Abstract, Introduction, Overview, Purpose
It is desirable to better characterize and understand how ventilation improvements in office spaces could offer significant protection against transmission of COVID-19. It is also desirable to understand how ventilation in office spaces compares to outdoor settings. An attempt to find this information from online searches that included medical journals, private industry, and US government provided materials failed to find specific quantitative estimates and recommendations, which motivated this study.
This study uses measured amounts of SARS-CoV-2 in the air of a hospital room with COVID-19 patients from a published and peer-reviewed study and known Influenza A challenge doses from a published and peer-reviewed study and known ASHRAE Office Ventilation standards and an Outdoor Air Exchange model to estimate the time necessary to cause various exposure levels and resulting infection potential in various indoor and outdoor settings of both Influenza A and COVID-19.
While these estimations have unknown error margins and cannot be considered authoritative, they may have utility in comparing various environments and relative risk factors. The estimates in this study also present an initial framework and specific quantitative examples for better understanding of the effects of ventilation on aerosolized transmission, and the immunology related to challenge doses, and the potential for low-level viral load exposure to result in some level of immunity without symptoms of illness (asymptomatic infection).
Specific quantitative examples of exposure viral load versus symptoms and immune response may Increase public understanding and consciousness of concepts such as “viral load”, “exposure time”, “challenge dose levels”, “shedding quantities”, “immune seroconversion”, and “re-challenge” and could achieve new levels of personal hygiene that complement centuries-old adages such as “wash your hands”.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
The authors performed all work on this study without compensation as an act of good will and statesmanship and have no beneficial affiliations with any institutions related to the work.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
This is a meta-study that does not require IRB approval. We don't know if it requires EQUATOR Network submission and need assistance in this area.
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
The manuscript contains all relevant data and references.
