Association of renal function with diabetic retinopathy and macular edema among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

Introduction

The number of people with diabetes mellitus (DM) is increasing worldwide, resulting in an increase in prevalent diabetic microvascular complications, which mainly include diabetic retinopathy (DR) and diabetic nephropathy (DN).¹ DR is a leading cause of vision impairment and blindness in working-aged people.^2-5 It is estimated that without prompt treatment, the number of people with DR will increase rapidly from 126.6 million in 2010 to 191 million by 2030 worldwide.⁶ Progressive microvascular damage is also commonly observed in glomeruli which may lead to microalbuminuria, a decrease in the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and the eventual development of chronic kidney disease (CKD).⁷

There is an increasing interesting in the literature about the relationship between DR and DN due to the shared risk factors and similar pathophysiological features.^{8, 9} Numerous studies have consistently demonstrated a strong association between DN and DR in type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) patients, but this association is not as strong in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients.^{10, 11} Recent studies on the relationship between the GFR and DR among T2DM patients showed equivocal results, with some studies indicating a negative association between the GFR and DR,^{10, 11} others showing no association.¹²

The role of microalbuminuria as a biomarker for microvascular damage of DM is debatable because some studies have indicated that microalbuminuria may regress to normal over time.^{13, 14} Additionally, studies found a dissociated relationship between GFRs and microalbuminuria levels in DM patients¹⁵ and about 50% of T2DM patients ^{16, 17} with normal microalbuminuria levels had decreased GFR levels, possibly due to nondiabetic causes¹⁸, aging¹³, kidney damage, or aggressive antihypertensive treatment.^{16, 19} Studies investigating whether the GFR and microalbuminuria are competing risk factors for DR are limited and controversial.^{12, 20}

Therefore, we conducted a cross-sectional study to investigate the association of the GFR with the presence of DR and diabetic macular edema (DME) in Chinese patients with T2DM. The effect of microalbuminuria on the association of the GFR with DR was also assessed.

Methods

Results

A total of 1877 participants with T2DM were enrolled in the current study. Of the 1877 eligible participants, 380 (20.3%) had any DR, and 66 (3.52%) had DME. Participants with any DR were less likely to be male (P=0.005), had a longer DM duration (P<0.001), were more likely to use insulin (P<0.001), were more likely to have a history of hyperlipidemia (P<0.001), had higher HbA1c (P<0.001), had higher SBP (P<0.001), had higher GFR (P<0.001), and had a higher microalbuminuria level (P<0.001) than those without any DR. Participants with DME tended to be younger (P=0.001), more likely to use insulin (P=0.001), less likely to have a history of hyperlipidemia (P<0.001), had higher HbA1c (P<0.001), had higher SBP (P<0.001), and had higher LDL-C (P=0.047) than those without DME (Table 1).

In general, participants with impaired renal function were more likely to be older (P<0.001), were more likely to be male (P<0.001), had a longer DM duration (P<0.001), were more likely to have a history of hypertension (P<0.001), had a higher BMI (P=0.016), had higher UA (P<0.001), had higher CPR (P=0.009), had a higher microalbuminuria level (P<0.001), and had higher risks of any DR (P=0.012) and VTDR (P=0.006) than those with normal GFR. (Table 2).

Participants in the higher quartile of microalbuminuria level tended to be older (P<0.001), were less likely to be female (P<0.001), had a longer DM duration (P<0.001), had higher HbA1c (P<0.001), were more likely to use insulin (P<0.001), were more likely to have history of hypertension (P<0.001), had a higher BMI (P<0.001), had a higher MAP (P=0.015), had a lower GFR (P<0.001), had lower HDL-c (P<0.001), had higher TGs (P<0.001), had higher UA (P<0.001), had higher CRP (P=0.002), had higher risks of any DR (P<0.001), VTDR (P<0.001) and DME (P<0.001) than those in the first quartile(Table 3).

In multiple logistic regression model, a low GFR was significantly associated with the presence of DR(OR=0.98 per 1 mL/min/1.73 m² increase, P<0.001) and VTDR (OR=0.98 per 1 mL/min/1.73 m² increase, P<0.001).We also assessed the associations of DR with different GFR levels, and the results showed that CKD were an important risk factor for any DR (OR=1.89, P=0.017) and VTDR (OR=2.76, P=0.009) compared to a normal GFR, and mildly impaired renal function (OR=1.39, P=0.031) was significantly associated with any DR. A high microalbuminuria level was significantly associated with any DR (OR=1.01 per 1 mg/dl increase, P<0.001) and VTDR (OR=1.39 per 1 mg/dl increase, P=0.003) in the multiple logistic regression model, and participants in the fourth quartile had a 3.09-fold (P<0.001) higher risk for any DR and a 6.41-fold (P<0.001) higher risk for VTDR than participants in the first microalbuminuria quartile (Table 4).

To further assess the influence of microalbuminuria on the relationship between GFR and the presence of DR and VTDR, participants were divided into six groups according to different GFR levels and the presence of microalbuminuria. Our results showed that a low GFR was associated with any DR only in the presence of microalbuminuria (OR=2.40 for participants with GFR>60 and microalbuminuria (+), P<0.001; OR=3.37 for participants with CKD and microalbuminuria (+), P=0.001), while the GFR was an independent risk factor for VTDR regardless of whether microalbuminuria was present (all P<0.05) (Table 4).

Although a low GFR (OR=0.98 per 1 mL/min/1.73 m² increase, P=0.007) and CKD (OR=2.95, P=0.011) were associated with DME in the age- and gender-adjusted logistic model, this association disappeared after adjusting for additional confounders. A significant association between DME and microalbuminuria was found in the third and fourth microalbuminuria quartiles in the multivariate logistic model, and this association increased from an OR of 2.99 in the third quartile (P=0.029) to an OR of 4.74 in the fourth quartile (P=0.002) (Table 5).

Discussion

In the current study, we found that both a low GFR level and a high level of microalbuminuria were significantly associated with the presence of any DR and VTDR in Chinese T2DM participants. We further assessed the influence of microalbuminuria on the association of the GFR with the presence of DR, and the results showed that a low GFR was associated with any DR only in the presence of microalbuminuria, while the GFR was an independent risk factor for VTDR even without presence of microalbuminuria. The microalbuminuria was an independent risk factor for the presence of DME.

The exact relationship between the GFR and DR is still controversial, with some studies demonstrating a strong negative association between the GFR and DR^{10, 11, 24-27} and other studies indicating no association or an indirect association.^{12, 20, 28} Some studies indicated an association between GFR and DR only under certain scenarios. The results of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) showed a significant association between DR and a decreased GFR in non-Hispanic Blacks, those with a BMI≥30 kg/m², or those who were not taking a renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) inhibitor.²⁶ Other studies indicated that there were racial differences in the associations between GFRs and DR.¹¹ Our study indicated that a low GFR level was significantly associated with an increased presence of DR and VTDR. Additionally, we found that a low GFR was associated with any DR only in the presence of microalbuminuria, while the GFR was independently associated with VTDR even without the presence of microalbuminuria. One study from Italy consistently showed an association between a low GFR and advanced DR regardless of whether microalbuminuria was present, although the association was strongest in the microalbuminuria group.²⁵ While the Singapore Prospective Study Program showed that low GFR levels were associated with any DR and advanced DR only in the presence of microalbuminuria.²⁰ Our study and previous studies further confirmed the hypothesis of shared pathogenesis mechanisms involving microvascular damage to retinal and renal vessels, leading to progression to DR and DN in diabetic patients.²⁹ Further longitudinal studies should be performed to verify the exact causal relationship between GFR and DR in future.

Many studies have investigated the association between microalbuminuria and DR, with some studies indicating a strong association^{12, 30, 31} and others not.²⁶Studies evaluating this association in Chinese diabetic patients are limited. One study from Shanghai indicated that microalbuminuria was an independent risk factor for DR.²⁸ The present study consistently showed that a high microalbuminuria level was a strong risk factor for any DR and VTDR. In addition to being a risk factor for renal damage, microalbuminuria was also associated with other diabetic micro- and macrovascular complications, suggesting its role as an indicator of generalized vascular damage.³² Thus, the close monitoring of microalbuminuria may help clinicians detect and treat DR early.

Existing studies on the relationship between microalbuminuria and DME are limited. One study from Korea showed that microalbuminuria was not associated with DME in 971 Korean DM patients.²⁷ Other studies have shown a positive relationship between microalbuminuria and DME.³³ Our study also indicated that microalbuminuria was significantly associated with DME, and the risk increased as microalbuminuria increased. However, we should interpret these results with caution because this association was significant only in the categorical variable analysis but not in the continuous variable analysis. The small number of participants with DME may partly explain our results that the association between microalbuminuria and DME may have occurred by chance. Further studies on DME and microalbuminuria should be conducted with different races and disease stage severities.

The reported disparity of association between DR and DN may be partly due to differences in study designs, subject races and study sample sizes.

Additionally, the current diagnosis of DN is based on clinical manifestations other than renal biopsy. Thus, it is impossible to distinguish DN from nondiabetic renal disease, for which the incidence rate varies from 27% to 82.9% among DM patients. Current studies on the pathophysiology of renal lesions and DR are limited.^{34, 35} One study of 250 diabetic participants with biopsy-proven DN at West China Hospital found that the severity of glomerular lesions was significantly associated with DR and that DR was an independent risk factor for renal change progression.³⁴ Further studies are needed to investigate the association of DR with DN and the exact mechanism.

The strengths of this study include the large sample size, detailed ocular examinations with standardized protocol. Each participant underwent 7-field fundus imaging, which ensured the possible maximal grade for the presence of DR, as some features of DR occurred in the peripheral retina, which may be missed in 2-field fundus imaging. The main limitation is that our study involved community-based recruitment from the Yuexiu Family Doctor Project, and selection bias may exist. Thus, the study conclusions may not be generalizable to the general population. However, the relatively large study population obtained by consecutive recruitment made the current study reliable. Second, we used the UK NDESP grading system instead of the commonly used ETDRS grading system which comprises different definitions. However, these two grading systems performed similarly when used to assess the presence and severity of DR, thus having little effect on the results.

In conclusion, the current study indicated that a low GFR was associated with the presence of any DR only in the presence of microalbuminuria, while the GFR was independently associated with VTDR regardless of microalbuminuria status among Chinese diabetic participants. A high level of microalbuminuria was significantly associated with the presence and severity of DR as well as the presence of DME. Our findings may provide evidence of the potential mechanisms underlying DR and DN and have clinical implications for the management of DM. Further longitudinal studies on the association between renal function and DR are needed to confirm the causal relationship and potential mechanisms.