Treatment with an Anti-CK2 Synthetic Peptide Improves Clinical Response in Covid-19 Patients with Pneumonia. A Randomized and Controlled Clinical Trial
=======================================================================================================================================================

* Leticia R. Cruz
* Idania Baladrón
* Aliusha Rittoles
* Pablo A. Díaz
* Carmen Valenzuela
* Raúl Santana
* Maria M. Vázquez
* Ariadna García
* Deyli Chacón
* Delvin Thompson
* Gustavo Perera
* Ariel González
* Rafael Reyes
* Loida Torres
* Jesus Pérez
* Dania M. Vázquez
* Gilda Lemus
* Mauro Rosales
* Ailyn C. Ramón
* George V. Perez
* Gerardo Guillén
* Verena Muzio
* Yasser Perera
* Silvio E. Perea
* for the ATENEA-Co-300 group

## Abstract

**Background** The recently discovered instrumental role of CK2 in the SARS-Cov2 infection has pointed out this protein kinase as a promising therapeutic target in Covid-19 disease. Accordingly, anti-SARS-Cov2 activity has been reported by CK2 inhibitors *in vitro*, however any anti-CK2 clinical approach has been assessed in Covid-19 patients so far. Here, we investigated the putative clinical benefit of CIGB-325, an anti-CK2 peptide previously used in cancer patients, which was added to the standard-of-care to treat Covid-19.

**Methods** A monocentric, randomized standard-of-care controlled trial of intravenous CIGB-325 in adults hospitalized with Covid-19. Twenty patients were randomly assigned to receive CIGB-300 (2.5 mg/kg/day during 5-consecutive days) plus standard-of-care (10 patients) or standard-of-care (10 patients). Primary outcomes were time to viral clearance defined as the time (in days) to have nasopharyngeal SARS-Cov2 negative PCR and clinical response. This trial is registered with [https://rpcec.sld.cu/trials/RPCEC00000317-En](https://rpcec.sld.cu/trials/RPCEC00000317-En) (Code: IG/CIGB300I/CV/2001).

**Results** Most of the patients had initial positive by chest-computed tomography (CT). CIGB-325 treatment reduced both number of pulmonary lesions and lesion’s extent compared to control group in seven days. Taking into account the Covid-19 chest-CT abnormalities, CIGB-325 was also superior to control as well as in terms of proportion of patients with such clinical benefit. Improvement of clinical status was experienced in 50% of patients in the CIGB-325 group and 25% in control. Accordingly, systemic levels of CPK, LDH and CRP were lowered at day 7 by treating with this anti-CK2 peptide. Both therapeutic regimens were similar respect to SARS-Cov2 clearance in nasopharynx swabs over the time.

**Conclusion** Our study revealed that consecutive-5 day regimen of intravenous CIGB-325 at 2.5 mg/kg quickly improved the chest-CT outcomes over standard-of-care. This is the first report describing signs of clinical benefit of an anti-CK2 approach in Covid-19.

Keywords
*   Covid-19
*   Coronavirus infection
*   SARS-Cov2
*   Protein Kinase CK2
*   CIGB-325

## Introduction

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has spread worldwide and has infected nearly 20 million people [1, 2]. Many infected people are asymptomatic or experience mild symptoms and recover without medical intervention [3, 4]. However, older people and those with comorbid hypertension, diabetes, obesity, and heart disease are at higher risk of life-threatening illness [5, 6]. Therefore, development of an effective antiviral drug for COVID-19 is a global health priority. Along with the development of new antiviral drugs, repurposing existing drugs for COVID-19 treatment is also accelerated [7]. Some antiviral drugs have shown high efficacy against SARS-CoV-2 both *in vitro* [8] and *in vivo* models [9, 10]. A number of clinical studies such as compassionate use programs and clinical trials have been conducted to test the efficacy of FDA-approved drugs, such as lopinavir and ritonavir, chloroquine, favipiravir, and remdesivir (RDV) [11-14]. However, the results from those clinical studies were often inconsistent and lacking of compelling evidences. More recently, a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of intravenous RDV in adults hospitalized with Covid-19 and lower respiratory tract involvement had a median recovery time of 11 days (95% confidence interval [CI], 9 to 12), as compared with 15 days (95% CI, 13 to 19) in those who received placebo (rate ratio for recovery, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.12 to 1.55; P < 0.001) [15].

At present, the main antiviral strategies currently employed against SARS-CoV-2 can broadly be divided into two types: strategies directly targeting the virus and strategies indirectly targeting the virus via host modulation [16]. In both strategies there are already-approved drugs and experimental candidates in Clinical trials [16]. Likewise, discovery of novel cellular targets for SARS-Cov2 coronavirus has led to novel putative clinical strategies which merit going into clinical research in Covid-19.

CK2 is a constitutively active Ser/Thr protein kinase deregulated in cancer and other pathologies, responsible for about the 20% of the human phosphoproteome [17, 18]. Considering, both experimental and clinical validation data, CK2 has been regarded as an emerging oncology target [19, 20]. In infectious diseases, CK2 phosphorylates and modulates the function of viral proteins from Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) [21], Vesicular stomatitis virus (VCV) [22], Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) [23], Human Papilloma Virus (HPV) [24], and Herpes simplex-1 (HSV-1) [25]. Furthermore, CK2 also regulates a number of signaling cascades such as NF-κB [26], JAK / STAT [27], and PTEN / PI3K / Akt-PKB [28], that viruses hijacked to guaranteed their propagation. Therefore, it is expected that pharmacological intervention of CK2 may impact on viral replication. Recently, CK2 has been found to be directly targeted by the SARS-Cov2 nucleocapsid protein and they both co-localize along the filopodia protrusions that promote virus egress and rapid cell-to-cell spread across epithelial mono-layers of infected cells [29]. Additionally, inhibition of CK2 in those experiments demonstrated the instrumental role of this protein kinase for SARS-Cov2 infection *in vitro* [29]. Considering the scientific rationality of inhibiting CK2 in SARS-Cov2 infection and taking advance of CIGB-325 (formerly CIGB-300) as an anti-CK2 synthetic peptide previously already assessed in different Phase I-II in cancer patients, we investigated the putative clinical benefit of this peptide in Covid-19 patients. Particularly, safety and tolerability of intravenous delivery of CIGB-325 has been previously assessed from 0.2 to 12.8 mg/kg [30, 31] as well as the consecutive-5 day regimen of administration.

In this clinical study we administered intravenous CIGB-325 at 2.5 mg/kg along with standard-of-care for treating SARS-Cov2 positive patients in Cuba which is based on alpha 2b-IFN plus kaletra/hydroxyquinoline. Preliminary data indicated that combination of CIGB-325 with standard-of-care improved chest-CT outcomes in Covid-19 patients with pneumonia at day 7. Other signs of clinical benefit for this therapeutic regimen were also registered in our study. This is the first clinical study where an anti-CK2 approach is investigated in Covid-19 disease.

## Methods

### Patients

Twenty patients confirmed as SARS-CoV-2 positive by real-time transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) were enrolled in an open, monocentric, randomized standard-of-care controlled trial at the “Luis Diaz Soto” Hospital in Havana, Cuba ([https://rpcec.sld.cu/trials/RPCEC00000317-En](https://rpcec.sld.cu/trials/RPCEC00000317-En) (Code: IG/CIGB300I/CV/2001) (ATENEA-Co-300 trial). CIGB-300 code was substituted by CIGB-325 just after online clinical trial registration; therefore, it appears with the former code. The Ethics Committee for Clinical Research in the hospital and Cuban Regulatory Agency (CECMED) approved the trial. The study complied with the Good Clinical Practices and the precepts established in the Declaration of the Helsinki World Medical Association. All patients met the inclusion criteria described in the protocol and signed the informed consent.

### Laboratory examination

Laboratory results included blood routine, leucocyte subsets and blood biochemical parameters. Serum levels of CPK, LDH and RCP were determined by a specific Roche system (Roche-cobas-C311).

### SARS-Cov2 viral dynamic in nasopharyngeal swabs

Nasopharyngeal swabs were obtained from patients at days 0, 3, 7, and 14. Viral RNA was detected by RT-PCR amplification by using specific SARS-Cov2 primers. Presence of SARS-Cov2 in swabs was followed-up at indicated times and compared among both groups.

### Clinical response

Clinical status was classified as asymptomatic, mild, moderate and severe Covid-19 disease according to the NIH guide “Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Treatment guidelines”. [https://www.covid19treatmentguidelines.nih.gov](https://www.covid19treatmentguidelines.nih.gov). The chest-CT analysis was performed considering number of pulmonary lesions, lesion’s extent and common Covid-19 typical abnormalities like consolidation, glass-round opacity and mix pattern.

### Safety

Pretreatment evaluation included a detailed history and physical examination. In addition, hematological counts, blood chemistry, coagulation, radiography and chest-CT studies were performed. Systemic toxicity was evaluated daily after each CIGB-325 administration. Severity of adverse events was classified by the WHO Adverse Reaction Terminology [32]. Causal relationship was classified as very probable (definitive), probable, possible or remote (doubtful) [33].

### Statistical Analysis

For chest-CT variables, the analysis was performed in Per Protocol population defined as patients who completed the originally allocated and patients that have TAC at the beginning and at the end of treatment. Continuous variables were expressed as mean and standard deviations or median and interquartile ranges (depending of the assumption of normal distribution). Student-t test or Mann-Whitney U test were applied to continuous variables, and chi-square or Fisher’s exact test were used for categorical variables. For the variation in time in each group, Wilcoxon-rank test or Student-t test for dependent variables were used. Type 1 error of 0.05 was specified. Considering the small sample size, the difference between groups (for clinical and chest-CT evaluations, proportion of patients with reduction of score and number of lesions) was estimated from the Bayesian point of view, performing 10,000 simulations and specifying non-informative prior distributions. The analysis was performed using SPSS 25.0 software and EPIDAT 3.1.

## Results

### Baseline characteristics of Covid-19 patients

Between June 1, 2020, and June 16, 2020, twenty SARS-Cov2 positive patients underwent randomization in the hospital “Luis Diaz Soto” in Havana, Cuba. Ten were assigned to receive intravenous CIGB-325 + standard-*of*-care (Group I) and 10 to receive standard-of-care as control (Group II). To diminish the chance of disease progression, the Cuban Program for managing Covid-19 patients is based on the application of standard-of-care immediately upon confirmation of nasopharyngeal SARS-Cov2 diagnosis irrespectively of having symptoms or not. The median number of days between SARS-Cov2 diagnosis, hospitalization and treatment initiation was 2 days. All the patients completed the treatment as planned except one patient from Group I who experienced some concomitant moderate histaminergic adverse events during the first CIGB-325 intravenous delivery and dose was decreased to 1.6 mg/kg for remaining days as indicated in the clinical protocol.

The mean age of patients was 45.35 years and 70% were male (Table 1). Fourteen patients (70%) were asymptomatic at the enrollment and 9 (45%) at the starting day of treatment. Fifty percent of patients (5/10) had moderate disease and 20% (2/10) were severe in the CIGB-325 group while 40% of patients (4/10) had moderate disease and none severe case at the starting day of treatment (Table 1).

View this table:
[Table 1.](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/09/15/2020.09.03.20187112/T1)

Table 1. Demographic and Clinical Characteristics at Baseline

Overall, 25% of patients had hypertension, 25% had obesity and none had type 2 diabetes. Other comorbidities were anemia (1/20), glaucoma (1/20), hypothyroidism (1/20), cancer (1/20). The most substantial imbalance in baseline characteristics was observed between the CIGB-325 group and control respect to age and coexisting high risk conditions which were more unfavorable in the CIGB-325 group (Table 1).

Data from baseline chest-CT analysis showed that 80% of patients in the CIGB-325 group had positive chest-CT according to presence of ground-glass opacity, consolidation, mixed pattern and affectation of more than three pulmonary lobules. In the control group, 50% of patients had positive chest-CT with presence of consolidation, mixed pattern and affectation of less than two pulmonary lobules.

Concerning hematological and biochemical baseline parameters in all patients, abnormal levels were observed in hemoglobin (25%), platelets (15%), neutrophils (50%), lymphocytes (40%), aspartate aminotransferase (ASAT) (20%), alanine aminotransferase (ALAT)(40%), ferritin (35%), creatinine (20%), and glycemia (30%). Other parameters were in the normal range.

### Primary and exploratory efficacy end points

The dynamic conversion from positive to negative of SARS-Cov2 RT-PCR results was analyzed in both groups of treatments at 0, 3, 7, and 14 days. No significant differences were observed in the median time, 11 days ± 8.0 for CIGB-325 plus standard care and 12 days ± 6 for standard care alone (p = 0.614). Thus, time to SARS-Cov2 viral clearance in the nasopharynx swabs behaved similarly for both treatments over the time.

The clinical status was classified in categories of asymptomatic, mild, moderate or severe disease and it was followed up until ending treatment and thereafter for both groups. In the intent-to-treat population of CIGB-325 group at day 6 there were 2/10 patients that remained asymptomatic since initiation of treatment, 2/10 changed from severe to moderate, 1/10 from moderate to asymptomatic, 1/10 from mild to asymptomatic and 4/10 did not change their clinical status during the treatment. Otherwise, in the control 6/10 patients remained asymptomatic since initiation of treatment, 1/10 changed from mild to asymptomatic and 3/10 did not change their clinical status during the treatment. Additionally, chest-CT analysis was performed to investigate the effect of CIGB-325 over the Covid-19 pulmonary lesions. For that purpose, both number and lesion’s extent at day 0 and after treatment (day 7) were compared just in those patients analyzed per protocol (Table 2). Importantly, CIGB-325 treatment significantly reduced the median number of pulmonary lesions from 9.5 ± 10 (day 0) to 5.5 ± 10 (day 7) (p = 0.042). Conversely, no substantial change was observed in the control group. Proportion of patients with reduction of pulmonary lesions was higher in the CIGB-325 group compared with control according to the Bayesian analysis (pDif > 0; 0.951) (Table 2).

View this table:
[Table 2:](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/09/15/2020.09.03.20187112/T2)

Table 2: Chest-CT evolution considering number of pulmonary lesions

The effect over lesion’s extent showed in Table 3 including those patients analyzed per protocol indicates that CIGB-325 treatment also reduced the median of lesion’s extent after consecutive-5 day regimen although not significantly. Otherwise, any kind of reduction was observed in the control group. Importantly, proportion of patients with reduction of lesion’s extent was higher in the CIGB-325 group (4/7) compared with control (1/9) (pDif > 0; 0.982) (Bayesian analysis).

View this table:
[Table 3:](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/09/15/2020.09.03.20187112/T3)

Table 3: Chest-CT evolution considering lesion’s extent

The overall chest-CT response was also analyzed considering the number of lesions, lesion’s extent and the pattern of Covid-19 typical chest-CT abnormalities (Table 4). The analysis per protocol showed that 50% (3/6) of patients in the CIGB-325 group had a favorable overall chest-CT response compared with 28.6% (2/7) in the control (pDif > 0; 0.796) (Bayesian analysis). Importantly, any patient had progression in the CIGB-325 group and 28.6% (2/7) in the control group did it. Representative images of chest-CT evolution from one CIGB-325 treated patient are shown in Figure 1.

View this table:
[Table 4:](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/09/15/2020.09.03.20187112/T4)

Table 4: Overall chest-CT response

![Figure 1:](http://medrxiv.org/https://www.medrxiv.org/content/medrxiv/early/2020/09/15/2020.09.03.20187112/F1.medium.gif)

[Figure 1:](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/09/15/2020.09.03.20187112/F1)

Figure 1: Chest-CT Evolution.
Representative chest-CT images from one patient in the CIGB-325 group at day 0 and day 7.

High levels of different serum markers like Creatinine Phospho Kinase (CPK), Reactive C-Protein (RCP), and Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) have been associated to the adverse clinical outcome in Covid-19 patients. Therefore, we also explored the effect of CIGB-325 over these markers as secondary measure of efficacy. Of note, data from Figure 2 shows that CIGB-325 treatment significantly reduced the CPK (p = 0.007) and LDH (p = 0.028) serum levels. Also, the RCP values were lowered by CIGB-325 although with no statistical difference.

![Figure 2:](http://medrxiv.org/https://www.medrxiv.org/content/medrxiv/early/2020/09/15/2020.09.03.20187112/F2.medium.gif)

[Figure 2:](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/09/15/2020.09.03.20187112/F2)

Figure 2: Serum levels of Covid-19 linked markers.
Serum levels of CPK (A), RCP (B) and LDH (C). Group I: CIGB-325 + Standard-of-care. Group II: Standard-of-care.

### Safety

Data from safety analysis indicated that intravenous CIGB-325 added to standard-of-care did increase both frequency of adverse events and patients with adverse events (Table 5). Particularly, pruritus, flushing and rash were increased by CIGB-325 treatment in the 100, 80 and 60 % of patients respectively. As previously observed during CIGB-325 intravenous administration, intensity of this kind of adverse events was mild and/or moderate in all of the patients.

View this table:
[Table 5:](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/09/15/2020.09.03.20187112/T5)

Table 5: Adverse events

## Discussion

Protein Kinase CK2 has been recently suggested as a relevant target to combat SARS-Cov2 infection because of its role on the viral particles egress once accumulated in filopodial protrusions possessing budding viral particles [29]. Although anti-SARS-Cov2 activity has been demonstrated through *in vitro* models by inhibiting protein kinase CK2, consistent and compelling evidence for effective anti-CK2 drugs from clinical studies is not available at this.

CIGB-325 is an anti-CK2 synthetic peptide extensively assessed in cancer patients whose safety, tolerability and efficacy signs have been gathered from Phase I-II trials. This clinical trial investigated the short-term outcomes of intravenous CIGB-325 at 2.5 mg/kg in a consecutive-5 day regimen which was added to standard care used in Covid-19 disease in Cuba. Preliminary results suggest a quick clinical benefit with CIGB-325 treatment particularly evidenced by the chest-CT data at day 7 post-treatment initiation. Despite the limited sample size and the imbalance of the baseline patient’s characteristics unfavorable for the CIGB-325 group, our trial found that this treatment regimen had clinical benefit for Covid-19 patients with lower respiratory tract involvement. Specifically, CIGB-325 treatment fostered reduction of both, the number pulmonary lesions, and lesion’s extent at day 7. Likewise, proportion of patients exhibiting this inhibitory effect is superior in the CIGB-325 group compared with standard care. When overall chest-CT response was analyzed by gathering number of lesions, lesion’s extent and the pattern of Covid-19 typical abnormalities, 50% of patients in the CIGB-325 group had favorable outcome compared with 20% in the standard care. The odds of difference for the CIGB-325 treatment respect standard care were > 0.90 in all the chest-CT data by using a Bayesian model.

Considering some specific Covid-19 pulmonary lesions haven been associated to direct SARS-Cov2 infection of pneumocytes [34] along with the instrumental role of CK2 during such infection [29], it might be reasonable to think that reduction of lesions can be achieved by an antiviral activity of CIGB-325 *onsite*. In fact, previous preclinical data of CIGB-325 pharmacokinetics and distribution in mice have demonstrated that up to 7.5 mg/kg of peptide lung uptake is achieved after intravenous delivery [35].

This quick improvement of chest-CT response encouraged by addition of CIGB-325 to standard care could have a great clinical impact in avoiding progression to severity of Covid-19 patients. Additionally, our study shows that standard care based on alpha 2b IFN + kaletra/hydroxychloroquine also reduces pulmonary lesions at day 7 although to a lesser extent. Such effect rather might be by the previously reported anti-SARS-Cov2 activity of type I IFNs when administered either by parenteral route or inhaled [36].

While the clinical status (in particular SpO2 levels) and concurrent comorbidities of COVID-19 patients largely determine the need for their admittance to Intensive Care Units, several laboratory parameters may facilitate the assessment of disease severity and rational triaging. Among the markers that may be used in risk stratification to predict severe and fatal COVID-19 in hospitalized patients are the high serum levels of CPK [37], CRP [38] and LDH [39]. We found that CIGB-325 treatment decreased significantly the CPK levels compared with standard care which can suggest an early protective effect from tissue damage. High serum CPK levels have been associated to rhabdomyolysis, weakness and heart injury in Covid-19 patients; therefore, these findings also support the clinical benefit of using CIGB-325 in this viral disease. Accordingly, LDH and CRP serum levels which are considered inflammatory markers were also reduced after CIGB-325 treatment although no significantly.

Improvement of the clinical status at day 7 also trended to be superior by adding CIGB-325 to the standard care where 50% (4/8) patients experienced change towards a more favorable clinical category. Otherwise, standard care alone improved clinical status in 25% (1/4). However, as this analysis takes into account only symptomatic patients in both groups, confirmation of the CIGB-325 effect in larger size population must be of major priority in future studies of this anti-CK2 peptide in Covid-19.

The dynamic conversion from positive to negative of SARS-Cov2 RT-PCR at the nasopharyngeal swabs was very similar for both groups of treatments over the time. Addition of CIGB-325 to the standard care did not shorten the time to viral clearance respect to the standard care at least in the regimen tested in our clinical trial. Other protocols with higher frequency of CIGB-325 administration merit to be explored for that purpose in future trials. Nonetheless, the usefulness and feasibility of the viral end point in nasopharyngeal swabs to assess anti-SARS-Cov2 drugs has not been established yet. Instead, clinical endpoints seem to be more informative in the Covid-19 disease [11, 15]. The safety profile of CIGB-325 plus standard care was very similar to that observed for CIGB-325 alone in which a predominant pattern of transient histaminergic-like side effects has been observed [30]. However, intensity of the side effects was mild and/or moderate in all the patients and total resolution of them was achieved in no more than one hour after CIGB-325 administration. Thus, our study confirms that combination of intravenous CIGB-325 at 2.5 mg/kg with standard care for Covid-19 is a manageable and safe strategy to treat patients with this infectious disease.

All in all, our study gave important clues suggesting a potential quick clinical benefit at day 7 by using our anti-CK2 approach which has not been reported so far in Covid-19. Recently, a clinical trial with RDV has reported clinical benefit in terms of the number of days to recovery of the hospitalized Covid-19 patients with lower respiratory tract involvement in 11 days (95% confidence interval [CI], 9 to 12), [15], however evidences of chest-CT improvement at day 7 were not provided.

Finally, integration of our data leads to the speculation that CIGB-325 might prevent COVID-19 getting worse by inducing an antiviral effect in the lungs and preventing damage caused by the virus. This notion merits further verification in future larger clinical trials of CIGB-325 in Covid-19 patients.

### Limitations

In this exploratory study with a small sample size, randomization allowed a balance between the groups regarding the allocation of treatments but not regarding the prognostic variables.

## Conclusions

Combination of CIGB-325 anti-CK2 peptide with standard-*of*-care based on alpha 2b-IFN/kaletra/hydroxychloroquine was adequately tolerated and superior in improving a quick chest-CT response in Covid-19 patients. On the contrary, SARS-Cov2 dynamics in nasopharyngeal swabs was similar for both groups over the time. Our clinical findings support future studies to continue to improve patient outcomes in Covid-19 by optimizing CIGB-325 regimens and combining with other antiviral agents. This is the first clinical study using an anti-CK2 approach in Covid-19 and our findings suggest that CK2 inhibition can be an antiviral strategy with favorable risk-benefit to fight SARS-Cov2 infection.

## Statements

## Data Availability

All data referred in the manuscript is available.

## Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

## Acknowledgements

We thank Rosa Martinez, Manuel Puerto, Daimays González, Yahima de la O Tamayo, Dianelis Pérez-Malo, Estela A Deyvis, Yuilyns Morales, Caridad Aguirre, and Yuliet Sinclair for their logistic support at the Luis Diaz Soto Hospital. Also, we thank Elizeth García, José Luis Rodriguez, Grettel Melo, Reinier Hernandez, Marel Alonso, Julio E Baldomero, and Francisco Hernandez from Clinical Department at the CIGB for their great contribution in the clinical trial execution.

## Footnotes

*   ♣ **Appendix** ATENEA-Co-300 group: Idelsis Esquivel, Maura García, Sara M Martínez, Ana G Galarraga, Kenia Gómez, Sidalyn Gutiérrez, Maria E Fuerte, Jane Fernandez, Yose Gamallo, Yanelis Alvarez, Yarelis Amador, Reynier Perez, Lisset Perurena, Daylen Aguilar

*   Received September 3, 2020.
*   Revision received September 3, 2020.
*   Accepted September 15, 2020.


*   © 2020, Posted by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

This pre-print is available under a Creative Commons License (Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International), CC BY-NC-ND 4.0, as described at [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/](http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

## References

1.  1.[https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/coronaviruse/situation-reports/20200809-covid-19-sitrep-202](https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/coronaviruse/situation-reports/20200809-covid-19-sitrep-202).
    
    

2.  2.[https://coronavirus.jhu.edu/map.html](https://coronavirus.jhu.edu/map.html).
    
    

3.  3.Cohen, P. A.; Hall, L.; John, J. N.; Rapoport, A. B. *In* The early natural history of SARS-CoV-2 infection: Clinical observations from an urban, ambulatory COVID-19 clinic, Mayo Clinic Proceedings, 2020; Elsevier: 2020; pp 1124–1126.
    
    

4.  4.Wu, Z.; McGoogan, J., Outbreak in China: Summary of a Report of 72314 Cases from the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention. JAMA 2020, 10.
    
    

5.  5.Wu, J.; Mafham, M.; Mamas, M.; Rashid, M.; Kontopantelis, E.; Deanfield, J.; de Belder, M.; Gale, C. P., Place and underlying cause of death during the COVID19 pandemic: retrospective cohort study of 3.5 million deaths in England and Wales, 2014 to 2020. medRxiv 2020.
    
    

6.  6.Phillips, R. O.; Robert, J.; Abass, K. M.; Thompson, W.; Sarfo, F. S.; Wilson, T.; Sarpong, G.; Gateau, T.; Chauty, A.; Omollo, R., Rifampicin and clarithromycin (extended release) versus rifampicin and streptomycin for limited Buruli ulcer lesions: a randomised, open-label, non-inferiority phase 3 trial. The Lancet 2020.
    
    

7.  7.Pushpakom, S.; Iorio, F.; Eyers, P. A.; Escott, K. J.; Hopper, S.; Wells, A.; Doig, A.; Guilliams, T.; Latimer, J.; McNamee, C., Drug repurposing: progress, challenges and recommendations. Nature reviews Drug discovery 2019, 18, (1), 41–58.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1038/nrd.2018.168&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=http://www.n&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2020%2F09%2F15%2F2020.09.03.20187112.atom) 

8.  8.Ohashi, H.; Watashi, K.; Saso, W.; Shionoya, K.; Iwanami, S.; Hirokawa, T.; Shirai, T.; Kanaya, S.; Ito, Y.; Kim, K. S., Multidrug treatment with nelfinavir and cepharanthine against COVID-19. bioRxiv 2020.
    
    

9.  9.Bao, L.; Deng, W.; Gao, H.; Xiao, C.; Liu, J.; Xue, J.; Lv, Q.; Liu, J.; Yu, P.; Xu, Y., Lack of reinfection in rhesus macaques infected with SARS-CoV-2. bioRxiv 2020.
    
    

10. 10.Cao, B.; Wang, Y.; Wen, D.; Liu, W.; Wang, J.; Fan, G.; Ruan, L.; Song, B.; Cai, Y.; Wei, M., A trial of lopinavir-ritonavir in adults hospitalized with severe Covid-19. New England Journal of Medicine 2020.
    
    

11. 11.Wang, Y.; Zhang, D.; Du, G.; Du, R.; Zhao, J.; Jin, Y.; Fu, S.; Gao, L.; Cheng, Z.; Lu, Q., Remdesivir in adults with severe COVID-19: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre trial. The Lancet 2020.
    
    

12. 12.Borba, M. G. S.; Val, F. F. A.; Sampaio, V. S.; Alexandre, M. A. A.; Melo, G. C.; Brito, M.; Mourão, M. P. G.; Brito-Sousa, J. D.; Baiá-da-Silva, D.; Guerra, M. V. F., Effect of high vs low doses of chloroquine diphosphate as adjunctive therapy for patients hospitalized with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA network open 2020, 3, (4), e208857–e208857.
    
    

13. 13.Cai, Q.; Yang, M.; Liu, D.; Chen, J.; Shu, D.; Xia, J.; Liao, X.; Gu, Y.; Cai, Q.; Yang, Y., Experimental treatment with favipiravir for COVID-19: an open-label control study. Engineering 2020.
    
    

14. 14.Bauchner, H.; Fontanarosa, P. B., Randomized clinical trials and COVID-19: managing expectations. Jama 2020.
    
    

15. 15.Beigel, J. H.; Tomashek, K. M.; Dodd, L. E.; Mehta, A. K.; Zingman, B. S.; Kalil, A. C.; Hohmann, E.; Chu, H. Y.; Luetkemeyer, A.; Kline, S., Remdesivir for the treatment of Covid-19—preliminary report. New England Journal of Medicine 2020.
    
    

16. 16.Ahidjo, B. A.; Loe, M.; Ng, Y. L.; Mok, C. K.; Chu, J. J. H., Current Perspective of Antiviral Strategies against COVID-19. ACS Infectious Diseases 2020.
    
    

17. 17.Perera, Y.; Ramos, Y.; Padrón, G.; Caballero, E.; Guirola, O.; Caligiuri, L. G.; Lorenzo, N.; Gottardo, F.; Farina, H. G.; Filhol, O., CIGB-300 anti-cancer peptide regulates the protein kinase CK2-dependent phosphoproteome. Mol Cell Biochem 2020.
    
    

18. 18.Chua, M. M.; Ortega, C. E.; Sheikh, A.; Lee, M.; Abdul-Rassoul, H.; Hartshorn, K. L.; Dominguez, I., CK2 in cancer: cellular and biochemical mechanisms and potential therapeutic target. Pharmaceuticals 2017, 10, (1), 18.
    
    

19. 19.Siddiqui-Jain, A.; Drygin, D.; Streiner, N.; Chua, P.; Pierre, F.; O’Brien, S. E.; Bliesath, J.; Omori, M.; Huser, N.; Ho, C., CX-4945, an orally bioavailable selective inhibitor of protein kinase CK2, inhibits prosurvival and angiogenic signaling and exhibits antitumor efficacy. Cancer research 2010, 70, (24), 10288–10298.
    
    [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6NjoiY2FucmVzIjtzOjU6InJlc2lkIjtzOjExOiI3MC8yNC8xMDI4OCI7czo0OiJhdG9tIjtzOjUwOiIvbWVkcnhpdi9lYXJseS8yMDIwLzA5LzE1LzIwMjAuMDkuMDMuMjAxODcxMTIuYXRvbSI7fXM6ODoiZnJhZ21lbnQiO3M6MDoiIjt9) 

20. 20.Laudet, B.; Barette, C.; Dulery, V.; Renaudet, O.; Dumy, P.; Metz, A.; Prudent, R.; Deshiere, A.; Dideberg, O.; Filhol, O., Structure-based design of small peptide inhibitors of protein kinase CK2 subunit interaction. Biochemical Journal 2007, 408, (3), 363–373.
    
    [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6MTA6InBwYmlvY2hlbWoiO3M6NToicmVzaWQiO3M6OToiNDA4LzMvMzYzIjtzOjQ6ImF0b20iO3M6NTA6Ii9tZWRyeGl2L2Vhcmx5LzIwMjAvMDkvMTUvMjAyMC4wOS4wMy4yMDE4NzExMi5hdG9tIjt9czo4OiJmcmFnbWVudCI7czowOiIiO30=) 

21. 21.Tellinghuisen, T. L.; Foss, K. L.; Treadaway, J., Regulation of hepatitis C virion production via phosphorylation of the NS5A protein. PLoS Pathog 2008, 4, (3), e1000032.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1371/journal.ppat.1000032&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=18369478&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2020%2F09%2F15%2F2020.09.03.20187112.atom) 

22. 22.Gupta, A. K.; Das, T.; Banerjee, A. K., Casein kinase II is the P protein phosphorylating cellular kinase associated with the ribonucleoprotein complex of purified vesicular stomatitis virus. Journal of general virology 1995, 76, (2), 365–372.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1099/0022-1317-76-2-365&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=7844556&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2020%2F09%2F15%2F2020.09.03.20187112.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=A1995QG43300013&link_type=ISI) 

23. 23.Meggio, F.; D’Agostino, D. M.; Ciminale, V.; Chieco-Bianchi, L.; Pinna, L. A., Phosphorylation of HIV-1 Rev protein: implication of protein kinase CK2 and pro-directed kinases. Biochemical and biophysical research communications 1996, 226, (2), 547–554.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1006/bbrc.1996.1392&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=8806671&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2020%2F09%2F15%2F2020.09.03.20187112.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=A1996VJ52500042&link_type=ISI) 

24. 24.Firzlaff, J.; Galloway, D.; Eisenman, R.; Lüscher, B., The E7 protein of human papillomavirus type 16 is phosphorylated by casein kinase II. The New biologist 1989, 1, (1), 44–53.
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=2562189&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2020%2F09%2F15%2F2020.09.03.20187112.atom) 

25. 25.Smith, M. C.; Bayless, A. M.; Goddard, E. T.; Davido, D. J., CK2 inhibitors increase the sensitivity of HSV-1 to interferon-β. Antiviral research 2011, 91, (3), 259–266.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.antiviral.2011.06.009&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=21722672&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2020%2F09%2F15%2F2020.09.03.20187112.atom) 

26. 26.Trembley, J. H.; Wang, G.; Unger, G.; Slaton, J.; Ahmed, K., Protein kinase CK2 in health and disease. Cellular and molecular life sciences 2009, 66, (11-12), 1858–1867.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1007/s00018-009-9154-y&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=19387548&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2020%2F09%2F15%2F2020.09.03.20187112.atom) 

27. 27.Zheng, Y., A CK2-dependent mechanism for activation of the JAK-STAT signaling pathway: implications for cancer biology. Journal of Interferon & Cytokine Research 2011, 31, (2), 265–267.
    
    

28. 28.Di Maira, G.; Salvi, M.; Arrigoni, G.; Marin, O.; Sarno, S.; Brustolon, F.; Pinna, L.; Ruzzene, M., Protein kinase CK2 phosphorylates and upregulates Akt/PKB. Cell Death & Differentiation 2005, 12, (6), 668–677.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1038/sj.cdd.4401604&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=15818404&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2020%2F09%2F15%2F2020.09.03.20187112.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000229182700016&link_type=ISI) 

29. 29.Bouhaddou, M.; Memon, D.; Meyer, B.; White, K. M.; Rezelj, V. V.; Marrero, M. C.; Polacco, B. J.; Melnyk, J. E.; Ulferts, S.; Kaake, R. M., The global phosphorylation landscape of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Cell 2020, 182, (3), 685–712. e19.
    
    

30. 30.García-Diegues, R.; de la Torre-Santos, A., Phase I Study of CIGB-300 Administered Intravenously in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Solid Tumors. ARCHIVOS DE MEDICINA 2018, 1, (1), 4.
    
    

31. 31.Fernández Águila, J. D.; García Vega, Y.; Ríos Jiménez, R. O.; López Sacerio, A.; Rodríguez Rodríguez, C. R.; Rodríguez Fraga, Y.; Valenzuela Silva, C., Safety of intravenous application of cigb-300 in patients with hematological malignancies. EHPMA study. Revista Cubana de Hematología, Inmunología y Hemoterapia 2016, 32, (2), 236–248.
    
    

32. 32.[https://ctep.cancer.gov/protocoldevelopment/electronic\_applications/ctc.htm#ctc\_40](https://ctep.cancer.gov/protocoldevelopment/electronic_applications/ctc.htm#ctc_40).
    
    

33. 33.[https://www.who-umc.org/whodrug/whodrug-portfolio](https://www.who-umc.org/whodrug/whodrug-portfolio).
    
    

34. 34.Carsana, L.; Sonzogni, A.; Nasr, A.; Rossi, R. S.; Pellegrinelli, A.; Zerbi, P.; Rech, R.; Colombo, R.; Antinori, S.; Corbellino, M., Pulmonary post-mortem findings in a series of COVID-19 cases from northern Italy: a two-centre descriptive study. The Lancet Infectious Diseases 2020.
    
    

35. 35.Perera, Y.; Farina, H. G.; Hernández, I.; Mendoza, O.; Serrano, J. M.; Reyes, O.; Gómez, D. E.; Gómez, R. E.; Acevedo, B. E.; Alonso, D. F., Systemic administration of a peptide that impairs the protein kinase (CK2) phosphorylation reduces solid tumor growth in mice. International journal of cancer 2008, 122, (1), 57–62.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1002/ijc.23013&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=17847034&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2020%2F09%2F15%2F2020.09.03.20187112.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000251193700008&link_type=ISI) 

36. 36.Pereda, R.; Gonzalez, D.; Rivero, H. B.; Rivero, J. C.; del Rosario Lopez, L.; Mezquia, N.; Venegas, R.; Betancourt, J. R.; Dominguez, R. E., Therapeutic effectiveness of interferon alpha 2b treatment for COVID-19 patient recovery. medRxiv 2020.
    
    

37. 37.Chan, K. H.; Farouji, I.; Harnoud, A. A.; Slim, J., Weakness and elevated creatinine kinase as the initial presentation of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). The American Journal of Emergency Medicine 2020.
    
    

38. 38.Velavan, T. P.; Meyer, C. G., Mild versus severe COVID-19: laboratory markers. International Journal of Infectious Diseases 2020.
    
    

39. 39.Henry, B. M.; Aggarwal, G.; Wong, J.; Benoit, S.; Vikse, J.; Plebani, M.; Lippi, G., Lactate dehydrogenase levels predict coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) severity and mortality: A pooled analysis. The American Journal of Emergency Medicine 2020.