ABSTRACT
The objective of this study was the validation of the Brazilian Portuguese version of The Copenhagen Burnout Inventory (CBI). The study sample consisted of 1.256 Brazilian health professionals. Data were collected during one month (May-2020 to June-2020) through an online self-administered questionnaire, including the CBI and the Patient Health Questionnaire 9 (PHQ-9) to evaluate depressive symptoms. All consistency measures showed values > 0.90. The split-half correlation values with Spearman-Brown reliability were higher than 0.8. The parallel analysis suggested two factors: the items of CBI’s personal burnout (PB) and work-related burnout (WB) sub-dimensions that were associated with factor 1 (personal and work-related fatigue and exhaustion) and the items of CBI’s client-related burnout (CB) sub-dimension were associated with factor 2 (exhaustion that emerges while working with people). The correlation between the PHQ-9 score and factor 1 was 0.76 (0.73; 0.79) and with factor 2, 0.49 (0.43; 0.55). Our study provides a valid and reliable Brazilian Portuguese version of CBI, encouraging the expansion of the burnout research field in our country.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study was financed in part by the Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior-Brasil -(CAPES)-Finance Code 001.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The study was approved by the research ethics committee of Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre (CAAE number 30745020.5.0000.5327).
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All authors agree with the avalability of all data referred in the manuscript.
