%CI:1.0-1.2, p=0.001 (Table 3)). No other covariates were significantly associated with the risk of persistent symptoms. Female sex and BMI were also the only significant risk factors for persistent symptoms in the 129 participants with a follow-up period of more than 12 weeks (see supplementary Table S1 available online).

View this table:

• View inline
• View popup
• Download powerpoint

Table 3. Risk of persistent symptoms after COVID-19

More women than men worked in the health care sector (table 1 and 2). Thus, we re-ran analyses of risk factors for persistent symptoms by only including the 117 women with follow-up of more than four weeks. Doing so, BMI was still a significant risk factor (adjusted OR 1.2 95%CI:1.1-1.3, p=0.003), but being a health care worker was not (OR 1.5 95%CI:0.6-3.8, p=0.39).

Furthermore, we depicted acute and persistent symptoms according to sex (Fig. 4). Men and women had a similar prevalence of fatigue in the acute phase (Fig. 4 left hand side). In participants with persistent symptoms, fatigue was the most common persistent symptom in both men and women, but the prevalence of persistent fatigue was almost twice as high in women compared to men (28% vs. 15%, OR 2.2 95%CI:1.0-4.7, p=0.05, right hand side of Fig. 4).

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Figure 4. Acute and persistent symptoms in non-hospitalized men and women with COVID-19

The percentage of acute (red panel to the left) and persistent (blue panel to the right) symptoms in non-hospitalized COVID-19 participants according to sex. Persistent symptoms were defined as lasting more than four weeks. A, prevalence of reported acute (total n=148) and persistent symptoms (total n=126) in women. B, prevalence of reported acute (total n=90) and persistent symptoms (total n=72) in men.

Discussion

The present study demonstrated a high prevalence of persistent symptoms in non-hospitalized patients with COVID-19 confirmed by SARS-CoV-2 PCR-testing. The most common persistent symptoms were fatigue and memory and concentration difficulties with a higher risk in women. Furthermore, there was an equally high prevalence of asymptomatic COVID-19 participants.

Unlike most previous studies on COVID-19-related symptoms an important strength of the present study was the recruitment of non-hospitalized participants with a positive SARS-CoV-2 PCR-test. Thus, we were able to depict variations in symptoms even among non-hospitalized participants with a confirmed COVID-19 diagnosis. Contrary to studies relying solely on information gathered through questionnaire data, our use of national register data on SARS-CoV-2 PCR tests and hospitalization strengthens the validity of the study results. However, our study finding of women being at higher risk of persistent symptoms may be biased by the fact that more asymptomatic individuals, especially men, were included towards the end of the inclusion period and were slightly older. This likely reflects both an altered test strategy in Denmark with easier access to targeted testing for mild cases of COVID-19 and screening of close contacts, and a survival bias with a higher risk of hospitalization among older citizens and symptomatic men. In addition, more women worked in the health care sector with patient contact and although this was not associated with an increased risk of persistent symptoms in the present study, larger studies are needed to clarify if the increased risk of persistent symptoms among women could be confounded by specific lines of work. Finally, all studies of COVID-19- related symptoms suffer from an inherent likelihood of attracting participants with a personal experience of severe or persistent symptoms thus risking an overestimation of the true prevalence of persistent symptoms. A similar selection bias may be present in our study, however, likely reduced compared to most studies specifically addressing COVID-19-related symptoms because we specifically invited participants to a study on genetics and not symptoms.

Our finding of fatigue as the most prevalent persistent symptom matches previous studies among post-hospitalized COVID-19 patients suffering from fatigue [9,12,28,29]. To our knowledge, few studies have been published on persistent symptoms in non-hospitalized patients with positive SARS-CoV-2 PCR-tests. Among 292 participants interviewed by phone at a median of 16 days post-testing, Tenforde et al found 35% of participants with acute symptoms to still be experiencing symptoms (especially coughing, fatigue and shortness of breath) [30]. In a study of 180 participants (8 of whom had been hospitalized) interviewed during the acute phase of disease and at follow-up phone calls, persistent symptoms were reported by 53% of symptomatic participants at a mean follow-up time of 125 days (most often fatigue, loss of smell and taste, and arthralgias) [31]. Larger survey-based studies on COVID-19-related symptoms in a multitude of participants with self-reported COVID-19 are available online, although not yet peer-reviewed (Table 4 presents an overview of studies) [32,33,34,35,36,37]. Characteristic for most of these studies is the acceptance of self-reported COVID-19 status by participants without laboratory confirmation of COVID-19-status, and recruitment of participants with the specific aim of COVID-19 symptom reporting likely inferred a substantial selection bias. However, most studies do report fatigue, concentration problems and loss of smell and taste as the most common persistent symptoms, which is comparable to our findings in PCR-confirmed COVID-19 non-hospitalized participants. Thus, our study provides substantial laboratory- and registry-confirmed evidence in support of these symptoms being part of a “long COVID”-syndrome existing even in non-hospitalized COVID-19 patients.

Why SARS-CoV-2 carries a high risk of persistent symptoms, especially in women, is an urgent research question. Suggested mechanisms fall into two categories of either direct effects from the virus or indirect effects caused by immune responses to the virus [38]. While persistent symptoms including chronic fatigue are well-described in other pulmonary infections such as SARS and pneumonia, SARS-CoV-2 may differ in its multi-organ-affection and high contagiousness [38,39,40,41]. The female preponderance bears resemblance to that of many autoimmune diseases [42]. Unfortunately, the present study did not have laboratory data to assess either initial or persistent immunological response against SARS-CoV-2 and did not have data for retesting for SARS-CoV-2 to ascertain resolution of the viral load in participants with persistent symptoms. However, previous studies have found a poor correlation between the risk of persistent symptoms and objective measures of disease despite performing a wide range of clinical and laboratory tests in COVID-19 patients either during the acute phase or at follow-up [9,28]. Also, a negative SARS-CoV-2 PCR-test as a sign of recovery has been criticized for not corresponding to the patients’ perception of (or lack of) recovery [33,35]. Thus, detailed laboratory data and functional studies are urgently needed to understand the immunological component of long COVID.

An important question arising from the present and other studies of long COVID is how to manage these patients with persistent symptoms. Previous studies of chronic fatigue have shown uncertain benefit of treatment such as exercise, cognitive behavioral therapy, and rehabilitation initiatives, and are, nevertheless, not necessarily compatible with post-COVID fatigue [43,44,45]. Several specific management initiatives are emerging for “long COVID” as well as guideline initiatives by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence in United Kingdom, and guidance material for self-rehabilitation after COVID-19 released by the World Health Organization [9,12,19,46]. Some have argued for the importance of involving general practitioners in the management of this syndrome [47] and some have advocated for the importance of including patients in emerging new strategies [16,48]. A subset of patients has yet to recover after months of symptoms and those patients may need long-term follow-up at specialized units. Thus, an important aspect of future studies on this matter is to identify patients at risk of long-term symptoms. The present study suggests that up to 40% of non-hospitalized previously healthy patients will experience some degree of persistent symptoms with an increased risk in women. Larger studies of big data including real-time symptom reporting will aid in determining risk factors and predicting disease trajectories [34,49]. The mounting evidence of “long COVID” calls for active policy making to secure prevention and early detection, facilitate optimal treatment and support rehabilitation [16,38].

Equally important may be the high proportion of asymptomatic COVID-19 individuals. In the present study 34% of non-hospitalized PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2-positive participants reported no symptoms in the acute phase of the disease. However, the overall prevalence of asymptomatic COVID-19 was similar to that estimated in Danish health care workers (assessed by IgM and IgG antibodies against SARS-CoV-2) of 46.5% [50]. Similarly, a study of the Icelandic population found that 43% were asymptomatic at time of a positive SARS-CoV-2 PCR test among participants included in a population screening unlike targeted testing of severely symptomatic individuals [51]. Furthermore, the COVID Symptom Score study prospectively monitored more than 2 million citizens in UK, US and Sweden. In a subset of 26,495 participants with a self-reported positive SARS-CoV-2 PCR-test, 55.3% were asymptomatic [34,49] [numbers deduced from supplementary files]. Although some studies reported a lower prevalence [31], there did seem to be a general agreement on a true high prevalence of asymptomatic COVID-19. In a recent analytical model based on the assumption that 30% of COVID-patients may by asymptomatic, Johansson et al found that asymptomatic individuals would carry 50% of all transmissions [52]. This has important implications for disease control and stresses the need for active tracing and testing of close contacts as part of disease control.

In conclusion, even among non-hospitalized PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2-positive participants, more than one third reported persistent symptoms after four and 12 weeks, respectively. The most prevalent persistent symptoms were fatigue and memory and concentration difficulties. Contrary to this, 34% of non-hospitalized patients were asymptomatic in the acute phase of the disease stressing the importance of testing near contacts. The high prevalence of both patients with persistent symptoms and of asymptomatic patients bear witness to the heterogeneity of the disease presentation. Although data should be reproduced due to possible limitations of survival or recall bias, these findings should be taken into account in future health care planning and policy making related to COVID-19 prevention, detection, treatment and follow-up.

Author contributions

SB and KB planned and conducted the analyses and drafted the manuscript and revisions. IN, HU, SDN, OBP, SB and MT contributed to the participant inclusion. OBP, SDN, and UFR developed the questionnaire. MS was in charge of project data management. All coauthors contributed to the conception or design of the work, or the acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data, as well as reviewed and approved the content of the manuscript.

Additional Information

The authors declare no competing interests.

Data Availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from The Danish COVID-19 Genetic Consortium but restrictions apply to the availability of data used under license for the current study, and thus are not publicly available. Data are however available from the authors upon reasonable request and with permission from The Danish COVID-19 Genetic Consortium under Danish legislation.