Impact of disasters, including pandemics, on cardiometabolic outcomes across the life-course: A systematic review
=================================================================================================================

* Vanessa De Rubeis
* Jinhee Lee
* Muhammad Saqib Anwer
* Yulika Yoshida-Montezuma
* Alessandra T. Andreacchi
* Erica Stone
* Saman Iftikhar
* Jason D. Morgenstern
* Reid Rebinsky
* Sarah E. Neil-Sztramko
* Elizabeth Alvarez
* Emma Apatu
* Laura N. Anderson

## ABSTRACT

**Objectives** Disasters, such as the current COVID-19 pandemic, disrupt daily life, increase uncertainty and stress, and may increase long-term risk of adverse cardiometabolic outcomes, including heart disease, obesity and diabetes. The objective was to conduct a systematic review to determine the impact of disasters, including pandemics, on cardiometabolic outcomes across the life-course.

**Design** A systematic search was conducted in May 2020 using two electronic databases, EMBASE and Medline. All studies were screened in duplicate at title and abstract, and full-text level. Studies were eligible for inclusion if they assessed an association with population-level or community disaster and cardiometabolic outcomes. There were no restrictions on year of publication, country or population. Non-English and earthquake-related studies were excluded. Data were extracted on study characteristics, exposure (e.g., type of disaster, name of specific event, region, year), cardiometabolic outcomes, and measures of effect. Study quality was evaluated using the Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal tools.

**Results** A total of 58 studies were included, with 24 studies reporting the effects of exposure to disaster during pregnancy/childhood and 34 studies reporting the effects of exposure during adulthood. Studies included exposure to natural (60%) and human-made (40%) disasters, with only 3 (5%) of these studies evaluating previous pandemics. Most studies were conducted in North America (62%). Most studies reported increased cardiometabolic risk, including increased cardiovascular disease incidence or mortality, diabetes, and obesity. Few studies investigated potential mechanisms or identified high risk subgroups.

**Conclusions** Understanding the long-term consequences of disasters on cardiometabolic outcomes across the life-course may inform public health strategies for the current COVID-19 pandemic. This review found strong evidence of an increased association between disaster exposure and cardiometabolic outcomes across the life-course, although more research is needed to better understand the mechanisms and preventative efforts.

**PROSPERO registration** CRD – 42020186074

**Strengths and limitations of this study**

*   This systematic review is one of the first to review the literature on disasters, including pandemics, and subsequent cardiometabolic outcomes throughout the life-course.

*   A comprehensive search strategy was developed in consultation with Health Science Librarians at McMaster University, which resulted in 58 studies that were eligible for inclusion into the review.

*   Due to the heterogeneity of the included studies, a meta-analysis was not conducted.

*   This review contributes a synthesis of the literature on the impact of disasters and cardiometabolic outcomes, that can help to inform public health strategies for the current COVID-19 pandemic.

## BACKGROUND

Disasters as defined by the World Health Organization (WHO), are events that disrupt the daily functioning of a community or society causing material, economic or environmental losses, overwhelming local capacity (1). Disasters can be categorized into natural disasters, human-made disasters, and hybrid disasters (2). Natural disasters include natural phenomenon above and beneath the earths surface (e.g., tsunamis or landslides), meteorological phenomenon (e.g., tornadoes or floods) or biological phenomenon (e.g., epidemics and pandemics) (2). Human-made disasters include adverse transportation incidents, technological events (e.g., fire or toxic leaks), terrorism, warfare or conflict (2). A hybrid disaster results from both human error and natural forces, such as the clearing of a jungle that results in a landslide (2). All types of disasters can result in public health emergencies as they typically impact a significant proportion of people (3). Epidemics, defined as a greater than expected increase in cases of a disease, and pandemics, which cross countries and continents, are types of natural disasters with far-reaching global disruption (4). The COVID-19 pandemic is a present-day example of a global disaster that is unlike any disaster in recent history. Understanding the potential long-term health implications of the current COVID-19 pandemic and resulting public health mitigation strategies is urgently needed.

Previous systematic reviews have focused specifically on the psychological impact of quarantine during pandemics (5), the impact on health outcomes after disasters in older adults (6), medically unexplained physical symptoms following disasters (7), and chronic medical interventions following a natural disaster (8). However, there is currently no review specifically focusing on the impact of either disasters, or epidemics and pandemics on cardiometabolic outcomes across the life-course. Noncommunicable diseases (NCDs), including cardiovascular disease (CVD), obesity, and diabetes, are the leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide (9,10). NCDs are attributed to 71% of all global deaths annually, with approximately 14 million CVD-related deaths and 1.6 million diabetes-related deaths (10). Findings from the Global Burden of Diseases Study indicate that CVD and diabetes account for over 20% of the global burden of disability, with diabetes recently emerging as the fourth leading cause of disability globally (9). Exposure to disasters may cause cardiometabolic outcomes to emerge or worsen through several different mechanistic pathways including stress exposure (11), lack of access to health services (12), food security and behavioural changes such as alterations in physical activity, sleep, and diet (13). It is important to understand the impact of disasters on the incidence of new cardiometabolic diseases and changes in disease status in all populations and age groups. Particular subgroups of a population may be more or less susceptible to cardiometabolic outcomes and understanding this can inform targeted interventions. The primary objective of this review was to determine the impact of disasters, including pandemics such as COVID-19, on risk of cardiometabolic outcomes across the life-course. The secondary objectives were to determine how to reduce the impact of chronic disease outcomes following a disaster and to identify populations at highest risk of cardiometabolic outcomes following a disaster.

## METHODS

A systematic review was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) (14). This review was registered on PROSPERO (CRD – 42020186074).

### Search strategy

A systematic search was conducted in May 2020 using the electronic databases EMBASE and MEDLINE. The health research librarians at McMaster University assisted in developing the search strategy. The search broadly captured two concepts: disasters and cardiometabolic outcomes (e.g., diabetes, obesity, hypertension). The complete search strategy for EMBASE can be found in Table 1. The search strategy for MEDLINE can be found in the Appendix (Table A1). Reference lists of eligible studies and relevant systematic reviews were hand searched to identify additional articles.

View this table:
[Table 1.](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/11/30/2020.11.27.20239830/T1)

Table 1. 
Search strategy for EMBASE

### Eligibility criteria

Studies were eligible for inclusion if they assessed the relationship between a population-level or community disaster and the risk of future cardiometabolic outcomes including CVD, diabetes or obesity or cardiometabolic risk scores (15). CVD included myocardial infarction, stroke, hypertension and angina. There were no restrictions on year of publication, country of disaster, or population. Only studies evaluating the impact of real-world disasters in humans were included. Due to the research team’s capacity, only studies published in English were included. Observational and quasi-experimental study designs, including case-control, cohort and other longitudinal study designs or natural experiments were included. Outcomes that were not cardiometabolic-related or acute cardiometabolic events, such as an immediate complication (defined as <1 month after disaster), were excluded. Studies that assessed the exposure to a chemical as a result of the disaster, were excluded, as we were not interested in outcomes resulting from chemical exposure. Earthquake studies were also excluded since a systematic review was published in 2018 that assessed the impact of earthquakes on cardiometabolic outcomes (16).

### Study selection

After running the search, all identified studies were imported into Covidence and duplicates were removed (17). Studies were screened at title and abstract-level, and then at full-text by two independent reviewers (VD, JL, MSA, YYM, ATA, ES, SI, JDM, RR LNA). Conflicts were resolved by a third reviewer who made the final decision regarding eligibility for inclusion.

### Data extraction

A data extraction template was created, and pilot tested prior to data extraction. Data were then extracted from all studies by two independent abstractors (VD, JL, SMA, YYM, ATA, RR) and conflicts were resolved by a third independent abstractor. Study characteristics including year of publication, study design, country of disaster, sample size, and length of study were extracted where reported. Specific information on the exposure and outcome in each study were extracted including the type and name of the disaster, country and year of the disaster, the outcome of interest, and how the exposure and outcome were measured. Finally, any information on subgroups including age, population, sex and disaster type were also extracted, if applicable.

### Critical appraisal

Critical appraisal was conducted using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Critical Appraisal Tools (18). This tool was chosen due to the availability of checklists for a wide range of study designs, including cohort, cross-sectional and quasi-experimental designs (18). The quasi-experimental study design checklist was used for natural experiments including time-series studies and pre/post designs, as it was decided this was the most appropriate tool. All studies were critically appraised independently by two individuals (VD, JL, MA, YYM, ATA, ES, SI) and a third individual was consulted for any discrepancies.

### Data analysis

Data from the included studies were narratively synthesized. Results are presented by exposure period (perinatal/childhood versus adulthood) and by cardiometabolic outcome (obesity, CVD, and diabetes). Characteristics of studies are presented as frequencies and percentages. Due to the heterogeneity of studies, a meta-analysis was not conducted.

## RESULTS

A total of 4830 studies were identified through the electronic database search. An additional 12 studies were identified through manual searching of the reference lists of relevant studies. After removing duplicates (n=439), 4403 studies were screened at title and abstract level. After applying inclusion and exclusion criteria, 4068 studies were excluded, leaving 335 studies screened for full-text eligibility. A total of 58 studies were eligible for inclusion into the review. The complete screening process is described in Figure 1.

![Figure 1.](http://medrxiv.org/https://www.medrxiv.org/content/medrxiv/early/2020/11/30/2020.11.27.20239830/F1.medium.gif)

[Figure 1.](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/11/30/2020.11.27.20239830/F1)

Figure 1. PRISMA Flow Chart

### Description of studies

Table 2 provides a summary of included studies. Of 58 included studies, 24 studies (13,19–41) investigated exposure to disasters during pregnancy or childhood while the remaining 34 studies (12,42–74) investigated exposure to disaster during adulthood. Almost all studies (n=49) assessed cardiometabolic outcomes during adulthood, only two studies assessed outcomes during pregnancy (25,26) and seven studies assessed outcomes during childhood and adolescence (13,19–24). The length of studies, including prospective follow-up and retrospective assessment, ranged from 1 month to 95 years. Most studies (n=36) focused on disasters that occurred in North America (12,19–26,36,37,40,43–47,49,50,52,53,55–58,61–63,65–70,73,74), followed by Europe (n=13) (27–33,39,41,51,60,71,72). The remaining disasters occurred in Asia (n=7) (13,35,38,42,48,54,59) and Africa (n=2) (34,64). The characteristics of included studies and key findings are provided in Table 3 for disaster exposure during the perinatal period and childhood, and Table 4 for exposure during adulthood.

View this table:
[Table 2.](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/11/30/2020.11.27.20239830/T2)

Table 2. 
Characteristics of included studies (n=58)

View this table:
[Table 3.](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/11/30/2020.11.27.20239830/T3)

Table 3. 
Characteristics of included studies investigating the association between exposure to a disaster during the perinatal and childhood periods and cardiometabolic outcomes across the life-course, by disaster type (n=24)

View this table:
[Table 4.](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/11/30/2020.11.27.20239830/T4)

Table 4. 
Description of studies investigating the association between exposure to a disaster during adulthood and cardiometabolic outcomes across the life-course, by disaster type (n=34)

### Studies on perinatal and childhood exposure to disaster and subsequent cardiometabolic outcomes

Of the 24 studies that evaluated perinatal and childhood exposure to disaster, 12 studies evaluated human-made disasters (27–35,38,39,45) and the remaining 12 evaluated natural disasters (13,19–26,36,37,40) of which two were pandemics (36,37). Most studies (n=15) assessed the disaster as the main exposure of interest (22,26–31,33–37,37–40). The remaining studies evaluated stress (e.g., maternal stress, disaster-related PTSD, subjective stress, objective hardship) (19–23,25,45), maternal weight and maternal nutrition status (13,79), cognitive appraisal (24), and coping strategies (25) that were the result of the disaster as the exposure variable. The age when cardiometabolic outcomes were assessed varied across studies, with 7 studies evaluating outcomes during childhood and adolescence (≤18 years of age) (13,19–24), 4 studies during young to mid adulthood (>18-40 years of age) (25,34,80,83), and 10 during later adulthood (≥50 years of age) (28,30–33,36–40). Ekamper et al. (2015), evaluated outcomes throughout the life-course, with age at outcome ranging from 18-63 years (29). Two studies (26,45) did not specifically identify the age at which outcomes were assessed. Detailed characteristics and findings of all studies that assessed perinatal and childhood exposures to disasters can be found in Table 3.

Studies that assessed human-made disasters found an increased association or increased change in obesity, metabolic syndrome, CVD related-outcomes and diabetes, however not all were statistically significant (OR range 1.15-3.11; hazard ratio (HR) range: 1.26-1.91) (27,29–35,38,45). Some studies also reported no association or a decreased association following exposure to human-made disasters and cardiometabolic outcomes (OR range: 0.94-1.02) (29,34). Among the studies that evaluated natural disasters, maternal stress, including objective hardship and objective prenatal maternal stress, were found to increase the odds of obesity using different adiposity measures during childhood and adolescence (19–21). However, weak correlations were found between subjective distress/stress and body mass index (BMI) (r=0.39; p=0.03), zBMI (r=0.40; p=0.02), and body fat percentage (r=0.33; p=0.09) in offspring at age 13 (22). The prevalence of heart disease, ischemic heart disease, emergency department visits for gestational hypertension, myocardial infarction, diabetes diagnoses and diabetes-related emergency department visits increased after exposure to Hurricanes Sandy, San Felipe and Ciprian, and the 1918 Influenza Pandemic (26,36,40). In addition, exposure to hurricanes and stress-related to hurricanes was noted to increase pregnancy induced hypertension and gestational diabetes (odds ratio (OR) range: 1.13-1.22) (25).

### Studies on adult exposure to disaster and subsequent cardiometabolic outcomes

Thirty-four studies investigated the effects of exposure to disasters during adulthood on cardiometabolic outcomes. The length of follow-up ranged from 1 month to 13 years. There were 23 studies that examined natural disasters (12,42–44,46,49,50,52–54,56–59,62,63,65,71–74), and 11 studies that examined human-made disasters (41,47,48,51,55,60,61,66–70). Of these studies, only one evaluated the impact of an infectious disease epidemic (64). Most studies (12,41–44,46,48,50,52–54,56–64,66,69–74) considered the disaster as the main exposure of interest (n=27). The remaining 7 studies assessed disaster-related stress (51,55,65,67), including post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and psychological strain, unemployment rates as a result of the disaster (49) and exposure to damaged or collapsed buildings during the World Trade Center disaster (68). Detailed characteristics and findings of all studies that assessed adult exposures to disasters are included in Table 4.

The studies that assessed exposure to human-made disasters during adulthood reported mixed results in terms of associations with outcomes and statistical significance. Most studies reported an increased association with outcomes, including heart disease-related mortality, CVD hospitalization, complaints of CVD, vascular problems, stroke, and incidence of hypertension (OR range: 1.21-3.30; HR range: 1.63-1.82) (41,43,47,51,55,60,61,67,68,70). No association or a decreased association with CVD hospitalizations was noted following exposure to the World Trade Centre attacks (47,66). In addition, time of evaluation from damaged buildings resulting from the World Trade Centre also had a decreased association with cardiometabolic outcomes (OR range: 0.7-0.9) (68). Among studies that evaluated the impact of exposure to natural disasters on subsequent cardiometabolic outcomes, nearly all studies reported an increased association (OR range: 1.08-5.65; relative risk (RR) range: 2.01-2.62; HR range: 1.72-3.29) (43,44,49,56,62,70). However, five studies reported no association or a decreased association after exposure to hurricanes among specific groups or at different timepoints following a disaster (47,56,58,62,70). Several studies evaluated the mean difference in outcomes including cardiovascular, diabetes and obesity-related outcomes, however, these results were very inconsistent, with some studies noting an increase, some a decrease and other reporting no change in outcomes following a disaster (12,46,52–54,57,59,63,65,73,74).

### Mediation and modification of cardiometabolic outcomes

Across all studies, few evaluated effect modification or subgroups of a population that may be at a greater risk of negative health outcomes following disasters. Some studies stratified by sex (28,32,34,39,43,48,55,62), gestational timing of exposure (20,27,29–31,33,36), year of birth or age at outcome (40,62,67), urban or rural area (35), race (43,46) and socioeconomic status (65), however, results varied greatly due to the differences in exposure period, disaster type, cardiometabolic outcome and age at outcome. One study explored the possible mediators between cognitive appraisal following the Quebec Ice Storm and obesity. It was noted that negative cognitive appraisal was found to predict obesity via DNA methylation of diabetes-related genes (24). No studies evaluated or discussed possible interventions to mitigate risk of cardiometabolic disease following a disaster.

### Critical appraisal

The critical appraisal assessment for all study designs are found in Tables A2-A4. Among the cohort studies, most studies met all criteria included in the checklist indicating high study quality. For instance, almost all cohort studies had comparable populations that were recruited in a similar way and exposures that were assessed in the same way across populations. However, across almost all cohort studies, information on follow-up or strategies to address incomplete follow-up were unclear or not addressed. The critical appraisal results for cross-sectional studies were inconsistent with a small number of studies meeting only some checklist requirements. For quasi-experimental studies, the checklist requirement for within person comparisons were not applicable for all studies, however, all studies clearly defined the cause and effect within the study.

## DISCUSSION

Exposure to both natural and human-made disasters, including famine, war, terrorism, natural disasters, and infectious disease epidemics, during both the perinatal/childhood and adult periods were associated with increased cardiometabolic outcomes including obesity, hypertension, myocardial infarction, diabetes, and cardiac mortality in most studies. These findings emphasize that the burden of disasters extends beyond the known direct harm they cause, and attention is needed on the detrimental indirect long-term effects on cardiometabolic health and chronic disease. Meta-analysis was not possible due to the very heterogeneous study designs, measures of effect, outcomes, and timing of exposures. The included studies also reported varied follow-up periods and length of retrospective assessment. From an epidemiological standpoint, the difference in the follow-up periods, timing of exposure, year of disaster and geographic location may help to explain the variation in the reported results. It is important for future studies to explore these differences and how they may influence cardiometabolic outcomes.

Studies also reported insufficient data on subgroups that were at increased risk of worse cardiometabolic health outcomes and interventions that were implemented to mitigate risk of cardiometabolic outcomes. There were also few results that investigated sex and gender differences, or that applied an equity lens. It has been noted that those of different levels of socioeconomic status experience differential cardiometabolic outcomes (84,85). This signifies the importance of exploring associations between exposure to disasters and cardiometabolic outcomes stratified by these factors. Understanding how these associations differ will also help to identify groups of people who will experience worse outcomes following a disaster.

The potential mechanisms discussed whereby exposure to disaster could increase cardiometabolic outcomes include maternal objective hardship, subjective stress and various coping mechanisms, psychological strains including PTSD, anxiety and fear, and reduced health care service access. One study that explored mediators in the association between stress and obesity measures identified the role of DNA methylation in this association (24). The findings from this study are important to better understand a possible pathway of obesity development following exposure to a disaster. More studies are needed that evaluate other mechanisms, such as disruptions to healthcare or medication access, and changes in dietary intake or physical activity. Understanding the mechanistic pathway following exposure to disaster will allow for targeted public health strategies, contributing to a mitigation of risk.

This review comprehensively evaluated of the impact of a wide range of disaster exposures on various cardiometabolic outcomes across the life-course. The search strategy was developed in consultation with health science librarians at McMaster University to ensure the most comprehensive search was developed and relevant literature was identified. Very few studies have evaluated the long-term impacts of pandemics and epidemics on cardiometabolic outcomes, identifying a current gap in the literature. The timely findings of this synthesis are a strength of this review, given the current COVID-19 pandemic, which is affecting millions of people worldwide. While only a small proportion of the identified studies focused on pandemics and epidemics, the findings may serve to guide our understanding of expected outcomes and to develop future research to study the effects of COVID-19 on cardiometabolic outcomes. The results from this study can also be used to better understand the trade-off between the implementation of public health measures, such as physical distancing to reduce transmission of a virus, and the implications with access to healthcare, as the review found access to healthcare was limited following a disaster (12). The findings from this review can help to inform future decisions by policy makers regarding the implementation of various public health measures.

The overall findings of this review indicate exposure to any type of disaster may increase the risk of cardiometabolic outcomes including obesity, diabetes and CVD. Further, our results suggest that increased risk is observed for disaster exposure at any period over the life-course from the perinatal child and adult periods. However, more studies are needed to understand the mechanisms which may explain these associations and to identify subgroups of the population at highest risk of long-term cardiometabolic outcomes post-disaster. Findings from this review may inform research that should be conducted in the context of the current COVID-19 pandemic and may inform public health mitigation measures that should be considered post-pandemic to prevent long term cardiometabolic outcomes in the population.

## Supporting information

PRISMA Checklist [[supplements/239830_file03.pdf]](pending:yes)

Supplemental Tables 1-4 [[supplements/239830_file04.pdf]](pending:yes)

## Data Availability

All data is available in the manuscript or supplementary material.

## Author contributions

Conceptualization: V.D., S.E.N.S., E.A., E.A., L.N.A.; Screening: V.D., J.L., M.S.A., Y.Y.M., A.T.A., E.S., S.I., J.D.M., R.R.; Data extraction: V.D., J.L., M.S.A., Y.Y.M., A.T.A., R.R.; Critical appraisal: V.D., J.L., M.S.A., Y.Y.M., A.T.A., E.S., S.I.; Writing – Original draft: V.D., J.L., M.S.A., Writing – review and editing: V.D., J.L., M.S.A., Y.Y.M., A.T.A., E.S., S.I., J.D.M., R.R. S.E.N.S., E.A., E.A., L.N.A.

*   Received November 27, 2020.
*   Revision received November 27, 2020.
*   Accepted November 30, 2020.


*   © 2020, Posted by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

This pre-print is available under a Creative Commons License (Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International), CC BY-NC-ND 4.0, as described at [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/](http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

## References

1.  1.World Health Organization. WHO |Definitions: emergencies [Internet]. WHO. World Health Organization; 2020 [cited 2020 May 12]. Available from: [https://www.who.int/hac/about/definitions/en/](https://www.who.int/hac/about/definitions/en/)
    
    

2.  2.Mohamed SI. An overview on disasters. Disaster Prev Manag Int J. 2007 Jan 1;16(5):687–703.
    
    

3.  3.Giorgadze T, Maisuradze I, Japaridze A, Utiashvili Z, Abesadze G. Disasters and their consequences for public health. Georgian Med News. 2011 May;(194):59–63.
    
    

4.  4.Ordway D-M, February 1 JR, 2016. Global trends in human infectious disease: Rising number of outbreaks, fewer per-capita cases [Internet]. Journalist’s Resource. 2016 [cited 2020 May 8]. Available from: [https://journalistsresource.org/studies/society/public-health/global-rise-human-infectious-disease-outbreaks/](https://journalistsresource.org/studies/society/public-health/global-rise-human-infectious-disease-outbreaks/)
    
    

5.  5.Brooks SK, Webster RK, Smith LE, Woodland L, Wessely S, Greenberg N, et al. The psychological impact of quarantine and how to reduce it: rapid review of the evidence. The Lancet. 2020 Mar 14;395(10227):912–20.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/s0140-6736(20)30460-8&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=http://www.n&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2020%2F11%2F30%2F2020.11.27.20239830.atom) 

6.  6.Bell SA, Horowitz J, Iwashyna TJ. Health Outcomes After Disaster for Older Adults With Chronic Disease: A Systematic Review. The Gerontologist [Internet]. [cited 2020 May 8]; Available from: [https://academic.oup.com/gerontologist/advance-article/doi/10.1093/geront/gnz123/5565119](https://academic.oup.com/gerontologist/advance-article/doi/10.1093/geront/gnz123/5565119)
    
    

7.  7.Jackson JL, George S, Hinchey S. Medically Unexplained Physical Symptoms. J Gen Intern Med. 2009 Apr;24(4):540–2.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1007/s11606-009-0932-x&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=19255810&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2020%2F11%2F30%2F2020.11.27.20239830.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000264484500017&link_type=ISI) 

8.  8.Chan EYY, Sondorp E. Medical interventions following natural disasters: missing out on chronic medical needs. Asia Pac J Public Health. 2007;19 Spec No:45–51.
    
    

9.  9.James SL, Abate D, Abate KH, Abay SM, Abbafati C, Abbasi N, et al. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 354 diseases and injuries for 195 countries and territories, 1990–2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. The Lancet. 2018 Nov;392(10159):1789–858.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32279-7.&link_type=DOI) 

10. 10.Forouzanfar MH, Afshin A, Alexander LT, Anderson HR, Bhutta ZA, Biryukov S, et al. Global, regional, and national comparative risk assessment of 79 behavioural, environmental and occupational, and metabolic risks or clusters of risks, 1990–2015:a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015. The Lancet. 2016 Oct;388(10053):1659–724.
    
    

11. 11.Tan SY, Yip A. Hans Selye (1907–1982): Founder of the stress theory. Singapore Med J. 2018 Apr;59(4):170–1.
    
    

12. 12.Baum A., Barnett M.L., Wisnivesky J., Schwartz M.D. Association between a Temporary Reduction in Access to Health Care and Long-term Changes in Hypertension Control among Veterans after a Natural Disaster. JAMA Netw Open. 2019;2(11):e1915111.
    
    

13. 13.Goudet S, Griffths P, Bogin BA. Mother’s body mass index as a predictor of infant’s nutritional status in the post-emergency phase of a flood. Disasters. 2011 Oct;35(4):701–19.
    
    

14. 14.Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG,  PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med. 2009 Aug 18;151(4):264–9, W64.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00135&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=19622511&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2020%2F11%2F30%2F2020.11.27.20239830.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000269038900006&link_type=ISI) 

15. 15.Kamel M, Smith BT, Wahi G, Carsley S, Birken CS, Anderson LN. Continuous cardiometabolic risk score definitions in early childhood: a scoping review. Obes Rev. 2018;19(12):1688–99.
    
    

16. 14.Bazoukis, G., Tse, G., Naka, K.K., Kalfakakou, V., Vlachos, K., Saplaouras, A., Letsas, K. P., Korantzopoulos, P., Thomopoulos, C., Michelongona, P., Bazoukis, X., González-Salvado, V., Liu, T., Michalis L.K., Baranchuk, A., Itoh, T., Efremidis, M., Tsioufis, C., Stavrakis, C. Impact of major earthquakes on the incidence of acute coronary syndromes - A systematic review of the literature [Internet]. Vol. 59, Hellenic journal of cardiology?: HJC = Hellenike kardiologike epitheorese. Hellenic J Cardiol; 2018 [cited 2020 Sep 10]. Available from: [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29807192/](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29807192/)
    
    

17. 17.Covidence - Better systematic review management [Internet]. Covidence. [cited 2020 Sep 10]. Available from: [https://www.covidence.org/](https://www.covidence.org/)
    
    

18. 18.Aromataris E, Munn Z, editors. JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis [Internet]. JBI; 2020 [cited 2020 Sep 10]. Available from: [https://wiki.jbi.global/display/MANUAL](https://wiki.jbi.global/display/MANUAL)
    
    

19. 19.Kroska EB, O’Hara MW, Elgbeili G, Hart KJ, Laplante DP, Dancause KN, et al. The impact of maternal flood-related stress and social support on offspring weight in early childhood. Arch Womens Ment Health. 2018 Apr 1;21(2):225–33.
    
    

20. 20.Dancause KN, Laplante DP, Hart KJ, O’Hara MW, Elgbeili G, Brunet A, et al. Prenatal stress due to a natural disaster predicts adiposity in childhood: the Iowa Flood Study. J Obes. 2015;2015(101526295):570541.
    
    

21. 21.Dancause KN, Laplante DP, Fraser S, Brunet A, Ciampi A, Schmitz N, et al. Prenatal exposure to a natural disaster increases risk for obesity in 51/2-year-old children. Pediatr Res. 2012;71(1):126– 31.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1038/pr.2011.18&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=22289861&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2020%2F11%2F30%2F2020.11.27.20239830.atom) 

22. 22.Dancause KN, Veru F, Andersen RE, Laplante DP, King S. Prenatal stress due to a natural disaster predicts insulin secretion in adolescence. Early Hum Dev. 2013 Sep;89(9):773–6.
    
    

23. 23.Liu GT, Dancause KN, Elgbeili G, Laplante DP, King S. Disaster-related prenatal maternal stress explains increasing amounts of variance in body composition through childhood and adolescence: Project Ice Storm. Environ Res. 2016;150:1–7.
    
    

24. 24.Cao-Lei L, Dancause KN, Elgbeili G, Laplante DP, Szyf M, King S. Pregnant women’s cognitive appraisal of a natural disaster affects their children’s BMI and central adiposity via DNA methylation: Project Ice Storm. Early Hum Dev. 2016 Dec 1;103:189–92.
    
    

25. 25.Oni O, Harville E, Xiong X, Buekens P. Relationships among stress coping styles and pregnancy complications among women exposed to Hurricane Katrina. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs JOGNN. 2015;44(2):256–67.
    
    

26. 26.Xiao J, Huang M, Zhang W, Rosenblum A, Ma W, Meng X, et al. The immediate and lasting impact of Hurricane Sandy on pregnancy complications in eight affected counties of New York State. Sci Total Environ. 2019;678(uj0, 0330500):755–60.
    
    

27. 27.Roseboom TJ, van der Meulen JH, Ravelli AC, Osmond C, Barker DJ, Bleker OP. Effects of prenatal exposure to the Dutch famine on adult disease in later life: an overview. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2001 Dec 20;185(1–2):93–8.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/S0303-7207(01)00721-3&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=11738798&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2020%2F11%2F30%2F2020.11.27.20239830.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000173052800011&link_type=ISI) 

28. 28.de Rooij SR, Painter RC, Holleman F, Bossuyt PM, Roseboom TJ. The metabolic syndrome in adults prenatally exposed to the Dutch famine. Am J Clin Nutr. 2007 Oct 1;86(4):1219–24.
    
    [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6NDoiYWpjbiI7czo1OiJyZXNpZCI7czo5OiI4Ni80LzEyMTkiO3M6NDoiYXRvbSI7czo1MDoiL21lZHJ4aXYvZWFybHkvMjAyMC8xMS8zMC8yMDIwLjExLjI3LjIwMjM5ODMwLmF0b20iO31zOjg6ImZyYWdtZW50IjtzOjA6IiI7fQ==) 

29. 29.Ekamper P, van Poppel F, Stein AD, Bijwaard GE, Lumey LH. Prenatal Famine Exposure and Adult Mortality From Cancer, Cardiovascular Disease, and Other Causes Through Age 63 Years. Am J Epidemiol. 2015 Feb 15;181(4):271–9.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1093/aje/kwu288&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=25632050&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2020%2F11%2F30%2F2020.11.27.20239830.atom) 

30. 30.Lumey LH, Martini LH, Myerson M, Stein AD, Prineas RJ. No relation between coronary artery disease or electrocardiographic markers of disease in middle age and prenatal exposure to the Dutch famine of 1944-5. Heart Br Card Soc. 2012 Nov;98(22):1653–9.
    
    [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6ODoiaGVhcnRqbmwiO3M6NToicmVzaWQiO3M6MTA6Ijk4LzIyLzE2NTMiO3M6NDoiYXRvbSI7czo1MDoiL21lZHJ4aXYvZWFybHkvMjAyMC8xMS8zMC8yMDIwLjExLjI3LjIwMjM5ODMwLmF0b20iO31zOjg6ImZyYWdtZW50IjtzOjA6IiI7fQ==) 

31. 31.Painter RC, de Rooij SR, Bossuyt PM, Simmers TA, Osmond C, Barker DJ, et al. Early onset of coronary artery disease after prenatal exposure to the Dutch famine. Am J Clin Nutr. 2006 Aug;84(2):322–7; quiz 466–7.
    
    [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6NDoiYWpjbiI7czo1OiJyZXNpZCI7czo4OiI4NC8yLzMyMiI7czo0OiJhdG9tIjtzOjUwOiIvbWVkcnhpdi9lYXJseS8yMDIwLzExLzMwLzIwMjAuMTEuMjcuMjAyMzk4MzAuYXRvbSI7fXM6ODoiZnJhZ21lbnQiO3M6MDoiIjt9) 

32. 32.Ravelli AC, van Der Meulen JH, Osmond C, Barker DJ, Bleker OP. Obesity at the age of 50 y in men and women exposed to famine prenatally. Am J Clin Nutr. 1999 Nov;70(5):811–6.
    
    [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6NDoiYWpjbiI7czo1OiJyZXNpZCI7czo4OiI3MC81LzgxMSI7czo0OiJhdG9tIjtzOjUwOiIvbWVkcnhpdi9lYXJseS8yMDIwLzExLzMwLzIwMjAuMTEuMjcuMjAyMzk4MzAuYXRvbSI7fXM6ODoiZnJhZ21lbnQiO3M6MDoiIjt9) 

33. 33.Stein AD, Zybert PA, van der Pal-de Bruin K, Lumey LH. Exposure to famine during gestation, size at birth, and blood pressure at age 59 y: evidence from the Dutch Famine. Eur J Epidemiol. 2006;21(10):759–65.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1007/s10654-006-9065-2&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=17082900&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2020%2F11%2F30%2F2020.11.27.20239830.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000242426000004&link_type=ISI) 

34. 34.Hult M, Tornhammar P, Ueda P, Chima C, Bonamy A-KE, Ozumba B, et al. Hypertension, diabetes and overweight: looming legacies of the Biafran famine. PloS One. 2010 Oct 22;5(10):e13582.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1371/journal.pone.0013582&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=21042579&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2020%2F11%2F30%2F2020.11.27.20239830.atom) 

35. 35.Huang C, Li Z, Wang M, Martorell R. Early life exposure to the 1959-1961 Chinese famine has long-term health consequences. J Nutr. 2010 Oct;140(10):1874–8.
    
    [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6OToibnV0cml0aW9uIjtzOjU6InJlc2lkIjtzOjExOiIxNDAvMTAvMTg3NCI7czo0OiJhdG9tIjtzOjUwOiIvbWVkcnhpdi9lYXJseS8yMDIwLzExLzMwLzIwMjAuMTEuMjcuMjAyMzk4MzAuYXRvbSI7fXM6ODoiZnJhZ21lbnQiO3M6MDoiIjt9) 

36. 36.Mazumder B, Almond D, Park K, Crimmins EM, Finch CE. Lingering prenatal effects of the 1918 influenza pandemic on cardiovascular disease. J Dev Orig Health Dis. 2010 Feb;1(1):26–34.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1017/S2040174409990031&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=20198106&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2020%2F11%2F30%2F2020.11.27.20239830.atom) 

37. 37.Myrskyla M, Mehta NK, Chang VW. Early life exposure to the 1918 influenza pandemic and old-age mortality by cause of death. Am J Public Health. 2013;103(7):e83–90.
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=23763420&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2020%2F11%2F30%2F2020.11.27.20239830.atom) 

38. 38.Bercovich E, Keinan-Boker L, Shasha SM. Long-Term Health Effects in Adults Born during the Holocaust. 2014;16:5.
    
    

39. 39.Schreier NK, Moltchanova EV, Blomstedt PA, Kajantie E, Eriksson JG. Prenatal exposure to wartime stress – long-term effect on coronary heart disease in later life. Ann Med. 2011 Nov 1;43(7):555– 61.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.3109/07853890.2010.521765&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=20977383&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2020%2F11%2F30%2F2020.11.27.20239830.atom) 

40. 40.Sotomayor O. Fetal and infant origins of diabetes and ill health: evidence from Puerto Rico’s 1928 and 1932 hurricanes. Econ Hum Biol. 2013 Jul;11(3):281–93.
    
    

41. 41.Dorn T, Yzermans CJ, Guijt H, van der Zee J. Disaster-related stress as a prospective risk factor for hypertension in parents of adolescent fire victims. Am J Epidemiol. 2007;165(4):410–7.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1093/aje/kwk029&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=17158856&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2020%2F11%2F30%2F2020.11.27.20239830.atom) 

42. 42.Karatzias T, Yan E, Jowett S. Adverse life events and health: A population study in Hong Kong. J Psychosom Res. 2015 Feb;78(2):173–7.
    
    

43. 43.Lawrence WR, Lin Z, Lipton EA, Birkhead G, Primeau M, Dong G-H, et al. After the Storm: Short-term and Long-term Health Effects Following Superstorm Sandy among the Elderly. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2019 Feb;13(1):28–32.
    
    

44. 44.Vanasse A, Cohen A, Courteau J, Bergeron P, Dault R, Gosselin P, et al. Association between Floods and Acute Cardiovascular Diseases: A Population-Based Cohort Study Using a Geographic Information System Approach. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2016;13(2):168.
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=http://www.n&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2020%2F11%2F30%2F2020.11.27.20239830.atom) 

45. 45.Trasande L, Koshy TT, Gilbert J, Burdine LK, Marmor M, Han X, et al. Cardiometabolic profiles of adolescents and young adults exposed to the World Trade Center Disaster. Environ Res. 2018;160(ei2, 0147621):107–14.
    
    

46. 46.Becquart NA, Naumova EN, Singh G, Chui KKH. Cardiovascular Disease Hospitalizations in Louisiana Parishes’ Elderly before, during and after Hurricane Katrina. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018;16(1).
    
    

47. 47.Jordan HT, Stellman SD, Morabia A, Miller-Archie SA, Alper H, Laskaris Z, et al. Cardiovascular disease hospitalizations in relation to exposure to the September 11, 2001 World Trade Center disaster and posttraumatic stress disorder. J Am Heart Assoc. 2013;2(5):e000431.
    
    [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6NToiYWhhb2EiO3M6NToicmVzaWQiO3M6MTE6IjIvNS9lMDAwNDMxIjtzOjQ6ImF0b20iO3M6NTA6Ii9tZWRyeGl2L2Vhcmx5LzIwMjAvMTEvMzAvMjAyMC4xMS4yNy4yMDIzOTgzMC5hdG9tIjt9czo4OiJmcmFnbWVudCI7czowOiIiO30=) 

48. 48.Kong SY, Song KJ, Shin SD, Ro YS. Cardiovascular Events after the Sewol Ferry Disaster, South Korea. Prehospital Disaster Med. 2019;34(2):142–8.
    
    

49. 49.Joseph NT, Matthews KA, Myers HF. Conceptualizing health consequences of Hurricane Katrina from the perspective of socioeconomic status decline. Health Psychol Off J Div Health Psychol Am Psychol Assoc. 2014;33(2):139–46.
    
    

50. 50.McKinney N, Houser C, Meyer-Arendt K. Direct and indirect mortality in Florida during the 2004 hurricane season. Int J Biometeorol. 2011;55(4):533–46.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1007/s00484-010-0370-9&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=20924612&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2020%2F11%2F30%2F2020.11.27.20239830.atom) 

51. 51.Dirkzwager AJE, van der Velden PG, Grievink L, Yzermans CJ. Disaster-related posttraumatic stress disorder and physical health. Psychosom Med. 2007;69(5):435–40.
    
    [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6ODoicHN5Y2htZWQiO3M6NToicmVzaWQiO3M6ODoiNjkvNS80MzUiO3M6NDoiYXRvbSI7czo1MDoiL21lZHJ4aXYvZWFybHkvMjAyMC8xMS8zMC8yMDIwLjExLjI3LjIwMjM5ODMwLmF0b20iO31zOjg6ImZyYWdtZW50IjtzOjA6IiI7fQ==) 

52. 52.Jiao Z, Kakoulides SV, Moscona J, Whittier J, Srivastav S, Delafontaine P, et al. Effect of Hurricane Katrina on incidence of acute myocardial infarction in New Orleans three years after the storm. Am J Cardiol. 2012;109(4):502–5.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.amjcard.2011.09.045&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=22154089&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2020%2F11%2F30%2F2020.11.27.20239830.atom) 

53. 53.Gautam S, Menachem J, Srivastav SK, Delafontaine P, Irimpen A. Effect of Hurricane Katrina on the incidence of acute coronary syndrome at a primary angioplasty center in New Orleans. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2009;3(3):144–50.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1097/DMP.0b013e3181b9db91&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=19713855&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2020%2F11%2F30%2F2020.11.27.20239830.atom) 

54. 54.Nagayoshi Y, Yumoto S, Sakaguchi K, Shudo C, Takino S, Hashiyama M, et al. Heart attacks triggered by huge mud slides in mountain regions and severe flooding in inhabited areas. J Cardiol. 2015;65(2):117–20.
    
    

55. 55.Jordan HT, Miller-Archie SA, Cone JE, Morabia A, Stellman SD. Heart disease among adults exposed to the September 11, 2001 World Trade Center disaster: results from the World Trade Center Health Registry. Prev Med. 2011;53(6):370–6.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.ypmed.2011.10.014&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=22040652&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2020%2F11%2F30%2F2020.11.27.20239830.atom) 

56. 56.Kim S, Kulkarni PA, Rajan M, Thomas P, Tsai S, Tan C, et al. Hurricane Sandy (New Jersey): Mortality Rates in the Following Month and Quarter. Am J Public Health. 2017;107(8):1304–7.
    
    

57. 57.Fonseca VA, Smith H, Kuhadiya N, Leger SM, Yau CL, Reynolds K, et al. Impact of a natural disaster on diabetes: exacerbation of disparities and long-term consequences. Diabetes Care. 2009;32(9):1632–8.
    
    [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6NzoiZGlhY2FyZSI7czo1OiJyZXNpZCI7czo5OiIzMi85LzE2MzIiO3M6NDoiYXRvbSI7czo1MDoiL21lZHJ4aXYvZWFybHkvMjAyMC8xMS8zMC8yMDIwLjExLjI3LjIwMjM5ODMwLmF0b20iO31zOjg6ImZyYWdtZW50IjtzOjA6IiI7fQ==) 

58. 58.Silva-Palacios F, Casanegra AI, Shapiro A, Phan M, Hawkins B, Li J, et al. Impact of tornadoes on hospital admissions for acute cardiovascular events. Thromb Res. 2015 Nov;136(5):907–10.
    
    

59. 59.Bich TH, Quang LN, Ha LTT, Hanh TTD, Guha-Sapir D. Impacts of flood on health: epidemiologic evidence from Hanoi, Vietnam. Glob Health Action. 2011;4(101496665):6356.
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=21866222&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2020%2F11%2F30%2F2020.11.27.20239830.atom) 

60. 60.Huizink AC, Slottje P, Witteveen AB, Bijlsma JA, Twisk JWR, Smidt N, et al. Long term health complaints following the Amsterdam Air Disaster in police officers and fire-fighters.Occup Environ Med. 2006;63(10):657–62.
    
    [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6NToib2VtZWQiO3M6NToicmVzaWQiO3M6OToiNjMvMTAvNjU3IjtzOjQ6ImF0b20iO3M6NTA6Ii9tZWRyeGl2L2Vhcmx5LzIwMjAvMTEvMzAvMjAyMC4xMS4yNy4yMDIzOTgzMC5hdG9tIjt9czo4OiJmcmFnbWVudCI7czowOiIiO30=) 

61. 61.Jordan HT, Brackbill RM, Cone JE, Debchoudhury I, Farfel MR, Greene CM, et al. Mortality among survivors of the Sept 11, 2001, World Trade Center disaster: results from the World Trade Center Health Registry cohort. Lancet Lond Engl. 2011;378(9794):879–87.
    
    

62. 62.Hendrickson LA, Vogt RL. Mortality of Kauai Residents in the 12-Month Period following Hurricane Iniki. Am J Epidemiol. 1996 Jul 15;144(2):188–91.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a008907&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=8678051&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2020%2F11%2F30%2F2020.11.27.20239830.atom) 

63. 63.Peters MN, Katz MJ, Moscona JC, Alkadri ME, Khazi Syed RH, Turnage TA, et al. Effect of Hurricane Katrina on chronobiology at onset of acute myocardial infarction during the subsequent three years. Am J Cardiol. 2013;111(6):800–3.
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=23291089&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2020%2F11%2F30%2F2020.11.27.20239830.atom) 

64. 64.Koroma IB, Javadi D, Hann K, Harries AD, Smart F, Samba T. Non-communicable diseases in the Western Area District, Sierra Leone, following the Ebola outbreak. F1000Research [Internet]. 2019 Nov 19 [cited 2020 Jul 30];8. Available from: [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6652098/](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6652098/)
    
    

65. 65.An K, Salyer J,  Kao H-FS. Psychological strains, salivary biomarkers, and risks for coronary heart disease among hurricane survivors. Biol Res Nurs. 2015;17(3):311–20.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1177/1099800414551164&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=25239941&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2020%2F11%2F30%2F2020.11.27.20239830.atom) 

66. 66.Lin S, Gomez MI, Gensburg L, Liu W, Hwang S-A. Respiratory and cardiovascular hospitalizations after the World Trade Center disaster. Arch Environ Occup Health. 2010;65(1):12–20.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1080/19338240903390230&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=20146998&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2020%2F11%2F30%2F2020.11.27.20239830.atom) 

67. 67.Yu S, Alper HE, Nguyen A-M, Brackbill RM. Risk of Stroke Among Survivors of the September 11, 2001, World Trade Center Disaster. J Occup Environ Med. 2018;60(8):e371–6.
    
    

68. 68.Brackbill RM, Thorpe LE, DiGrande L, Perrin M, Sapp JH 2nd, Wu D, et al. Surveillance for World Trade Center disaster health effects among survivors of collapsed and damaged buildings. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep Surveill Summ Wash DC 2002. 2006;55(2):1–18.
    
    

69. 69.Gerin W, Chaplin W, Schwartz JE, Holland J, Alter R, Wheeler R, et al. Sustained blood pressure increase after an acute stressor: the effects of the 11 September 2001 attack on the New York City World Trade Center: J Hypertens. 2005 Feb;23(2):279–84.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1097/00004872-200502000-00009&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=15662215&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2020%2F11%2F30%2F2020.11.27.20239830.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000227228700009&link_type=ISI) 

70. 70.Husarewycz MN, El-Gabalawy R, Logsetty S, Sareen J. The association between number and type of traumatic life experiences and physical conditions in a nationally representative sample. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2014 Jan;36(1):26–32.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2013.06.003&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=24183489&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2020%2F11%2F30%2F2020.11.27.20239830.atom) 

71. 71.Ng J, Atkin SL, Rigby AS, Walton C, Kilpatrick ES. The effect of extensive flooding in Hull on the glycaemic control of patients with diabetes: Impact of flooding on glycaemic control. Diabet Med. 2011 May;28(5):519–24.
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=21214625&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2020%2F11%2F30%2F2020.11.27.20239830.atom) 

72. 72.Rey G, Jougla E, Fouillet A, Pavillon G, Bessemoulin P, Frayssinet P, et al. The impact of major heat waves on all-cause and cause-specific mortality in France from 1971 to 2003. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2007 May 2;80(7):615–26.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1007/s00420-007-0173-4&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=17468879&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2020%2F11%2F30%2F2020.11.27.20239830.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000246203800006&link_type=ISI) 

73. 73.Moscona JC, Peters MN, Maini R, Katigbak P, Deere B, Gonzales H, et al. The Incidence, Risk Factors, and Chronobiology of Acute Myocardial Infarction Ten Years After Hurricane Katrina. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2019 Apr;13(02):217–22.
    
    

74. 74.Thethi TK, Yau CL, Shi L, Leger S, Nagireddy P, Waddadar J, et al. Time to recovery in diabetes and comorbidities following Hurricane Katrina. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2010;4 Suppl 1(101297401):S33–8.
    
    

75. 75.Obrova J, Sovova E, Ivanova K, Taborsky M, Loyka S. Effects of the july 1997 floods in the Czech Republic on cardiac mortality. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2014;8(6):492–6.
    
    

76. 84.Schultz WM, Kelli HM, Lisko JC, Varghese T, Shen J, Sandesara P, et al. Socioeconomic Status and Cardiovascular Outcomes: Challenges and Interventions. Circulation. 2018 May 15;137(20):2166– 78.
    
    [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6MTQ6ImNpcmN1bGF0aW9uYWhhIjtzOjU6InJlc2lkIjtzOjExOiIxMzcvMjAvMjE2NiI7czo0OiJhdG9tIjtzOjUwOiIvbWVkcnhpdi9lYXJseS8yMDIwLzExLzMwLzIwMjAuMTEuMjcuMjAyMzk4MzAuYXRvbSI7fXM6ODoiZnJhZ21lbnQiO3M6MDoiIjt9) 

77. 85.Mohammed SH, Habtewold TD, Birhanu MM, Sissay TA, Tegegne BS, Abuzerr S, et al. Neighbourhood socioeconomic status and overweight/obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis of epidemiological studies. BMJ Open [Internet]. 2019 Nov 14 [cited 2020 Nov 17];9(11). Available from: [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6886990/](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6886990/)