Summary
Background The human gut microbiome and its effect on brain function and mental health is emerging as an area of intensive research. Both animal and human research point towards adolescence as a sensitive period when the gut-brain axis is fine-tuned, and when we can use dietary intervention to change the microbiome, with long-lasting consequences for mental health. Here we report the results of a systematic review/meta-analysis of microbiota-targeted (psychobiotics) interventions on anxiety in youth, together with a summary of consultation work of youth with lived experience.
Methods Seven databases were searched (no date cut-offs), and controlled trials in clinical and healthy human samples (age range: 10-24) seeking to reduce anxiety were included. All data on between group-differences post intervention and outcomes were extracted as standard mean differences (SMDs) and pooled together based on a random-effects model.
Findings 5416 studies were identified, 14 were eligible for the qualitative summary, of which 10 were included in the meta-analyses (total of 324 experimental and 293 control subjects). The heterogeneity I2 was12% and the pooled SMD was −0.04 (95% CI: −0.21, 0.14). One study presented with low bias risk whereas 5 with high and 4 with uncertain risk, accounting for that, sensitivities analysis revealed a SMD of −0.16 (95%CI: −0.39, 0.06).
Interpretation There is currently limited evidence for use of psychobiotics to treat anxiety in youth. However, future progress will require a multidisciplinary research approach, which gives priority to specifying mechanisms in the human models, providing causal understanding and addressing the wider context.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This project was funded by the Wellcome Trust and conducted in collaboration with the McPin foundation.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
University of Surrey research ethics committee
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Data are available from corresponding author on reasonable request.
