Management of Acute Appendicitis in Children: Takeaway from Coronavirus Disease-2019, a Perspective of Pediatric Surgeons from South Asia

INTRODUCTION

As early as the 1950’s, non-operative management of acute appendicitis in children has been practiced.[1]Yet treating pediatric acute appendicitis non-operatively rather than by open or laparoscopic appendectomy still elicits great debate,[2–4]spawned by the results of control trials and observational studies[5–9], reviews[10–13] and meta-analyses.[14–16]The meta-analyses are not in agreement. Kessler et al.[15] determined that the operative treatment group yielded a 98% effectiveness, while the non-operative treatment (NOT) group resulted in a significantly lower 74% effectiveness rate. This contrasts the rather positive findings of Georgios et al.[14] who found a 97% success rate with NOT, and Maita et al.[16], who found a 92% effectiveness with NOT in their meta-analyses.Not surprisingly, results of individual control trials and studies are similar in their disagreement. Knappen et al.[5] used a prospective cohort study of 45 children aged 7-17 years from multiple institutions to study the success rate of NOT of acute uncomplicated appendicitis (AUA). They found that NOT was effective in 93% of the cases, with only 3 of the 45 participants requiring readmission for an appendectomy within the eight weeks follow up period. Similarly, Svensson et al.[7] also reported very positive findings in their randomized control trial of 50 children between the ages of 5 and 15 years. They demonstrated a 92% success rate with NOT with only a 5% (1 patient) recurrence within the oneyear followup period and concluded that NOT was a safe and feasible approach for the treatment of AUA in children. Contrasting these studies are the results of Tanaka et al.[8] and Minneci et al.[6]. Though the former found a 98.7% success rate using NOT, 20.8% of the participants required readmission for ACU within the oneyear follow up period. The latter found, in a non-randomized control trial comprising 1068 children between the ages of 7 and 17 years, that NOT was effective in 85.7% of the cases at hospitalization. However, this number decreased rather substantially to 62.0% by the one year follow up period. These figures are in fact, slightly worse compared to their results from an earlier study[9] where they found NOM to be effective in 89.2% of cases at the 30days follow up, decreasing to 75.5% effectiveness after one year. So how does a physician interpret this somewhat disparate data? The different approaches certainly need to be discussed with the patient and parents[4], though appendectomy is not without its own set of potential complications.[17] Ultimately, it will likely come down to a discussion with the patients and their families, and probably skewed in a certain direction by the personal opinion of the practicing physician. As Werner et al. succinctly writes: “Should we send our patients to the operating room or to the pharmacy?”.[3]

However, the year 2020 has provided a unique opportunity in which some of this opinion bias, particularly against NOT, can be partially removed. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) emerged from Wuhan, China in December 2019. As of September 2020, the infection has spread globally, with over 43 million confirmed cases resulting in over 1.1 million deaths worldwide.[18]The response to the pandemic has affected all social and economic aspects of life. But it has also significantly impacted health care[19] in various ways, such as the re-purposing of hospital facilities to accommodate the large influx of COVID patients, reducing the number of procedures that would normally be carried out as a result of this re-purposing of rooms and also to maintain social distancing protocols to mitigate spread of the virus.Nearly allcountries (90%) have experienced such disruptions to their health services,with low and middle income countries reporting the greatest difficulties.[19] This effect has been particularly strained surgeries in general,[19,20] and thus would have a direct effect on treatment strategies for pediatric ACU. It is the objective of this paper to determine the effect of the present COVID pandemic has had on the approaches of care for ACU in Bangladesh, India, Nepal and Pakistan, and to determine if any permanent changes in opinions of care once the effects of the pandemic have diminished will occur as a result.

METHODS

The instrument used in this study was a survey (administered via SurveyMonkey) addressed to pediatric surgeons in South Asia, particularly Bangladesh, India, Pakistan and Nepal consisting of ten questions pertaining to the position, type of institute, country, the number of appendicitis cases managed between April 1 – August 31 in 2019 and 2020, and the number and percentage of those that were treated non-operatively (with responses binned within 10% increments). The final question posed to each pediatric surgeon was whether they would maintain their current COVID imposed level of NOT once the effect of pandemic on the ability to perform surgeries subsides. The study was approved by the South Point Hospital, Chittagong, Bangladesh (No. Admn/SPH/190/2020).

The survey response data was analyzed using JMP Software V15.2 (JMP, Cary, South Carolina USA). Matched pair tests for each respondent were the main tool used and the analysis of these results performed using a Wilcoxan Signed Rank Test. The analyses were performed ungrouped and grouped by country, type of institute and position.

RESULTS

A total of 134 physicians responded to the survey. There was no missing data. Their positions, types of institutes and country of practice are summarized in Table 1.

The results from the Wilcoxan Signed Rank Tests are given in Table 2 for the entire cohort as well as grouped by position, institute and country. Not surprisingly, there was a significant increase in the percentage of appendicitis treated non-operatively from April 1 – August 31, 2020 compared to the same time period in 2019 (P < .0001). No significant differences were found in the group analysis by institute (P = .645 within pairs; P = .516 among pairs) or country (P = .652 within pairs; P = .516 among pairs). When grouping by position, a weak significance within pairs (comparing the differences between pairs in a group) was found (P = .059) but not among pairs (P = .123), which compares the averages of the pairs between groups.

This potentially interesting effect of the position grouping is shown in more detail in Figure 1, which is the matched pair plot where the difference between pairs is plotted on the y-axis and the average between pairs is plotted on the x-axis. As this is grouped data, the y-axis is reporting the mean of the differences of the groups, and the y-axis the mean on the means. For clarity the data points have been removed and just the group labels are plotted. The dotted red lines indicate the 95% confidence levels and the solid line the mean for the entire cohort. Note that that the upper 95% confidence interval falls below zero. This clearly shows that the percentage of appendicitis cases treated non-operatively has significantly increased in 2020. The grouping data suggests that the change has not been as significant for those occupying the registrar/assistant registrar position, while professors, associate professors and consultants have treated more cases non-operatively relative to the entire cohort compared to the same time period in 2019.

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Figure 1:

Matching pair plot showing difference between pairs is plotted on the y-axis and the average between pairs is plotted on the x-axis. For this grouped data, the y-axis is reporting the mean of the differences of the groups, and the y-axis the mean on the means. For clarity, only position of groups and not individual pairs are shown.

Also interesting are the results from the final question as to whether or not the physicians would consider maintaining the COVID imposed level of NOT of appendicitis after the effects of the pandemic on surgery capability subside. An interesting result from this points to the level and spirit of opinion on the topic of NOT in general. Though the respondents were given the option of replying “Don’t know” or “No comment”, the great majority (94%; 126/134) responded with a definitive “Yes” or “No”. The fraction of those grouped by position, institute and country are shown in the mosaic plots in Figure 2. As in the matched pair analysis, no association was found using Fisher’s Exact test between institute (P = .987) or country (P = .367) and a planned change of level of NOT practice after the effects of the pandemic subside. However, a significant association was found for position (P = .037). The results suggest that professors are the most likely to adapt to using NOT more regularly in the post-COVID world.

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Figure 2:

Mosaic plots illustrating distribution of responses to the question of adopting NOT of appendicitis used between April 1 – August 31, 2020 at the height of the COVID pandemic.

DISCUSSION

The results indicate that despite being required to be more reliant on usage of NOT for pediatric appendicitis necessitated by the effects of the COVID pandemic to health care, it has done little to sway the opinion of most physicians in Bangladesh, Nepal, India and Pakistan in its place in treatment of AUA. Only those practicing with appointed professorships have appeared to give the idea of making the increased usage of NOT a permanent practice after the effects of the pandemic wanes. The results of this study indicated an increased usage of NOT, particularly by professors, associate professors and consultants. This is in good agreement with a recent study of Irish surgeons, where 76% of the 161 participants disclosed that they had modified their practice to a predominantly NOT approach.[21] Similarly, in a New York hospital which traditionally favors operative management,NOT usage was increased to roughly 50% of all cases with favorable results as a result of the pandemic.[22]An Indian study by Verma et al.[23] documented how their institute increased their percentage of NOT to 69% of patients, a significant increase from 22% recorded during the same time period in 2019. The recent work of Ielpo et al.[24] also showed an increased usage of NOT of pediatric appendicitis during the pandemic.However, a global study on the effect of COVID on pediatric surgery in general shows less of an effect, where only 4 out of 20 institutes were found to begin using NOT of appendicitis and 14 out of 20 reported that they had not changed their extent of NOT’s.[25]

In all of these studies, little, if anything is discussed about how the physicians would modify their practice of NOT once the crisis is over. This study directly addresses this question and the results suggest that it is mainly professors who would consider adapting to change. This is an interesting result as one may naively think they sit within an older age bracket and their opinions on NOT of appendicitis may already be firmly set. With time, their students and others they mentor may adopt a similar open mindedness. However, a limitation of this study that is independent of a physicians’personal opinion or preference is that the resources and capacities of hospitals will be different, a factor that was not measured in the survey. This could also sway the usage of NOT towards those facilities with the scarcest of capacities and resources. Ultimately, all of these factors can and should contribute to treatment decisions.[26]Even when the effects of the pandemic subside, the economic effects will lag considerably and recovery will be slow. This will in turn continue to place economic pressures on institutions that may necessitate longer than anticipated usage of NOT of AUA.

CONCLUSIONS

The global COVID pandemic has resulted in severe disruption of surgeries worldwide, necessitating new approaches to maintain care for those in need when so many resources are being repurposed to address the massive influx of patients stricken by the virus. In the specific area of pediatric appendicitis, there is ample evidence that more hospitals and institutes are increasing their implementation of NOT of AUA in Bangladesh, India, Pakistan and Nepal. In some respects the pediatric surgeons could think of this as their participation in an involuntary clinical trial. The results suggest that only professors in these countries would consider consider maintaining this increased level of practice in the post-COVID world and that the effect of hospital type or country was insignificant.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

All five authors have designed the study, performed the experiments, analyzed the data and wrote the manuscript.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

ETHICS STATEMENT

The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of South Point Hospital (No. Admn/SPH/190/2020).

FUNDING STATEMENT

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.13049630.v3