Abstract
Introduction The Indonesian roadmap to malaria elimination in 2009 indicated that the country is progressing towards achieve malaria elimination by 2030. Currently, most of the districts in the western part of Indonesia have eliminated malaria, however, none of the districts in East Nusa Tenggara Province (ENTP) have met set targets. This study aims to investigate the status of malaria awareness of rural adults in the ENTP.
Methods A cross-sectional study was conducted between October and December 2019. Fourteen hundred and ninety-five participants from high, moderate, and low malaria endemic settings (MES) in ENTP were interviewed using a semi-structure questionnaire. A malaria awareness index was developed based on ten questions. Chi-square test was applied to investigate the significance of associations of malaria awareness with the three malaria endemic settings.
Results Participants were between 18 and 89 years old, 51.4% were female and 45.5% had completed primary education. Malaria awareness index was 48.8% with the highest in low MES 64.8%, followed by the moderate MES 44.4% and the high MES 37.2% (p<0.001). Of total participants, 81.3% were aware that malaria could be prevented and 75.1% knew at least one prevention measure. Overall, the awareness of fever as the main symptom of malaria, seeking treatment within 24 hours when suffering with malaria, and mosquito bites as the transmission mode of malaria was poor, 37.9%, 46.0%, and 59.1% respectively. The poor level of awareness was statistically significantly different amongst three MES, the level of awareness was the lowest in the high endemic setting.
Conclusion Malaria awareness of rural adults needs to be improved to address Indonesia’s national action plan. Results indicate public health programs at a local government level should incorporate the malaria awareness index in their key strategic intervention packages to address local malaria awareness.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
PhD scholarship for RDG was supported by the Australia Awards Scholarship (ST000TBK6). The Faculty of Health, Arts and Design (FHAD) of the Swinburne University Technology supported for the primary data collection . The funders had no role in the design of the study, data collection, analysis, or interpretation of data or writing the manuscripts.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The research was conducted in accordance with the tenet of The Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by Human Ethics Committee of the Swinburne University of Technology (Reference: 20191428-1490) and from Health Research Ethics Committee, National Institute of Health Research and Development (HERC-NIHRD) the Indonesian Ministry of Health (Reference: LB.02.01/2/KE.418/2019)
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Data will be available after the article has been published.
